Carbon Storage in Silvopastoral Systems and Other Land Uses, Argentina
Silvopastoral systems (SPS) provide a range of ecosystem services, including carbon (C) sequestration. Well-managed SPS outperform grasslands, pastures, and forests in terms of C through increased soil and biomass storage. This becomes relevant for landscapes that continue to be intensely transformed for agriculture and livestock production. In this chapter, we provide information on C storage in native forests under silvopastoral management in different regions of Argentina. In the Dry Chaco region, we evaluated mammal and tree diversity, carbon stocks, and herbaceous productivity in different land covers across a temperature and rainfall gradient. In San Luis, dry forests had higher primary productivity (10.6 vs. 7.8 g CO2/m2/d) and lower net C exchange than open pastures, because of greater drought tolerance. In cattle breeding systems of native forests in the Entre Ríos province, average values of C stored were 65 t C/ha in the soil (30 cm depth) and 20 t C/ha in the tree biomass, varying with forest type and grazing intensity. In Southern Patagonia, we assessed natural variation of carbon storage in Nothofagus antarctica forests, examining changes from different harvesting and landscape transformations. In the context of climate change, it is essential to understand how ecosystems respond in order to increase productivity and resilience of silvopastoral systems. Silvopastoral systems practiced in Argentina provide multiple products (food, wood, fodder) and services, where carbon sequestration represents an advantage compared to monocultures (pastures or crops). The proposition of feasible models for forest-livestock systems, such as SPS, can help determine socialecological and economic thresholds to modulate the provision of ecosystem services in the long term.
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | info:ar-repo/semantics/parte de libro biblioteca |
Language: | eng |
Published: |
Springer
2024-06-26
|
Subjects: | Silvopastoral Systems, Carbon Stock Assessments, Ecosystem Services, Pastures, Herbaceous Plants, Mammals, Primary Forests, Resilience, Sistemas Silvopastoriles, Estimación de las Existencias de Carbono, Servicios de los Ecosistemas, Pastizales, Planta Herbácea, Mamíferos, Bosques Primarios, Resiliencia, Argentina, Mammal Diversity, Soil Carbon, Diversidad de Mamíferos, Carbono del Suelo, Bosques Nativos, |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/18821 https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-54270-1_24 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54270-1_24 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
oai:localhost:20.500.12123-18821 |
---|---|
record_format |
koha |
institution |
INTA AR |
collection |
DSpace |
country |
Argentina |
countrycode |
AR |
component |
Bibliográfico |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
dig-inta-ar |
tag |
biblioteca |
region |
America del Sur |
libraryname |
Biblioteca Central del INTA Argentina |
language |
eng |
topic |
Silvopastoral Systems Carbon Stock Assessments Ecosystem Services Pastures Herbaceous Plants Mammals Primary Forests Resilience Sistemas Silvopastoriles Estimación de las Existencias de Carbono Servicios de los Ecosistemas Pastizales Planta Herbácea Mamíferos Bosques Primarios Resiliencia Argentina Mammal Diversity Soil Carbon Diversidad de Mamíferos Carbono del Suelo Bosques Nativos Silvopastoral Systems Carbon Stock Assessments Ecosystem Services Pastures Herbaceous Plants Mammals Primary Forests Resilience Sistemas Silvopastoriles Estimación de las Existencias de Carbono Servicios de los Ecosistemas Pastizales Planta Herbácea Mamíferos Bosques Primarios Resiliencia Argentina Mammal Diversity Soil Carbon Diversidad de Mamíferos Carbono del Suelo Bosques Nativos |
spellingShingle |
