A comparison of two in vitro bioassays to detect resistance of the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus to fipronil

The aim of this work is to compare the sensitivity of two in vitro bioassays to detect resistant to fipronil in Argentinean populations of the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus. Two different larval bioassays prepared with technical grade (97%) fipronil were compared: larval immersion test (LIT) and larval packet test (LPT). Seven strains from different provinces were treated with both assays. Colonia Tabay, Colonia Benítez, Intiyaco and Quimili strains were considered resistant in both LIT and LPT bioassays. The 95% confidence intervals (IC95) for lethal concentration 50% (LC50) did not overlap with the susceptible reference strain (SRS) and all the values of RR50 obtained were higher than 2. Garabato and Federal strains were considered as susceptible for both techniques because the IC95 for the LC50 overlapped with those of the SRS and the RR50 values were lesser than 2. An ambiguous situation occurs with Reconquista strain. This strain was considered as susceptible with LPT and with incipient resistant after LIT trial. The analysis of the results indicates that both LIT and LPT trials have enough sensibility to differentiate resistant and susceptible strains, but LIT was more sensitive than LPT when the resistance is incipient.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Torrents, Jorgelina, Morel, Nicolas, Rossner, Maria Victoria, Martinez, Norberto Claudio, Nava, Santiago
Format: info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo biblioteca
Language:eng
Published: Elsevier 2023-01
Subjects:Rhipicephalus, Fipronil, Resistance to Acaricides, Bio-assays, Cattle, Resistencia a los Acaricidas, Ensayo Biológico, Ganado Bovino,
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/13726
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405939022001320
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vprsr.2022.100816
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:localhost:20.500.12123-13726
record_format koha
spelling oai:localhost:20.500.12123-137262024-01-10T13:37:50Z A comparison of two in vitro bioassays to detect resistance of the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus to fipronil Torrents, Jorgelina Morel, Nicolas Rossner, Maria Victoria Martinez, Norberto Claudio Nava, Santiago Rhipicephalus Fipronil Resistance to Acaricides Bio-assays Cattle Resistencia a los Acaricidas Ensayo Biológico Ganado Bovino The aim of this work is to compare the sensitivity of two in vitro bioassays to detect resistant to fipronil in Argentinean populations of the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus. Two different larval bioassays prepared with technical grade (97%) fipronil were compared: larval immersion test (LIT) and larval packet test (LPT). Seven strains from different provinces were treated with both assays. Colonia Tabay, Colonia Benítez, Intiyaco and Quimili strains were considered resistant in both LIT and LPT bioassays. The 95% confidence intervals (IC95) for lethal concentration 50% (LC50) did not overlap with the susceptible reference strain (SRS) and all the values of RR50 obtained were higher than 2. Garabato and Federal strains were considered as susceptible for both techniques because the IC95 for the LC50 overlapped with those of the SRS and the RR50 values were lesser than 2. An ambiguous situation occurs with Reconquista strain. This strain was considered as susceptible with LPT and with incipient resistant after LIT trial. The analysis of the results indicates that both LIT and LPT trials have enough sensibility to differentiate resistant and susceptible strains, but LIT was more sensitive than LPT when the resistance is incipient. EEA Rafaela Fil: Torrents, Jorgelina. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias; Argentina Fil: Morel, Nicolas. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela; Argentina Fil: Morel, Nicolas. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Investigación de la Cadena Láctea (IDICAL); Argentina Fil: Rossner, Maria Victoria. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Colonia Benitez; Argentina Fil: Martinez, Norberto Claudio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Reconquista. Agencia de Extensión Rural Garabato; Argentina Fil: Nava, Santiago. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela; Argentina Fil: Nava, Santiago. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Nava, Santiago. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Instituto de Investigación de la Cadena Láctea (IDICAL); Argentina 2022-12-27T13:11:34Z 2022-12-27T13:11:34Z 2023-01 info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/13726 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405939022001320 2405-9390 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vprsr.2022.100816 eng info:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/2019-PE-E5-I109-001/2019-PE-E5-I109-001/AR./Convocatoria: Estudios para el control de enfermedades subtropicales y/o transmitidas por vectores (Tristeza Bovina, Garrapatas, Miasis, Tripanosomiasis, Lengua Azul y la info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess application/pdf Elsevier Veterinary Parasitology : Regional Studies and Reports; 37: 100816 (January 2023)
