Comparison of two bioelectrical impedance analyzers for estimating body composition in a cohort of pediatric oncology patients
Background and Aims: Unfavourable changes in body composition are frequently reported in children with cancer. An easy and affordable method to measure body composition is bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). In this study, we compared the Tanita MC780-MA Body Composition Analyzer (Tanita) versus the Bodystat Quadscan 4000 analyzer (Bodystat) to determine whether the Tanita is a suitable analyzer for pediatric oncology patients. Methods: In this study, 84 childhood cancer patients/survivors were included. Per patient 1, 2 or 3 visits were planned during or after treatment. During each visit, BIA measurements were performed first with the Tanita analyzer followed by the Bodystat analyzer. In total, 131 measurements were included. Spearman correlation and concordance correlation coefficients of Lin (CCC) were calculated for fat percentage (Fat%), fat mass (FM) and fat free mass (FFM). Bland-Altman plots were constructed to assess the agreement between both analyzers. Results: Fat%, FM and FFM values differed statistically significantly when comparing the BIA devices (Wilcoxon signed rank test, P<0.001), but absolute differences between medians were small. Spearman correlations and CCC's were high for FM (0.94 and 0.92, respectively) and FFM (0.99 and 0.99, respectively), but moderate for Fat% (0.70 and 0.65, respectively). Bland-Altman plots did not show low differences of means (biases; for Fat%, FM and FFM 2,6%, 0,6 kg and -0,6 kg respectively), but relatively large limits of agreement (-9.77%–15.89%, -5.6 kg–7.2 kg and -5.9 kg–4.6 kg respectively). Conclusions: Based on the good agreement between the Tanita and Bodystat on group level, and the fact that the Tanita is a more patient-friendly device, the Tanita can be used to measure body composition instead of the Bodystat in pediatric oncology patients, making it easier and faster to gain information about body composition.
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article/Letter to editor biblioteca |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | Body composition, Child, Nutrition assessment, Nutritional status, |
Online Access: | https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/comparison-of-two-bioelectrical-impedance-analyzers-for-estimatin |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
dig-wur-nl-wurpubs-632876 |
---|---|
record_format |
koha |
spelling |
dig-wur-nl-wurpubs-6328762024-12-04 Froon-Torenstra, Denise Renting, Lisanne Kok, Dieuwertje E. Vermeij, Wilbert P. Tissing, Wim J.E. Article/Letter to editor Clinical Nutrition Open Science 57 (2024) ISSN: 2667-2685 Comparison of two bioelectrical impedance analyzers for estimating body composition in a cohort of pediatric oncology patients 2024 Background and Aims: Unfavourable changes in body composition are frequently reported in children with cancer. An easy and affordable method to measure body composition is bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). In this study, we compared the Tanita MC780-MA Body Composition Analyzer (Tanita) versus the Bodystat Quadscan 4000 analyzer (Bodystat) to determine whether the Tanita is a suitable analyzer for pediatric oncology patients. Methods: In this study, 84 childhood cancer patients/survivors were included. Per patient 1, 2 or 3 visits were planned during or after treatment. During each visit, BIA measurements were performed first with the Tanita analyzer followed by the Bodystat analyzer. In total, 131 measurements were included. Spearman correlation and concordance correlation coefficients of Lin (CCC) were calculated for fat percentage (Fat%), fat mass (FM) and fat free mass (FFM). Bland-Altman plots were constructed to assess the agreement between both analyzers. Results: Fat%, FM and FFM values differed statistically significantly when comparing the BIA devices (Wilcoxon signed rank test, P<0.001), but absolute differences between medians were small. Spearman correlations and CCC's were high for FM (0.94 and 0.92, respectively) and FFM (0.99 and 0.99, respectively), but moderate for Fat% (0.70 and 0.65, respectively). Bland-Altman plots did not show low differences of means (biases; for Fat%, FM and FFM 2,6%, 0,6 kg and -0,6 kg respectively), but relatively large limits of agreement (-9.77%–15.89%, -5.6 kg–7.2 kg and -5.9 kg–4.6 kg respectively). Conclusions: Based on the good agreement between the Tanita and Bodystat on group level, and the fact that the Tanita is a more patient-friendly device, the Tanita can be used to measure body composition instead of the Bodystat in pediatric oncology patients, making it easier and faster to gain information about body composition. en application/pdf https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/comparison-of-two-bioelectrical-impedance-analyzers-for-estimatin 10.1016/j.nutos.2024.07.006 https://edepot.wur.nl/670655 Body composition Child Nutrition assessment Nutritional status https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Wageningen University & Research |
