Carbon pool dynamics after variable retention harvesting in Nothofagus pumilio forests of Tierra del Fuego

Background It is necessary to determine the implications for managing forest stands using variable retention harvesting for maintaining carbon and for calculating the effects of different harvesting practices on above‑ and belowground carbon balance in forest ecosystems. In this context, forest carbon management has gained more attention among managers and policy‑makers during recent years. The aim of this study was to determine carbon pool dynamics in different forest ecosystem components after variable retention harvesting (VRH) to characterize the ecological stability and quantify the recovery rate through the years‑after‑harvesting (YAH). Methods Carbon pool compartmentalization of 14 different components was determined in 60 harvested and primary unmanaged forests during the first 18 YAH in Tierra del Fuego (Argentina). We compared them using uni‑ and multi‑variate methods, relativizing the outputs with primary unmanaged forests. Results We determined the effectiveness to retain carbon components in post‑harvested stands under different retention strategies (aggregated vs. dispersed). The balance among carbon pool components changed between managed and unmanaged stands across the YAH, and was directly related to the impact magnitude. Aggregated retention improved the ecological stability of the harvested areas, where the below‑ground components were more stable than the above‑ground components. The recovery rate was directly related to the post‑harvesting natural dynamics of the stands. The studied period was not enough to fully recover the C levels of primary unmanaged forests, but VRH showed advantages to increase the C pools in the managed stands. Conclusions Promoting VRH can improve sustainable forestry at the landscape level and in the long term, generating positive synergies with biodiversity and the provision of ecosystem services. This study provides important new insights into forest carbon management, in particular to setting standards in carbon projects and sets the groundwork for analysing the economics of the mentioned harvesting systems.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chaves, Jimena Elizabeth, Aravena Acuña, Marie Claire, Rodríguez‑Souilla, Julián, Cellini, Juan Manuel, Rappa, Nolan J., Lencinas, María Vanessa, Peri, Pablo Luis, Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José
Format: info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo biblioteca
Language:eng
Published: Springer Nature 2023-01-23
Subjects:Primary Forests, Silviculture, Carbon, Harvesting, Sustainable Forestry, Biodiversity, Ecosystem Services, Bosque Primario, Nothofagus pumilio, Silvicultura, Carbono, Cosecha, Gestión Sostenible de los Bosques, Biodiversidad, Servicios de los Ecosistemas, Tierra del Fuego, Lenga, Sinergia Positiva, Corta de Retención Variable, Retención Agregada, Retención Dispersa, Balance de Carbono, Dinámica de Carbono, Región Patagónica, Positive Synergies, Variable Retention Harvesting (VRH), Aggregated Retention, Dispersed Retention, Carbon Balance, Carbon Dynamics,
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/13954
https://ecologicalprocesses.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s13717-023-00418-z
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-023-00418-z
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:localhost:20.500.12123-13954
record_format koha
institution INTA AR
collection DSpace
country Argentina
countrycode AR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-inta-ar
tag biblioteca
region America del Sur
libraryname Biblioteca Central del INTA Argentina
language eng
topic Primary Forests
Silviculture
Carbon
Harvesting
Sustainable Forestry
Biodiversity
Ecosystem Services
Bosque Primario
Nothofagus pumilio
Silvicultura
Carbono
Cosecha
Gestión Sostenible de los Bosques
Biodiversidad
Servicios de los Ecosistemas
Tierra del Fuego
Lenga
Sinergia Positiva
Corta de Retención Variable
Retención Agregada
Retención Dispersa
Balance de Carbono
Dinámica de Carbono
Región Patagónica
Positive Synergies
Variable Retention Harvesting (VRH)
Aggregated Retention
Dispersed Retention
Carbon Balance
Carbon Dynamics
Primary Forests
Silviculture
Carbon
Harvesting
Sustainable Forestry
Biodiversity
Ecosystem Services
Bosque Primario
Nothofagus pumilio
Silvicultura
Carbono
Cosecha
Gestión Sostenible de los Bosques
Biodiversidad
Servicios de los Ecosistemas
Tierra del Fuego
Lenga
Sinergia Positiva
Corta de Retención Variable
Retención Agregada
Retención Dispersa
Balance de Carbono
Dinámica de Carbono
Región Patagónica
Positive Synergies
Variable Retention Harvesting (VRH)
Aggregated Retention
Dispersed Retention
Carbon Balance
Carbon Dynamics
spellingShingle Primary Forests
Silviculture
Carbon
Harvesting
Sustainable Forestry
Biodiversity
Ecosystem Services
Bosque Primario
Nothofagus pumilio
Silvicultura
Carbono
Cosecha
Gestión Sostenible de los Bosques
Biodiversidad
Servicios de los Ecosistemas
Tierra del Fuego
Lenga
Sinergia Positiva
Corta de Retención Variable
Retención Agregada
Retención Dispersa
Balance de Carbono
Dinámica de Carbono
Región Patagónica
Positive Synergies
Variable Retention Harvesting (VRH)
Aggregated Retention
Dispersed Retention
Carbon Balance
Carbon Dynamics
Primary Forests
Silviculture
Carbon
Harvesting
Sustainable Forestry
Biodiversity
Ecosystem Services
Bosque Primario
Nothofagus pumilio
Silvicultura
Carbono
Cosecha
Gestión Sostenible de los Bosques
Biodiversidad
Servicios de los Ecosistemas
Tierra del Fuego
Lenga
Sinergia Positiva
Corta de Retención Variable
Retención Agregada
Retención Dispersa
Balance de Carbono
Dinámica de Carbono
Región Patagónica
Positive Synergies
Variable Retention Harvesting (VRH)
Aggregated Retention
Dispersed Retention
Carbon Balance
Carbon Dynamics
Chaves, Jimena Elizabeth
Aravena Acuña, Marie Claire
Rodríguez‑Souilla, Julián
Cellini, Juan Manuel
Rappa, Nolan J.
