Does reduced intraspecific competition of the dominant species in intercrops allow for a higher population density?

Dominant species in intercropping experience less resource competition compared with its monoculture. This reduced competition for resources may allow cultivating the dominant species at an increased density in intercropping to obtain greater yield. However, experimental results are inconclusive when the optimal within row density in the sole crop is not well established. Here, we conducted a two-year experiment to test the hypothesis that optimal within row plant density of dominant species in intercropping would be higher in the intercrop than in the sole crop. We tested three maize densities (3, 4.5, and 6 plants m−1) in both sole maize and two replacement designed intercrops. The row configurations of two intercrops are two rows maize intercropped with four rows peanut (M2P4) and four rows maize intercropped with four rows peanut (M4P4). Peanut was grown at the same plant density of 12 plants m−1 row in both sole crop and intercrops. The results indicated that increasing maize density from the optimal density in monoculture is not worthy of promotion to improve yield in intercropping, which denied our hypothesis. The land equivalent ratios (LER) in the dry year (2017) were higher than the wet year (2016). Maize yields per unit area of the whole intercropping system were highest with densities of 4.5 and 6 plants m−1 row, with no significant difference between these two densities. Maximum maize yields in sole cropping were obtained with maize densities of 6 plants m−1 row. Intercropping provided higher yields at low and intermediate sole crop maize densities, but not at high sole crop maize density. Average land equivalent ratios at 3, 4.5, and 6 plants m−1 of maize were 1.09, 1.04, and 0.95 in 2016, and 1.07, 1.10, and 1.02 in 2017. Our results suggest that intercropping performs better at conditions with less resources than adequate resources.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wang, Qi, Bai, Wei, Sun, Zhanxiang, Zhang, Dongsheng, Zhang, Yue, Wang, Ruonan, Evers, Jochem B., Stomph, Tjeerd Jan, van der Werf, Wopke, Feng, Chen, Zhang, Lizhen
Format: Article/Letter to editor biblioteca
Language:English
Subjects:density, intraspecific competition, land equivalent ratio, row configuration, yield,
Online Access:https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/does-reduced-intraspecific-competition-of-the-dominant-species-in
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-wur-nl-wurpubs-579059
record_format koha
spelling dig-wur-nl-wurpubs-5790592024-12-04 Wang, Qi Bai, Wei Sun, Zhanxiang Zhang, Dongsheng Zhang, Yue Wang, Ruonan Evers, Jochem B. Stomph, Tjeerd Jan van der Werf, Wopke Feng, Chen Zhang, Lizhen Article/Letter to editor Food and Energy Security 10 (2021) 2 ISSN: 2048-3694 Does reduced intraspecific competition of the dominant species in intercrops allow for a higher population density? 2021 Dominant species in intercropping experience less resource competition compared with its monoculture. This reduced competition for resources may allow cultivating the dominant species at an increased density in intercropping to obtain greater yield. However, experimental results are inconclusive when the optimal within row density in the sole crop is not well established. Here, we conducted a two-year experiment to test the hypothesis that optimal within row plant density of dominant species in intercropping would be higher in the intercrop than in the sole crop. We tested three maize densities (3, 4.5, and 6 plants m−1) in both sole maize and two replacement designed intercrops. The row configurations of two intercrops are two rows maize intercropped with four rows peanut (M2P4) and four rows maize intercropped with four rows peanut (M4P4). Peanut was grown at the same plant density of 12 plants m−1 row in both sole crop and intercrops. The results indicated that increasing maize density from the optimal density in monoculture is not worthy of promotion to improve yield in intercropping, which denied our hypothesis. The land equivalent ratios (LER) in the dry year (2017) were higher than the wet year (2016). Maize yields per unit area of the whole intercropping system were highest with densities of 4.5 and 6 plants m−1 row, with no significant difference between these two densities. Maximum maize yields in sole cropping were obtained with maize densities of 6 plants m−1 row. Intercropping provided higher yields at low and intermediate sole crop maize densities, but not at high sole crop maize density. Average land equivalent ratios at 3, 4.5, and 6 plants m−1 of maize were 1.09, 1.04, and 0.95 in 2016, and 1.07, 1.10, and 1.02 in 2017. Our results suggest that intercropping performs better at conditions with less resources than adequate resources. en application/pdf https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/does-reduced-intraspecific-competition-of-the-dominant-species-in 10.1002/fes3.270 https://edepot.wur.nl/541586 density intraspecific competition land equivalent ratio row configuration yield https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Wageningen University & Research
institution WUR NL
collection DSpace
country Países bajos
countrycode NL
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-wur-nl
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname WUR Library Netherlands
language English
topic density
intraspecific competition
land equivalent ratio
row configuration
yield
density
intraspecific competition
land equivalent ratio
row configuration
yield
spellingShingle density
intraspecific competition
land equivalent ratio
row configuration
yield
density
intraspecific competition
land equivalent ratio
row configuration
yield
Wang, Qi
Bai, Wei
Sun, Zhanxiang
Zhang, Dongsheng
Zhang, Yue
Wang, Ruonan
Evers, Jochem B.
