A comparative study of culture methods and PCR assay for Salmonella detection in poultry drinking water

The present work compared 2 culture methods and PCR assays for motile and nonmotile Salmonella detection using artificially contaminated poultry drinking water. The specificity was 1 for all methods studied. The accuracy and sensitivity were 1 for all motile strains, whereas these parameters were between 0 and 0.7 for nonmotile Salmonella strains. The positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 1 for all motile Salmonella strains in the 3 methods used. Nonmotile Salmonella strains showed a positive predictive value of 1 in the PCR method. However, the positive predictive value was indeterminate in the tetrathionate (TT) methods for both strains tested and in the modified semisolid Rappaport-Vassiliadis (MSRV) method for Salmonella Pullorum. On the other hand, the negative predictive value was between 0.20 and 0.43 for the 3 methods. The detection level of motile strains was 4 to 7 cfu/25 mL for all methods. Nonmotile Salmonella strains could not be detected in the TT method, whereas only Salmonella Gallinarum could be recovered from 1.1 × 101 cfu/25 mL in the MSRV method. In relation to the molecular methods, PCR could detect these strains from 1.1 × 104 cfu/25 mL. Extending incubation time of the enrichment medium to 6 d in the TT method did not improve the isolation rates. In general, all selective plating media did not show any statistical differences in the parameters of performance studied. The kappa coefficient showed that there was an excellent agreement between the 3 methods for motile strains. For nonmotile strains, the agreement was poor between the MSRV and the PCR; there was no agreement when the TT method was compared with the MSRV and the PCR methods. The difference in detection levels obtained with the methods used for motile and nonmotile Salmonella strains and the difficulty in detecting these last strains represents a potential problem when a poultry water sample is considered negative for the presence of Salmonella.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Soria, Maria Cecilia, Soria, Mario, Bueno, Dante Javier
Format: info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo biblioteca
Language:eng
Published: Oxford Academic Press 2013-01
Subjects:Aves de Corral, Salmonella, Agua Potable, Enfermedades de los Animales, Técnicas de Cultivo, PCR, Poultry, Drinking Water, Animal Diseases, Culture Techniques,
Online Access:https://academic.oup.com/ps/article/92/1/225/1554522
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/6468
https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-02254
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:localhost:20.500.12123-6468
record_format koha
spelling oai:localhost:20.500.12123-64682019-12-06T14:52:54Z A comparative study of culture methods and PCR assay for Salmonella detection in poultry drinking water Soria, Maria Cecilia Soria, Mario Bueno, Dante Javier Aves de Corral Salmonella Agua Potable Enfermedades de los Animales Técnicas de Cultivo PCR Poultry Drinking Water Animal Diseases Culture Techniques The present work compared 2 culture methods and PCR assays for motile and nonmotile Salmonella detection using artificially contaminated poultry drinking water. The specificity was 1 for all methods studied. The accuracy and sensitivity were 1 for all motile strains, whereas these parameters were between 0 and 0.7 for nonmotile Salmonella strains. The positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 1 for all motile Salmonella strains in the 3 methods used. Nonmotile Salmonella strains showed a positive predictive value of 1 in the PCR method. However, the positive predictive value was indeterminate in the tetrathionate (TT) methods for both strains tested and in the modified semisolid Rappaport-Vassiliadis (MSRV) method for Salmonella Pullorum. On the other hand, the negative predictive value was between 0.20 and 0.43 for the 3 methods. The detection level of motile strains was 4 to 7 cfu/25 mL for all methods. Nonmotile Salmonella strains could not be detected in the TT method, whereas only Salmonella Gallinarum could be recovered from 1.1 × 101 cfu/25 mL in the MSRV method. In relation to the molecular methods, PCR could detect these strains from 1.1 × 104 cfu/25 mL. Extending incubation time of the enrichment medium to 6 d in the TT method did not improve the isolation rates. In general, all selective plating media did not show any statistical differences in the parameters of performance studied. The kappa coefficient showed that there was an excellent agreement between the 3 methods for motile strains. For nonmotile strains, the agreement was poor between the MSRV and the PCR; there was no agreement when the TT method was compared with the MSRV and the PCR methods. The difference in detection levels obtained with the methods used for motile and nonmotile Salmonella strains and the difficulty in detecting these last strains represents a potential problem when a poultry water sample is considered negative for the presence of Salmonella. EEA Concepción del Uruguay Fil: Soria, Maria Cecilia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Concepción del Uruguay; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Soria, Mario Alberto. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Concepción del Uruguay; Argentina Fil: Bueno, Dante Javier. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Concepción del Uruguay; Argentina 2019-12-06T14:51:32Z 2019-12-06T14:51:32Z 2013-01 info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion https://academic.oup.com/ps/article/92/1/225/1554522 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/6468 0032-5791 1525-3171 https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-02254 eng info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess application/pdf Oxford Academic Press Poultry Science 92 (1) : 225–232 (January 2013)
