Social capital, biocultural heritage, and commoning for inclusive sustainability of peasant agriculture: three case studies in Argentina, Bolivia, and Chile = Capital social, patrimônio biocultural e bens comuns para a sustentabilidade inclusiva da agricultura camponesa: três estudos de caso na Argentina, Bolívia e Chile
Social issues and theoretical background: the sustainability of human societies depends on the intergenerational transmission of capital stocks, whether natural, social or economic. With ever more competition for economic resources, sustainability must increasingly focus on the mutual reinforcement of social and natural capitals. This perspective is particularly relevant for peasant agriculture and producers, who are constantly at risk of social and economic exclusion, but whose social and natural capitals remain important, though often underutilized, even by the peasants themselves. The concepts of commoning and social capital are useful for addressing these issues and activating biocultural heritage from an ethically inclusive sustainability perspective. Objective and methods: We seek to understand how peasants organize to collectively achieve goals of social and economic inclusion that could promote their sustainability and resilience in the face of economic constraints. Using field surveys and participatory action research, we analyzed the social, economic, and environmental factors that fostered the emergence and sustainability of producer organizations and their value chains. This was done in three peasant organizations in Argentina, Bolivia and Chile, whose common starting point is the valorization of traditional quinoa grain, but which differ greatly in terms of size, internal dynamics and organizational trajectories. Results: The successes and challenges of the social innovations implemented in the three cases studied provide lessons on how farmers can mobilize their social capital and leverage the resources of their cultural and natural capitals to achieve ethically inclusive sustainability. While some lessons remain context-specific, others appear to be independent of the size and place of organizations, and several demonstrate the importance of socio-ethical interactions cultivated both within organizations and with consumers.
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo biblioteca |
Language: | eng |
Published: |
Universidade Federal do Paraná
2023-11
|
Subjects: | Agricultura, Campesinado, Sostenibilidad, Acción Colectiva, Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, Agriculture, Peasantry, Sustainability, Collective Action, Quinoa, Quinua, |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/16227 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
oai:localhost:20.500.12123-16227 |
---|---|
record_format |
koha |
institution |
INTA AR |
collection |
DSpace |
country |
Argentina |
countrycode |
AR |
component |
Bibliográfico |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
dig-inta-ar |
tag |
biblioteca |
region |
America del Sur |
libraryname |
Biblioteca Central del INTA Argentina |
language |
eng |
topic |
Agricultura Campesinado Sostenibilidad Acción Colectiva Argentina Bolivia Chile Agriculture Peasantry Sustainability Collective Action Quinoa Quinua Agricultura Campesinado Sostenibilidad Acción Colectiva Argentina Bolivia Chile Agriculture Peasantry Sustainability Collective Action Quinoa Quinua |
spellingShingle |
Agricultura Campesinado Sostenibilidad Acción Colectiva Argentina Bolivia Chile Agriculture Peasantry Sustainability Collective Action Quinoa Quinua Agricultura Campesinado Sostenibilidad Acción Colectiva Argentina Bolivia Chile Agriculture Peasantry Sustainability Collective Action Quinoa Quinua Núñez-Carrasco, Lizbeth Cladera, Jorge Cruz, Pablo José Egan, Nancy Figlioli, Gabriela Andrea Godoy Garraza, Gaston Golsberg, Celeste Quiñones-Díaz, Ximena Sáez-Tonacca, Luis Vieira-Pak, Manuela Winkel, Thierry Social capital, biocultural heritage, and commoning for inclusive sustainability of peasant agriculture: three case studies in Argentina, Bolivia, and Chile = Capital social, patrimônio biocultural e bens comuns para a sustentabilidade inclusiva da agricultura camponesa: três estudos de caso na Argentina, Bolívia e Chile |
description |
