Risk assessment of agriculture impact on the Frío River watershed and Caño Negro Ramsar wetland, Costa Rica

The Caño Negro Ramsar wetland is a conservation area of great natural and societal value, located in the lower part of the Frío River watershed in the north of Costa Rica. Its aquatic ecosystems may be considered vulnerable to pollution due to recent changes in land use toward agriculture. In 2011 and 2012, quarterly sampling was done at ten sites located in the middle and lower sections of the Frío River Basin that pass through crop areas and later drain into Caño Negro wetland. Pesticide residues, nitrates, sediment concentrations, and diversity of benthic macroinvertebrates and fish biomarkers were studied in the selected sites. Additionally, risk of toxicity was calculated in two different ways: (1) by using a ratio of MEC to hazard concentrations threshold for 5% of species (HC5) to calculate a risk quotient (RQ), and (2) by using a ratio of MEC to available ecotoxicity data of native fish and cladocera for diazinon and ethoprophos, to obtain a risk quotient for native species (RQns). Results indicated that three out of the ten sites (rivers Thiales, Mónico, and Sabogal) showed variable levels of pollution including six different active ingredients (a.i.) of pesticide formulations (herbicides ametryn, bromacil, and diuron; insecticides cypermethrin, diazinon, and ethoprophos). Moreover, potential adverse effects on fishes in Thiales and Mónico rivers were indicated by cholinesterase (ChE) inhibition and glutathione S-transferase (GST) enhancement. Risk evaluations indicated pesticide residues of ametryn, bromacil, and ethoprophos to be exceeding the limits set by MTR, also RQ was high (>1) in 70% of the positive samples for diuron (most frequently found pesticide in water samples), cypermethrin, diazinon, and ethoprophos, and RQns was high for diazinon. Therefore, these substances might be of major concern for the ecological health of aquatic ecosystems in the middle basin of the Frío River. The most critical site was Mónico River, which had the highest pollution (75% detection samples with 3–5 a.i.) and highest calculated risk (RQ > 1 in 75% of the samples). This is also the river that most directly drains into the protected wetland. Even though pesticide pollution in this area is not as severe as in other parts of Costa Rica, it is imperative that measures are taken, particularly in the surroundings of Mónico River, in order to diminish and mitigate possible detrimental effects to biota in Caño Negro Ramsar Site.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fournier, María Luisa, Echeverría-Sáenz, Silvia, Mena, Freylan, Arias-Andrés, María, de la Cruz, Elba, Ruepert, Clemens
Format: http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 biblioteca
Language:eng
Published: Springer 2017-01-10
Subjects:COSTA RICA, CAÑO NEGRO, PLAGUICIDAS, PESTICIDES, RIESGO, RISK, CONSERVACIÓN DE LA VIDA SILVESTRE, WILDLIFE CONSERVATION, ECOSISTEMAS ACUÁTICOS, AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS, MACROINVERTEBRADOS BENTÓNICOS, BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES, CONTAMINACIÓN, CONTAMINATION, HUMEDALES, TOXICOLOGÍA, SUSTANCIAS TOXICAS, TOXICOLOGY, TOXIC SUBSTANCES, WETLANDS,
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/11056/20732
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-8353-y
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:https:--repositorio.una.ac.cr:11056-20732
record_format koha
institution UNA CR
collection DSpace
country Costa Rica
countrycode CR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-una-cr
tag biblioteca
region America Central
libraryname Biblioteca de la Facultad de Ciencias de la Tierra y el Mar de la UNA CR
language eng
topic COSTA RICA
CAÑO NEGRO
PLAGUICIDAS
PESTICIDES
RIESGO
RISK
CONSERVACIÓN DE LA VIDA SILVESTRE
WILDLIFE CONSERVATION
ECOSISTEMAS ACUÁTICOS
AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS
MACROINVERTEBRADOS BENTÓNICOS
BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES
CONTAMINACIÓN
CONTAMINATION
HUMEDALES
TOXICOLOGÍA
SUSTANCIAS TOXICAS
TOXICOLOGY
TOXIC SUBSTANCES
WETLANDS
COSTA RICA
CAÑO NEGRO
PLAGUICIDAS
PESTICIDES
RIESGO
RISK
CONSERVACIÓN DE LA VIDA SILVESTRE
WILDLIFE CONSERVATION
ECOSISTEMAS ACUÁTICOS
AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS
MACROINVERTEBRADOS BENTÓNICOS
BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES
CONTAMINACIÓN
CONTAMINATION
HUMEDALES
TOXICOLOGÍA
SUSTANCIAS TOXICAS
TOXICOLOGY
TOXIC SUBSTANCES
WETLANDS
spellingShingle COSTA RICA
CAÑO NEGRO
PLAGUICIDAS
PESTICIDES
RIESGO
RISK
CONSERVACIÓN DE LA VIDA SILVESTRE
WILDLIFE CONSERVATION
ECOSISTEMAS ACUÁTICOS
AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS
MACROINVERTEBRADOS BENTÓNICOS
BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES
CONTAMINACIÓN
CONTAMINATION
HUMEDALES
TOXICOLOGÍA
SUSTANCIAS TOXICAS
TOXICOLOGY
TOXIC SUBSTANCES
WETLANDS
COSTA RICA
CAÑO NEGRO
PLAGUICIDAS
PESTICIDES
RIESGO
RISK
CONSERVACIÓN DE LA VIDA SILVESTRE
WILDLIFE CONSERVATION
ECOSISTEMAS ACUÁTICOS
AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS
MACROINVERTEBRADOS BENTÓNICOS
BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES
CONTAMINACIÓN
CONTAMINATION
HUMEDALES
TOXICOLOGÍA
SUSTANCIAS TOXICAS
TOXICOLOGY
TOXIC SUBSTANCES
WETLANDS
Fournier, María Luisa
Echeverría-Sáenz, Silvia
Mena, Freylan
Arias-Andrés, María
de la Cruz, Elba
Ruepert, Clemens
Risk assessment of agriculture impact on the Frío River watershed and Caño Negro Ramsar wetland, Costa Rica
description The Caño Negro Ramsar wetland is a conservation area of great natural and societal value, located in the lower part of the Frío River watershed in the north of Costa Rica. Its aquatic ecosystems may be considered vulnerable to pollution due to recent changes in land use toward agriculture. In 2011 and 2012, quarterly sampling was done at ten sites located in the middle and lower sections of the Frío River Basin that pass through crop areas and later drain into Caño Negro wetland. Pesticide residues, nitrates, sediment concentrations, and diversity of benthic macroinvertebrates and fish biomarkers were studied in the selected sites. Additionally, risk of toxicity was calculated in two different ways: (1) by using a ratio of MEC to hazard concentrations threshold for 5% of species (HC5) to calculate a risk quotient (RQ), and (2) by using a ratio of MEC to available ecotoxicity data of native fish and cladocera for diazinon and ethoprophos, to obtain a risk quotient for native species (RQns). Results indicated that three out of the ten sites (rivers Thiales, Mónico, and Sabogal) showed variable levels of pollution including six different active ingredients (a.i.) of pesticide formulations (herbicides ametryn, bromacil, and diuron; insecticides cypermethrin, diazinon, and ethoprophos). Moreover, potential adverse effects on fishes in Thiales and Mónico rivers were indicated by cholinesterase (ChE) inhibition and glutathione S-transferase (GST) enhancement. Risk evaluations indicated pesticide residues of ametryn, bromacil, and ethoprophos to be exceeding the limits set by MTR, also RQ was high (>1) in 70% of the positive samples for diuron (most frequently found pesticide in water samples), cypermethrin, diazinon, and ethoprophos, and RQns was high for diazinon. Therefore, these substances might be of major concern for the ecological health of aquatic ecosystems in the middle basin of the Frío River. The most critical site was Mónico River, which had the highest pollution (75% detection samples with 3–5 a.i.) and highest calculated risk (RQ > 1 in 75% of the samples). This is also the river that most directly drains into the protected wetland. Even though pesticide pollution in this area is not as severe as in other parts of Costa Rica, it is imperative that measures are taken, particularly in the surroundings of Mónico River, in order to diminish and mitigate possible detrimental effects to biota in Caño Negro Ramsar Site.