Silvopastoral Systems Carbon Stock Assessments Ecosystem Services Pastures Herbaceous Plants Mammals Primary Forests Resilience Sistemas Silvopastoriles Estimación de las Existencias de Carbono Servicios de los Ecosistemas Pastizales Planta Herbácea Mamíferos Bosques Primarios Resiliencia Argentina Mammal Diversity Soil Carbon Diversidad de Mamíferos Carbono del Suelo Bosques Nativos Silvopastoral Systems Carbon Stock Assessments Ecosystem Services Pastures Herbaceous Plants Mammals Primary Forests Resilience Sistemas Silvopastoriles Estimación de las Existencias de Carbono Servicios de los Ecosistemas Pastizales Planta Herbácea Mamíferos Bosques Primarios Resiliencia Argentina Mammal Diversity Soil Carbon Diversidad de Mamíferos Carbono del Suelo Bosques Nativos Peri, Pablo Luis Nosetto, Marcelo Daniel Fernandez, Pedro David Eclesia, Roxana Paola Banegas, Natalia Romina Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel Aravena Acuña, Marie Claire Chaves, Jimena Elizabeth Canavelli, Sonia Beatriz Lezana, Lucrecia Murray, Francisco Toro Manríquez, Mónica D.R. Nanni, Ana Sofía Huertas Herrera, Alejandro Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José Carbon Storage in Silvopastoral Systems and Other Land Uses, Argentina |
description |
Silvopastoral systems (SPS) provide a range of ecosystem services, including carbon (C) sequestration. Well-managed SPS outperform grasslands, pastures, and forests in terms of C through increased soil and biomass storage. This becomes relevant for landscapes that continue to be intensely transformed for agriculture and livestock production. In this chapter, we provide information on C storage in native forests under silvopastoral management in different regions of Argentina. In the Dry Chaco region, we evaluated mammal and tree diversity, carbon stocks, and herbaceous productivity in different land covers across a temperature and rainfall gradient. In San Luis, dry forests had higher primary productivity (10.6 vs. 7.8 g CO2/m2/d) and lower net C exchange than open pastures, because of greater drought tolerance. In cattle breeding systems of native forests in the Entre Ríos province, average values of C stored were 65 t C/ha in the soil (30 cm depth) and 20 t C/ha in the tree biomass, varying with forest type and grazing intensity. In Southern Patagonia, we assessed natural variation of carbon storage in Nothofagus antarctica forests, examining changes from different harvesting and landscape transformations. In the context of climate change, it is essential to understand how
ecosystems respond in order to increase productivity and resilience of silvopastoral systems. Silvopastoral systems practiced in Argentina provide multiple products (food, wood, fodder) and services, where carbon sequestration represents an advantage compared to monocultures (pastures or crops). The proposition of feasible models for forest-livestock systems, such as SPS, can help determine socialecological and economic thresholds to modulate the provision of ecosystem services in the long term. |
format |
info:ar-repo/semantics/parte de libro |
topic_facet |
Silvopastoral Systems Carbon Stock Assessments Ecosystem Services Pastures Herbaceous Plants Mammals Primary Forests Resilience Sistemas Silvopastoriles Estimación de las Existencias de Carbono Servicios de los Ecosistemas Pastizales Planta Herbácea Mamíferos Bosques Primarios Resiliencia Argentina Mammal Diversity Soil Carbon Diversidad de Mamíferos Carbono del Suelo Bosques Nativos |
author |
Peri, Pablo Luis Nosetto, Marcelo Daniel Fernandez, Pedro David Eclesia, Roxana Paola Banegas, Natalia Romina Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel Aravena Acuña, Marie Claire Chaves, Jimena Elizabeth Canavelli, Sonia Beatriz Lezana, Lucrecia Murray, Francisco Toro Manríquez, Mónica D.R. Nanni, Ana Sofía Huertas Herrera, Alejandro Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José |
author_facet |
Peri, Pablo Luis Nosetto, Marcelo Daniel Fernandez, Pedro David Eclesia, Roxana Paola Banegas, Natalia Romina Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel Aravena Acuña, Marie Claire Chaves, Jimena Elizabeth Canavelli, Sonia Beatriz Lezana, Lucrecia Murray, Francisco Toro Manríquez, Mónica D.R. Nanni, Ana Sofía Huertas Herrera, Alejandro Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José |
author_sort |
Peri, Pablo Luis |
title |
Carbon Storage in Silvopastoral Systems and Other Land Uses, Argentina |
