Comparing rheological, tribological and sensory properties of microfibrillated cellulose dispersions and xanthan gum solutions

Utilisation of plant waste materials contributes to sustainable food production and allows preparation of functional ingredients from natural bio-materials. Microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) from plant waste materials such as citrus peels has been suggested to have potential as “clean label” thickener. This study compared rheological (shear and extensional rheology, hysteresis, yield stress), tribological and sensory properties of MFC dispersions (0.2–2.0 wt%) to xanthan gum (XG) solutions (0.04–4.3 wt%) and linked sensory characteristics to instrumental properties. Concentrations of MFC and XG were chosen so that shear viscosities of MFC dispersions and XG solutions were similar over a large range of shear rates. XG had higher extensional viscosity at high deformation rates than MFC. XG had higher yield stress than MFC at similar shear viscosity. Yield stress increased linearly with increasing concentrations for XG, while it increased exponentially for MFC. Seventy-three consumers evaluated the appearance, flavour, and mouthfeel of all samples using the Rate-All-That-Apply (RATA) method. Sensory differences between MFC and XG were generally larger at higher concentrations. MFC dispersions were less transparent and had more intense cardboard flavour than XG solutions of comparable shear viscosity. At high thickener concentrations, XG solutions were perceived as glossier, stickier, slimier and more mouthcoating than MFC dispersions of similar shear viscosity. Sticky, slimy and mouthcoating perception were correlated with extensional viscosity at higher deformation rates. We conclude that MFC can thicken foods similar to XG while avoiding undesired texture sensations such as mouthcoating, sliminess and stickiness. The flavour and dispersibility of MFC need to be improved further before it can be applied as thickener in foods.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Blok, Annelies E., Bolhuis, Dieuwerke P., Kibbelaar, Heleen V.M., Bonn, Daniel, Velikov, Krassimir P., Stieger, Markus
Format: Article/Letter to editor biblioteca
Language:English
Subjects:Microfibrillated cellulose, Rheology, Sensory, Tribology, Xanthan gum,
Online Access:https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/comparing-rheological-tribological-and-sensory-properties-of-micr
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-wur-nl-wurpubs-586137
record_format koha
spelling dig-wur-nl-wurpubs-5861372024-12-04 Blok, Annelies E. Bolhuis, Dieuwerke P. Kibbelaar, Heleen V.M. Bonn, Daniel Velikov, Krassimir P. Stieger, Markus Article/Letter to editor Food Hydrocolloids 121 (2021) ISSN: 0268-005X Comparing rheological, tribological and sensory properties of microfibrillated cellulose dispersions and xanthan gum solutions 2021 Utilisation of plant waste materials contributes to sustainable food production and allows preparation of functional ingredients from natural bio-materials. Microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) from plant waste materials such as citrus peels has been suggested to have potential as “clean label” thickener. This study compared rheological (shear and extensional rheology, hysteresis, yield stress), tribological and sensory properties of MFC dispersions (0.2–2.0 wt%) to xanthan gum (XG) solutions (0.04–4.3 wt%) and linked sensory characteristics to instrumental properties. Concentrations of MFC and XG were chosen so that shear viscosities of MFC dispersions and XG solutions were similar over a large range of shear rates. XG had higher extensional viscosity at high deformation rates than MFC. XG had higher yield stress than MFC at similar shear viscosity. Yield stress increased linearly with increasing concentrations for XG, while it increased exponentially for MFC. Seventy-three consumers evaluated the appearance, flavour, and mouthfeel of all samples using the Rate-All-That-Apply (RATA) method. Sensory differences between MFC and XG were generally larger at higher concentrations. MFC dispersions were less transparent and had more intense cardboard flavour than XG solutions of comparable shear viscosity. At high thickener concentrations, XG solutions were perceived as glossier, stickier, slimier and more mouthcoating than MFC dispersions of similar shear viscosity. Sticky, slimy and mouthcoating perception were correlated with extensional viscosity at higher deformation rates. We conclude that MFC can thicken foods similar to XG while avoiding undesired texture sensations such as mouthcoating, sliminess and stickiness. The flavour and dispersibility of MFC need to be improved further before it can be applied as thickener in foods. en application/pdf https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/comparing-rheological-tribological-and-sensory-properties-of-micr 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.107052 https://edepot.wur.nl/552633 Microfibrillated cellulose Rheology Sensory Tribology Xanthan gum https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Wageningen University & Research
institution WUR NL
collection DSpace
country Países bajos
countrycode NL
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-wur-nl
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname WUR Library Netherlands
language English
topic Microfibrillated cellulose
Rheology
Sensory
Tribology
Xanthan gum
Microfibrillated cellulose
Rheology
Sensory
Tribology
Xanthan gum
spellingShingle Microfibrillated cellulose
Rheology
Sensory
Tribology
Xanthan gum
Microfibrillated cellulose
Rheology
Sensory
Tribology
Xanthan gum
Blok, Annelies E.
