Meaning-making on the ground : an empirical study on interactional framing in environmental conflicts
Purpose: The study aims to explain the communicative basis of conflicts in which actors stand in opposition in defining a negotiated situation and to deepen knowledge of environmental conflict development, in particular on how frames are (re)shaped through discursive choices in interaction. Design/methodology/approach: This study adopts an interactional approach to framing and 1) identifies the frames shaped and reshaped in four environmental debates and 2) analyzes how framing activities affect the course of the debates. Findings: This study contributes to understanding 1) the interactive nature of conflicts; 2) how the reception and interpretation of issue framing depends on the surrounding identity and characterization framing and 3) how framing activities, like identity work, emotional alignment and reframing, can affect the course of environmental debates toward polarizing or bridging. Research limitations/implications: On a methodological level, this study contributes to communication research by applying methodologies for investigating framing processes on a micro-level. This study investigates interactional framing, considering the perspectives of frame strategists engaging in issue arenas. The study provides an in-depth discourse analysis of the debates but lacks an overview on the entire issue arena regarding this conflict. Practical implications: Skilled actors span boundaries by articulating issue frames that accommodate opponents' concerns and values while demonstrating the added value of the new frame, adjusting identity work in favor of relations with opponents. Furthermore, calibrating emotional intensity offers opportunities to mobilize support. Originality/value: This research investigates which communicative competences are essential to act adequately in environmental conflicts, given their intractable nature, and suggests opportunities for cocreation by making discursive choices. This approach helps to uncover the micro-processes that escalate and de-escalate a conflict.
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article/Letter to editor biblioteca |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | Communication practitioner, Conflict, Environmental communication, Framing, Issues management, Public relations, Relationship management, Strategic communication, |
Online Access: | https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/meaning-making-on-the-ground-an-empirical-study-on-interactional- |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
dig-wur-nl-wurpubs-587753 |
---|---|
record_format |
koha |
spelling |
dig-wur-nl-wurpubs-5877532024-10-02 van Vuuren-Verkerk, Korien Aarts, Noelle van der Stoep, Jan Article/Letter to editor Journal of Communication Management 25 (2021) 4 ISSN: 1363-254X Meaning-making on the ground : an empirical study on interactional framing in environmental conflicts 2021 Purpose: The study aims to explain the communicative basis of conflicts in which actors stand in opposition in defining a negotiated situation and to deepen knowledge of environmental conflict development, in particular on how frames are (re)shaped through discursive choices in interaction. Design/methodology/approach: This study adopts an interactional approach to framing and 1) identifies the frames shaped and reshaped in four environmental debates and 2) analyzes how framing activities affect the course of the debates. Findings: This study contributes to understanding 1) the interactive nature of conflicts; 2) how the reception and interpretation of issue framing depends on the surrounding identity and characterization framing and 3) how framing activities, like identity work, emotional alignment and reframing, can affect the course of environmental debates toward polarizing or bridging. Research limitations/implications: On a methodological level, this study contributes to communication research by applying methodologies for investigating framing processes on a micro-level. This study investigates interactional framing, considering the perspectives of frame strategists engaging in issue arenas. The study provides an in-depth discourse analysis of the debates but lacks an overview on the entire issue arena regarding this conflict. Practical implications: Skilled actors span boundaries by articulating issue frames that accommodate opponents' concerns and values while demonstrating the added value of the new frame, adjusting identity work in favor of relations with opponents. Furthermore, calibrating emotional intensity offers opportunities to mobilize support. Originality/value: This research investigates which communicative competences are essential to act adequately in environmental conflicts, given their intractable nature, and suggests opportunities for cocreation by making discursive choices. This approach helps to uncover the micro-processes that escalate and de-escalate a conflict. en application/pdf https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/meaning-making-on-the-ground-an-empirical-study-on-interactional- 10.1108/JCOM-11-2020-0149 https://edepot.wur.nl/554892 Communication practitioner Conflict Environmental communication Framing Issues management Public relations Relationship management Strategic communication https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Wageningen University & Research |
