Differences in ontogenetic and diurnal microhabitat selection by sympatric live-bearing fish species with different reproductive modes

A pregnancy imposes a heavy reproductive burden on females. Some live-bearing species have evolved reproductive adaptations to reduce this burden, which may influence their ability to use specific microhabitats. We investigate whether two such reproductive adaptations, placentation (embryo provisioning via a placenta) and superfetation (the ability to carry multiple broods at various developmental stages), influence microhabitat selection by five sympatric Costa Rican live-bearing fish species (family Poeciliidae). Theory predicts that placentation and superfetation should both reduce the reproductive burden of females during pregnancy, improve their body streamlining, and swimming performance, and consequently allow them to use more performance-demanding microhabitats. Here we apply underwater visual fish surveys to test a key prediction of this hypothesis, which is that the presence of these two reproductive adaptations is correlated with the use of microhabitats in the river that are characterised by a higher-flow velocity. Consistent with our predictions, we observed significant interspecific differences in daytime microhabitat use: species that had both placentation and superfetation were found in deeper and faster-flowing parts of the river, species that lacked both adaptations were confined to shallow slow-flowing areas, and species with one adaptation (i.e. only superfetation) inhabited intermediate areas. This interspecific daytime microhabitat use was strongest in reproductive adults, intermediate in immatures, and absent in juveniles (the latter of which were all found in shallow low-velocity zones), suggesting that ontogeny influences species-specific microhabitat use. Finally, at night, all fishes, regardless of the species or age-class, congregated in shallow slow-flowing waters to rest (sleep) on the river bottom. Taken together, our results suggest that placentation and superfetation may be hitherto unrecognised reproductive features that help to explain differences in ontogenetic and diurnal microhabitat preferences between sympatric live-bearing fish species living in environments characterised by large flow variation.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hagmayer, Andres, Furness, Andrew I., Pollux, Bart J.A.
Format: Article/Letter to editor biblioteca
Language:English
Subjects:Poeciliidae, habitat selection, matrotrophy, placenta, superfetation,
Online Access:https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/differences-in-ontogenetic-and-diurnal-microhabitat-selection-by-
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-wur-nl-wurpubs-586623
record_format koha
spelling dig-wur-nl-wurpubs-5866232024-10-30 Hagmayer, Andres Furness, Andrew I. Pollux, Bart J.A. Article/Letter to editor Freshwater Biology 66 (2021) 9 ISSN: 0046-5070 Differences in ontogenetic and diurnal microhabitat selection by sympatric live-bearing fish species with different reproductive modes 2021 A pregnancy imposes a heavy reproductive burden on females. Some live-bearing species have evolved reproductive adaptations to reduce this burden, which may influence their ability to use specific microhabitats. We investigate whether two such reproductive adaptations, placentation (embryo provisioning via a placenta) and superfetation (the ability to carry multiple broods at various developmental stages), influence microhabitat selection by five sympatric Costa Rican live-bearing fish species (family Poeciliidae). Theory predicts that placentation and superfetation should both reduce the reproductive burden of females during pregnancy, improve their body streamlining, and swimming performance, and consequently allow them to use more performance-demanding microhabitats. Here we apply underwater visual fish surveys to test a key prediction of this hypothesis, which is that the presence of these two reproductive adaptations is correlated with the use of microhabitats in the river that are characterised by a higher-flow velocity. Consistent with our predictions, we observed significant interspecific differences in daytime microhabitat use: species that had both placentation and superfetation were found in deeper and faster-flowing parts of the river, species that lacked both adaptations were confined to shallow slow-flowing areas, and species with one adaptation (i.e. only superfetation) inhabited intermediate areas. This interspecific daytime microhabitat use was strongest in reproductive adults, intermediate in immatures, and absent in juveniles (the latter of which were all found in shallow low-velocity zones), suggesting that ontogeny influences species-specific microhabitat use. Finally, at night, all fishes, regardless of the species or age-class, congregated in shallow slow-flowing waters to rest (sleep) on the river bottom. Taken together, our results suggest that placentation and superfetation may be hitherto unrecognised reproductive features that help to explain differences in ontogenetic and diurnal microhabitat preferences between sympatric live-bearing fish species living in environments characterised by large flow variation. en application/pdf https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/differences-in-ontogenetic-and-diurnal-microhabitat-selection-by- 10.1111/fwb.13786 https://edepot.wur.nl/553338 Poeciliidae habitat selection matrotrophy placenta superfetation https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Wageningen University & Research
institution WUR NL
collection DSpace
country Países bajos
countrycode NL
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-wur-nl
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname WUR Library Netherlands
language English
topic Poeciliidae
habitat selection
matrotrophy
placenta
superfetation
Poeciliidae
habitat selection
matrotrophy
placenta
superfetation
spellingShingle Poeciliidae
habitat selection
matrotrophy
placenta
superfetation
Poeciliidae
habitat selection
matrotrophy
placenta
superfetation
Hagmayer, Andres
Furness, Andrew I.
