Meaning-making on the ground : an empirical study on interactional framing in environmental conflicts

Purpose: The study aims to explain the communicative basis of conflicts in which actors stand in opposition in defining a negotiated situation and to deepen knowledge of environmental conflict development, in particular on how frames are (re)shaped through discursive choices in interaction. Design/methodology/approach: This study adopts an interactional approach to framing and 1) identifies the frames shaped and reshaped in four environmental debates and 2) analyzes how framing activities affect the course of the debates. Findings: This study contributes to understanding 1) the interactive nature of conflicts; 2) how the reception and interpretation of issue framing depends on the surrounding identity and characterization framing and 3) how framing activities, like identity work, emotional alignment and reframing, can affect the course of environmental debates toward polarizing or bridging. Research limitations/implications: On a methodological level, this study contributes to communication research by applying methodologies for investigating framing processes on a micro-level. This study investigates interactional framing, considering the perspectives of frame strategists engaging in issue arenas. The study provides an in-depth discourse analysis of the debates but lacks an overview on the entire issue arena regarding this conflict. Practical implications: Skilled actors span boundaries by articulating issue frames that accommodate opponents' concerns and values while demonstrating the added value of the new frame, adjusting identity work in favor of relations with opponents. Furthermore, calibrating emotional intensity offers opportunities to mobilize support. Originality/value: This research investigates which communicative competences are essential to act adequately in environmental conflicts, given their intractable nature, and suggests opportunities for cocreation by making discursive choices. This approach helps to uncover the micro-processes that escalate and de-escalate a conflict.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: van Vuuren-Verkerk, Korien, Aarts, Noelle, van der Stoep, Jan
Format: Article/Letter to editor biblioteca
Language:English
Subjects:Communication practitioner, Conflict, Environmental communication, Framing, Issues management, Public relations, Relationship management, Strategic communication,
Online Access:https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/meaning-making-on-the-ground-an-empirical-study-on-interactional-
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-wur-nl-wurpubs-587753
record_format koha
spelling dig-wur-nl-wurpubs-5877532024-10-02 van Vuuren-Verkerk, Korien Aarts, Noelle van der Stoep, Jan Article/Letter to editor Journal of Communication Management 25 (2021) 4 ISSN: 1363-254X Meaning-making on the ground : an empirical study on interactional framing in environmental conflicts 2021 Purpose: The study aims to explain the communicative basis of conflicts in which actors stand in opposition in defining a negotiated situation and to deepen knowledge of environmental conflict development, in particular on how frames are (re)shaped through discursive choices in interaction. Design/methodology/approach: This study adopts an interactional approach to framing and 1) identifies the frames shaped and reshaped in four environmental debates and 2) analyzes how framing activities affect the course of the debates. Findings: This study contributes to understanding 1) the interactive nature of conflicts; 2) how the reception and interpretation of issue framing depends on the surrounding identity and characterization framing and 3) how framing activities, like identity work, emotional alignment and reframing, can affect the course of environmental debates toward polarizing or bridging. Research limitations/implications: On a methodological level, this study contributes to communication research by applying methodologies for investigating framing processes on a micro-level. This study investigates interactional framing, considering the perspectives of frame strategists engaging in issue arenas. The study provides an in-depth discourse analysis of the debates but lacks an overview on the entire issue arena regarding this conflict. Practical implications: Skilled actors span boundaries by articulating issue frames that accommodate opponents' concerns and values while demonstrating the added value of the new frame, adjusting identity work in favor of relations with opponents. Furthermore, calibrating emotional intensity offers opportunities to mobilize support. Originality/value: This research investigates which communicative competences are essential to act adequately in environmental conflicts, given their intractable nature, and suggests opportunities for cocreation by making discursive choices. This approach helps to uncover the micro-processes that escalate and de-escalate a conflict. en application/pdf https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/meaning-making-on-the-ground-an-empirical-study-on-interactional- 10.1108/JCOM-11-2020-0149 https://edepot.wur.nl/554892 Communication practitioner Conflict Environmental communication Framing Issues management Public relations Relationship management Strategic communication https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Wageningen University & Research
