Euthanasie van dieren op het primaire bedrijf

The research described in this report was performed at the request of the Dutch ministry for Economic Affairs. It comprises a review of literature and a pilot experiment on farm with a euthanasia method for young piglets. The literature review is a sequel to an earlier report of Wageningen UR Livestock Research, updated with recent literature as well as literature regarding the relevant species. A schematic overview is presented with scientific knowledge regarding the relevant aspects of the euthanasia methods. Described methods are compared with Verordening (EG) Nr. 1099/2009. In the pilot experiment a commercially available method for euthanasia of young piglets was tested on farm. The literature review focussed on pigs, turkeys, sheep (lambs) and goat (kids). There appeared to be no literature regarding goat, possibly/likely methods that have been researched in sheep can be transferred to goat. A large number of methods were found that have been tested on several or all aspects relevant in euthanasia of animals (i.e. welfare, speed and effectiveness). Methods can be grouped in three categories: mechanical, electrical and gaseous. A fourth category is a lethal injection, but since this method is allowed for veterinarians only, it was not included. Methods aren’t always compliant with Verordening (EG) Nr. 1099/2009, however. Methods that are compliant with this regulation, on the other hand, haven’t always been researched on all relevant aspects. Mechanical methods that scored positive in literature on welfare, speed and effectiveness, are: non-penetrating captive bolt (in turkeys, piglets until 9 kg BW and lambs) and the penetrating captive bolt (in pigs and lambs). Of different gaseous euthanasia methods CO2 has been researched the most, where effect on welfare, speed and effectivity are highly dependent on the execution. Several methods are commercially available, but haven’t been researched on all critical aspects, examples being nitrogen foam (in all mentioned species), the Zephyr-E (in pigs over 9 kg BW, lambs and kids) en possibly the VetCon Aurelia P (in turkeys). Literature also mentions several aspects that require attention, for example the extent of the brain injury caused by mechanical methods. Development of user protocols that ensure safe as well as effective application of methods are mandatory. One specific aspects in those protocols should be the method of fixation of animals during euthanasia. Besides welfare, speed and effectiveness of different methods, the esthetical as well as societal side is an aspects of consideration. In an on farm pilot experiment the Zephyr-E, a non-penetrating captive bolt that has been researched in the UK and Canada, has been tested. In the experiment 25 piglets weighing 0.5 to 9 kg have been euthanized using the Zephyr-E, without using an additional killing method. The effectiveness of the method was assessed by testing several reflexes, as well as brain and heart activity. The use of the Zephyr-E resulted in immediate loss of reflexes (indicative for loss of consciousness). No animal regained consciousness. Practically, applying the Zephyr in very small animals requested careful placement. Fixation of the animal during euthanasia was a point of consideration. After the use of the device, muscle contractions were noticed in all animals and were a concern to the user. It appeared that in very small piglets (<1 kg) a fracture of the skull could occur, which is not allowed in Verordening (EG) Nr. 1099/2009. Possibly, an adjusted in the air pressure could prevent this.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kluivers-Poodt, M., Rommers, J., Reimert, H., Troquet, L., Gerritzen, M.
Format: External research report biblioteca
Language:Dutch
Published: Wageningen Livestock Research
Subjects:animal health, animal production, animal welfare, goats, killing of animals, pigs, poultry, sheep, turkeys, dierenwelzijn, diergezondheid, dierlijke productie, doden van dieren, geiten, kalkoenen, pluimvee, schapen, varkens,
Online Access:https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/euthanasie-van-dieren-op-het-primaire-bedrijf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-wur-nl-wurpubs-593253
record_format koha
institution WUR NL
collection DSpace
country Países bajos
countrycode NL
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-wur-nl
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname WUR Library Netherlands
language Dutch
topic animal health
animal production
animal welfare
goats
killing of animals
pigs
poultry
sheep
turkeys
dierenwelzijn
diergezondheid
dierlijke productie
doden van dieren
geiten
kalkoenen
pluimvee
schapen
varkens
animal health
animal production
animal welfare
goats
killing of animals
pigs
poultry
sheep
turkeys
dierenwelzijn
diergezondheid
dierlijke productie
doden van dieren
geiten
kalkoenen
pluimvee
schapen
varkens
spellingShingle animal health
animal production
animal welfare
goats
killing of animals
pigs
poultry
sheep
turkeys
dierenwelzijn
diergezondheid
dierlijke productie
doden van dieren
geiten
kalkoenen
pluimvee
schapen
varkens
animal health
animal production
animal welfare
goats
killing of animals
pigs
poultry
sheep
turkeys
dierenwelzijn
diergezondheid
dierlijke productie
doden van dieren
geiten
kalkoenen
pluimvee
schapen
varkens
Kluivers-Poodt, M.
