25 Years of Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management: Why Some Intergovernmental C&I Processes Flourished While Others Faded

The use of criteria and indicators (C&I) for data collection, monitoring, assessing and reporting on sustainable forest management (SFM) has been growing since the Earth Summit in 1992, supported by eleven intergovernmental, regional and international forest-related C&I processes. The initial effort led to varying levels of implementation across countries. Several processes never went much beyond the adoption of a first set of C&I while others have made substantial progress. In recent years, interest in C&I for SFM has again increased. In light of the Sustainable Development Goals and emerging global challenges the contribution of C&I to monitor, assess and report on forest conditions and trends is increasingly important. We compare and analyse the structure, activities and progress of the intergovernmental C&I processes. The work is based on document analysis and questionnaires sent to the secretariats of the processes and C&I experts. We found many similarities but also major differences in the structure and content of the C&I sets. The results provide a context for discussing and understanding why some of the C&I processes are successful in their work while others have stalled. Finally, we propose the required ingredients for success for the future activities of the forest-related intergovernmental C&I processes.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Linser, Stefanie, Wolfslehner, Bernhard, Asmar, Fady, Bridge, Simon Richard Jess, Gritten, David, Guadalupe, Vicente, Jafari, Mostafa, Johnson, Steven, Laclau, Pablo, Robertson, Guy
Format: info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo biblioteca
Language:eng
Published: MDPI 2018-08-25
Subjects:Ordenación Forestal, Bosques, Indicadores, Forest Management, Forests, Indicators, Manejo Forestal,
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/6495
https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/9/9/515
https://doi.org/10.3390/f9090515
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:localhost:20.500.12123-6495
record_format koha
spelling oai:localhost:20.500.12123-64952019-12-12T14:34:19Z 25 Years of Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management: Why Some Intergovernmental C&I Processes Flourished While Others Faded Linser, Stefanie Wolfslehner, Bernhard Asmar, Fady Bridge, Simon Richard Jess Gritten, David Guadalupe, Vicente Jafari, Mostafa Johnson, Steven Laclau, Pablo Robertson, Guy Ordenación Forestal Bosques Indicadores Forest Management Forests Indicators Manejo Forestal The use of criteria and indicators (C&I) for data collection, monitoring, assessing and reporting on sustainable forest management (SFM) has been growing since the Earth Summit in 1992, supported by eleven intergovernmental, regional and international forest-related C&I processes. The initial effort led to varying levels of implementation across countries. Several processes never went much beyond the adoption of a first set of C&I while others have made substantial progress. In recent years, interest in C&I for SFM has again increased. In light of the Sustainable Development Goals and emerging global challenges the contribution of C&I to monitor, assess and report on forest conditions and trends is increasingly important. We compare and analyse the structure, activities and progress of the intergovernmental C&I processes. The work is based on document analysis and questionnaires sent to the secretariats of the processes and C&I experts. We found many similarities but also major differences in the structure and content of the C&I sets. The results provide a context for discussing and understanding why some of the C&I processes are successful in their work while others have stalled. Finally, we propose the required ingredients for success for the future activities of the forest-related intergovernmental C&I processes. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche. Agencia de Extensión Rural San Martín de los Andes Fil: Linser, Stefanie. University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences; Austria Fil: Wolfslehner, Bernhard. University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences. Vienna Regional Office of the European Forest Institute; Austria Fil: Asmar, Fady. Consultor FAO; Líbano Fil: Bridge, Simon Richard Jess. Canadian Forest Service. Natural Resources Canada; Canada Fil: Gritten, David. The Center for People and Forests; Tailandia Fil: Guadalupe, Vicente. Permanent Secretariat of the Amazon Cooperation Treaty Organization; Brasil Fil: Jafari, Mostafa. Tehran Processes Secretariat for Low Forest Cover Countries; Irán Fil: Johnson, Steven. International Tropical Timber Organization; Japón Fil: Laclau, Pablo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche. Agencia de Extensión Rural San Martín de los Andes; Argentina Fil: Robertson, Guy. U.S. Forest Service, Research and Development; Estados Unidos 2019-12-12T14:19:57Z 2019-12-12T14:19:57Z 2018-08-25 info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/6495 https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/9/9/515 1999-4907 https://doi.org/10.3390/f9090515 eng info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess application/pdf MDPI Forests 9 (9) : 515 : 23 (2018)
institution INTA AR
