Impact of food texture modifications on oral processing behaviour, bolus properties and postprandial glucose responses

Several studies have demonstrated food texture manipulation on oral processing behaviour (OPB). We explored the effect of texture-differences of equivalent carbohydrate load on OPB, bolus properties and postprandial glycaemic responses (PPG). In a randomised cross-over, within-subjects, non-blinded design, healthy male participants (N = 39) consumed fixed portions of white rice (WR) and rice cake (RC) while being video recorded to measure microstructural eating behaviours. PPG was compared between test foods over a period of 120-min, and the bolus properties and saliva uptake at swallow were measured for both test foods. RC displayed higher instrumental hardness, chewiness and Young's modulus than WR (p = 0.01), and participants perceived RC as more springy and sticky than WR (p < 0.001). The RC meal was chewed more per bite (p < 0.001) and consumed at a faster eating rate (p = 0.033) than WR. WR bolus particles were smaller at swallow (p < 0.001) with a larger total surface area (p < 0.001), compared to RC. The glucose response for RC was significantly higher during the first 30-min postprandial period (p = 0.010), and lower in the later (30–120 min) postprandial period (p = 0.031) compared to WR. Total blood glucose iAUC did not differ significantly between WR and RC meals despite their large differences in texture, OPB and bolus properties. Oro-sensory exposure time was a significant predictor of glucose iAUC30min for both test meals (RC, p = 0.003; WR, p = 0.029). Saliva uptake in the bolus was significantly positively associated with blood glucose during the first 30-min postprandial period for the RC meal (p = 0.008), but not for WR. We conclude that food texture modifications can influence OPB and bolus properties which are key contributors to the dynamic evolution of the glycaemic response. Total blood glucose responses were the same for both test foods, though differences in oral processing and bolus properties influenced temporal changes in PPG.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Choy, J.Y.M., Goh, A.T., Chatonidi, G., Ponnalagu, S., Wee, S.M.M., Stieger, M., Forde, C.G.
Format: Article/Letter to editor biblioteca
Language:English
Subjects:Bolus particle size, Bolus surface area, Food texture, Glycemic response, Oral processing behaviour, Salivary α–amylase,
Online Access:https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/impact-of-food-texture-modifications-on-oral-processing-behaviour
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-wur-nl-wurpubs-590734
record_format koha
spelling dig-wur-nl-wurpubs-5907342024-10-02 Choy, J.Y.M. Goh, A.T. Chatonidi, G. Ponnalagu, S. Wee, S.M.M. Stieger, M. Forde, C.G. Article/Letter to editor Current Research in Food Science 4 (2021) ISSN: 2665-9271 Impact of food texture modifications on oral processing behaviour, bolus properties and postprandial glucose responses 2021 Several studies have demonstrated food texture manipulation on oral processing behaviour (OPB). We explored the effect of texture-differences of equivalent carbohydrate load on OPB, bolus properties and postprandial glycaemic responses (PPG). In a randomised cross-over, within-subjects, non-blinded design, healthy male participants (N = 39) consumed fixed portions of white rice (WR) and rice cake (RC) while being video recorded to measure microstructural eating behaviours. PPG was compared between test foods over a period of 120-min, and the bolus properties and saliva uptake at swallow were measured for both test foods. RC displayed higher instrumental hardness, chewiness and Young's modulus than WR (p = 0.01), and participants perceived RC as more springy and sticky than WR (p < 0.001). The RC meal was chewed more per bite (p < 0.001) and consumed at a faster eating rate (p = 0.033) than WR. WR bolus particles were smaller at swallow (p < 0.001) with a larger total surface area (p < 0.001), compared to RC. The glucose response for RC was significantly higher during the first 30-min postprandial period (p = 0.010), and lower in the later (30–120 min) postprandial period (p = 0.031) compared to WR. Total blood glucose iAUC did not differ significantly between WR and RC meals despite their large differences in texture, OPB and bolus properties. Oro-sensory exposure time was a significant predictor of glucose iAUC30min for both test meals (RC, p = 0.003; WR, p = 0.029). Saliva uptake in the bolus was significantly positively associated with blood glucose during the first 30-min postprandial period for the RC meal (p = 0.008), but not for WR. We conclude that food texture modifications can influence OPB and bolus properties which are key contributors to the dynamic evolution of the glycaemic response. Total blood glucose responses were the same for both test foods, though differences in oral processing and bolus properties influenced temporal changes in PPG. en application/pdf https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/impact-of-food-texture-modifications-on-oral-processing-behaviour 10.1016/j.crfs.2021.11.018 https://edepot.wur.nl/560264 Bolus particle size Bolus surface area Food texture Glycemic response Oral processing behaviour Salivary α–amylase https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Wageningen University & Research
institution WUR NL
collection DSpace
country Países bajos
countrycode NL
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-wur-nl
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname WUR Library Netherlands
language English
topic Bolus particle size
Bolus surface area
Food texture
Glycemic response
Oral processing behaviour
Salivary α–amylase
Bolus particle size
Bolus surface area
Food texture
Glycemic response
Oral processing behaviour
Salivary α–amylase
spellingShingle Bolus particle size
Bolus surface area
Food texture
Glycemic response
Oral processing behaviour
Salivary α–amylase
Bolus particle size
Bolus surface area
Food texture
Glycemic response
Oral processing behaviour
Salivary α–amylase
Choy, J.Y.M.
