Scientific Opinion on the state of the art of Toxicokinetic/Toxicodynamic (TKTD) effect models for regulatory risk assessment of pesticides for aquatic organisms

Following a request from EFSA, the Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR) developed an opinion on the state of the art of Toxicokinetic/Toxicodynamic (TKTD) models and their use in prospective environmental risk assessment (ERA) for pesticides and aquatic organisms. TKTD models are species‐ and compound‐specific and can be used to predict (sub)lethal effects of pesticides under untested (time‐variable) exposure conditions. Three different types of TKTD models are described, viz., (i) the ‘General Unified Threshold models of Survival’ (GUTS), (ii) those based on the Dynamic Energy Budget theory (DEBtox models), and (iii) models for primary producers. All these TKTD models follow the principle that the processes influencing internal exposure of an organism, (TK), are separated from the processes that lead to damage and effects/mortality (TD). GUTS models can be used to predict survival rate under untested exposure conditions. DEBtox models explore the effects on growth and reproduction of toxicants over time, even over the entire life cycle. TKTD model for primary producers and pesticides have been developed for algae, Lemna and Myriophyllum. For all TKTD model calibration, both toxicity data on standard test species and/or additional species can be used. For validation, substance and species‐specific data sets from independent refined‐exposure experiments are required. Based on the current state of the art (e.g. lack of documented and evaluated examples), the DEBtox modelling approach is currently limited to research applications. However, its great potential for future use in prospective ERA for pesticides is recognised. The GUTS model and the Lemna model are considered ready to be used in risk assessment.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ockleford, Colin, Adriaanse, Paulien, Berny, Philippe, Brock, Theodorus, Duquesne, Sabine, Grilli, Sandro, Hernandez‐Jerez, Antonio F., Bennekou, Susanne Hougaard, Klein, Michael, Kuhl, Thomas, Laskowski, Ryszard, Machera, Kyriaki, Pelkonen, Olavi, Pieper, Silvia, Smith, Robert H., Stemmer, Michael, Sundh, Ingvar, Tiktak, Aaldrik, Topping, Christopher J., Wolterink, Gerrit, Cedergreen, Nina, Charles, Sandrine, Focks, Andreas, Reed, Melissa, Arena, Maria, Ippolito, Alessio, Byers, Harry, Teodorovic, Ivana
Format: Article/Letter to editor biblioteca
Language:English
Subjects:Toxicokinetic/Toxicodynamic models, aquatic organisms, model calibration, model evaluation, model validation, prospective risk assessment, time-variable exposure,
Online Access:https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/scientific-opinion-on-the-state-of-the-art-of-toxicokinetictoxico
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-wur-nl-wurpubs-543642
record_format koha
spelling dig-wur-nl-wurpubs-5436422025-01-17 Ockleford, Colin Adriaanse, Paulien Berny, Philippe Brock, Theodorus Duquesne, Sabine Grilli, Sandro Hernandez‐Jerez, Antonio F. Bennekou, Susanne Hougaard Klein, Michael Kuhl, Thomas Laskowski, Ryszard Machera, Kyriaki Pelkonen, Olavi Pieper, Silvia Smith, Robert H. Stemmer, Michael Sundh, Ingvar Tiktak, Aaldrik Topping, Christopher J. Wolterink, Gerrit Cedergreen, Nina Charles, Sandrine Focks, Andreas Reed, Melissa Arena, Maria Ippolito, Alessio Byers, Harry Teodorovic, Ivana Article/Letter to editor EFSA Journal 16 (2018) 8 ISSN: 1831-4732 Scientific Opinion on the state of the art of Toxicokinetic/Toxicodynamic (TKTD) effect models for regulatory risk assessment of pesticides for aquatic organisms 2018 Following a request from EFSA, the Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR) developed an opinion on the state of the art of Toxicokinetic/Toxicodynamic (TKTD) models and their use in prospective environmental risk assessment (ERA) for pesticides and aquatic organisms. TKTD models are species‐ and compound‐specific and can be used to predict (sub)lethal effects of pesticides under untested (time‐variable) exposure conditions. Three different types of TKTD models are described, viz., (i) the ‘General Unified Threshold models of Survival’ (GUTS), (ii) those based on the Dynamic Energy Budget theory (DEBtox models), and (iii) models for primary producers. All these TKTD models follow the principle that the processes influencing internal exposure of an organism, (TK), are separated from the processes that lead to damage and effects/mortality (TD). GUTS models can be used to predict survival rate under untested exposure conditions. DEBtox models explore the effects on growth and reproduction of toxicants over time, even over the entire life cycle. TKTD