Fruit, mesocarp, and endocarp responses to crop load and to different estimates of source: sink ratio in olive (cv. Arauco) at final harvest

The annual fluctuations in olive crop load due to alternate bearing and other factors often lead to large differences in fruit size and oil content between years at harvest. A better understanding of how fruit parameters respond to the different leaf: fruit (i.e., source: sink) ratios that occur with contrasting crop loads would provide important information for crop management. Thus, the primary objectives of this study conducted with the cv. Arauco in three growing seasons were to: 1) determine the weight and size responses of the fruit and its main tissues, mesocarp (pulp) and endocarp (pit), to crop load; and 2) obtain relationships between different estimates of the source: sink ratio versus various fruit and oil parameters. Fruit thinning was performed by hand on uniform trees with high initial crop loads four weeks after full bloom the first season to obtain different crop loads at harvest. The thinning percentages the first season were 24%, 48% and 87%, along with an unthinned control. The same trees were then monitored the following two seasons without any further thinning. Fruit were sampled at harvest each season to determine fruit and tissue weights and diameters, oil weight per fruit, and oil concentration (%). Fruit weight was reduced 30–40% by high crop loads in each growing season with the mesocarp being much more affected than the endocarp. Oil weight per fruit (−50%) showed a somewhat greater reduction than fruit weight to crop load due to both fruit diameters and fruit oil concentration being decreased at high crop loads. Fruit and tissue weights and oil weight per fruit all displayed bilinear functions versus source: sink ratio when the source was expressed as canopy volume (a surrogate for leaf area) and sink on both a fruit number and glucose equivalent (GE) basis. Source limited fruit growth at both medium and high crop loads due to limited photoassimilate availability based on the bilinear functions, and the slope of the endocarp response to source: sink ratio was 15 times less than that of the mesocarp when expressed on a GE basis. A quantitative comparison with previously published studies indicated that maximum fruit weight appears to be obtained in olive between 1–2 m2 of leaf area per kg of GE. The bilinear relationships of source: sink ratio versus fruit weight observed in this study could contribute to crop modelling, and further research concerning how and when the mesocarp and endocarp respond to crop load is needed to aid crop management in obtaining sufficient fruit size and quality for table olive cultivars.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fernandez, Fabricio, Ladux, Jose Luis, Hammami, Sofiene B.M., Rapoport, Hava F., Searles, Peter Stoughton
Format: info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo biblioteca
Language:eng
Published: 2018-04-14
Subjects:Olea Europaea, Variedades, Manipulación, Cosecha, Mesocarpio, Endocarpio, Varieties, Handling, Harvesting, Mesocarp, Endocarp, Olivo, Variedad Arauco,
Online Access:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304423818300918
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2741
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.02.016
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:localhost:20.500.12123-2741
record_format koha
institution INTA AR
collection DSpace
country Argentina
countrycode AR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-inta-ar
tag biblioteca
region America del Sur
libraryname Biblioteca Central del INTA Argentina
language eng
topic Olea Europaea
Variedades
Manipulación
Cosecha
Mesocarpio
Endocarpio
Varieties
Handling
Harvesting
Mesocarp
Endocarp
Olivo
Variedad Arauco
Olea Europaea
Variedades
Manipulación
Cosecha
Mesocarpio
Endocarpio
Varieties
Handling
Harvesting
Mesocarp
Endocarp
Olivo
Variedad Arauco
spellingShingle Olea Europaea
Variedades
Manipulación
Cosecha
Mesocarpio
Endocarpio
Varieties
Handling
Harvesting
Mesocarp
Endocarp
Olivo
Variedad Arauco
Olea Europaea
Variedades
Manipulación
Cosecha
Mesocarpio
Endocarpio
Varieties
Handling
Harvesting
Mesocarp
Endocarp
Olivo
Variedad Arauco
Fernandez, Fabricio
Ladux, Jose Luis
Hammami, Sofiene B.M.
Rapoport, Hava F.