title_short |
Carbon Storage in Silvopastoral Systems and Other Land Uses, Argentina |
title_full |
Carbon Storage in Silvopastoral Systems and Other Land Uses, Argentina |
title_fullStr |
Carbon Storage in Silvopastoral Systems and Other Land Uses, Argentina |
title_full_unstemmed |
Carbon Storage in Silvopastoral Systems and Other Land Uses, Argentina |
title_sort |
carbon storage in silvopastoral systems and other land uses, argentina |
publisher |
Springer |
publishDate |
2024-06-26 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/18821 https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-54270-1_24 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54270-1_24 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT peripabloluis carbonstorageinsilvopastoralsystemsandotherlandusesargentina AT nosettomarcelodaniel carbonstorageinsilvopastoralsystemsandotherlandusesargentina AT fernandezpedrodavid carbonstorageinsilvopastoralsystemsandotherlandusesargentina AT eclesiaroxanapaola carbonstorageinsilvopastoralsystemsandotherlandusesargentina AT banegasnataliaromina carbonstorageinsilvopastoralsystemsandotherlandusesargentina AT jobbagygampelestebangabriel carbonstorageinsilvopastoralsystemsandotherlandusesargentina AT aravenaacunamarieclaire carbonstorageinsilvopastoralsystemsandotherlandusesargentina AT chavesjimenaelizabeth carbonstorageinsilvopastoralsystemsandotherlandusesargentina AT canavellisoniabeatriz carbonstorageinsilvopastoralsystemsandotherlandusesargentina AT lezanalucrecia carbonstorageinsilvopastoralsystemsandotherlandusesargentina AT murrayfrancisco carbonstorageinsilvopastoralsystemsandotherlandusesargentina AT toromanriquezmonicadr carbonstorageinsilvopastoralsystemsandotherlandusesargentina AT nannianasofia carbonstorageinsilvopastoralsystemsandotherlandusesargentina AT huertasherreraalejandro carbonstorageinsilvopastoralsystemsandotherlandusesargentina AT martinezpasturguillermojose carbonstorageinsilvopastoralsystemsandotherlandusesargentina |
_version_ |
1809100967085342720 |
spelling |
oai:localhost:20.500.12123-188212024-08-06T12:37:31Z Carbon Storage in Silvopastoral Systems and Other Land Uses, Argentina Peri, Pablo Luis Nosetto, Marcelo Daniel Fernandez, Pedro David Eclesia, Roxana Paola Banegas, Natalia Romina Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel Aravena Acuña, Marie Claire Chaves, Jimena Elizabeth Canavelli, Sonia Beatriz Lezana, Lucrecia Murray, Francisco Toro Manríquez, Mónica D.R. Nanni, Ana Sofía Huertas Herrera, Alejandro Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José Silvopastoral Systems Carbon Stock Assessments Ecosystem Services Pastures Herbaceous Plants Mammals Primary Forests Resilience Sistemas Silvopastoriles Estimación de las Existencias de Carbono Servicios de los Ecosistemas Pastizales Planta Herbácea Mamíferos Bosques Primarios Resiliencia Argentina Mammal Diversity Soil Carbon Diversidad de Mamíferos Carbono del Suelo Bosques Nativos Silvopastoral systems (SPS) provide a range of ecosystem services, including carbon (C) sequestration. Well-managed SPS outperform grasslands, pastures, and forests in terms of C through increased soil and biomass storage. This becomes relevant for landscapes that continue to be intensely transformed for agriculture and livestock production. In this chapter, we provide information on C storage in native forests under silvopastoral management in different regions of Argentina. In the Dry Chaco region, we evaluated mammal and tree diversity, carbon stocks, and herbaceous productivity in different land covers across a temperature and rainfall gradient. In San Luis, dry forests had higher primary productivity (10.6 vs. 7.8 g CO2/m2/d) and lower net C exchange than open pastures, because of greater drought tolerance. In cattle breeding systems of native forests in the Entre Ríos province, average values of C stored were 65 t C/ha in the soil (30 cm depth) and 20 t C/ha in the tree biomass, varying with forest type and grazing intensity. In Southern Patagonia, we assessed natural variation of carbon storage in Nothofagus antarctica