institution |
WUR NL |
collection |
DSpace |
country |
Países bajos |
countrycode |
NL |
component |
Bibliográfico |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
dig-wur-nl |
tag |
biblioteca |
region |
Europa del Oeste |
libraryname |
WUR Library Netherlands |
language |
English |
topic |
Body composition Child Nutrition assessment Nutritional status Body composition Child Nutrition assessment Nutritional status |
spellingShingle |
Body composition Child Nutrition assessment Nutritional status Body composition Child Nutrition assessment Nutritional status Froon-Torenstra, Denise Renting, Lisanne Kok, Dieuwertje E. Vermeij, Wilbert P. Tissing, Wim J.E. Comparison of two bioelectrical impedance analyzers for estimating body composition in a cohort of pediatric oncology patients |
description |
Background and Aims: Unfavourable changes in body composition are frequently reported in children with cancer. An easy and affordable method to measure body composition is bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). In this study, we compared the Tanita MC780-MA Body Composition Analyzer (Tanita) versus the Bodystat Quadscan 4000 analyzer (Bodystat) to determine whether the Tanita is a suitable analyzer for pediatric oncology patients. Methods: In this study, 84 childhood cancer patients/survivors were included. Per patient 1, 2 or 3 visits were planned during or after treatment. During each visit, BIA measurements were performed first with the Tanita analyzer followed by the Bodystat analyzer. In total, 131 measurements were included. Spearman correlation and concordance correlation coefficients of Lin (CCC) were calculated for fat percentage (Fat%), fat mass (FM) and fat free mass (FFM). Bland-Altman plots were constructed to assess the agreement between both analyzers. Results: Fat%, FM and FFM values differed statistically significantly when comparing the BIA devices (Wilcoxon signed rank test, P<0.001), but absolute differences between medians were small. Spearman correlations and CCC's were high for FM (0.94 and 0.92, respectively) and FFM (0.99 and 0.99, respectively), but moderate for Fat% (0.70 and 0.65, respectively). Bland-Altman plots did not show low differences of means (biases; for Fat%, FM and FFM 2,6%, 0,6 kg and -0,6 kg respectively), but relatively large limits of agreement (-9.77%–15.89%, -5.6 kg–7.2 kg and -5.9 kg–4.6 kg respectively). Conclusions: Based on the good agreement between the Tanita and Bodystat on group level, and the fact that the Tanita is a more patient-friendly device, the Tanita can be used to measure body composition instead of the Bodystat in pediatric oncology patients, making it easier and faster to gain information about body composition. |
format |
Article/Letter to editor |
topic_facet |
Body composition Child Nutrition assessment Nutritional status |
author |
Froon-Torenstra, Denise Renting, Lisanne Kok, Dieuwertje E. Vermeij, Wilbert P. Tissing, Wim J.E. |
author_facet |
Froon-Torenstra, Denise Renting, Lisanne Kok, Dieuwertje E. Vermeij, Wilbert P. Tissing, Wim J.E. |
author_sort |
Froon-Torenstra, Denise |
title |
Comparison of two bioelectrical impedance analyzers for estimating body composition in a cohort of pediatric oncology patients |
title_short |
Comparison of two bioelectrical impedance analyzers for estimating body composition in a cohort of pediatric oncology patients |
title_full |
Comparison of two bioelectrical impedance analyzers for estimating body composition in a cohort of pediatric oncology patients |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of two bioelectrical impedance analyzers for estimating body composition in a cohort of pediatric oncology patients |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of two bioelectrical impedance analyzers for estimating body composition in a cohort of pediatric oncology patients |
title_sort |
comparison of two bioelectrical impedance analyzers for estimating body composition in a cohort of pediatric oncology patients |
url |
https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/comparison-of-two-bioelectrical-impedance-analyzers-for-estimatin |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT froontorenstradenise comparisonoftwobioelectricalimpedanceanalyzersforestimatingbodycompositioninacohortofpediatriconcologypatients AT rentinglisanne comparisonoftwobioelectricalimpedanceanalyzersforestimatingbodycompositioninacohortofpediatriconcologypatients AT kokdieuwertjee comparisonoftwobioelectricalimpedanceanalyzersforestimatingbodycompositioninacohortofpediatriconcologypatients AT vermeijwilbertp comparisonoftwobioelectricalimpedanceanalyzersforestimatingbodycompositioninacohortofpediatriconcologypatients AT tissingwimje comparisonoftwobioelectricalimpedanceanalyzersforestimatingbodycompositioninacohortofpediatriconcologypatients |
_version_ |
1819140436476821504 |