institution |
WUR NL |
collection |
DSpace |
country |
Países bajos |
countrycode |
NL |
component |
Bibliográfico |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
dig-wur-nl |
tag |
biblioteca |
region |
Europa del Oeste |
libraryname |
WUR Library Netherlands |
language |
English |
topic |
Communication practitioner Conflict Environmental communication Framing Issues management Public relations Relationship management Strategic communication Communication practitioner Conflict Environmental communication Framing Issues management Public relations Relationship management Strategic communication |
spellingShingle |
Communication practitioner Conflict Environmental communication Framing Issues management Public relations Relationship management Strategic communication Communication practitioner Conflict Environmental communication Framing Issues management Public relations Relationship management Strategic communication van Vuuren-Verkerk, Korien Aarts, Noelle van der Stoep, Jan Meaning-making on the ground : an empirical study on interactional framing in environmental conflicts |
description |
Purpose: The study aims to explain the communicative basis of conflicts in which actors stand in opposition in defining a negotiated situation and to deepen knowledge of environmental conflict development, in particular on how frames are (re)shaped through discursive choices in interaction. Design/methodology/approach: This study adopts an interactional approach to framing and 1) identifies the frames shaped and reshaped in four environmental debates and 2) analyzes how framing activities affect the course of the debates. Findings: This study contributes to understanding 1) the interactive nature of conflicts; 2) how the reception and interpretation of issue framing depends on the surrounding identity and characterization framing and 3) how framing activities, like identity work, emotional alignment and reframing, can affect the course of environmental debates toward polarizing or bridging. Research limitations/implications: On a methodological level, this study contributes to communication research by applying methodologies for investigating framing processes on a micro-level. This study investigates interactional framing, considering the perspectives of frame strategists engaging in issue arenas. The study provides an in-depth discourse analysis of the debates but lacks an overview on the entire issue arena regarding this conflict. Practical implications: Skilled actors span boundaries by articulating issue frames that accommodate opponents' concerns and values while demonstrating the added value of the new frame, adjusting identity work in favor of relations with opponents. Furthermore, calibrating emotional intensity offers opportunities to mobilize support. Originality/value: This research investigates which communicative competences are essential to act adequately in environmental conflicts, given their intractable nature, and suggests opportunities for cocreation by making discursive choices. This approach helps to uncover the micro-processes that escalate and de-escalate a conflict. |
format |
Article/Letter to editor |
topic_facet |
Communication practitioner Conflict Environmental communication Framing Issues management Public relations Relationship management Strategic communication |
author |
van Vuuren-Verkerk, Korien Aarts, Noelle van der Stoep, Jan |
author_facet |
van Vuuren-Verkerk, Korien Aarts, Noelle van der Stoep, Jan |
author_sort |
van Vuuren-Verkerk, Korien |
title |
Meaning-making on the ground : an empirical study on interactional framing in environmental conflicts |
title_short |
Meaning-making on the ground : an empirical study on interactional framing in environmental conflicts |
title_full |
Meaning-making on the ground : an empirical study on interactional framing in environmental conflicts |
title_fullStr |
Meaning-making on the ground : an empirical study on interactional framing in environmental conflicts |
title_full_unstemmed |
Meaning-making on the ground : an empirical study on interactional framing in environmental conflicts |
title_sort |
meaning-making on the ground : an empirical study on interactional framing in environmental conflicts |
url |
https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/meaning-making-on-the-ground-an-empirical-study-on-interactional- |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT vanvuurenverkerkkorien meaningmakingonthegroundanempiricalstudyoninteractionalframinginenvironmentalconflicts AT aartsnoelle meaningmakingonthegroundanempiricalstudyoninteractionalframinginenvironmentalconflicts AT vanderstoepjan meaningmakingonthegroundanempiricalstudyoninteractionalframinginenvironmentalconflicts |
_version_ |
1813438047755173888 |