Goh, A.T.
Chatonidi, G.
Ponnalagu, S.
Wee, S.M.M.
Stieger, M.
Forde, C.G.
Impact of food texture modifications on oral processing behaviour, bolus properties and postprandial glucose responses
description Several studies have demonstrated food texture manipulation on oral processing behaviour (OPB). We explored the effect of texture-differences of equivalent carbohydrate load on OPB, bolus properties and postprandial glycaemic responses (PPG). In a randomised cross-over, within-subjects, non-blinded design, healthy male participants (N = 39) consumed fixed portions of white rice (WR) and rice cake (RC) while being video recorded to measure microstructural eating behaviours. PPG was compared between test foods over a period of 120-min, and the bolus properties and saliva uptake at swallow were measured for both test foods. RC displayed higher instrumental hardness, chewiness and Young's modulus than WR (p = 0.01), and participants perceived RC as more springy and sticky than WR (p < 0.001). The RC meal was chewed more per bite (p < 0.001) and consumed at a faster eating rate (p = 0.033) than WR. WR bolus particles were smaller at swallow (p < 0.001) with a larger total surface area (p < 0.001), compared to RC. The glucose response for RC was significantly higher during the first 30-min postprandial period (p = 0.010), and lower in the later (30–120 min) postprandial period (p = 0.031) compared to WR. Total blood glucose iAUC did not differ significantly between WR and RC meals despite their large differences in texture, OPB and bolus properties. Oro-sensory exposure time was a significant predictor of glucose iAUC30min for both test meals (RC, p = 0.003; WR, p = 0.029). Saliva uptake in the bolus was significantly positively associated with blood glucose during the first 30-min postprandial period for the RC meal (p = 0.008), but not for WR. We conclude that food texture modifications can influence OPB and bolus properties which are key contributors to the dynamic evolution of the glycaemic response. Total blood glucose responses were the same for both test foods, though differences in oral processing and bolus properties influenced temporal changes in PPG.
format Article/Letter to editor
topic_facet Bolus particle size
Bolus surface area
Food texture
Glycemic response
Oral processing behaviour
Salivary α–amylase
author Choy, J.Y.M.
Goh, A.T.
Chatonidi, G.
Ponnalagu, S.
Wee, S.M.M.
Stieger, M.
Forde, C.G.
author_facet Choy, J.Y.M.
Goh, A.T.
Chatonidi, G.
Ponnalagu, S.
Wee, S.M.M.
Stieger, M.
Forde, C.G.
author_sort Choy, J.Y.M.
title Impact of food texture modifications on oral processing behaviour, bolus properties and postprandial glucose responses
title_short Impact of food texture modifications on oral processing behaviour, bolus properties and postprandial glucose responses
title_full Impact of food texture modifications on oral processing behaviour, bolus properties and postprandial glucose responses
title_fullStr Impact of food texture modifications on oral processing behaviour, bolus properties and postprandial glucose responses
title_full_unstemmed Impact of food texture modifications on oral processing behaviour, bolus properties and postprandial glucose responses
title_sort impact of food texture modifications on oral processing behaviour, bolus properties and postprandial glucose responses
url https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/impact-of-food-texture-modifications-on-oral-processing-behaviour
work_keys_str_mv AT choyjym impactoffoodtexturemodificationsonoralprocessingbehaviourboluspropertiesandpostprandialglucoseresponses
AT gohat impactoffoodtexturemodificationsonoralprocessingbehaviourboluspropertiesandpostprandialglucoseresponses
AT chatonidig impactoffoodtexturemodificationsonoralprocessingbehaviourboluspropertiesandpostprandialglucoseresponses
AT ponnalagus impactoffoodtexturemodificationsonoralprocessingbehaviourboluspropertiesandpostprandialglucoseresponses
AT weesmm impactoffoodtexturemodificationsonoralprocessingbehaviourboluspropertiesandpostprandialglucoseresponses
AT stiegerm impactoffoodtexturemodificationsonoralprocessingbehaviourboluspropertiesandpostprandialglucoseresponses
AT fordecg impactoffoodtexturemodificationsonoralprocessingbehaviourboluspropertiesandpostprandialglucoseresponses
_version_ 1813194998701621248