collection DSpace
country Argentina
countrycode AR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-inta-ar
tag biblioteca
region America del Sur
libraryname Biblioteca Central del INTA Argentina
language eng
topic Ordenación Forestal
Bosques
Indicadores
Forest Management
Forests
Indicators
Manejo Forestal
Ordenación Forestal
Bosques
Indicadores
Forest Management
Forests
Indicators
Manejo Forestal
spellingShingle Ordenación Forestal
Bosques
Indicadores
Forest Management
Forests
Indicators
Manejo Forestal
Ordenación Forestal
Bosques
Indicadores
Forest Management
Forests
Indicators
Manejo Forestal
Linser, Stefanie
Wolfslehner, Bernhard
Asmar, Fady
Bridge, Simon Richard Jess
Gritten, David
Guadalupe, Vicente
Jafari, Mostafa
Johnson, Steven
Laclau, Pablo
Robertson, Guy
25 Years of Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management: Why Some Intergovernmental C&I Processes Flourished While Others Faded
description The use of criteria and indicators (C&I) for data collection, monitoring, assessing and reporting on sustainable forest management (SFM) has been growing since the Earth Summit in 1992, supported by eleven intergovernmental, regional and international forest-related C&I processes. The initial effort led to varying levels of implementation across countries. Several processes never went much beyond the adoption of a first set of C&I while others have made substantial progress. In recent years, interest in C&I for SFM has again increased. In light of the Sustainable Development Goals and emerging global challenges the contribution of C&I to monitor, assess and report on forest conditions and trends is increasingly important. We compare and analyse the structure, activities and progress of the intergovernmental C&I processes. The work is based on document analysis and questionnaires sent to the secretariats of the processes and C&I experts. We found many similarities but also major differences in the structure and content of the C&I sets. The results provide a context for discussing and understanding why some of the C&I processes are successful in their work while others have stalled. Finally, we propose the required ingredients for success for the future activities of the forest-related intergovernmental C&I processes.
format info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
topic_facet Ordenación Forestal
Bosques
Indicadores
Forest Management
Forests
Indicators
Manejo Forestal
author Linser, Stefanie
Wolfslehner, Bernhard
Asmar, Fady
Bridge, Simon Richard Jess
Gritten, David
Guadalupe, Vicente
Jafari, Mostafa
Johnson, Steven
Laclau, Pablo
Robertson, Guy
author_facet Linser, Stefanie
Wolfslehner, Bernhard
Asmar, Fady
Bridge, Simon Richard Jess
Gritten, David
Guadalupe, Vicente
Jafari, Mostafa
Johnson, Steven
Laclau, Pablo
Robertson, Guy
author_sort Linser, Stefanie
title 25 Years of Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management: Why Some Intergovernmental C&I Processes Flourished While Others Faded
title_short 25 Years of Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management: Why Some Intergovernmental C&I Processes Flourished While Others Faded
title_full 25 Years of Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management: Why Some Intergovernmental C&I Processes Flourished While Others Faded
title_fullStr 25 Years of Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management: Why Some Intergovernmental C&I Processes Flourished While Others Faded
title_full_unstemmed 25 Years of Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management: Why Some Intergovernmental C&I Processes Flourished While Others Faded
title_sort 25 years of criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management: why some intergovernmental c&i processes flourished while others faded
publisher MDPI
publishDate 2018-08-25
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/6495
https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/9/9/515
https://doi.org/10.3390/f9090515
work_keys_str_mv AT linserstefanie 25yearsofcriteriaandindicatorsforsustainableforestmanagementwhysomeintergovernmentalciprocessesflourishedwhileothersfaded
AT wolfslehnerbernhard 25yearsofcriteriaandindicatorsforsustainableforestmanagementwhysomeintergovernmentalciprocessesflourishedwhileothersfaded
AT asmarfady 25yearsofcriteriaandindicatorsforsustainableforestmanagementwhysomeintergovernmentalciprocessesflourishedwhileothersfaded
AT bridgesimonrichardjess 25yearsofcriteriaandindicatorsforsustainableforestmanagementwhysomeintergovernmentalciprocessesflourishedwhileothersfaded
AT grittendavid 25yearsofcriteriaandindicatorsforsustainableforestmanagementwhysomeintergovernmentalciprocessesflourishedwhileothersfaded
AT guadalupevicente 25yearsofcriteriaandindicatorsforsustainableforestmanagementwhysomeintergovernmentalciprocessesflourishedwhileothersfaded
AT jafarimostafa 25yearsofcriteriaandindicatorsforsustainableforestmanagementwhysomeintergovernmentalciprocessesflourishedwhileothersfaded
AT johnsonsteven 25yearsofcriteriaandindicatorsforsustainableforestmanagementwhysomeintergovernmentalciprocessesflourishedwhileothersfaded
AT laclaupablo 25yearsofcriteriaandindicatorsforsustainableforestmanagementwhysomeintergovernmentalciprocessesflourishedwhileothersfaded
AT robertsonguy 25yearsofcriteriaandindicatorsforsustainableforestmanagementwhysomeintergovernmentalciprocessesflourishedwhileothersfaded
_version_ 1756007654212239360