Non-pupillary block angle-closure mechanisms: a comprehensive analysis of their prevalence and treatment outcomes

Purpose: To assess the prevalence and treatment outcomes of angle-closure mechanisms other than pupillary block in a population of Brazilian patients. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted to evaluate patients who had undergone laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) due to occludable angles at a single institution between July 2009 and April 2012. An occludable angle was defined as an eye in which the posterior trabecular meshwork was not visible for ≥180° on dark-room gonioscopy. Key exclusion criteria were any form of secondary glaucoma and the presence of >90° of peripheral anterior synechiae. Collected data were age, race, gender, angle-closure mechanism (based on indentation goniocopy and ultrasound biomicroscopy), intraocular pressure (IOP), number of antiglaucoma medications and subsequent management during follow-up. If both eyes were eligible, the right eye was arbitrarily selected for analysis. Results: A total of 196 eyes of 196 consecutive patients (mean age 58.3 ± 11.6 years) who underwent LPI were included. In most of the patients [86% (169 patients; 133 women and 36 men]), LPI sucessfully opened the angle. Mean IOP was reduced from 18.3 ± 6.4 mmHg to 15.4 ± 4.5 mmHg after LPI (p<0.01). Among the 27 patients with persistent occludable angles, the most common underlying mechanisms were plateau iris (56%) and lens-induced component (34%). Most of these patients (85%) were treated with argon laser peripheral iridoplasty (ALPI); approximately 90% showed non-occludable angles following the laser procedure (mean IOP reduction of 18.9%), with no significant differences between patients with plateau iris and lens-induced components (p=0.34; mean follow-up of 11.4 ± 3.6 months). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that, in this population of Brazilian patients, several eyes with angle closure were not completely treated with LPI. In the present large case series involving middle-age patients, plateau iris was the leading cause of persistent angle closure and was effectively treated with ALPI. A detailed eye examination with indentation gonioscopy should always be performed after LPI to rule out persistent angle closure due to non-pupillary block mechanisms.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Junqueira,Daniela L. M., Prado,Vitor G., Lopes,Flavio S., Biteli,Luis Gustavo, Dorairaj,Syril, Prata,Tiago S.
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia 2014
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27492014000600009
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0004-27492014000600009
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0004-274920140006000092015-04-10Non-pupillary block angle-closure mechanisms: a comprehensive analysis of their prevalence and treatment outcomesJunqueira,Daniela L. M.Prado,Vitor G.Lopes,Flavio S.Biteli,Luis GustavoDorairaj,SyrilPrata,Tiago S. Angle closure Non-pupillary block mechanisms Iris diseases Iris/pathology Iridectomy Treatment outcome Purpose: To assess the prevalence and treatment outcomes of angle-closure mechanisms other than pupillary block in a population of Brazilian patients. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted to evaluate patients who had undergone laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) due to occludable angles at a single institution between July 2009 and April 2012. An occludable angle was defined as an eye in which the posterior trabecular meshwork was not visible for ≥180° on dark-room gonioscopy. Key exclusion criteria were any form of secondary glaucoma and the presence of >90° of peripheral anterior synechiae. Collected data were age, race, gender, angle-closure mechanism (based on indentation goniocopy and ultrasound biomicroscopy), intraocular pressure (IOP), number of antiglaucoma medications and subsequent management during follow-up. If both eyes were eligible, the right eye was arbitrarily selected for analysis. Results: A total of 196 eyes of 196 consecutive patients (mean age 58.3 ± 11.6 years) who underwent LPI were included. In most of the patients [86% (169 patients; 133 women and 36 men]), LPI sucessfully opened the angle. Mean IOP was reduced from 18.3 ± 6.4 mmHg to 15.4 ± 4.5 mmHg after LPI (p<0.01). Among the 27 patients with persistent occludable angles, the most common underlying mechanisms were plateau iris (56%) and lens-induced component (34%). Most of these patients (85%) were treated with argon laser peripheral iridoplasty (ALPI); approximately 90% showed non-occludable angles following the laser procedure (mean IOP reduction of 18.9%), with no significant differences between patients with plateau iris and lens-induced components (p=0.34; mean follow-up of 11.4 ± 3.6 months). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that, in this population of Brazilian patients, several eyes with angle closure were not completely treated with LPI. In the present large case series involving middle-age patients, plateau iris was the leading cause of persistent angle closure and was effectively treated with ALPI. A detailed eye examination with indentation gonioscopy should always be performed after LPI to rule out persistent angle closure due to non-pupillary block mechanisms. info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessConselho Brasileiro de OftalmologiaArquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia v.77 n.6 20142014-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27492014000600009en10.5935/0004-2749.20140090
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Junqueira,Daniela L. M.