model for primary producers and pesticides have been developed for algae, Lemna and Myriophyllum. For all TKTD model calibration, both toxicity data on standard test species and/or additional species can be used. For validation, substance and species‐specific data sets from independent refined‐exposure experiments are required. Based on the current state of the art (e.g. lack of documented and evaluated examples), the DEBtox modelling approach is currently limited to research applications. However, its great potential for future use in prospective ERA for pesticides is recognised. The GUTS model and the Lemna model are considered ready to be used in risk assessment. en application/pdf https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/scientific-opinion-on-the-state-of-the-art-of-toxicokinetictoxico 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5377 https://edepot.wur.nl/464723 Toxicokinetic/Toxicodynamic models aquatic organisms model calibration model evaluation model validation prospective risk assessment time-variable exposure https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ Wageningen University & Research
institution WUR NL
collection DSpace
country Países bajos
countrycode NL
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-wur-nl
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname WUR Library Netherlands
language English
topic Toxicokinetic/Toxicodynamic models
aquatic organisms
model calibration
model evaluation
model validation
prospective risk assessment
time-variable exposure
Toxicokinetic/Toxicodynamic models
aquatic organisms
model calibration
model evaluation
model validation
prospective risk assessment
time-variable exposure
spellingShingle Toxicokinetic/Toxicodynamic models
aquatic organisms
model calibration
model evaluation
model validation
prospective risk assessment
time-variable exposure
Toxicokinetic/Toxicodynamic models
aquatic organisms
model calibration
model evaluation
model validation
prospective risk assessment
time-variable exposure
Ockleford, Colin
Adriaanse, Paulien
Berny, Philippe
Brock, Theodorus
Duquesne, Sabine
Grilli, Sandro
Hernandez‐Jerez, Antonio F.
Bennekou, Susanne Hougaard
Klein, Michael
Kuhl, Thomas
Laskowski, Ryszard
Machera, Kyriaki
Pelkonen, Olavi
Pieper, Silvia
Smith, Robert H.
Stemmer, Michael
Sundh, Ingvar
Tiktak, Aaldrik
Topping, Christopher J.
Wolterink, Gerrit
Cedergreen, Nina
Charles, Sandrine
Focks, Andreas
Reed, Melissa
Arena, Maria
Ippolito, Alessio
Byers, Harry
Teodorovic, Ivana
Scientific Opinion on the state of the art of Toxicokinetic/Toxicodynamic (TKTD) effect models for regulatory risk assessment of pesticides for aquatic organisms
description Following a request from EFSA, the Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR) developed an opinion on the state of the art of Toxicokinetic/Toxicodynamic (TKTD) models and their use in prospective environmental risk assessment (ERA) for pesticides and aquatic organisms. TKTD models are species‐ and compound‐specific and can be used to predict (sub)lethal effects of pesticides under untested (time‐variable) exposure conditions. Three different types of TKTD models are described, viz., (i) the ‘General Unified Threshold models of Survival’ (GUTS), (ii) those based on the Dynamic Energy Budget theory (DEBtox models), and (iii) models for primary producers. All these TKTD models follow the principle that the processes influencing internal exposure of an organism, (TK), are separated from the processes that lead to damage and effects/mortality (TD). GUTS models can be used to predict survival rate under untested exposure conditions. DEBtox models explore the effects on growth and reproduction of toxicants over time, even over the entire life cycle. TKTD model for primary producers and pesticides have been developed for algae, Lemna and Myriophyllum. For all TKTD model calibration, both toxicity data on standard test species and/or additional species can be used. For validation, substance and species‐specific data sets from independent refined‐exposure experiments are required. Based on the current state of the art (e.g. lack of documented and evaluated examples), the DEBtox modelling approach is currently limited to research applications. However, its great potential for future use in prospective ERA for pesticides is recognised. The GUTS model and the Lemna model are considered ready to be used in risk assessment.
format Article/Letter to editor
topic_facet Toxicokinetic/Toxicodynamic models
aquatic organisms
model calibration
model evaluation
model validation
prospective risk assessment
time-variable exposure
author Ockleford, Colin
Adriaanse, Paulien
Berny, Philippe
Brock, Theodorus
Duquesne, Sabine
Grilli, Sandro
Hernandez‐Jerez, Antonio F.