Social issues and theoretical background: the sustainability of human societies depends on the intergenerational transmission of capital stocks, whether natural, social or economic. With ever more competition for economic resources, sustainability must increasingly focus on the mutual reinforcement of social and natural capitals. This perspective is particularly relevant for peasant agriculture and producers, who are constantly at risk of social and economic exclusion, but whose social and natural capitals remain important, though often underutilized, even by the peasants themselves. The concepts of commoning and social capital are useful for addressing these issues and activating biocultural heritage from an ethically inclusive sustainability perspective. Objective and methods: We seek to understand how peasants organize to collectively achieve goals of social and economic inclusion that could promote their sustainability and resilience in the face of economic constraints. Using field surveys and participatory action research, we analyzed the social, economic, and environmental factors that fostered the emergence and sustainability of producer organizations and their value chains. This was done in three peasant organizations in Argentina, Bolivia and Chile, whose common starting point is the valorization of traditional quinoa grain, but which differ greatly in terms of size, internal dynamics and organizational trajectories. Results: The successes and challenges of the social innovations implemented in the three cases studied provide lessons on how farmers can mobilize their social capital and leverage the resources of their cultural and natural capitals to achieve ethically inclusive sustainability. While some lessons remain context-specific, others appear to be independent of the size and place of organizations,
and several demonstrate the importance of socio-ethical interactions cultivated both within organizations and with consumers. |
format |
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo |
topic_facet |
Agricultura Campesinado Sostenibilidad Acción Colectiva Argentina Bolivia Chile Agriculture Peasantry Sustainability Collective Action Quinoa Quinua |
author |
Núñez-Carrasco, Lizbeth Cladera, Jorge Cruz, Pablo José Egan, Nancy Figlioli, Gabriela Andrea Godoy Garraza, Gaston Golsberg, Celeste Quiñones-Díaz, Ximena Sáez-Tonacca, Luis Vieira-Pak, Manuela Winkel, Thierry |
author_facet |
Núñez-Carrasco, Lizbeth Cladera, Jorge Cruz, Pablo José Egan, Nancy Figlioli, Gabriela Andrea Godoy Garraza, Gaston Golsberg, Celeste Quiñones-Díaz, Ximena Sáez-Tonacca, Luis Vieira-Pak, Manuela Winkel, Thierry |
author_sort |
Núñez-Carrasco, Lizbeth |
title |
Social capital, biocultural heritage, and commoning for inclusive sustainability of peasant agriculture: three case studies in Argentina, Bolivia, and Chile = Capital social, patrimônio biocultural e bens comuns para a sustentabilidade inclusiva da agricultura camponesa: três estudos de caso na Argentina, Bolívia e Chile |
title_short |
Social capital, biocultural heritage, and commoning for inclusive sustainability of peasant agriculture: three case studies in Argentina, Bolivia, and Chile = Capital social, patrimônio biocultural e bens comuns para a sustentabilidade inclusiva da agricultura camponesa: três estudos de caso na Argentina, Bolívia e Chile |
title_full |
Social capital, biocultural heritage, and commoning for inclusive sustainability of peasant agriculture: three case studies in Argentina, Bolivia, and Chile = Capital social, patrimônio biocultural e bens comuns para a sustentabilidade inclusiva da agricultura camponesa: três estudos de caso na Argentina, Bolívia e Chile |
title_fullStr |
Social capital, biocultural heritage, and commoning for inclusive sustainability of peasant agriculture: three case studies in Argentina, Bolivia, and Chile = Capital social, patrimônio biocultural e bens comuns para a sustentabilidade inclusiva da agricultura camponesa: três estudos de caso na Argentina, Bolívia e Chile |
title_full_unstemmed |
Social capital, biocultural heritage, and commoning for inclusive sustainability of peasant agriculture: three case studies in Argentina, Bolivia, and Chile = Capital social, patrimônio biocultural e bens comuns para a sustentabilidade inclusiva da agricultura camponesa: três estudos de caso na Argentina, Bolívia e Chile |
title_sort |
social capital, biocultural heritage, and commoning for inclusive sustainability of peasant agriculture: three case studies in argentina, bolivia, and chile = capital social, patrimônio biocultural e bens comuns para a sustentabilidade inclusiva da agricultura camponesa: três estudos de caso na argentina, bolívia e chile |
publisher |
Universidade Federal do Paraná |
publishDate |
