Comparison of central corneal thickness estimated by an ultrasonic pachymeter and non-contact specular microscopy

ABSTRACT Purpose: To compare central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements of healthy individuals obtained with ultrasonic pachymetry (UP) and non-contact specular microscopy (NCSM). Method: In total, 148 eyes of 74 subjects with no ocular or systemic diseases were included in the study. Central corneal thickness measurements of all patients performed with UP and NCCM were compared. Results: A total of 74 subjects (38 females) were included in this study. The mean age was 45.2 ± 18.4 (range 12-85) years. The mean central corneal thickness of all 148 eyes was 546.9 ± 40 μm with UP and 510.8 ± 42 μm with NCSM. The mean central corneal thickness measured with NCSM was 35 μm thinner than that measured with UP (p<0.001). A high degree of agreement was found between the two methods (r=0.942, p<0.001). Conclusions: Our results suggest that NCSM measures thinner corneas than UP and that the correction formula we identified should be applied when comparing between these two devices.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Çevik,Sadık Görkem, Duman,Rahmi, Çevik,Mediha Tok, Kıvanç,Sertaç Argun, Akova-Budak,Berna, Perente,Irfan, Duman,Resat
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia 2016
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27492016000500312
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0004-27492016000500312
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0004-274920160005003122016-11-30Comparison of central corneal thickness estimated by an ultrasonic pachymeter and non-contact specular microscopyÇevik,Sadık GörkemDuman,RahmiÇevik,Mediha TokKıvanç,Sertaç ArgunAkova-Budak,BernaPerente,IrfanDuman,Resat Cornea/pathology Corneal pachymetry Microscopy/methods Cornea/anatomy &amp; histology Comparative study ABSTRACT Purpose: To compare central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements of healthy individuals obtained with ultrasonic pachymetry (UP) and non-contact specular microscopy (NCSM). Method: In total, 148 eyes of 74 subjects with no ocular or systemic diseases were included in the study. Central corneal thickness measurements of all patients performed with UP and NCCM were compared. Results: A total of 74 subjects (38 females) were included in this study. The mean age was 45.2 ± 18.4 (range 12-85) years. The mean central corneal thickness of all 148 eyes was 546.9 ± 40 μm with UP and 510.8 ± 42 μm with NCSM. The mean central corneal thickness measured with NCSM was 35 μm thinner than that measured with UP (p<0.001). A high degree of agreement was found between the two methods (r=0.942, p<0.001). Conclusions: Our results suggest that NCSM measures thinner corneas than UP and that the correction formula we identified should be applied when comparing between these two devices.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessConselho Brasileiro de OftalmologiaArquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia v.79 n.5 20162016-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27492016000500312en10.5935/0004-2749.20160089
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Çevik,Sadık Görkem
Duman,Rahmi
Çevik,Mediha Tok
Kıvanç,Sertaç Argun
Akova-Budak,Berna
Perente,Irfan
Duman,Resat
spellingShingle Çevik,Sadık Görkem
Duman,Rahmi
Çevik,Mediha Tok
Kıvanç,Sertaç Argun
Akova-Budak,Berna
Perente,Irfan
Duman,Resat
Comparison of central corneal thickness estimated by an ultrasonic pachymeter and non-contact specular microscopy
author_facet Çevik,Sadık Görkem
Duman,Rahmi
Çevik,Mediha Tok
Kıvanç,Sertaç Argun
Akova-Budak,Berna
Perente,Irfan
Duman,Resat
author_sort Çevik,Sadık Görkem
title Comparison of central corneal thickness estimated by an ultrasonic pachymeter and non-contact specular microscopy
title_short Comparison of central corneal thickness estimated by an ultrasonic pachymeter and non-contact specular microscopy
title_full Comparison of central corneal thickness estimated by an ultrasonic pachymeter and non-contact specular microscopy
title_fullStr Comparison of central corneal thickness estimated by an ultrasonic pachymeter and non-contact specular microscopy
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of central corneal thickness estimated by an ultrasonic pachymeter and non-contact specular microscopy
title_sort comparison of central corneal thickness estimated by an ultrasonic pachymeter and non-contact specular microscopy
description ABSTRACT Purpose: To compare central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements of healthy individuals obtained with ultrasonic pachymetry (UP) and non-contact specular microscopy (NCSM). Method: In total, 148 eyes of 74 subjects with no ocular or systemic diseases were included in the study. Central corneal thickness measurements of all patients performed with UP and NCCM were compared. Results: A total of 74 subjects (38 females) were included in this study. The mean age was 45.2 ± 18.4 (range 12-85) years. The mean central corneal thickness of all 148 eyes was 546.9 ± 40 μm with UP and 510.8 ± 42 μm with NCSM. The mean central corneal thickness measured with NCSM was 35 μm thinner than that measured with UP (p<0.001). A high degree of agreement was found between the two methods (r=0.942, p<0.001). Conclusions: Our results suggest that NCSM measures thinner corneas than UP and that the correction formula we identified should be applied when comparing between these two devices.
publisher Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia
publishDate 2016
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27492016000500312
work_keys_str_mv AT ceviksadıkgorkem comparisonofcentralcornealthicknessestimatedbyanultrasonicpachymeterandnoncontactspecularmicroscopy
AT dumanrahmi comparisonofcentralcornealthicknessestimatedbyanultrasonicpachymeterandnoncontactspecularmicroscopy
AT cevikmedihatok comparisonofcentralcornealthicknessestimatedbyanultrasonicpachymeterandnoncontactspecularmicroscopy
AT kıvancsertacargun comparisonofcentralcornealthicknessestimatedbyanultrasonicpachymeterandnoncontactspecularmicroscopy
AT akovabudakberna comparisonofcentralcornealthicknessestimatedbyanultrasonicpachymeterandnoncontactspecularmicroscopy
AT perenteirfan comparisonofcentralcornealthicknessestimatedbyanultrasonicpachymeterandnoncontactspecularmicroscopy
AT dumanresat comparisonofcentralcornealthicknessestimatedbyanultrasonicpachymeterandnoncontactspecularmicroscopy
_version_ 1756373225699278848