Cost-effectiveness analysis on spinal anesthesia versus local anesthesia plus sedation for loop colostomy closure

CONTEXT: Studies in the area of health economics are still poorly explored and it is known that the cost savings in this area is becoming more necessary, provided that strict criteria. OBJECTIVE: To perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of spinal anesthesia versus local anesthesia plus sedation for loop colostomy closure. METHODS: This was a randomized clinical trial with 50 patients undergoing loop colostomy closure either under spinal anesthesia (n = 25) or under local anesthesia plus sedation (n = 25). The duration of the operation, time spent in the post-anesthesia recovery room, pain, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, laboratory and imaging examinations and need for rehospitalization and reoperation were analyzed. The direct medical costs were analyzed. A decision tree model was constructed. The outcome measures were mean cost and cost per local and systemic postoperative complications avoided. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were presented. RESULTS: Duration of operation: 146 ± 111.5 min. vs 105 ± 23.6 min. (P = 0.012); mean time spent in post-anesthesia recovery room: 145 ± 110.8 min. vs 36.8 ± 34.6 min. (P<0.001). Immediate postoperative pain was lower with local anesthesia plus sedation (P<0.05). Local and systemic complications were fewer with local anesthesia plus sedation (P = 0.209). Hospitalization + rehospitalization: 4.5 ± 4.1 days vs 2.9 ± 2.2 days (P<0.0001); mean spending per patient: R$ 5,038.05 vs 2,665.57 (P<0.001). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio: R$ -474.78, indicating that the strategy with local anesthesia plus sedation is cost saving. CONCLUSION: In the present investigation, loop colostomy closure under local anesthesia plus sedation was effective and appeared to be a dominant strategy, compared with the same surgical procedure under spinal anesthesia.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vaz,Filinto Aníbal Alagia, Abreu,Rone Antônio Alves, Soárez,Patrícia Coelho de, Speranzini,Manlio Basílio, Fernandes,Luís Cesar, Matos,Delcio
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Instituto Brasileiro de Estudos e Pesquisas de Gastroenterologia e Outras Especialidades - IBEPEGE. 2010
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-28032010000200008
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0004-28032010000200008
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0004-280320100002000082010-09-22Cost-effectiveness analysis on spinal anesthesia versus local anesthesia plus sedation for loop colostomy closureVaz,Filinto Aníbal AlagiaAbreu,Rone Antônio AlvesSoárez,Patrícia Coelho deSperanzini,Manlio BasílioFernandes,Luís CesarMatos,Delcio Colostomy Anesthesia, local Anesthesia, spinal Concious sedation Costs and cost analysis CONTEXT: Studies in the area of health economics are still poorly explored and it is known that the cost savings in this area is becoming more necessary, provided that strict criteria. OBJECTIVE: To perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of spinal anesthesia versus local anesthesia plus sedation for loop colostomy closure. METHODS: This was a randomized clinical trial with 50 patients undergoing loop colostomy closure either under spinal anesthesia (n = 25) or under local anesthesia plus sedation (n = 25). The duration of the operation, time spent in the post-anesthesia recovery room, pain, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, laboratory and imaging examinations and need for rehospitalization and reoperation were analyzed. The direct medical costs were analyzed. A decision tree model was constructed. The outcome measures were mean cost and cost per local and systemic postoperative complications avoided. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were presented. RESULTS: Duration of operation: 146 ± 111.5 min. vs 105 ± 23.6 min. (P = 0.012); mean time spent in post-anesthesia recovery room: 145 ± 110.8 min. vs 36.8 ± 34.6 min. (P<0.001). Immediate postoperative pain was lower with local anesthesia plus sedation (P<0.05). Local and systemic complications were fewer with local anesthesia plus sedation (P = 0.209). Hospitalization + rehospitalization: 4.5 ± 4.1 days vs 2.9 ± 2.2 days (P<0.0001); mean spending per patient: R$ 5,038.05 vs 2,665.57 (P<0.001). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio: R$ -474.78, indicating that the strategy with local anesthesia plus sedation is cost saving. CONCLUSION: In the present investigation, loop colostomy closure under local anesthesia plus sedation was effective and appeared to be a dominant strategy, compared with the same surgical procedure under spinal anesthesia.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessInstituto Brasileiro de Estudos e Pesquisas de Gastroenterologia e Outras Especialidades - IBEPEGE. Arquivos de Gastroenterologia v.47 n.2 20102010-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-28032010000200008en10.1590/S0004-28032010000200008