forests, examining changes from different harvesting and landscape transformations. In the context of climate change, it is essential to understand how ecosystems respond in order to increase productivity and resilience of silvopastoral systems. Silvopastoral systems practiced in Argentina provide multiple products (food, wood, fodder) and services, where carbon sequestration represents an advantage compared to monocultures (pastures or crops). The proposition of feasible models for forest-livestock systems, such as SPS, can help determine socialecological and economic thresholds to modulate the provision of ecosystem services in the long term. EEA Santa Cruz Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentina. Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina. Fil: Nosetto, Marcelo Daniel. Universidad Nacional de San Luis. Instituto de Matemática Aplicada San Luis. Grupo de Estudios Ambientales; Argentina. Fil: Nosetto, Marcelo Daniel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Fil: Fernandez, Pedro David. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Investigación Animal del Chaco Semiárido; Argentina. Fil: Eclesia, Roxana Paola. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Paraná; Argentina. Fil: Banegas, Natalia Romina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Investigación Animal del Chaco Semiárido; Argentina. Fil: Banegas, Natalia Romina. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Agronomía y Zootecnia; Argentina. Fil: Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico San Luis. Instituto de Matemática Aplicada de San Luis. Grupo de Estudios Ambientales; Argentina. Fil: Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel. Universidad Nacional de San Luis. Instituto de Matemática Aplicada de San Luis. Grupo de Estudios Ambientales; Argentina. Fil: Aravena Acuña, Marie Claire. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC). Laboratorio de Recursos Agroforestales; Argentina. Fil: Chaves, Jimena Elizabeth. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC); Argentina. Fil: Canavelli, Sonia Beatriz. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Paraná. Departamento de Recursos Naturales y Gestión Ambiental; Argentina. Fil: Lezana, Lucrecia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Delta del Paraná. Departamento de Producción; Argentina. Fil: Murray, Francisco. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria San Luis. Agencia de Extensión Rural INTA San Luis; Argentina. Fil: Toro Manríquez, Mónica D.R. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC); Argentina. Fil: Nanni, Ana Sofía. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán; Argentina. Fil: Nanni, Ana Sofía. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Ecología Regional. Tucuman; Argentina. Fil: Huertas Herrera, Alejandro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC); Argentina. Fil: Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC). Ushuaia, Tierra del Fuego; Argentina. 2024-08-06T12:07:48Z 2024-08-06T12:07:48Z 2024-06-26 info:ar-repo/semantics/parte de libro info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/18821 https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-54270-1_24 Peri P.L.; Nosetto M.; Fernandez P.; Eclesia R.P.; Banega N.; Jobbágy E.; Aravena M.C.; Chaves J.E.; Canavelli S.; Lezana L.; Murray F.; Toro-Manríquez M.; Nanni S.; Huertas Herrera A.; Martínez Pastur G. (2024) Carbon Storage in Silvopastoral Systems and other Land Uses, Argentina. In: Integrating Landscapes: Agroforestry for Biodiversity Conservation and Food Sovereignty (F. Montagnini Ed.), Advances in Agroforestry 14, 2nd. Edition, Chapter 24, pp. 675-706. Springer International Publishing. 978-3-031-54269-5 (print) 978-3-031-54270-1 (online) 1875-1202 (electronic) 1875-1199 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54270-1_24 eng info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) application/pdf Springer Integrating Landscapes: Agroforestry for Biodiversity Conservation and Food Sovereignty, (F. Montagnini Ed.). 2nd Edition. Springer International Publishing, 2024. Chapter 24, p. 675-706 |