Searles, Peter Stoughton
Fruit, mesocarp, and endocarp responses to crop load and to different estimates of source: sink ratio in olive (cv. Arauco) at final harvest
description The annual fluctuations in olive crop load due to alternate bearing and other factors often lead to large differences in fruit size and oil content between years at harvest. A better understanding of how fruit parameters respond to the different leaf: fruit (i.e., source: sink) ratios that occur with contrasting crop loads would provide important information for crop management. Thus, the primary objectives of this study conducted with the cv. Arauco in three growing seasons were to: 1) determine the weight and size responses of the fruit and its main tissues, mesocarp (pulp) and endocarp (pit), to crop load; and 2) obtain relationships between different estimates of the source: sink ratio versus various fruit and oil parameters. Fruit thinning was performed by hand on uniform trees with high initial crop loads four weeks after full bloom the first season to obtain different crop loads at harvest. The thinning percentages the first season were 24%, 48% and 87%, along with an unthinned control. The same trees were then monitored the following two seasons without any further thinning. Fruit were sampled at harvest each season to determine fruit and tissue weights and diameters, oil weight per fruit, and oil concentration (%). Fruit weight was reduced 30–40% by high crop loads in each growing season with the mesocarp being much more affected than the endocarp. Oil weight per fruit (−50%) showed a somewhat greater reduction than fruit weight to crop load due to both fruit diameters and fruit oil concentration being decreased at high crop loads. Fruit and tissue weights and oil weight per fruit all displayed bilinear functions versus source: sink ratio when the source was expressed as canopy volume (a surrogate for leaf area) and sink on both a fruit number and glucose equivalent (GE) basis. Source limited fruit growth at both medium and high crop loads due to limited photoassimilate availability based on the bilinear functions, and the slope of the endocarp response to source: sink ratio was 15 times less than that of the mesocarp when expressed on a GE basis. A quantitative comparison with previously published studies indicated that maximum fruit weight appears to be obtained in olive between 1–2 m2 of leaf area per kg of GE. The bilinear relationships of source: sink ratio versus fruit weight observed in this study could contribute to crop modelling, and further research concerning how and when the mesocarp and endocarp respond to crop load is needed to aid crop management in obtaining sufficient fruit size and quality for table olive cultivars.
format info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
topic_facet Olea Europaea
Variedades
Manipulación
Cosecha
Mesocarpio
Endocarpio
Varieties
Handling
Harvesting
Mesocarp
Endocarp
Olivo
Variedad Arauco
author Fernandez, Fabricio
Ladux, Jose Luis
Hammami, Sofiene B.M.
Rapoport, Hava F.
Searles, Peter Stoughton
author_facet Fernandez, Fabricio
Ladux, Jose Luis
Hammami, Sofiene B.M.
Rapoport, Hava F.
Searles, Peter Stoughton
author_sort Fernandez, Fabricio
title Fruit, mesocarp, and endocarp responses to crop load and to different estimates of source: sink ratio in olive (cv. Arauco) at final harvest
title_short Fruit, mesocarp, and endocarp responses to crop load and to different estimates of source: sink ratio in olive (cv. Arauco) at final harvest
title_full Fruit, mesocarp, and endocarp responses to crop load and to different estimates of source: sink ratio in olive (cv. Arauco) at final harvest
title_fullStr Fruit, mesocarp, and endocarp responses to crop load and to different estimates of source: sink ratio in olive (cv. Arauco) at final harvest
title_full_unstemmed Fruit, mesocarp, and endocarp responses to crop load and to different estimates of source: sink ratio in olive (cv. Arauco) at final harvest
title_sort fruit, mesocarp, and endocarp responses to crop load and to different estimates of source: sink ratio in olive (cv. arauco) at final harvest
publishDate 2018-04-14
url https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304423818300918
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2741
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.02.016
work_keys_str_mv AT fernandezfabricio fruitmesocarpandendocarpresponsestocroploadandtodifferentestimatesofsourcesinkratioinolivecvaraucoatfinalharvest
AT laduxjoseluis fruitmesocarpandendocarpresponsestocroploadandtodifferentestimatesofsourcesinkratioinolivecvaraucoatfinalharvest