Rommers, J.
Reimert, H.
Troquet, L.
Gerritzen, M.
Euthanasie van dieren op het primaire bedrijf
description The research described in this report was performed at the request of the Dutch ministry for Economic Affairs. It comprises a review of literature and a pilot experiment on farm with a euthanasia method for young piglets. The literature review is a sequel to an earlier report of Wageningen UR Livestock Research, updated with recent literature as well as literature regarding the relevant species. A schematic overview is presented with scientific knowledge regarding the relevant aspects of the euthanasia methods. Described methods are compared with Verordening (EG) Nr. 1099/2009. In the pilot experiment a commercially available method for euthanasia of young piglets was tested on farm. The literature review focussed on pigs, turkeys, sheep (lambs) and goat (kids). There appeared to be no literature regarding goat, possibly/likely methods that have been researched in sheep can be transferred to goat. A large number of methods were found that have been tested on several or all aspects relevant in euthanasia of animals (i.e. welfare, speed and effectiveness). Methods can be grouped in three categories: mechanical, electrical and gaseous. A fourth category is a lethal injection, but since this method is allowed for veterinarians only, it was not included. Methods aren’t always compliant with Verordening (EG) Nr. 1099/2009, however. Methods that are compliant with this regulation, on the other hand, haven’t always been researched on all relevant aspects. Mechanical methods that scored positive in literature on welfare, speed and effectiveness, are: non-penetrating captive bolt (in turkeys, piglets until 9 kg BW and lambs) and the penetrating captive bolt (in pigs and lambs). Of different gaseous euthanasia methods CO2 has been researched the most, where effect on welfare, speed and effectivity are highly dependent on the execution. Several methods are commercially available, but haven’t been researched on all critical aspects, examples being nitrogen foam (in all mentioned species), the Zephyr-E (in pigs over 9 kg BW, lambs and kids) en possibly the VetCon Aurelia P (in turkeys). Literature also mentions several aspects that require attention, for example the extent of the brain injury caused by mechanical methods. Development of user protocols that ensure safe as well as effective application of methods are mandatory. One specific aspects in those protocols should be the method of fixation of animals during euthanasia. Besides welfare, speed and effectiveness of different methods, the esthetical as well as societal side is an aspects of consideration. In an on farm pilot experiment the Zephyr-E, a non-penetrating captive bolt that has been researched in the UK and Canada, has been tested. In the experiment 25 piglets weighing 0.5 to 9 kg have been euthanized using the Zephyr-E, without using an additional killing method. The effectiveness of the method was assessed by testing several reflexes, as well as brain and heart activity. The use of the Zephyr-E resulted in immediate loss of reflexes (indicative for loss of consciousness). No animal regained consciousness. Practically, applying the Zephyr in very small animals requested careful placement. Fixation of the animal during euthanasia was a point of consideration. After the use of the device, muscle contractions were noticed in all animals and were a concern to the user. It appeared that in very small piglets (<1 kg) a fracture of the skull could occur, which is not allowed in Verordening (EG) Nr. 1099/2009. Possibly, an adjusted in the air pressure could prevent this.
format External research report
topic_facet animal health
animal production
animal welfare
goats
killing of animals
pigs
poultry
sheep
turkeys
dierenwelzijn
diergezondheid
dierlijke productie
doden van dieren
geiten
kalkoenen
pluimvee
schapen
varkens
author Kluivers-Poodt, M.
Rommers, J.
Reimert, H.
Troquet, L.
Gerritzen, M.
author_facet Kluivers-Poodt, M.
Rommers, J.
Reimert, H.
Troquet, L.
