Confrontation or Dialogue? Productive Tensions between Decolonial and Intercultural Scholarship

For several decades, intercultural philosophers have produced an extensive body of scholarly work aimed at mutual intercultural understanding. They have focused on the ideal of intercultural dialogue that is supported by dialogue principles and virtuous attitudes. However, this ideal is challenged by decolonial scholarship as one which neglects power inequalities. Decolonial scholars have emphasized the differences between cultures and worldviews, shifting the focus to colonial history and radical alterity. In return, intercultural philosophers have worried about the very possibility of dialogue and mutual understanding in frameworks that use coloniality as their singular pole of analysis. In this paper, we explore the complex relations between decolonial and intercultural philosophies. While we diagnose tensions between both intellectual discourses, we argue that these tensions turn out to be productive: for intercultural philosophers, decolonial challenges provide an opportunity to critically rethink ideals of equitable dialogue in light of colonial inequity and its deep entrenchment in global philosophical encounters. For decolonial scholars, intercultural philosophies provide an opportunity to sharpen positive proposals of equitable encounters beyond the critique of current forms of colonial domination. Rather than developing a general compromise, we propose a contextualist strategy, highlighting that different situations require different responses that can be strongly confrontational or dialogical in character. Decolonial and intercultural motifs serve different functions in the articulation of a critical global philosophy and can sharpen each other without integrating into a middle ground that is “a little bit intercultural” and “a little bit decolonial”.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kramm, Matthias, Ludwig, David, Ngosso, Thierry, Mosima, Pius M., Boogaard, Birgit
Format: Article/Letter to editor biblioteca
Language:English
Subjects:Life Science,
Online Access:https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/confrontation-or-dialogue-productive-tensions-between-decolonial-
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-wur-nl-wurpubs-635820
record_format koha
spelling dig-wur-nl-wurpubs-6358202024-11-05 Kramm, Matthias Ludwig, David Ngosso, Thierry Mosima, Pius M. Boogaard, Birgit Article/Letter to editor Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy 11 (2024) ISSN: 2330-4014 Confrontation or Dialogue? Productive Tensions between Decolonial and Intercultural Scholarship 2024 For several decades, intercultural philosophers have produced an extensive body of scholarly work aimed at mutual intercultural understanding. They have focused on the ideal of intercultural dialogue that is supported by dialogue principles and virtuous attitudes. However, this ideal is challenged by decolonial scholarship as one which neglects power inequalities. Decolonial scholars have emphasized the differences between cultures and worldviews, shifting the focus to colonial history and radical alterity. In return, intercultural philosophers have worried about the very possibility of dialogue and mutual understanding in frameworks that use coloniality as their singular pole of analysis. In this paper, we explore the complex relations between decolonial and intercultural philosophies. While we diagnose tensions between both intellectual discourses, we argue that these tensions turn out to be productive: for intercultural philosophers, decolonial challenges provide an opportunity to critically rethink ideals of equitable dialogue in light of colonial inequity and its deep entrenchment in global philosophical encounters. For decolonial scholars, intercultural philosophies provide an opportunity to sharpen positive proposals of equitable encounters beyond the critique of current forms of colonial domination. Rather than developing a general compromise, we propose a contextualist strategy, highlighting that different situations require different responses that can be strongly confrontational or dialogical in character. Decolonial and intercultural motifs serve different functions in the articulation of a critical global philosophy and can sharpen each other without integrating into a middle ground that is “a little bit intercultural” and “a little bit decolonial”. en application/pdf https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/confrontation-or-dialogue-productive-tensions-between-decolonial- 10.3998/ergo.6163 https://edepot.wur.nl/676064 Life Science (c) open_access_other Wageningen University & Research
institution WUR NL
collection DSpace
country Países bajos
countrycode NL
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-wur-nl
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname WUR Library Netherlands
language English
topic Life Science
Life Science
spellingShingle Life Science
Life Science
Kramm, Matthias
Ludwig, David
Ngosso, Thierry
Mosima, Pius M.
Boogaard, Birgit
Confrontation or Dialogue? Productive Tensions between Decolonial and Intercultural Scholarship
description For several decades, intercultural philosophers have produced an extensive body of scholarly work aimed at mutual intercultural understanding. They have focused on the ideal of intercultural dialogue that is supported by dialogue principles and virtuous attitudes. However, this ideal is challenged by decolonial scholarship as one which neglects power inequalities. Decolonial scholars have emphasized the differences between cultures and worldviews, shifting the focus to colonial history and radical alterity. In return, intercultural philosophers have worried about the very possibility of dialogue and mutual understanding in frameworks that use coloniality as their singular pole of analysis. In this paper, we explore the complex relations between decolonial and intercultural philosophies. While we diagnose tensions between both intellectual discourses, we argue that these tensions turn out to be productive: for intercultural philosophers, decolonial challenges provide an opportunity to critically rethink ideals of equitable dialogue in light of colonial inequity and its deep entrenchment in global philosophical encounters. For decolonial scholars, intercultural philosophies provide an opportunity to sharpen positive proposals of equitable encounters beyond the critique of current forms of colonial domination. Rather than developing a general compromise, we propose a contextualist strategy, highlighting that different situations require different responses that can be strongly confrontational or dialogical in character. Decolonial and intercultural motifs serve different functions in the articulation of a critical global philosophy and can sharpen each other without integrating into a middle ground that is “a little bit intercultural” and “a little bit decolonial”.
format Article/Letter to editor
topic_facet Life Science
author Kramm, Matthias
Ludwig, David
Ngosso, Thierry
Mosima, Pius M.
Boogaard, Birgit
author_facet Kramm, Matthias
Ludwig, David
Ngosso, Thierry
Mosima, Pius M.
Boogaard, Birgit
author_sort Kramm, Matthias
title Confrontation or Dialogue? Productive Tensions between Decolonial and Intercultural Scholarship
title_short Confrontation or Dialogue? Productive Tensions between Decolonial and Intercultural Scholarship
title_full Confrontation or Dialogue? Productive Tensions between Decolonial and Intercultural Scholarship
title_fullStr Confrontation or Dialogue? Productive Tensions between Decolonial and Intercultural Scholarship
title_full_unstemmed Confrontation or Dialogue? Productive Tensions between Decolonial and Intercultural Scholarship
title_sort confrontation or dialogue? productive tensions between decolonial and intercultural scholarship
url https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/confrontation-or-dialogue-productive-tensions-between-decolonial-
work_keys_str_mv AT krammmatthias confrontationordialogueproductivetensionsbetweendecolonialandinterculturalscholarship
AT ludwigdavid confrontationordialogueproductivetensionsbetweendecolonialandinterculturalscholarship
AT ngossothierry confrontationordialogueproductivetensionsbetweendecolonialandinterculturalscholarship
AT mosimapiusm confrontationordialogueproductivetensionsbetweendecolonialandinterculturalscholarship
AT boogaardbirgit confrontationordialogueproductivetensionsbetweendecolonialandinterculturalscholarship
_version_ 1816149624380981248