Prado,Vitor G.
Lopes,Flavio S.
Biteli,Luis Gustavo
Dorairaj,Syril
Prata,Tiago S.
spellingShingle Junqueira,Daniela L. M.
Prado,Vitor G.
Lopes,Flavio S.
Biteli,Luis Gustavo
Dorairaj,Syril
Prata,Tiago S.
Non-pupillary block angle-closure mechanisms: a comprehensive analysis of their prevalence and treatment outcomes
author_facet Junqueira,Daniela L. M.
Prado,Vitor G.
Lopes,Flavio S.
Biteli,Luis Gustavo
Dorairaj,Syril
Prata,Tiago S.
author_sort Junqueira,Daniela L. M.
title Non-pupillary block angle-closure mechanisms: a comprehensive analysis of their prevalence and treatment outcomes
title_short Non-pupillary block angle-closure mechanisms: a comprehensive analysis of their prevalence and treatment outcomes
title_full Non-pupillary block angle-closure mechanisms: a comprehensive analysis of their prevalence and treatment outcomes
title_fullStr Non-pupillary block angle-closure mechanisms: a comprehensive analysis of their prevalence and treatment outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Non-pupillary block angle-closure mechanisms: a comprehensive analysis of their prevalence and treatment outcomes
title_sort non-pupillary block angle-closure mechanisms: a comprehensive analysis of their prevalence and treatment outcomes
description Purpose: To assess the prevalence and treatment outcomes of angle-closure mechanisms other than pupillary block in a population of Brazilian patients. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted to evaluate patients who had undergone laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) due to occludable angles at a single institution between July 2009 and April 2012. An occludable angle was defined as an eye in which the posterior trabecular meshwork was not visible for ≥180° on dark-room gonioscopy. Key exclusion criteria were any form of secondary glaucoma and the presence of >90° of peripheral anterior synechiae. Collected data were age, race, gender, angle-closure mechanism (based on indentation goniocopy and ultrasound biomicroscopy), intraocular pressure (IOP), number of antiglaucoma medications and subsequent management during follow-up. If both eyes were eligible, the right eye was arbitrarily selected for analysis. Results: A total of 196 eyes of 196 consecutive patients (mean age 58.3 ± 11.6 years) who underwent LPI were included. In most of the patients [86% (169 patients; 133 women and 36 men]), LPI sucessfully opened the angle. Mean IOP was reduced from 18.3 ± 6.4 mmHg to 15.4 ± 4.5 mmHg after LPI (p<0.01). Among the 27 patients with persistent occludable angles, the most common underlying mechanisms were plateau iris (56%) and lens-induced component (34%). Most of these patients (85%) were treated with argon laser peripheral iridoplasty (ALPI); approximately 90% showed non-occludable angles following the laser procedure (mean IOP reduction of 18.9%), with no significant differences between patients with plateau iris and lens-induced components (p=0.34; mean follow-up of 11.4 ± 3.6 months). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that, in this population of Brazilian patients, several eyes with angle closure were not completely treated with LPI. In the present large case series involving middle-age patients, plateau iris was the leading cause of persistent angle closure and was effectively treated with ALPI. A detailed eye examination with indentation gonioscopy should always be performed after LPI to rule out persistent angle closure due to non-pupillary block mechanisms.
publisher Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia
publishDate 2014
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27492014000600009
work_keys_str_mv AT junqueiradanielalm nonpupillaryblockangleclosuremechanismsacomprehensiveanalysisoftheirprevalenceandtreatmentoutcomes
AT pradovitorg nonpupillaryblockangleclosuremechanismsacomprehensiveanalysisoftheirprevalenceandtreatmentoutcomes
AT lopesflavios nonpupillaryblockangleclosuremechanismsacomprehensiveanalysisoftheirprevalenceandtreatmentoutcomes
AT biteliluisgustavo nonpupillaryblockangleclosuremechanismsacomprehensiveanalysisoftheirprevalenceandtreatmentoutcomes
AT dorairajsyril nonpupillaryblockangleclosuremechanismsacomprehensiveanalysisoftheirprevalenceandtreatmentoutcomes
AT pratatiagos nonpupillaryblockangleclosuremechanismsacomprehensiveanalysisoftheirprevalenceandtreatmentoutcomes
_version_ 1756373195430035456