institution INTA AR
collection DSpace
country Argentina
countrycode AR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-inta-ar
tag biblioteca
region America del Sur
libraryname Biblioteca Central del INTA Argentina
language eng
topic Rhipicephalus
Fipronil
Resistance to Acaricides
Bio-assays
Cattle
Resistencia a los Acaricidas
Ensayo Biológico
Ganado Bovino
Rhipicephalus
Fipronil
Resistance to Acaricides
Bio-assays
Cattle
Resistencia a los Acaricidas
Ensayo Biológico
Ganado Bovino
spellingShingle Rhipicephalus
Fipronil
Resistance to Acaricides
Bio-assays
Cattle
Resistencia a los Acaricidas
Ensayo Biológico
Ganado Bovino
Rhipicephalus
Fipronil
Resistance to Acaricides
Bio-assays
Cattle
Resistencia a los Acaricidas
Ensayo Biológico
Ganado Bovino
Torrents, Jorgelina
Morel, Nicolas
Rossner, Maria Victoria
Martinez, Norberto Claudio
Nava, Santiago
A comparison of two in vitro bioassays to detect resistance of the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus to fipronil
description The aim of this work is to compare the sensitivity of two in vitro bioassays to detect resistant to fipronil in Argentinean populations of the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus. Two different larval bioassays prepared with technical grade (97%) fipronil were compared: larval immersion test (LIT) and larval packet test (LPT). Seven strains from different provinces were treated with both assays. Colonia Tabay, Colonia Benítez, Intiyaco and Quimili strains were considered resistant in both LIT and LPT bioassays. The 95% confidence intervals (IC95) for lethal concentration 50% (LC50) did not overlap with the susceptible reference strain (SRS) and all the values of RR50 obtained were higher than 2. Garabato and Federal strains were considered as susceptible for both techniques because the IC95 for the LC50 overlapped with those of the SRS and the RR50 values were lesser than 2. An ambiguous situation occurs with Reconquista strain. This strain was considered as susceptible with LPT and with incipient resistant after LIT trial. The analysis of the results indicates that both LIT and LPT trials have enough sensibility to differentiate resistant and susceptible strains, but LIT was more sensitive than LPT when the resistance is incipient.
format info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
topic_facet Rhipicephalus
Fipronil
Resistance to Acaricides
Bio-assays
Cattle
Resistencia a los Acaricidas
Ensayo Biológico
Ganado Bovino
author Torrents, Jorgelina
Morel, Nicolas
Rossner, Maria Victoria
Martinez, Norberto Claudio
Nava, Santiago
author_facet Torrents, Jorgelina
Morel, Nicolas
Rossner, Maria Victoria
Martinez, Norberto Claudio
Nava, Santiago
author_sort Torrents, Jorgelina
title A comparison of two in vitro bioassays to detect resistance of the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus to fipronil
title_short A comparison of two in vitro bioassays to detect resistance of the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus to fipronil
title_full A comparison of two in vitro bioassays to detect resistance of the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus to fipronil
title_fullStr A comparison of two in vitro bioassays to detect resistance of the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus to fipronil
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of two in vitro bioassays to detect resistance of the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus to fipronil
title_sort comparison of two in vitro bioassays to detect resistance of the cattle tick rhipicephalus microplus to fipronil
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2023-01
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/13726
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405939022001320
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vprsr.2022.100816
work_keys_str_mv AT torrentsjorgelina acomparisonoftwoinvitrobioassaystodetectresistanceofthecattletickrhipicephalusmicroplustofipronil
AT morelnicolas acomparisonoftwoinvitrobioassaystodetectresistanceofthecattletickrhipicephalusmicroplustofipronil
AT rossnermariavictoria acomparisonoftwoinvitrobioassaystodetectresistanceofthecattletickrhipicephalusmicroplustofipronil
AT martineznorbertoclaudio acomparisonoftwoinvitrobioassaystodetectresistanceofthecattletickrhipicephalusmicroplustofipronil
AT navasantiago acomparisonoftwoinvitrobioassaystodetectresistanceofthecattletickrhipicephalusmicroplustofipronil
AT torrentsjorgelina comparisonoftwoinvitrobioassaystodetectresistanceofthecattletickrhipicephalusmicroplustofipronil
AT morelnicolas comparisonoftwoinvitrobioassaystodetectresistanceofthecattletickrhipicephalusmicroplustofipronil
AT rossnermariavictoria comparisonoftwoinvitrobioassaystodetectresistanceofthecattletickrhipicephalusmicroplustofipronil
AT martineznorbertoclaudio comparisonoftwoinvitrobioassaystodetectresistanceofthecattletickrhipicephalusmicroplustofipronil
AT navasantiago comparisonoftwoinvitrobioassaystodetectresistanceofthecattletickrhipicephalusmicroplustofipronil
_version_ 1798158112675332096