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
topic_facet COSTA RICA
CAÑO NEGRO
PLAGUICIDAS
PESTICIDES
RIESGO
RISK
CONSERVACIÓN DE LA VIDA SILVESTRE
WILDLIFE CONSERVATION
ECOSISTEMAS ACUÁTICOS
AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS
MACROINVERTEBRADOS BENTÓNICOS
BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES
CONTAMINACIÓN
CONTAMINATION
HUMEDALES
TOXICOLOGÍA
SUSTANCIAS TOXICAS
TOXICOLOGY
TOXIC SUBSTANCES
WETLANDS
author Fournier, María Luisa
Echeverría-Sáenz, Silvia
Mena, Freylan
Arias-Andrés, María
de la Cruz, Elba
Ruepert, Clemens
author_facet Fournier, María Luisa
Echeverría-Sáenz, Silvia
Mena, Freylan
Arias-Andrés, María
de la Cruz, Elba
Ruepert, Clemens
author_sort Fournier, María Luisa
title Risk assessment of agriculture impact on the Frío River watershed and Caño Negro Ramsar wetland, Costa Rica
title_short Risk assessment of agriculture impact on the Frío River watershed and Caño Negro Ramsar wetland, Costa Rica
title_full Risk assessment of agriculture impact on the Frío River watershed and Caño Negro Ramsar wetland, Costa Rica
title_fullStr Risk assessment of agriculture impact on the Frío River watershed and Caño Negro Ramsar wetland, Costa Rica
title_full_unstemmed Risk assessment of agriculture impact on the Frío River watershed and Caño Negro Ramsar wetland, Costa Rica
title_sort risk assessment of agriculture impact on the frío river watershed and caño negro ramsar wetland, costa rica
publisher Springer
publishDate 2017-01-10
url http://hdl.handle.net/11056/20732
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-8353-y
work_keys_str_mv AT fourniermarialuisa riskassessmentofagricultureimpactonthefrioriverwatershedandcanonegroramsarwetlandcostarica
AT echeverriasaenzsilvia riskassessmentofagricultureimpactonthefrioriverwatershedandcanonegroramsarwetlandcostarica
AT menafreylan riskassessmentofagricultureimpactonthefrioriverwatershedandcanonegroramsarwetlandcostarica
AT ariasandresmaria riskassessmentofagricultureimpactonthefrioriverwatershedandcanonegroramsarwetlandcostarica
AT delacruzelba riskassessmentofagricultureimpactonthefrioriverwatershedandcanonegroramsarwetlandcostarica
AT ruepertclemens riskassessmentofagricultureimpactonthefrioriverwatershedandcanonegroramsarwetlandcostarica
_version_ 1756475326823661568
spelling oai:https:--repositorio.una.ac.cr:11056-207322021-08-05T23:06:08Z Risk assessment of agriculture impact on the Frío River watershed and Caño Negro Ramsar wetland, Costa Rica Fournier, María Luisa Echeverría-Sáenz, Silvia Mena, Freylan Arias-Andrés, María de la Cruz, Elba Ruepert, Clemens COSTA RICA CAÑO NEGRO PLAGUICIDAS PESTICIDES RIESGO RISK CONSERVACIÓN DE LA VIDA SILVESTRE WILDLIFE CONSERVATION ECOSISTEMAS ACUÁTICOS AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS MACROINVERTEBRADOS BENTÓNICOS BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES CONTAMINACIÓN CONTAMINATION HUMEDALES TOXICOLOGÍA SUSTANCIAS TOXICAS TOXICOLOGY TOXIC SUBSTANCES WETLANDS The Caño Negro Ramsar wetland is a conservation area of great natural and societal value, located in the lower part of the Frío River watershed in the north of Costa Rica. Its aquatic ecosystems may be considered vulnerable to pollution due to recent changes in land use toward agriculture. In 2011 and 2012, quarterly sampling was done at ten sites located in the middle and lower sections of the Frío River Basin that pass through crop areas and later drain into Caño Negro wetland. Pesticide residues, nitrates, sediment concentrations, and diversity of benthic macroinvertebrates and fish biomarkers were studied in the selected sites. Additionally, risk of toxicity was calculated in two different ways: (1) by using a ratio