AT hammamisofienebm fruitmesocarpandendocarpresponsestocroploadandtodifferentestimatesofsourcesinkratioinolivecvaraucoatfinalharvest
AT rapoporthavaf fruitmesocarpandendocarpresponsestocroploadandtodifferentestimatesofsourcesinkratioinolivecvaraucoatfinalharvest
AT searlespeterstoughton fruitmesocarpandendocarpresponsestocroploadandtodifferentestimatesofsourcesinkratioinolivecvaraucoatfinalharvest
_version_ 1756007166414684160
spelling oai:localhost:20.500.12123-27412018-07-06T16:43:04Z Fruit, mesocarp, and endocarp responses to crop load and to different estimates of source: sink ratio in olive (cv. Arauco) at final harvest Fernandez, Fabricio Ladux, Jose Luis Hammami, Sofiene B.M. Rapoport, Hava F. Searles, Peter Stoughton Olea Europaea Variedades Manipulación Cosecha Mesocarpio Endocarpio Varieties Handling Harvesting Mesocarp Endocarp Olivo Variedad Arauco The annual fluctuations in olive crop load due to alternate bearing and other factors often lead to large differences in fruit size and oil content between years at harvest. A better understanding of how fruit parameters respond to the different leaf: fruit (i.e., source: sink) ratios that occur with contrasting crop loads would provide important information for crop management. Thus, the primary objectives of this study conducted with the cv. Arauco in three growing seasons were to: 1) determine the weight and size responses of the fruit and its main tissues, mesocarp (pulp) and endocarp (pit), to crop load; and 2) obtain relationships between different estimates of the source: sink ratio versus various fruit and oil parameters. Fruit thinning was performed by hand on uniform trees with high initial crop loads four weeks after full bloom the first season to obtain different crop loads at harvest. The thinning percentages the first season were 24%, 48% and 87%, along with an unthinned control. The same trees were then monitored the following two seasons without any further thinning. Fruit were sampled at harvest each season to determine fruit and tissue weights and diameters, oil weight per fruit, and oil concentration (%). Fruit weight was reduced 30–40% by high crop loads in each growing season with the mesocarp being much more affected than the endocarp. Oil weight per fruit (−50%) showed a somewhat greater reduction than fruit weight to crop load due to both fruit diameters and fruit oil concentration being decreased at high crop loads. Fruit and tissue weights and oil weight per fruit all displayed bilinear functions versus source: sink ratio when the source was expressed as canopy volume (a surrogate for leaf area) and sink on both a fruit number and glucose equivalent (GE) basis. Source limited fruit growth at both medium and high crop loads due to limited photoassimilate availability based on the bilinear functions, and the slope of the endocarp response to source: sink ratio was 15 times less than that of the mesocarp when expressed on a GE basis. A quantitative comparison with previously published studies indicated that maximum fruit weight appears to be obtained in olive between 1–2 m2 of leaf area per kg of GE. The bilinear relationships of source: sink ratio versus fruit weight observed in this study could contribute to crop modelling, and further research concerning how and when the mesocarp and endocarp respond to crop load is needed to aid crop management in obtaining sufficient fruit size and quality for table olive cultivars. EEA Chilecito Fil: Fernandez, Fabricio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Chilecito. Agencia de Extensión Rural Aimogasta; Argentina Fil: Ladux, Jose Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Chilecito. Agencia de Extensión Rural Aimogasta; Argentina Fil: Hammami, Sofiene B.M. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC). Instituto de Agricultura Sostenible; España. Institut National Agronomique de Tunisie; Túnez Fil: Rapoport, Hava F. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC). Instituto de Agricultura Sostenible; España Fil: Searles, Peter Stoughton. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Regional de Investigaciones Científicas y Transferencia Tecnológica de La Rioja; Argentina 2018-07-06T16:41:03Z 2018-07-06T16:41:03Z 2018-04-14 info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304423818300918 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2741 0304-4238 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.02.016 eng info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess application/pdf Scientia Horticulturae 234 : 49-57 (April 2018)