Bennekou, Susanne Hougaard
Klein, Michael
Kuhl, Thomas
Laskowski, Ryszard
Machera, Kyriaki
Pelkonen, Olavi
Pieper, Silvia
Smith, Robert H.
Stemmer, Michael
Sundh, Ingvar
Tiktak, Aaldrik
Topping, Christopher J.
Wolterink, Gerrit
Cedergreen, Nina
Charles, Sandrine
Focks, Andreas
Reed, Melissa
Arena, Maria
Ippolito, Alessio
Byers, Harry
Teodorovic, Ivana
author_facet Ockleford, Colin
Adriaanse, Paulien
Berny, Philippe
Brock, Theodorus
Duquesne, Sabine
Grilli, Sandro
Hernandez‐Jerez, Antonio F.
Bennekou, Susanne Hougaard
Klein, Michael
Kuhl, Thomas
Laskowski, Ryszard
Machera, Kyriaki
Pelkonen, Olavi
Pieper, Silvia
Smith, Robert H.
Stemmer, Michael
Sundh, Ingvar
Tiktak, Aaldrik
Topping, Christopher J.
Wolterink, Gerrit
Cedergreen, Nina
Charles, Sandrine
Focks, Andreas
Reed, Melissa
Arena, Maria
Ippolito, Alessio
Byers, Harry
Teodorovic, Ivana
author_sort Ockleford, Colin
title Scientific Opinion on the state of the art of Toxicokinetic/Toxicodynamic (TKTD) effect models for regulatory risk assessment of pesticides for aquatic organisms
title_short Scientific Opinion on the state of the art of Toxicokinetic/Toxicodynamic (TKTD) effect models for regulatory risk assessment of pesticides for aquatic organisms
title_full Scientific Opinion on the state of the art of Toxicokinetic/Toxicodynamic (TKTD) effect models for regulatory risk assessment of pesticides for aquatic organisms
title_fullStr Scientific Opinion on the state of the art of Toxicokinetic/Toxicodynamic (TKTD) effect models for regulatory risk assessment of pesticides for aquatic organisms
title_full_unstemmed Scientific Opinion on the state of the art of Toxicokinetic/Toxicodynamic (TKTD) effect models for regulatory risk assessment of pesticides for aquatic organisms
title_sort scientific opinion on the state of the art of toxicokinetic/toxicodynamic (tktd) effect models for regulatory risk assessment of pesticides for aquatic organisms
url https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/scientific-opinion-on-the-state-of-the-art-of-toxicokinetictoxico
work_keys_str_mv AT ocklefordcolin scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms
AT adriaansepaulien scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms
AT bernyphilippe scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms
AT brocktheodorus scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms
AT duquesnesabine scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms
AT grillisandro scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms
AT hernandezjerezantoniof scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms
AT bennekoususannehougaard scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms
AT kleinmichael scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms
AT kuhlthomas scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms
AT laskowskiryszard scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms
AT macherakyriaki scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms
AT pelkonenolavi scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms
AT piepersilvia scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms
AT smithroberth scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms
AT stemmermichael scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms
AT sundhingvar scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms
AT tiktakaaldrik scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms
AT toppingchristopherj scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms
AT wolterinkgerrit scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms
AT cedergreennina scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms
AT charlessandrine scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms
AT focksandreas scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms
AT reedmelissa scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms
AT arenamaria scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms
AT ippolitoalessio scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms
AT byersharry scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms
AT teodorovicivana scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms
_version_ 1822269354036690944