institution INTA AR
collection DSpace
country Argentina
countrycode AR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-inta-ar
tag biblioteca
region America del Sur
libraryname Biblioteca Central del INTA Argentina
language eng
topic Aves de Corral
Salmonella
Agua Potable
Enfermedades de los Animales
Técnicas de Cultivo
PCR
Poultry
Drinking Water
Animal Diseases
Culture Techniques
Aves de Corral
Salmonella
Agua Potable
Enfermedades de los Animales
Técnicas de Cultivo
PCR
Poultry
Drinking Water
Animal Diseases
Culture Techniques
spellingShingle Aves de Corral
Salmonella
Agua Potable
Enfermedades de los Animales
Técnicas de Cultivo
PCR
Poultry
Drinking Water
Animal Diseases
Culture Techniques
Aves de Corral
Salmonella
Agua Potable
Enfermedades de los Animales
Técnicas de Cultivo
PCR
Poultry
Drinking Water
Animal Diseases
Culture Techniques
Soria, Maria Cecilia
Soria, Mario
Bueno, Dante Javier
A comparative study of culture methods and PCR assay for Salmonella detection in poultry drinking water
description The present work compared 2 culture methods and PCR assays for motile and nonmotile Salmonella detection using artificially contaminated poultry drinking water. The specificity was 1 for all methods studied. The accuracy and sensitivity were 1 for all motile strains, whereas these parameters were between 0 and 0.7 for nonmotile Salmonella strains. The positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 1 for all motile Salmonella strains in the 3 methods used. Nonmotile Salmonella strains showed a positive predictive value of 1 in the PCR method. However, the positive predictive value was indeterminate in the tetrathionate (TT) methods for both strains tested and in the modified semisolid Rappaport-Vassiliadis (MSRV) method for Salmonella Pullorum. On the other hand, the negative predictive value was between 0.20 and 0.43 for the 3 methods. The detection level of motile strains was 4 to 7 cfu/25 mL for all methods. Nonmotile Salmonella strains could not be detected in the TT method, whereas only Salmonella Gallinarum could be recovered from 1.1 × 101 cfu/25 mL in the MSRV method. In relation to the molecular methods, PCR could detect these strains from 1.1 × 104 cfu/25 mL. Extending incubation time of the enrichment medium to 6 d in the TT method did not improve the isolation rates. In general, all selective plating media did not show any statistical differences in the parameters of performance studied. The kappa coefficient showed that there was an excellent agreement between the 3 methods for motile strains. For nonmotile strains, the agreement was poor between the MSRV and the PCR; there was no agreement when the TT method was compared with the MSRV and the PCR methods. The difference in detection levels obtained with the methods used for motile and nonmotile Salmonella strains and the difficulty in detecting these last strains represents a potential problem when a poultry water sample is considered negative for the presence of Salmonella.
format info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
topic_facet Aves de Corral
Salmonella
Agua Potable
Enfermedades de los Animales
Técnicas de Cultivo
PCR
Poultry
Drinking Water
Animal Diseases
Culture Techniques
author Soria, Maria Cecilia
Soria, Mario
Bueno, Dante Javier
author_facet Soria, Maria Cecilia
Soria, Mario
Bueno, Dante Javier
author_sort Soria, Maria Cecilia
title A comparative study of culture methods and PCR assay for Salmonella detection in poultry drinking water
title_short A comparative study of culture methods and PCR assay for Salmonella detection in poultry drinking water
title_full A comparative study of culture methods and PCR assay for Salmonella detection in poultry drinking water
title_fullStr A comparative study of culture methods and PCR assay for Salmonella detection in poultry drinking water
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study of culture methods and PCR assay for Salmonella detection in poultry drinking water
title_sort comparative study of culture methods and pcr assay for salmonella detection in poultry drinking water
publisher Oxford Academic Press
publishDate 2013-01
url https://academic.oup.com/ps/article/92/1/225/1554522
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/6468
https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-02254
work_keys_str_mv AT soriamariacecilia acomparativestudyofculturemethodsandpcrassayforsalmonelladetectioninpoultrydrinkingwater
AT soriamario acomparativestudyofculturemethodsandpcrassayforsalmonelladetectioninpoultrydrinkingwater
AT buenodantejavier acomparativestudyofculturemethodsandpcrassayforsalmonelladetectioninpoultrydrinkingwater
AT soriamariacecilia comparativestudyofculturemethodsandpcrassayforsalmonelladetectioninpoultrydrinkingwater
AT soriamario comparativestudyofculturemethodsandpcrassayforsalmonelladetectioninpoultrydrinkingwater
AT buenodantejavier comparativestudyofculturemethodsandpcrassayforsalmonelladetectioninpoultrydrinkingwater
_version_ 1756007650506571776