Lencinas, María Vanessa
Peri, Pablo Luis
Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José
Carbon pool dynamics after variable retention harvesting in Nothofagus pumilio forests of Tierra del Fuego
description Background It is necessary to determine the implications for managing forest stands using variable retention harvesting for maintaining carbon and for calculating the effects of different harvesting practices on above‑ and belowground carbon balance in forest ecosystems. In this context, forest carbon management has gained more attention among managers and policy‑makers during recent years. The aim of this study was to determine carbon pool dynamics in different forest ecosystem components after variable retention harvesting (VRH) to characterize the ecological stability and quantify the recovery rate through the years‑after‑harvesting (YAH). Methods Carbon pool compartmentalization of 14 different components was determined in 60 harvested and primary unmanaged forests during the first 18 YAH in Tierra del Fuego (Argentina). We compared them using uni‑ and multi‑variate methods, relativizing the outputs with primary unmanaged forests. Results We determined the effectiveness to retain carbon components in post‑harvested stands under different retention strategies (aggregated vs. dispersed). The balance among carbon pool components changed between managed and unmanaged stands across the YAH, and was directly related to the impact magnitude. Aggregated retention improved the ecological stability of the harvested areas, where the below‑ground components were more stable than the above‑ground components. The recovery rate was directly related to the post‑harvesting natural dynamics of the stands. The studied period was not enough to fully recover the C levels of primary unmanaged forests, but VRH showed advantages to increase the C pools in the managed stands. Conclusions Promoting VRH can improve sustainable forestry at the landscape level and in the long term, generating positive synergies with biodiversity and the provision of ecosystem services. This study provides important new insights into forest carbon management, in particular to setting standards in carbon projects and sets the groundwork for analysing the economics of the mentioned harvesting systems.
format info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
topic_facet Primary Forests
Silviculture
Carbon
Harvesting
Sustainable Forestry
Biodiversity
Ecosystem Services
Bosque Primario
Nothofagus pumilio
Silvicultura
Carbono
Cosecha
Gestión Sostenible de los Bosques
Biodiversidad
Servicios de los Ecosistemas
Tierra del Fuego
Lenga
Sinergia Positiva
Corta de Retención Variable
Retención Agregada
Retención Dispersa
Balance de Carbono
Dinámica de Carbono
Región Patagónica
Positive Synergies
Variable Retention Harvesting (VRH)
Aggregated Retention
Dispersed Retention
Carbon Balance
Carbon Dynamics
author Chaves, Jimena Elizabeth
Aravena Acuña, Marie Claire
Rodríguez‑Souilla, Julián
Cellini, Juan Manuel
Rappa, Nolan J.
Lencinas, María Vanessa
Peri, Pablo Luis
Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José
author_facet Chaves, Jimena Elizabeth
Aravena Acuña, Marie Claire
Rodríguez‑Souilla, Julián
Cellini, Juan Manuel
Rappa, Nolan J.