2023-11 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/16227 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nunezcarrascolizbeth socialcapitalbioculturalheritageandcommoningforinclusivesustainabilityofpeasantagriculturethreecasestudiesinargentinaboliviaandchilecapitalsocialpatrimoniobioculturalebenscomunsparaasustentabilidadeinclusivadaagriculturacamponesatresestudosdecasonaargenti AT claderajorge socialcapitalbioculturalheritageandcommoningforinclusivesustainabilityofpeasantagriculturethreecasestudiesinargentinaboliviaandchilecapitalsocialpatrimoniobioculturalebenscomunsparaasustentabilidadeinclusivadaagriculturacamponesatresestudosdecasonaargenti AT cruzpablojose socialcapitalbioculturalheritageandcommoningforinclusivesustainabilityofpeasantagriculturethreecasestudiesinargentinaboliviaandchilecapitalsocialpatrimoniobioculturalebenscomunsparaasustentabilidadeinclusivadaagriculturacamponesatresestudosdecasonaargenti AT egannancy socialcapitalbioculturalheritageandcommoningforinclusivesustainabilityofpeasantagriculturethreecasestudiesinargentinaboliviaandchilecapitalsocialpatrimoniobioculturalebenscomunsparaasustentabilidadeinclusivadaagriculturacamponesatresestudosdecasonaargenti AT figlioligabrielaandrea socialcapitalbioculturalheritageandcommoningforinclusivesustainabilityofpeasantagriculturethreecasestudiesinargentinaboliviaandchilecapitalsocialpatrimoniobioculturalebenscomunsparaasustentabilidadeinclusivadaagriculturacamponesatresestudosdecasonaargenti AT godoygarrazagaston socialcapitalbioculturalheritageandcommoningforinclusivesustainabilityofpeasantagriculturethreecasestudiesinargentinaboliviaandchilecapitalsocialpatrimoniobioculturalebenscomunsparaasustentabilidadeinclusivadaagriculturacamponesatresestudosdecasonaargenti AT golsbergceleste socialcapitalbioculturalheritageandcommoningforinclusivesustainabilityofpeasantagriculturethreecasestudiesinargentinaboliviaandchilecapitalsocialpatrimoniobioculturalebenscomunsparaasustentabilidadeinclusivadaagriculturacamponesatresestudosdecasonaargenti AT quinonesdiazximena socialcapitalbioculturalheritageandcommoningforinclusivesustainabilityofpeasantagriculturethreecasestudiesinargentinaboliviaandchilecapitalsocialpatrimoniobioculturalebenscomunsparaasustentabilidadeinclusivadaagriculturacamponesatresestudosdecasonaargenti AT saeztonaccaluis socialcapitalbioculturalheritageandcommoningforinclusivesustainabilityofpeasantagriculturethreecasestudiesinargentinaboliviaandchilecapitalsocialpatrimoniobioculturalebenscomunsparaasustentabilidadeinclusivadaagriculturacamponesatresestudosdecasonaargenti AT vieirapakmanuela socialcapitalbioculturalheritageandcommoningforinclusivesustainabilityofpeasantagriculturethreecasestudiesinargentinaboliviaandchilecapitalsocialpatrimoniobioculturalebenscomunsparaasustentabilidadeinclusivadaagriculturacamponesatresestudosdecasonaargenti AT winkelthierry socialcapitalbioculturalheritageandcommoningforinclusivesustainabilityofpeasantagriculturethreecasestudiesinargentinaboliviaandchilecapitalsocialpatrimoniobioculturalebenscomunsparaasustentabilidadeinclusivadaagriculturacamponesatresestudosdecasonaargenti |
_version_ |
1798158439273201664 |
spelling |
oai:localhost:20.500.12123-162272023-12-14T12:26:48Z Social capital, biocultural heritage, and commoning for inclusive sustainability of peasant agriculture: three case studies in Argentina, Bolivia, and Chile = Capital social, patrimônio biocultural e bens comuns para a sustentabilidade inclusiva da agricultura camponesa: três estudos de caso na Argentina, Bolívia e Chile Núñez-Carrasco, Lizbeth Cladera, Jorge Cruz, Pablo José Egan, Nancy Figlioli, Gabriela Andrea Godoy Garraza, Gaston Golsberg, Celeste Quiñones-Díaz, Ximena Sáez-Tonacca, Luis Vieira-Pak, Manuela Winkel, Thierry Agricultura Campesinado Sostenibilidad Acción Colectiva Argentina Bolivia Chile Agriculture Peasantry Sustainability Collective Action Quinoa Quinua Social issues and theoretical background: the sustainability of human societies depends on the intergenerational transmission of capital stocks, whether natural, social or economic. With ever more competition for economic resources, sustainability must increasingly focus on the mutual reinforcement of social and natural capitals. This perspective is particularly relevant for peasant agriculture and producers, who are constantly at risk of social and economic exclusion, but whose social and natural capitals remain important, though often underutilized, even by the peasants themselves. The concepts of commoning and social capital are useful for addressing these issues and activating biocultural heritage from an ethically inclusive sustainability perspective. Objective and methods: We seek to understand how peasants organize to collectively achieve goals of social and economic inclusion that could promote their sustainability and resilience in the face of economic constraints. Using field surveys and participatory action research, we analyzed the social, economic, and environmental factors that fostered the emergence and sustainability of producer organizations and their value chains. This was done in three peasant organizations in Argentina, Bolivia and Chile, whose common starting point is the valorization of traditional quinoa grain, but which differ greatly in terms of size, internal dynamics and organizational trajectories. Results: The successes and challenges of the social innovations implemented in the three cases studied provide lessons on how farmers can mobilize their social capital and leverage the resources of their cultural and natural capitals to achieve ethically inclusive sustainability. While some lessons remain context-specific, others appear to be independent of the size and place of organizations, and several demonstrate the importance of socio-ethical interactions cultivated both within organizations and with consumers. Problemática social e fundamento teórico: A sustentabilidade das sociedades humanas depende da transmissão intergeracional dos estoques de capital, sejam eles naturais, sociais ou econômicos. Com a concorrência crescente por recursos econômicos, a sustentabilidade deve se concentrar cada vez mais no reforço mútuo do capital social e natural. Esta perspectiva é particularmente relevante para a agricultura camponesa e para os produtores sob constante ameaça de exclusão social e econômica, mas cujo capital social e natural permanece importante, embora frequentemente subutilizado, mesmo pelos próprios camponeses. Os conceitos de capital social e bens comuns são úteis para abordar estas questões e ativar o patrimônio biocultural a partir de uma perspectiva de sustentabilidade eticamente inclusiva. Objetivos e métodos: Procuramos entender como os camponeses se organizam para alcançar coletivamente objetivos de inclusão social e econômica que possam promover sua sustentabilidade e resiliência diante das restrições econômicas. Utilizando pesquisas de campo e pesquisa-ação participativa, analisamos os fatores sociais, econômicos e ambientais que promoveram o surgimento e a sustentabilidade das organizações de produtores e suas cadeias de valor. Fizemos isso em três organizações camponesas na Argentina, Bolívia e Chile, que compartilham um ponto de partida comum em torno da valorização do grão tradicional de quinoa, mas variam muito em termos de tamanho, dinâmica interna e trajetórias organizacionais. Resultados: Os sucessos e desafios das inovações sociais implementadas nos três casos estudados fornecem lições sobre como os agricultores mobilizam seu capital social e aproveitam os recursos de seu capital cultural e natural para alcançar a sustentabilidade eticamente inclusiva. Enquanto algumas lições permanecem específicas do contexto, outras parecem ser independentes do tamanho e do lugar das organizações, e várias demonstram a importância das interações sócio-éticas mantidas tanto dentro das organizações quanto com os consumidores. IPAF Región Noroeste Fil: Núñez-Carrasco, Lizbeth. Universidad Católica del Maule. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales; Chile. Fil: Cladera, Jorge. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Instituto Interdisciplinario de Tilcara; Argentina Fil: Cruz, Pablo José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Unidad Ejecutora en Ciencias Sociales Regionales y Humanidades; Argentina Fil: Cruz, Pablo José. Universidad Nacional de Jujuy. Unidad Ejecutora en Ciencias Sociales Regionales y Humanidades; Argentina Fil: Egan, Nancy. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Unidad Ejecutora en Ciencias Sociales Regionales y Humanidades; Argentina Fil: Egan, Nancy. Universidad Nacional de Jujuy. Unidad Ejecutora en Ciencias Sociales Regionales y Humanidades; Argentina Fil: Figlioli, Gabriela Andrea. Provincia de Jujuy. Ministerio de Agricultura, Ganadería y Pesca; Argentina Fil: Godoy Garraza, Gastón. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto De Investigación y Desarrollo Tecnológico para la Agricultura Familiar Región NOA; Argentina. Fil: Golsberg, Celeste. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto De Investigación y Desarrollo Tecnológico para la Agricultura Familiar Región NOA; Argentina. Fil: Quiñones-Díaz, Ximena. Universidad Católica del Maule. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales; Chile Fil: Sáez-Tonacca, Luis. Universidad de Santiago de Chile. Facultad Tecnológica; Chile. Fil: Vieira-Pak, Manuela. Independant Consultant associated to LISODE; Francia Fil: Winkel, Thierry. Universite Paul - Valery Montpellier-CNRS. Centre d’Écologie Fonctionnelle et Évolutive. Institut de Recherche pour le Développement; Francia 2023-12-14T12:18:25Z 2023-12-14T12:18:25Z 2023-11 info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/16227 2176-9109 1518-952X eng info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) application/pdf Argentina .......... (nation) (World, South America) 7006477 Bolivia .......... (nation) (World, South America) 1000046 Chile .......... (nation) (World, South America) 1000049 Universidade Federal do Paraná Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente 62 : 1021-1050 (jul./dez. 2023) |