Gerritzen, M.
author_sort Kluivers-Poodt, M.
title Euthanasie van dieren op het primaire bedrijf
title_short Euthanasie van dieren op het primaire bedrijf
title_full Euthanasie van dieren op het primaire bedrijf
title_fullStr Euthanasie van dieren op het primaire bedrijf
title_full_unstemmed Euthanasie van dieren op het primaire bedrijf
title_sort euthanasie van dieren op het primaire bedrijf
publisher Wageningen Livestock Research
url https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/euthanasie-van-dieren-op-het-primaire-bedrijf
work_keys_str_mv AT kluiverspoodtm euthanasievandierenophetprimairebedrijf
AT rommersj euthanasievandierenophetprimairebedrijf
AT reimerth euthanasievandierenophetprimairebedrijf
AT troquetl euthanasievandierenophetprimairebedrijf
AT gerritzenm euthanasievandierenophetprimairebedrijf
_version_ 1813201231892447232
spelling dig-wur-nl-wurpubs-5932532024-08-16 Kluivers-Poodt, M. Rommers, J. Reimert, H. Troquet, L. Gerritzen, M. External research report Euthanasie van dieren op het primaire bedrijf 2014 The research described in this report was performed at the request of the Dutch ministry for Economic Affairs. It comprises a review of literature and a pilot experiment on farm with a euthanasia method for young piglets. The literature review is a sequel to an earlier report of Wageningen UR Livestock Research, updated with recent literature as well as literature regarding the relevant species. A schematic overview is presented with scientific knowledge regarding the relevant aspects of the euthanasia methods. Described methods are compared with Verordening (EG) Nr. 1099/2009. In the pilot experiment a commercially available method for euthanasia of young piglets was tested on farm. The literature review focussed on pigs, turkeys, sheep (lambs) and goat (kids). There appeared to be no literature regarding goat, possibly/likely methods that have been researched in sheep can be transferred to goat. A large number of methods were found that have been tested on several or all aspects relevant in euthanasia of animals (i.e. welfare, speed and effectiveness). Methods can be grouped in three categories: mechanical, electrical and gaseous. A fourth category is a lethal injection, but since this method is allowed for veterinarians only, it was not included. Methods aren’t always compliant with Verordening (EG) Nr. 1099/2009, however. Methods that are compliant with this regulation, on the other hand, haven’t always been researched on all relevant aspects. Mechanical methods that scored positive in literature on welfare, speed and effectiveness, are: non-penetrating captive bolt (in turkeys, piglets until 9 kg BW and lambs) and the penetrating captive bolt (in pigs and lambs). Of different gaseous euthanasia methods CO2 has been researched the most, where effect on welfare, speed and effectivity are highly dependent on the execution. Several methods are commercially available, but haven’t been researched on all critical aspects, examples being nitrogen foam (in all mentioned species), the Zephyr-E (in pigs over 9 kg BW, lambs and kids) en possibly the VetCon Aurelia P (in turkeys). Literature also mentions several aspects that require attention, for example the extent of the brain injury caused by mechanical methods. Development of user protocols that ensure safe as well as effective application of methods are mandatory. One specific aspects in those protocols should be the method of fixation of animals during euthanasia. Besides welfare, speed and effectiveness of different methods, the esthetical as well as societal side is an aspects of consideration. In an on farm pilot experiment the Zephyr-E, a non-penetrating captive bolt that has been researched in the UK and Canada, has been tested. In the experiment 25 piglets weighing 0.5 to 9 kg have been euthanized using the Zephyr-E, without using an additional killing method. The effectiveness of the method was assessed by testing several reflexes, as well as brain and heart activity. The use of the Zephyr-E resulted in immediate loss of reflexes (indicative for loss of consciousness). No animal regained consciousness. Practically, applying the Zephyr in very small animals requested careful placement. Fixation of the animal during euthanasia was a point of consideration. After the use of the device, muscle contractions were noticed in all animals and were a concern to the user. It appeared that in very small piglets (<1 kg) a fracture of the skull could occur, which is not allowed in Verordening (EG) Nr. 1099/2009. Possibly, an adjusted in the air pressure could prevent this. Het in dit rapport beschreven onderzoek is uitgevoerd in