Lencinas, María Vanessa
Peri, Pablo Luis
Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José
author_sort Chaves, Jimena Elizabeth
title Carbon pool dynamics after variable retention harvesting in Nothofagus pumilio forests of Tierra del Fuego
title_short Carbon pool dynamics after variable retention harvesting in Nothofagus pumilio forests of Tierra del Fuego
title_full Carbon pool dynamics after variable retention harvesting in Nothofagus pumilio forests of Tierra del Fuego
title_fullStr Carbon pool dynamics after variable retention harvesting in Nothofagus pumilio forests of Tierra del Fuego
title_full_unstemmed Carbon pool dynamics after variable retention harvesting in Nothofagus pumilio forests of Tierra del Fuego
title_sort carbon pool dynamics after variable retention harvesting in nothofagus pumilio forests of tierra del fuego
publisher Springer Nature
publishDate 2023-01-23
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/13954
https://ecologicalprocesses.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s13717-023-00418-z
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-023-00418-z
work_keys_str_mv AT chavesjimenaelizabeth carbonpooldynamicsaftervariableretentionharvestinginnothofaguspumilioforestsoftierradelfuego
AT aravenaacunamarieclaire carbonpooldynamicsaftervariableretentionharvestinginnothofaguspumilioforestsoftierradelfuego
AT rodriguezsouillajulian carbonpooldynamicsaftervariableretentionharvestinginnothofaguspumilioforestsoftierradelfuego
AT cellinijuanmanuel carbonpooldynamicsaftervariableretentionharvestinginnothofaguspumilioforestsoftierradelfuego
AT rappanolanj carbonpooldynamicsaftervariableretentionharvestinginnothofaguspumilioforestsoftierradelfuego
AT lencinasmariavanessa carbonpooldynamicsaftervariableretentionharvestinginnothofaguspumilioforestsoftierradelfuego
AT peripabloluis carbonpooldynamicsaftervariableretentionharvestinginnothofaguspumilioforestsoftierradelfuego
AT martinezpasturguillermojose carbonpooldynamicsaftervariableretentionharvestinginnothofaguspumilioforestsoftierradelfuego
_version_ 1762927330924167168
spelling oai:localhost:20.500.12123-139542023-02-13T13:47:20Z Carbon pool dynamics after variable retention harvesting in Nothofagus pumilio forests of Tierra del Fuego Chaves, Jimena Elizabeth Aravena Acuña, Marie Claire Rodríguez‑Souilla, Julián Cellini, Juan Manuel Rappa, Nolan J. Lencinas, María Vanessa Peri, Pablo Luis Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José Primary Forests Silviculture Carbon Harvesting Sustainable Forestry Biodiversity Ecosystem Services Bosque Primario Nothofagus pumilio Silvicultura Carbono Cosecha Gestión Sostenible de los Bosques Biodiversidad Servicios de los Ecosistemas Tierra del Fuego Lenga Sinergia Positiva Corta de Retención Variable Retención Agregada Retención Dispersa Balance de Carbono Dinámica de Carbono Región Patagónica Positive Synergies Variable Retention Harvesting (VRH) Aggregated Retention Dispersed Retention Carbon Balance Carbon Dynamics Background It is necessary to determine the implications for managing forest stands using variable retention harvesting for maintaining carbon and for calculating the effects of different harvesting practices on above‑ and belowground carbon balance in forest ecosystems. In this context, forest carbon management has gained more attention among managers and policy‑makers during recent years. The aim of this study was to determine carbon pool dynamics in different forest ecosystem components after variable retention harvesting (VRH) to characterize the ecological stability and quantify the recovery rate through the years‑after‑harvesting (YAH). Methods Carbon pool compartmentalization of 14 different components was determined in 60 harvested and primary unmanaged forests during the first 18 YAH in Tierra del Fuego (Argentina). We compared them using uni‑ and multi‑variate methods, relativizing the outputs with primary unmanaged forests. Results We determined the effectiveness to retain carbon components in post‑harvested stands under different retention strategies (aggregated vs. dispersed). The balance among carbon pool components changed between managed and unmanaged stands across the YAH, and was directly related to the impact magnitude. Aggregated retention improved the ecological stability of the harvested areas, where the below‑ground components were more stable than the above‑ground components. The recovery rate was directly related to the post‑harvesting natural dynamics of the stands. The studied period was not enough to fully recover the C levels of primary unmanaged forests, but VRH showed advantages to increase the C pools in the managed stands. Conclusions Promoting VRH can improve sustainable forestry at the landscape level and in the long term, generating positive synergies with biodiversity and the provision of ecosystem services. This study provides important new insights into forest carbon management, in particular to setting standards in carbon projects and sets the groundwork for analysing the economics of the mentioned harvesting systems. EEA Santa Cruz Fil: Chaves, Jimena Elizabeth. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC); Argentina. Fil: Aravena Acuña, Marie Claire. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC). Laboratorio de Recursos Agroforestales; Argentina. Fil: Rodríguez‑Souilla, Julián. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC); Argentina. Fil: Cellini, Juan Manuel. Universidad Nacional de la Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo. Laboratorio de Investigaciones en Maderas; Argentina. Fil: Rappa, Nolan J. University of Freiburg. Nature Conservation & Landscape Ecology; Alemania Fil: Lencinas, María Vanessa. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC); Argentina. Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentina. Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina. Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Fil: Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC); Argentina. 2023-02-13T13:38:32Z 2023-02-13T13:38:32Z 2023-01-23 info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/13954 https://ecologicalprocesses.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s13717-023-00418-z Chaves J.E.; Aravena Acuña M.C.; Rodríguez-Souilla J.; Cellini J.M.; Rappa N.; Lencinas M.V.; Peri P.L.; Martínez Pastur G. (2023) Carbon pool dynamics after variable retention harvesting in Nothofagus pumilio forests of Tierra del Fuego. Ecological Processes 12: 5. doi: 10.1186/s13717-023-00418-z. 2192-1709 (electronic) https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-023-00418-z eng info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) application/pdf Springer Nature Ecological Processes 12 : article number 5. (Published: 23 January 2023)