Stomph, Tjeerd Jan
van der Werf, Wopke
Feng, Chen
Zhang, Lizhen
Does reduced intraspecific competition of the dominant species in intercrops allow for a higher population density?
description Dominant species in intercropping experience less resource competition compared with its monoculture. This reduced competition for resources may allow cultivating the dominant species at an increased density in intercropping to obtain greater yield. However, experimental results are inconclusive when the optimal within row density in the sole crop is not well established. Here, we conducted a two-year experiment to test the hypothesis that optimal within row plant density of dominant species in intercropping would be higher in the intercrop than in the sole crop. We tested three maize densities (3, 4.5, and 6 plants m−1) in both sole maize and two replacement designed intercrops. The row configurations of two intercrops are two rows maize intercropped with four rows peanut (M2P4) and four rows maize intercropped with four rows peanut (M4P4). Peanut was grown at the same plant density of 12 plants m−1 row in both sole crop and intercrops. The results indicated that increasing maize density from the optimal density in monoculture is not worthy of promotion to improve yield in intercropping, which denied our hypothesis. The land equivalent ratios (LER) in the dry year (2017) were higher than the wet year (2016). Maize yields per unit area of the whole intercropping system were highest with densities of 4.5 and 6 plants m−1 row, with no significant difference between these two densities. Maximum maize yields in sole cropping were obtained with maize densities of 6 plants m−1 row. Intercropping provided higher yields at low and intermediate sole crop maize densities, but not at high sole crop maize density. Average land equivalent ratios at 3, 4.5, and 6 plants m−1 of maize were 1.09, 1.04, and 0.95 in 2016, and 1.07, 1.10, and 1.02 in 2017. Our results suggest that intercropping performs better at conditions with less resources than adequate resources.
format Article/Letter to editor
topic_facet density
intraspecific competition
land equivalent ratio
row configuration
yield
author Wang, Qi
Bai, Wei
Sun, Zhanxiang
Zhang, Dongsheng
Zhang, Yue
Wang, Ruonan
Evers, Jochem B.
Stomph, Tjeerd Jan
van der Werf, Wopke
Feng, Chen
Zhang, Lizhen
author_facet Wang, Qi
Bai, Wei
Sun, Zhanxiang
Zhang, Dongsheng
Zhang, Yue
Wang, Ruonan
Evers, Jochem B.
Stomph, Tjeerd Jan
van der Werf, Wopke
Feng, Chen
Zhang, Lizhen
author_sort Wang, Qi
title Does reduced intraspecific competition of the dominant species in intercrops allow for a higher population density?
title_short Does reduced intraspecific competition of the dominant species in intercrops allow for a higher population density?
title_full Does reduced intraspecific competition of the dominant species in intercrops allow for a higher population density?
title_fullStr Does reduced intraspecific competition of the dominant species in intercrops allow for a higher population density?
title_full_unstemmed Does reduced intraspecific competition of the dominant species in intercrops allow for a higher population density?
title_sort does reduced intraspecific competition of the dominant species in intercrops allow for a higher population density?
url https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/does-reduced-intraspecific-competition-of-the-dominant-species-in
work_keys_str_mv AT wangqi doesreducedintraspecificcompetitionofthedominantspeciesinintercropsallowforahigherpopulationdensity
AT baiwei doesreducedintraspecificcompetitionofthedominantspeciesinintercropsallowforahigherpopulationdensity
AT sunzhanxiang doesreducedintraspecificcompetitionofthedominantspeciesinintercropsallowforahigherpopulationdensity
AT zhangdongsheng doesreducedintraspecificcompetitionofthedominantspeciesinintercropsallowforahigherpopulationdensity
AT zhangyue doesreducedintraspecificcompetitionofthedominantspeciesinintercropsallowforahigherpopulationdensity
AT wangruonan doesreducedintraspecificcompetitionofthedominantspeciesinintercropsallowforahigherpopulationdensity
AT eversjochemb doesreducedintraspecificcompetitionofthedominantspeciesinintercropsallowforahigherpopulationdensity
AT stomphtjeerdjan doesreducedintraspecificcompetitionofthedominantspeciesinintercropsallowforahigherpopulationdensity
AT vanderwerfwopke doesreducedintraspecificcompetitionofthedominantspeciesinintercropsallowforahigherpopulationdensity
AT fengchen doesreducedintraspecificcompetitionofthedominantspeciesinintercropsallowforahigherpopulationdensity
AT zhanglizhen doesreducedintraspecificcompetitionofthedominantspeciesinintercropsallowforahigherpopulationdensity
_version_ 1819144170991779840