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Vaz,Filinto Aníbal Alagia
Abreu,Rone Antônio Alves
Soárez,Patrícia Coelho de
Speranzini,Manlio Basílio
Fernandes,Luís Cesar
Matos,Delcio
spellingShingle Vaz,Filinto Aníbal Alagia
Abreu,Rone Antônio Alves
Soárez,Patrícia Coelho de
Speranzini,Manlio Basílio
Fernandes,Luís Cesar
Matos,Delcio
Cost-effectiveness analysis on spinal anesthesia versus local anesthesia plus sedation for loop colostomy closure
author_facet Vaz,Filinto Aníbal Alagia
Abreu,Rone Antônio Alves
Soárez,Patrícia Coelho de
Speranzini,Manlio Basílio
Fernandes,Luís Cesar
Matos,Delcio
author_sort Vaz,Filinto Aníbal Alagia
title Cost-effectiveness analysis on spinal anesthesia versus local anesthesia plus sedation for loop colostomy closure
title_short Cost-effectiveness analysis on spinal anesthesia versus local anesthesia plus sedation for loop colostomy closure
title_full Cost-effectiveness analysis on spinal anesthesia versus local anesthesia plus sedation for loop colostomy closure
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness analysis on spinal anesthesia versus local anesthesia plus sedation for loop colostomy closure
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness analysis on spinal anesthesia versus local anesthesia plus sedation for loop colostomy closure
title_sort cost-effectiveness analysis on spinal anesthesia versus local anesthesia plus sedation for loop colostomy closure
description CONTEXT: Studies in the area of health economics are still poorly explored and it is known that the cost savings in this area is becoming more necessary, provided that strict criteria. OBJECTIVE: To perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of spinal anesthesia versus local anesthesia plus sedation for loop colostomy closure. METHODS: This was a randomized clinical trial with 50 patients undergoing loop colostomy closure either under spinal anesthesia (n = 25) or under local anesthesia plus sedation (n = 25). The duration of the operation, time spent in the post-anesthesia recovery room, pain, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, laboratory and imaging examinations and need for rehospitalization and reoperation were analyzed. The direct medical costs were analyzed. A decision tree model was constructed. The outcome measures were mean cost and cost per local and systemic postoperative complications avoided. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were presented. RESULTS: Duration of operation: 146 ± 111.5 min. vs 105 ± 23.6 min. (P = 0.012); mean time spent in post-anesthesia recovery room: 145 ± 110.8 min. vs 36.8 ± 34.6 min. (P<0.001). Immediate postoperative pain was lower with local anesthesia plus sedation (P<0.05). Local and systemic complications were fewer with local anesthesia plus sedation (P = 0.209). Hospitalization + rehospitalization: 4.5 ± 4.1 days vs 2.9 ± 2.2 days (P<0.0001); mean spending per patient: R$ 5,038.05 vs 2,665.57 (P<0.001). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio: R$ -474.78, indicating that the strategy with local anesthesia plus sedation is cost saving. CONCLUSION: In the present investigation, loop colostomy closure under local anesthesia plus sedation was effective and appeared to be a dominant strategy, compared with the same surgical procedure under spinal anesthesia.
publisher Instituto Brasileiro de Estudos e Pesquisas de Gastroenterologia e Outras Especialidades - IBEPEGE.
publishDate 2010
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-28032010000200008
work_keys_str_mv AT vazfilintoanibalalagia costeffectivenessanalysisonspinalanesthesiaversuslocalanesthesiaplussedationforloopcolostomyclosure
AT abreuroneantonioalves costeffectivenessanalysisonspinalanesthesiaversuslocalanesthesiaplussedationforloopcolostomyclosure
AT soarezpatriciacoelhode costeffectivenessanalysisonspinalanesthesiaversuslocalanesthesiaplussedationforloopcolostomyclosure
AT speranzinimanliobasilio costeffectivenessanalysisonspinalanesthesiaversuslocalanesthesiaplussedationforloopcolostomyclosure
AT fernandesluiscesar costeffectivenessanalysisonspinalanesthesiaversuslocalanesthesiaplussedationforloopcolostomyclosure
AT matosdelcio costeffectivenessanalysisonspinalanesthesiaversuslocalanesthesiaplussedationforloopcolostomyclosure
_version_ 1756373475510976512