of MEC to hazard concentrations threshold for 5% of species (HC5) to calculate a risk quotient (RQ), and (2) by using a ratio of MEC to available ecotoxicity data of native fish and cladocera for diazinon and ethoprophos, to obtain a risk quotient for native species (RQns). Results indicated that three out of the ten sites (rivers Thiales, Mónico, and Sabogal) showed variable levels of pollution including six different active ingredients (a.i.) of pesticide formulations (herbicides ametryn, bromacil, and diuron; insecticides cypermethrin, diazinon, and ethoprophos). Moreover, potential adverse effects on fishes in Thiales and Mónico rivers were indicated by cholinesterase (ChE) inhibition and glutathione S-transferase (GST) enhancement. Risk evaluations indicated pesticide residues of ametryn, bromacil, and ethoprophos to be exceeding the limits set by MTR, also RQ was high (>1) in 70% of the positive samples for diuron (most frequently found pesticide in water samples), cypermethrin, diazinon, and ethoprophos, and RQns was high for diazinon. Therefore, these substances might be of major concern for the ecological health of aquatic ecosystems in the middle basin of the Frío River. The most critical site was Mónico River, which had the highest pollution (75% detection samples with 3–5 a.i.) and highest calculated risk (RQ > 1 in 75% of the samples). This is also the river that most directly drains into the protected wetland. Even though pesticide pollution in this area is not as severe as in other parts of Costa Rica, it is imperative that measures are taken, particularly in the surroundings of Mónico River, in order to diminish and mitigate possible detrimental effects to biota in Caño Negro Ramsar Site. El humedal Ramsar Caño Negro es un área de conservación de gran valor natural y social, ubicado en la parte baja de la cuenca del río Frío en el norte de Costa Rica. Sus ecosistemas acuáticos pueden considerarse vulnerables a la contaminación debido a cambios recientes en el uso de la tierra hacia la agricultura. En 2011 y 2012 se realizaron muestreos trimestrales en diez sitios ubicados en los tramos medio y bajo de la cuenca del río Frío que atraviesan áreas de cultivo y luego desembocan en el humedal de Caño Negro. Se estudiaron residuos de plaguicidas, nitratos, concentraciones de sedimentos y diversidad de macroinvertebrados bentónicos y biomarcadores de peces en los sitios seleccionados. Además, el riesgo de toxicidad se calculó de dos formas diferentes: (1) utilizando una relación de MEC a las concentraciones de peligro para el 5% de las especies (HC5) para calcular un cociente de riesgo (RQ), y (2) utilizando una relación de MEC a los datos de ecotoxicidad disponibles de peces nativos y cladóceras para diazinón y etoprofos, para obtener un cociente de riesgo para especies nativas (RQns). Los resultados indicaron que tres de los diez sitios (ríos Thiales, Mónico y Sabogal) mostraron niveles variables de contaminación, incluidos seis ingredientes activos (ia) diferentes de formulaciones de plaguicidas (herbicidas ametrina, bromacil y diurón; insecticidas cipermetrina, diazinón y etoprofos). ). Además, los posibles efectos adversos en los peces de los ríos Thiales y Mónico fueron indicados por la inhibición de la colinesterasa (ChE) y la mejora de la glutatión S-transferasa (GST). Las evaluaciones de riesgo indicaron que los residuos de plaguicidas de ametrina, bromacilo y etoprofos excedían los límites establecidos por el MTR, además, la RQ era alta (> 1) en el 70% de las muestras positivas para diurón (plaguicida que se encuentra con mayor frecuencia en muestras de agua), cipermetrina, diazinón y etoprofos, y la RQns fue alta para el