opdracht van het Ministerie van Economische Zaken. Het onderzoek betreft de mogelijkheden van het euthanaseren van dieren op het primaire bedrijf. Als eerste is een literatuurstudie uitgevoerd, voortbordurend op een studie van Wageningen UR Livestock Research in 2010, waarin een schematisch overzicht is gemaakt van de wetenschappelijke kennis ten aanzien van euthanasiemethoden op het primaire bedrijf. De beschreven methoden zijn vergeleken met die beschreven in Verordening (EG) Nr. 1099/2009. Als tweede is een praktijkproef uitgevoerd met een commercieel verkrijgbare methode voor het euthanaseren van biggen op het primaire bedrijf. Het literatuuronderzoek was gericht op een aantal specifieke diersoorten, nl. varkens, kalkoenen, geiten- en schapen(lammeren). Over het euthanaseren van geitenlammeren bleek geen literatuur beschikbaar, mogelijk/waarschijnlijk zijn methoden die geschikt zijn voor het euthanaseren van schapenlammeren echter ook geschikt voor geitenlammeren. Een groot aantal methoden is wetenschappelijk op verschillende aspecten onderzocht. Methoden vallen binnen drie categorieën: mechanisch, elektrisch, gas. Een vierde categorie is de dodelijke injectie, maar deze mag uitsluitend door dierenartsen gegeven worden en is niet verder in dit onderzoek meegenomen. De onderzochte methoden in de literatuur zijn niet altijd toegestaan volgens Verordening (EG) Nr. 1099/2009. Van methoden die binnen de verordening vallen, is aan de andere kant niet altijd een wetenschappelijke beoordeling van de relevante criteria in de literatuur te vinden. Mechanische methoden die in een wetenschappelijke opzet positief scoren op de parameters welzijn, snelheid en effectiviteit zijn: het niet-penetrerend penschiettoestel in kalkoenen, pasgeboren biggen en schapenlammeren, en het penetrerend penschiettoestel in varkens en schapenlammeren. Van de verschillende gasmethoden is vooral CO2 onderzocht, waarbij het effect op welzijn, snelheid en effectiviteit sterk afhankelijk is van de exacte uitvoering. Verschillende methoden zijn commercieel beschikbaar en (mogelijk) perspectiefvol voor toepassing op het primaire bedrijf, maar ze kennen vaak onvoldoende wetenschappelijke onderbouwing. Voorbeelden zijn stikstofschuim (bij alle genoemde diersoorten), de Zephyr-E (bij varkens >9 kg, schapen- en geitenlammeren) en mogelijk de VetCon Aurelia P (bij kalkoenen). In de beschikbare literatuur worden verschillende aandachtspunten c.q. onderzoeksvragen genoemd, zoals bijvoorbeeld de aard van het hersenletsel dat met een mechanische methode veroorzaakt wordt. Daarnaast wordt het ontwikkelen van gebruiksprotocollen die een veilige en effectieve toepassing van een methode garanderen, aanbevolen. Een specifiek aspect dat in gebruikersprotocollen aandacht moet krijgen is de fixatie van de te euthanaseren dieren, om een zorgvuldige toepassing te waarborgen. Naast welzijn, snelheid en effectiviteit van methoden is ook de esthetische en maatschappelijke kant van een methode een nadrukkelijk aandachtspunt. In een praktijkproef is de Zephyr-E getest, een niet-penetrerend penschiettoestel dat ontwikkeld en wetenschappelijk onderzocht is in Canada en het Verenigd Koninkrijk. In de proef zijn 25 biggen, variërend van 0,5 tot 9kg, met het apparaat geëuthanaseerd, zonder gebruik van een aanvullende dodingshandeling. De effectiviteit van het apparaat werd aan de hand van de afwezigheid van een aantal reflexen bepaald, aangevuld met metingen van hersenen- (EEG) en hartactiviteit (ECG) bij een deel van de dieren. Het gebruik van het apparaat resulteerde in direct verdwijnen van vrijwel alle geteste reflexen en snel bewustzijnsverlies. In praktisch opzicht behoeft de positionering van het apparaat en de fixatie van de dieren, met name bij kleine dieren, bijzondere aandacht. Geen van de dieren is bij bewustzijn gebleven dan wel gekomen na het gebruik van de Zephyr-E. Echter, het optreden van soms heftige en langdurige spiertrekkingen direct na het schieten waren voor de gebruiker onplezierig om te zien. De kans op het optreden van een schedelfractuur is bij hele kleine biggen aanwezig, mogelijk zou aanpassing van de toegepaste druk van de compressor dit kunnen verminderen. nl Wageningen Livestock Research application/pdf https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/euthanasie-van-dieren-op-het-primaire-bedrijf 10.18174/563306 https://edepot.wur.nl/563306 animal health animal production animal welfare goats killing of animals pigs poultry sheep turkeys dierenwelzijn diergezondheid dierlijke productie doden van dieren geiten kalkoenen pluimvee schapen varkens https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Wageningen University & Research