Pollux, Bart J.A.
Differences in ontogenetic and diurnal microhabitat selection by sympatric live-bearing fish species with different reproductive modes
description A pregnancy imposes a heavy reproductive burden on females. Some live-bearing species have evolved reproductive adaptations to reduce this burden, which may influence their ability to use specific microhabitats. We investigate whether two such reproductive adaptations, placentation (embryo provisioning via a placenta) and superfetation (the ability to carry multiple broods at various developmental stages), influence microhabitat selection by five sympatric Costa Rican live-bearing fish species (family Poeciliidae). Theory predicts that placentation and superfetation should both reduce the reproductive burden of females during pregnancy, improve their body streamlining, and swimming performance, and consequently allow them to use more performance-demanding microhabitats. Here we apply underwater visual fish surveys to test a key prediction of this hypothesis, which is that the presence of these two reproductive adaptations is correlated with the use of microhabitats in the river that are characterised by a higher-flow velocity. Consistent with our predictions, we observed significant interspecific differences in daytime microhabitat use: species that had both placentation and superfetation were found in deeper and faster-flowing parts of the river, species that lacked both adaptations were confined to shallow slow-flowing areas, and species with one adaptation (i.e. only superfetation) inhabited intermediate areas. This interspecific daytime microhabitat use was strongest in reproductive adults, intermediate in immatures, and absent in juveniles (the latter of which were all found in shallow low-velocity zones), suggesting that ontogeny influences species-specific microhabitat use. Finally, at night, all fishes, regardless of the species or age-class, congregated in shallow slow-flowing waters to rest (sleep) on the river bottom. Taken together, our results suggest that placentation and superfetation may be hitherto unrecognised reproductive features that help to explain differences in ontogenetic and diurnal microhabitat preferences between sympatric live-bearing fish species living in environments characterised by large flow variation.
format Article/Letter to editor
topic_facet Poeciliidae
habitat selection
matrotrophy
placenta
superfetation
author Hagmayer, Andres
Furness, Andrew I.
Pollux, Bart J.A.
author_facet Hagmayer, Andres
Furness, Andrew I.
Pollux, Bart J.A.
author_sort Hagmayer, Andres
title Differences in ontogenetic and diurnal microhabitat selection by sympatric live-bearing fish species with different reproductive modes
title_short Differences in ontogenetic and diurnal microhabitat selection by sympatric live-bearing fish species with different reproductive modes
title_full Differences in ontogenetic and diurnal microhabitat selection by sympatric live-bearing fish species with different reproductive modes
title_fullStr Differences in ontogenetic and diurnal microhabitat selection by sympatric live-bearing fish species with different reproductive modes
title_full_unstemmed Differences in ontogenetic and diurnal microhabitat selection by sympatric live-bearing fish species with different reproductive modes
title_sort differences in ontogenetic and diurnal microhabitat selection by sympatric live-bearing fish species with different reproductive modes
url https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/differences-in-ontogenetic-and-diurnal-microhabitat-selection-by-
work_keys_str_mv AT hagmayerandres differencesinontogeneticanddiurnalmicrohabitatselectionbysympatriclivebearingfishspecieswithdifferentreproductivemodes
AT furnessandrewi differencesinontogeneticanddiurnalmicrohabitatselectionbysympatriclivebearingfishspecieswithdifferentreproductivemodes
AT polluxbartja differencesinontogeneticanddiurnalmicrohabitatselectionbysympatriclivebearingfishspecieswithdifferentreproductivemodes
_version_ 1816153886406213632