diazinón. Por tanto, estas sustancias pueden ser de gran preocupación para la salud ecológica de los ecosistemas acuáticos de la cuenca media del río Frío. El sitio más crítico fue el río Mónico, que tuvo la mayor contaminación (75% de muestras de detección con 3-5 a.i.) y el mayor riesgo calculado (RQ> 1 en el 75% de las muestras). Este es también el río que desemboca más directamente en el humedal protegido. Si bien la contaminación por plaguicidas en esta zona no es tan severa como en otras partes de Costa Rica, es imperativo que se tomen medidas, particularmente en los alrededores del río Mónico, con el fin de disminuir y mitigar los posibles efectos perjudiciales a la biota en Caño Negro Ramsar Sitio. O Pantanal Caño Negro Ramsar é uma área de preservação de grande valor natural e social, localizada na parte baixa da bacia do rio Frío, no norte da Costa Rica. Seus ecossistemas aquáticos podem ser considerados vulneráveis ​​à poluição devido às recentes mudanças no uso da terra para a agricultura. Em 2011 e 2012, a amostragem trimestral foi feita em dez locais localizados nas seções média e baixa da Bacia do Rio Frío, que passam por áreas de cultivo e depois drenam para o pantanal de Caño Negro. Resíduos de pesticidas, nitratos, concentrações de sedimentos e diversidade de macroinvertebrados bentônicos e biomarcadores de peixes foram estudados nos locais selecionados. Além disso, o risco de toxicidade foi calculado de duas maneiras diferentes: (1) usando uma proporção de MEC para o limite de concentrações de perigo para 5% das espécies (HC5) para calcular um quociente de risco (RQ), e (2) usando uma proporção de MEC para dados de ecotoxicidade disponíveis de peixes nativos e cladóceros para diazinon e etoprofos, para obter um quociente de risco para espécies nativas (RQns). Os resultados indicaram que três dos dez locais (rios Thiales, Mónico e Sabogal) apresentaram níveis variáveis ​​de poluição, incluindo seis diferentes ingredientes ativos (ai) de formulações de pesticidas (herbicidas ametryn, bromacil e diuron; inseticidas cipermetrina, diazinon e etoprophos ) Além disso, potenciais efeitos adversos em peixes nos rios Thiales e Mónico foram indicados pela inibição da colinesterase (ChE) e aumento da glutationa S-transferase (GST). As avaliações de risco indicaram que os resíduos de pesticidas de ametrina, bromacil e etoprofos excediam os limites estabelecidos pela MTR, também RQ foi alto (> 1) em 70% das amostras positivas para diuron (pesticida mais frequentemente encontrado em amostras de água), cipermetrina, diazinon e etoprofos, e RQns foi alto para o diazinon. Portanto, essas substâncias podem ser uma grande preocupação para a saúde ecológica dos ecossistemas aquáticos na bacia média do rio Frío. O local mais crítico foi o rio Mónico, que teve a maior poluição (75% das amostras de detecção com 3–5 a.i.) e o maior risco calculado (RQ> 1 em 75% das amostras). Este também é o rio que deságua mais diretamente na área úmida protegida. Embora a poluição por agrotóxicos nesta área não seja tão severa como em outras partes da Costa Rica, é imprescindível que sejam tomadas medidas, especialmente nas proximidades do rio Mónico, a fim de diminuir e mitigar possíveis efeitos prejudiciais à biota em Caño Negro Ramsar Local. Universidad Nacional, Costa Rica Instituto Regional de Estudios en Sustancias Tóxicas 2021-08-05T22:54:38Z 2021-08-05T22:54:38Z 2017-01-10 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 13347–13359 http://hdl.handle.net/11056/20732 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-8353-y 10.1007/s11356-016-8353-y eng Acceso abierto application/pdf Springer Environmental Science and Pollution Research vol. 25 13347–13359 2017