Border-row proportion determines strength of interspecific interactions and crop yields in maize/peanut strip intercropping

Strip intercropping enables increases in yields and ecological services in agriculture. Crop yields of species grown in strip intercropping are often related to the yield responses (increases or decreases) in the outer rows of the strips: the border rows. This suggests that the yield response can be modulated by changing the proportion of border rows in the field. Here we studied the relationship between component species yields and proportion of border rows in strip intercrops of maize (Zea mays L.) and peanut (Arachis hypogaea Linn.). We tested four different intercrops with equal proportions of maize and peanut but a different number of rows per strip: M2P2 (2 rows maize intercropped with 2 rows peanut), M4P4, M6P6, M8P8, and sole maize (SM) and sole peanut (SP). The border-row proportions were 1, 0.5, 0.33 and 0.25 for the intercropping M2P2 to M8P8, respectively, and 0 for the pure stands. Yield responded positively to the proportion of border rows for maize, but negatively for peanut, confirming the dominance of maize in this system. Kernel number per ear of maize and pod number per plant of peanut were the main yield components that responded to the border-row proportion. Across three years, relative maize yield (yield in intercropping divided by yield in monoculture), varied from 0.76 in M2P2 to 0.56 in M8P8, while relative peanut yield varied from 0.19 in M2P2 to 0.39 in M8P8. Relative yield total was not significantly different from one in any of the mixtures. Yield of intercropped maize in border rows was 48% higher than in inner rows and the sole crop, in part due to a significantly higher kernel number per ear (13%). Yield of intercropped peanut in border rows was on average 29% lower than in inner rows and 48% lower than in sole peanut. Yield responses in border rows were independent from the border-row proportion. The results show that relative crop yields responded strongly to variation in border-row proportion resulting from variation in strip width from 1 to 4 m. Strip width thus provides a mechanism to control the strength of interspecific plant interactions and relative yields in strip intercropping.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wang, Ruonan, Sun, Zhanxiang, Zhang, Lizhen, Yang, Ning, Feng, Liangshan, Bai, Wei, Zhang, Dongsheng, Wang, Qi, Evers, Jochem B., Liu, Yang, Ren, Jianhong, Zhang, Yue, van der Werf, Wopke
Format: Article/Letter to editor biblioteca
Language:English
Subjects:border-row effect, relative yield total, row configuration, strip cropping, yield components,
Online Access:https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/border-row-proportion-determines-strength-of-interspecific-intera
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-wur-nl-wurpubs-564045
record_format koha
spelling dig-wur-nl-wurpubs-5640452024-12-04 Wang, Ruonan Sun, Zhanxiang Zhang, Lizhen Yang, Ning Feng, Liangshan Bai, Wei Zhang, Dongsheng Wang, Qi Evers, Jochem B. Liu, Yang Ren, Jianhong Zhang, Yue van der Werf, Wopke Article/Letter to editor Field Crops Research 253 (2020) ISSN: 0378-4290 Border-row proportion determines strength of interspecific interactions and crop yields in maize/peanut strip intercropping 2020 Strip intercropping enables increases in yields and ecological services in agriculture. Crop yields of species grown in strip intercropping are often related to the yield responses (increases or decreases) in the outer rows of the strips: the border rows. This suggests that the yield response can be modulated by changing the proportion of border rows in the field. Here we studied the relationship between component species yields and proportion of border rows in strip intercrops of maize (Zea mays L.) and peanut (Arachis hypogaea Linn.). We tested four different intercrops with equal proportions of maize and peanut but a different number of rows per strip: M2P2 (2 rows maize intercropped with 2 rows peanut), M4P4, M6P6, M8P8, and sole maize (SM) and sole peanut (SP). The border-row proportions were 1, 0.5, 0.33 and 0.25 for the intercropping M2P2 to M8P8, respectively, and 0 for the pure stands. Yield responded positively to the proportion of border rows for maize, but negatively for peanut, confirming the dominance of maize in this system. Kernel number per ear of maize and pod number per plant of peanut were the main yield components that responded to the border-row proportion. Across three years, relative maize yield (yield in intercropping divided by yield in monoculture), varied from 0.76 in M2P2 to 0.56 in M8P8, while relative peanut yield varied from 0.19 in M2P2 to 0.39 in M8P8. Relative yield total was not significantly different from one in any of the mixtures. Yield of intercropped maize in border rows was 48% higher than in inner rows and the sole crop, in part due to a significantly higher kernel number per ear (13%). Yield of intercropped peanut in border rows was on average 29% lower than in inner rows and 48% lower than in sole peanut. Yield responses in border rows were independent from the border-row proportion. The results show that relative crop yields responded strongly to variation in border-row proportion resulting from variation in strip width from 1 to 4 m. Strip width thus provides a mechanism to control the strength of interspecific plant interactions and relative yields in strip intercropping. en application/pdf https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/border-row-proportion-determines-strength-of-interspecific-intera 10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107819 https://edepot.wur.nl/521416 border-row effect relative yield total row configuration strip cropping yield components Wageningen University & Research
institution WUR NL
collection DSpace
country Países bajos
countrycode NL
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-wur-nl
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname WUR Library Netherlands
language English
topic border-row effect
relative yield total
row configuration
strip cropping
yield components
border-row effect
relative yield total
row configuration
strip cropping
yield components
spellingShingle border-row effect
relative yield total
row configuration
strip cropping
yield components
border-row effect
relative yield total
row configuration
strip cropping
yield components
Wang, Ruonan
Sun, Zhanxiang
Zhang, Lizhen
Yang, Ning
Feng, Liangshan
Bai, Wei
Zhang, Dongsheng
Wang, Qi
Evers, Jochem B.
