Pediatric canalicular laceration repair using the Mini Monoka versus Masterka monocanalicular stent
ABSTRACT Purpose: One of the most important disadvantages of using Mini Monoka stents in pediatric canalicular laceration repair is premature stent loss. In this study, we aimed to compare clinical outcomes between the use of Mini Monoka and Masterka monocanalicular stents in children and discuss the potential causes of premature stent loss. Methods: The medical records of 36 patients who underwent surgical repair of canalicular lacerations were retrospectively reviewed. Children aged <18 years who underwent canalicular laceration repair with either Mini Monoka or Masterka and had at least 6 months of follow-up after stent removal were included in the study. The patients’ demographics, mechanism of injury, type of stent used, premature stent loss, and success rate were analyzed. Success was defined as stent removal without subsequent epiphora and premature stent loss. Results: Twenty-seven children fulfilled our study criteria, and their data were included in the analyses. Mini Monoka was used in 14 patients (51.9%), whereas Masterka was used in 13 patients (48.1%). The preoperative clinical features, including age, sex, and mechanism of injury, were similar between the two groups. The mean age was 8.3 ± 5.5 years in the Mini Monoka group and 7.8 ± 5.9 years in the Masterka group (p=0.61). Three patients in the Mini Monoka group (21.4%) underwent reoperation due to premature stent loss. No premature stent loss was observed in the Masterka group. As a result, the rate of success was 78.6% in the Mini Monoka group, whereas it was 100% in the Masterka group (p=0.22). Conclusions: Even though the two groups did not show any statistically significant difference in success rate, we did not observe any premature stent loss in the Masterka group. Further studies with larger and randomized series are warranted to elaborate on these findings.
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Digital revista |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia
2022
|
Online Access: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27492022005002213 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
oai:scielo:S0004-27492022005002213 |
---|---|
record_format |
ojs |
spelling |
oai:scielo:S0004-274920220050022132022-02-11Pediatric canalicular laceration repair using the Mini Monoka versus Masterka monocanalicular stentMangan,Mehmet SerhatTuran,Sevil GulOcak,Serap Yurttaser Eye injuries Lacrimal apparatus/injuries Nasolacrimal duct Lacerations Stents Microsurgery Intubation/methods Canalicular laceration Child Comparative study ABSTRACT Purpose: One of the most important disadvantages of using Mini Monoka stents in pediatric canalicular laceration repair is premature stent loss. In this study, we aimed to compare clinical outcomes between the use of Mini Monoka and Masterka monocanalicular stents in children and discuss the potential causes of premature stent loss. Methods: The medical records of 36 patients who underwent surgical repair of canalicular lacerations were retrospectively reviewed. Children aged <18 years who underwent canalicular laceration repair with either Mini Monoka or Masterka and had at least 6 months of follow-up after stent removal were included in the study. The patients’ demographics, mechanism of injury, type of stent used, premature stent loss, and success rate were analyzed. Success was defined as stent removal without subsequent epiphora and premature stent loss. Results: Twenty-seven children fulfilled our study criteria, and their data were included in the analyses. Mini Monoka was used in 14 patients (51.9%), whereas Masterka was used in 13 patients (48.1%). The preoperative clinical features, including age, sex, and mechanism of injury, were similar between the two groups. The mean age was 8.3 ± 5.5 years in the Mini Monoka group and 7.8 ± 5.9 years in the Masterka group (p=0.61). Three patients in the Mini Monoka group (21.4%) underwent reoperation due to premature stent loss. No premature stent loss was observed in the Masterka group. As a result, the rate of success was 78.6% in the Mini Monoka group, whereas it was 100% in the Masterka group (p=0.22). Conclusions: Even though the two groups did not show any statistically significant difference in success rate, we did not observe any premature stent loss in the Masterka group. Further studies with larger and randomized series are warranted to elaborate on these findings.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessConselho Brasileiro de OftalmologiaArquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia n.ahead 20222022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27492022005002213en10.5935/0004-2749.20220084 |
institution |
SCIELO |
collection |
OJS |
country |
Brasil |
countrycode |
BR |
component |
Revista |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
rev-scielo-br |
tag |
revista |
region |
America del Sur |
libraryname |
SciELO |
language |
English |
format |
Digital |
author |
Mangan,Mehmet Serhat Turan,Sevil Gul Ocak,Serap Yurttaser |
spellingShingle |
Mangan,Mehmet Serhat Turan,Sevil Gul Ocak,Serap Yurttaser Pediatric canalicular laceration repair using the Mini Monoka versus Masterka monocanalicular stent |
author_facet |
Mangan,Mehmet Serhat Turan,Sevil Gul Ocak,Serap Yurttaser |
author_sort |
Mangan,Mehmet Serhat |
title |
Pediatric canalicular laceration repair using the Mini Monoka versus Masterka monocanalicular stent |
title_short |
Pediatric canalicular laceration repair using the Mini Monoka versus Masterka monocanalicular stent |
title_full |
Pediatric canalicular laceration repair using the Mini Monoka versus Masterka monocanalicular stent |
title_fullStr |
Pediatric canalicular laceration repair using the Mini Monoka versus Masterka monocanalicular stent |
title_full_unstemmed |
Pediatric canalicular laceration repair using the Mini Monoka versus Masterka monocanalicular stent |
title_sort |
pediatric canalicular laceration repair using the mini monoka versus masterka monocanalicular stent |
description |
ABSTRACT Purpose: One of the most important disadvantages of using Mini Monoka stents in pediatric canalicular laceration repair is premature stent loss. In this study, we aimed to compare clinical outcomes between the use of Mini Monoka and Masterka monocanalicular stents in children and discuss the potential causes of premature stent loss. Methods: The medical records of 36 patients who underwent surgical repair of canalicular lacerations were retrospectively reviewed. Children aged <18 years who underwent canalicular laceration repair with either Mini Monoka or Masterka and had at least 6 months of follow-up after stent removal were included in the study. The patients’ demographics, mechanism of injury, type of stent used, premature stent loss, and success rate were analyzed. Success was defined as stent removal without subsequent epiphora and premature stent loss. Results: Twenty-seven children fulfilled our study criteria, and their data were included in the analyses. Mini Monoka was used in 14 patients (51.9%), whereas Masterka was used in 13 patients (48.1%). The preoperative clinical features, including age, sex, and mechanism of injury, were similar between the two groups. The mean age was 8.3 ± 5.5 years in the Mini Monoka group and 7.8 ± 5.9 years in the Masterka group (p=0.61). Three patients in the Mini Monoka group (21.4%) underwent reoperation due to premature stent loss. No premature stent loss was observed in the Masterka group. As a result, the rate of success was 78.6% in the Mini Monoka group, whereas it was 100% in the Masterka group (p=0.22). Conclusions: Even though the two groups did not show any statistically significant difference in success rate, we did not observe any premature stent loss in the Masterka group. Further studies with larger and randomized series are warranted to elaborate on these findings. |
publisher |
Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia |
publishDate |
2022 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27492022005002213 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT manganmehmetserhat pediatriccanalicularlacerationrepairusingtheminimonokaversusmasterkamonocanalicularstent AT turansevilgul pediatriccanalicularlacerationrepairusingtheminimonokaversusmasterkamonocanalicularstent AT ocakserapyurttaser pediatriccanalicularlacerationrepairusingtheminimonokaversusmasterkamonocanalicularstent |
_version_ |
1756373364067270656 |