Bolhuis, Dieuwerke P.
Kibbelaar, Heleen V.M.
Bonn, Daniel
Velikov, Krassimir P.
Stieger, Markus
Comparing rheological, tribological and sensory properties of microfibrillated cellulose dispersions and xanthan gum solutions
description Utilisation of plant waste materials contributes to sustainable food production and allows preparation of functional ingredients from natural bio-materials. Microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) from plant waste materials such as citrus peels has been suggested to have potential as “clean label” thickener. This study compared rheological (shear and extensional rheology, hysteresis, yield stress), tribological and sensory properties of MFC dispersions (0.2–2.0 wt%) to xanthan gum (XG) solutions (0.04–4.3 wt%) and linked sensory characteristics to instrumental properties. Concentrations of MFC and XG were chosen so that shear viscosities of MFC dispersions and XG solutions were similar over a large range of shear rates. XG had higher extensional viscosity at high deformation rates than MFC. XG had higher yield stress than MFC at similar shear viscosity. Yield stress increased linearly with increasing concentrations for XG, while it increased exponentially for MFC. Seventy-three consumers evaluated the appearance, flavour, and mouthfeel of all samples using the Rate-All-That-Apply (RATA) method. Sensory differences between MFC and XG were generally larger at higher concentrations. MFC dispersions were less transparent and had more intense cardboard flavour than XG solutions of comparable shear viscosity. At high thickener concentrations, XG solutions were perceived as glossier, stickier, slimier and more mouthcoating than MFC dispersions of similar shear viscosity. Sticky, slimy and mouthcoating perception were correlated with extensional viscosity at higher deformation rates. We conclude that MFC can thicken foods similar to XG while avoiding undesired texture sensations such as mouthcoating, sliminess and stickiness. The flavour and dispersibility of MFC need to be improved further before it can be applied as thickener in foods.
format Article/Letter to editor
topic_facet Microfibrillated cellulose
Rheology
Sensory
Tribology
Xanthan gum
author Blok, Annelies E.
Bolhuis, Dieuwerke P.
Kibbelaar, Heleen V.M.
Bonn, Daniel
Velikov, Krassimir P.
Stieger, Markus
author_facet Blok, Annelies E.
Bolhuis, Dieuwerke P.
Kibbelaar, Heleen V.M.
Bonn, Daniel
Velikov, Krassimir P.
Stieger, Markus
author_sort Blok, Annelies E.
title Comparing rheological, tribological and sensory properties of microfibrillated cellulose dispersions and xanthan gum solutions
title_short Comparing rheological, tribological and sensory properties of microfibrillated cellulose dispersions and xanthan gum solutions
title_full Comparing rheological, tribological and sensory properties of microfibrillated cellulose dispersions and xanthan gum solutions
title_fullStr Comparing rheological, tribological and sensory properties of microfibrillated cellulose dispersions and xanthan gum solutions
title_full_unstemmed Comparing rheological, tribological and sensory properties of microfibrillated cellulose dispersions and xanthan gum solutions
title_sort comparing rheological, tribological and sensory properties of microfibrillated cellulose dispersions and xanthan gum solutions
url https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/comparing-rheological-tribological-and-sensory-properties-of-micr
work_keys_str_mv AT blokanneliese comparingrheologicaltribologicalandsensorypropertiesofmicrofibrillatedcellulosedispersionsandxanthangumsolutions
AT bolhuisdieuwerkep comparingrheologicaltribologicalandsensorypropertiesofmicrofibrillatedcellulosedispersionsandxanthangumsolutions
AT kibbelaarheleenvm comparingrheologicaltribologicalandsensorypropertiesofmicrofibrillatedcellulosedispersionsandxanthangumsolutions
AT bonndaniel comparingrheologicaltribologicalandsensorypropertiesofmicrofibrillatedcellulosedispersionsandxanthangumsolutions
AT velikovkrassimirp comparingrheologicaltribologicalandsensorypropertiesofmicrofibrillatedcellulosedispersionsandxanthangumsolutions
AT stiegermarkus comparingrheologicaltribologicalandsensorypropertiesofmicrofibrillatedcellulosedispersionsandxanthangumsolutions
_version_ 1819143565255639040