Liu, Yang
Ren, Jianhong
Zhang, Yue
van der Werf, Wopke
Border-row proportion determines strength of interspecific interactions and crop yields in maize/peanut strip intercropping
description Strip intercropping enables increases in yields and ecological services in agriculture. Crop yields of species grown in strip intercropping are often related to the yield responses (increases or decreases) in the outer rows of the strips: the border rows. This suggests that the yield response can be modulated by changing the proportion of border rows in the field. Here we studied the relationship between component species yields and proportion of border rows in strip intercrops of maize (Zea mays L.) and peanut (Arachis hypogaea Linn.). We tested four different intercrops with equal proportions of maize and peanut but a different number of rows per strip: M2P2 (2 rows maize intercropped with 2 rows peanut), M4P4, M6P6, M8P8, and sole maize (SM) and sole peanut (SP). The border-row proportions were 1, 0.5, 0.33 and 0.25 for the intercropping M2P2 to M8P8, respectively, and 0 for the pure stands. Yield responded positively to the proportion of border rows for maize, but negatively for peanut, confirming the dominance of maize in this system. Kernel number per ear of maize and pod number per plant of peanut were the main yield components that responded to the border-row proportion. Across three years, relative maize yield (yield in intercropping divided by yield in monoculture), varied from 0.76 in M2P2 to 0.56 in M8P8, while relative peanut yield varied from 0.19 in M2P2 to 0.39 in M8P8. Relative yield total was not significantly different from one in any of the mixtures. Yield of intercropped maize in border rows was 48% higher than in inner rows and the sole crop, in part due to a significantly higher kernel number per ear (13%). Yield of intercropped peanut in border rows was on average 29% lower than in inner rows and 48% lower than in sole peanut. Yield responses in border rows were independent from the border-row proportion. The results show that relative crop yields responded strongly to variation in border-row proportion resulting from variation in strip width from 1 to 4 m. Strip width thus provides a mechanism to control the strength of interspecific plant interactions and relative yields in strip intercropping.
format Article/Letter to editor
topic_facet border-row effect
relative yield total
row configuration
strip cropping
yield components
author Wang, Ruonan
Sun, Zhanxiang
Zhang, Lizhen
Yang, Ning
Feng, Liangshan
Bai, Wei
Zhang, Dongsheng
Wang, Qi
Evers, Jochem B.
Liu, Yang
Ren, Jianhong
Zhang, Yue
van der Werf, Wopke
author_facet Wang, Ruonan
Sun, Zhanxiang
Zhang, Lizhen
Yang, Ning
Feng, Liangshan
Bai, Wei
Zhang, Dongsheng
Wang, Qi
Evers, Jochem B.
Liu, Yang
Ren, Jianhong
Zhang, Yue
van der Werf, Wopke
author_sort Wang, Ruonan
title Border-row proportion determines strength of interspecific interactions and crop yields in maize/peanut strip intercropping
title_short Border-row proportion determines strength of interspecific interactions and crop yields in maize/peanut strip intercropping
title_full Border-row proportion determines strength of interspecific interactions and crop yields in maize/peanut strip intercropping
title_fullStr Border-row proportion determines strength of interspecific interactions and crop yields in maize/peanut strip intercropping
title_full_unstemmed Border-row proportion determines strength of interspecific interactions and crop yields in maize/peanut strip intercropping
title_sort border-row proportion determines strength of interspecific interactions and crop yields in maize/peanut strip intercropping
url https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/border-row-proportion-determines-strength-of-interspecific-intera
work_keys_str_mv AT wangruonan borderrowproportiondeterminesstrengthofinterspecificinteractionsandcropyieldsinmaizepeanutstripintercropping
AT sunzhanxiang borderrowproportiondeterminesstrengthofinterspecificinteractionsandcropyieldsinmaizepeanutstripintercropping
AT zhanglizhen borderrowproportiondeterminesstrengthofinterspecificinteractionsandcropyieldsinmaizepeanutstripintercropping
AT yangning borderrowproportiondeterminesstrengthofinterspecificinteractionsandcropyieldsinmaizepeanutstripintercropping
AT fengliangshan borderrowproportiondeterminesstrengthofinterspecificinteractionsandcropyieldsinmaizepeanutstripintercropping
AT baiwei borderrowproportiondeterminesstrengthofinterspecificinteractionsandcropyieldsinmaizepeanutstripintercropping
AT zhangdongsheng borderrowproportiondeterminesstrengthofinterspecificinteractionsandcropyieldsinmaizepeanutstripintercropping
AT wangqi borderrowproportiondeterminesstrengthofinterspecificinteractionsandcropyieldsinmaizepeanutstripintercropping
AT eversjochemb borderrowproportiondeterminesstrengthofinterspecificinteractionsandcropyieldsinmaizepeanutstripintercropping
AT liuyang borderrowproportiondeterminesstrengthofinterspecificinteractionsandcropyieldsinmaizepeanutstripintercropping
AT renjianhong borderrowproportiondeterminesstrengthofinterspecificinteractionsandcropyieldsinmaizepeanutstripintercropping
AT zhangyue borderrowproportiondeterminesstrengthofinterspecificinteractionsandcropyieldsinmaizepeanutstripintercropping
AT vanderwerfwopke borderrowproportiondeterminesstrengthofinterspecificinteractionsandcropyieldsinmaizepeanutstripintercropping
_version_ 1819145153479180288