institution WUR NL
collection DSpace
country Países bajos
countrycode NL
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-wur-nl
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname WUR Library Netherlands
language English
topic Communication practitioner
Conflict
Environmental communication
Framing
Issues management
Public relations
Relationship management
Strategic communication
Communication practitioner
Conflict
Environmental communication
Framing
Issues management
Public relations
Relationship management
Strategic communication
spellingShingle Communication practitioner
Conflict
Environmental communication
Framing
Issues management
Public relations
Relationship management
Strategic communication
Communication practitioner
Conflict
Environmental communication
Framing
Issues management
Public relations
Relationship management
Strategic communication
van Vuuren-Verkerk, Korien
Aarts, Noelle
van der Stoep, Jan
Meaning-making on the ground : an empirical study on interactional framing in environmental conflicts
description Purpose: The study aims to explain the communicative basis of conflicts in which actors stand in opposition in defining a negotiated situation and to deepen knowledge of environmental conflict development, in particular on how frames are (re)shaped through discursive choices in interaction. Design/methodology/approach: This study adopts an interactional approach to framing and 1) identifies the frames shaped and reshaped in four environmental debates and 2) analyzes how framing activities affect the course of the debates. Findings: This study contributes to understanding 1) the interactive nature of conflicts; 2) how the reception and interpretation of issue framing depends on the surrounding identity and characterization framing and 3) how framing activities, like identity work, emotional alignment and reframing, can affect the course of environmental debates toward polarizing or bridging. Research limitations/implications: On a methodological level, this study contributes to communication research by applying methodologies for investigating framing processes on a micro-level. This study investigates interactional framing, considering the perspectives of frame strategists engaging in issue arenas. The study provides an in-depth discourse analysis of the debates but lacks an overview on the entire issue arena regarding this conflict. Practical implications: Skilled actors span boundaries by articulating issue frames that accommodate opponents' concerns and values while demonstrating the added value of the new frame, adjusting identity work in favor of relations with opponents. Furthermore, calibrating emotional intensity offers opportunities to mobilize support. Originality/value: This research investigates which communicative competences are essential to act adequately in environmental conflicts, given their intractable nature, and suggests opportunities for cocreation by making discursive choices. This approach helps to uncover the micro-processes that escalate and de-escalate a conflict.
format Article/Letter to editor
topic_facet Communication practitioner
Conflict
Environmental communication
Framing
Issues management
Public relations
Relationship management
Strategic communication
author van Vuuren-Verkerk, Korien
Aarts, Noelle
van der Stoep, Jan
author_facet van Vuuren-Verkerk, Korien
Aarts, Noelle
van der Stoep, Jan
author_sort van Vuuren-Verkerk, Korien
title Meaning-making on the ground : an empirical study on interactional framing in environmental conflicts
title_short Meaning-making on the ground : an empirical study on interactional framing in environmental conflicts
title_full Meaning-making on the ground : an empirical study on interactional framing in environmental conflicts
title_fullStr Meaning-making on the ground : an empirical study on interactional framing in environmental conflicts
title_full_unstemmed Meaning-making on the ground : an empirical study on interactional framing in environmental conflicts
title_sort meaning-making on the ground : an empirical study on interactional framing in environmental conflicts
url https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/meaning-making-on-the-ground-an-empirical-study-on-interactional-
work_keys_str_mv AT vanvuurenverkerkkorien meaningmakingonthegroundanempiricalstudyoninteractionalframinginenvironmentalconflicts
AT aartsnoelle meaningmakingonthegroundanempiricalstudyoninteractionalframinginenvironmentalconflicts
AT vanderstoepjan meaningmakingonthegroundanempiricalstudyoninteractionalframinginenvironmentalconflicts
_version_ 1813438047755173888