Scientific Opinion on the state of the art of Toxicokinetic/Toxicodynamic (TKTD) effect models for regulatory risk assessment of pesticides for aquatic organisms
Following a request from EFSA, the Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR) developed an opinion on the state of the art of Toxicokinetic/Toxicodynamic (TKTD) models and their use in prospective environmental risk assessment (ERA) for pesticides and aquatic organisms. TKTD models are species‐ and compound‐specific and can be used to predict (sub)lethal effects of pesticides under untested (time‐variable) exposure conditions. Three different types of TKTD models are described, viz., (i) the ‘General Unified Threshold models of Survival’ (GUTS), (ii) those based on the Dynamic Energy Budget theory (DEBtox models), and (iii) models for primary producers. All these TKTD models follow the principle that the processes influencing internal exposure of an organism, (TK), are separated from the processes that lead to damage and effects/mortality (TD). GUTS models can be used to predict survival rate under untested exposure conditions. DEBtox models explore the effects on growth and reproduction of toxicants over time, even over the entire life cycle. TKTD model for primary producers and pesticides have been developed for algae, Lemna and Myriophyllum. For all TKTD model calibration, both toxicity data on standard test species and/or additional species can be used. For validation, substance and species‐specific data sets from independent refined‐exposure experiments are required. Based on the current state of the art (e.g. lack of documented and evaluated examples), the DEBtox modelling approach is currently limited to research applications. However, its great potential for future use in prospective ERA for pesticides is recognised. The GUTS model and the Lemna model are considered ready to be used in risk assessment.
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article/Letter to editor biblioteca |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | Toxicokinetic/Toxicodynamic models, aquatic organisms, model calibration, model evaluation, model validation, prospective risk assessment, time-variable exposure, |
Online Access: | https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/scientific-opinion-on-the-state-of-the-art-of-toxicokinetictoxico |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
dig-wur-nl-wurpubs-543642 |
---|---|
record_format |
koha |
spelling |
dig-wur-nl-wurpubs-5436422025-01-17 Ockleford, Colin Adriaanse, Paulien Berny, Philippe Brock, Theodorus Duquesne, Sabine Grilli, Sandro Hernandez‐Jerez, Antonio F. Bennekou, Susanne Hougaard Klein, Michael Kuhl, Thomas Laskowski, Ryszard Machera, Kyriaki Pelkonen, Olavi Pieper, Silvia Smith, Robert H. Stemmer, Michael Sundh, Ingvar Tiktak, Aaldrik Topping, Christopher J. Wolterink, Gerrit Cedergreen, Nina Charles, Sandrine Focks, Andreas Reed, Melissa Arena, Maria Ippolito, Alessio Byers, Harry Teodorovic, Ivana Article/Letter to editor EFSA Journal 16 (2018) 8 ISSN: 1831-4732 Scientific Opinion on the state of the art of Toxicokinetic/Toxicodynamic (TKTD) effect models for regulatory risk assessment of pesticides for aquatic organisms 2018 Following a request from EFSA, the Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR) developed an opinion on the state of the art of Toxicokinetic/Toxicodynamic (TKTD) models and their use in prospective environmental risk assessment (ERA) for pesticides and aquatic organisms. TKTD models are species‐ and compound‐specific and can be used to predict (sub)lethal effects of pesticides under untested (time‐variable) exposure conditions. Three different types of TKTD models are described, viz., (i) the ‘General Unified Threshold models of Survival’ (GUTS), (ii) those based on the Dynamic Energy Budget theory (DEBtox models), and (iii) models for primary producers. All these TKTD models follow the principle that the processes influencing internal exposure of an organism, (TK), are separated from the processes that lead to damage and effects/mortality (TD). GUTS models can be used to predict survival rate under untested exposure conditions. DEBtox models explore the effects on growth and reproduction of toxicants over time, even over the entire life cycle. TKTD model for primary producers and pesticides have been developed for algae, Lemna and Myriophyllum. For all TKTD model calibration, both toxicity data on standard test species and/or additional species can be used. For validation, substance and species‐specific data sets from independent refined‐exposure experiments are required. Based on the current state of the art (e.g. lack of documented and evaluated examples), the DEBtox modelling approach is currently limited to research applications. However, its great potential for future use in prospective ERA for pesticides is recognised. The GUTS model and the Lemna model are considered ready to be used in risk assessment. en application/pdf https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/scientific-opinion-on-the-state-of-the-art-of-toxicokinetictoxico 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5377 https://edepot.wur.nl/464723 Toxicokinetic/Toxicodynamic models aquatic organisms model calibration model evaluation model validation prospective risk assessment time-variable exposure https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ Wageningen University & Research |
institution |
WUR NL |
collection |
DSpace |
country |
Países bajos |
countrycode |
NL |
component |
Bibliográfico |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
dig-wur-nl |
tag |
biblioteca |
region |
Europa del Oeste |
libraryname |
WUR Library Netherlands |
language |
English |
topic |
Toxicokinetic/Toxicodynamic models aquatic organisms model calibration model evaluation model validation prospective risk assessment time-variable exposure Toxicokinetic/Toxicodynamic models aquatic organisms model calibration model evaluation model validation prospective risk assessment time-variable exposure |
spellingShingle |
Toxicokinetic/Toxicodynamic models aquatic organisms model calibration model evaluation model validation prospective risk assessment time-variable exposure Toxicokinetic/Toxicodynamic models aquatic organisms model calibration model evaluation model validation prospective risk assessment time-variable exposure Ockleford, Colin Adriaanse, Paulien Berny, Philippe Brock, Theodorus Duquesne, Sabine Grilli, Sandro Hernandez‐Jerez, Antonio F. Bennekou, Susanne Hougaard Klein, Michael Kuhl, Thomas Laskowski, Ryszard Machera, Kyriaki Pelkonen, Olavi Pieper, Silvia Smith, Robert H. Stemmer, Michael Sundh, Ingvar Tiktak, Aaldrik Topping, Christopher J. Wolterink, Gerrit Cedergreen, Nina Charles, Sandrine Focks, Andreas Reed, Melissa Arena, Maria Ippolito, Alessio Byers, Harry Teodorovic, Ivana Scientific Opinion on the state of the art of Toxicokinetic/Toxicodynamic (TKTD) effect models for regulatory risk assessment of pesticides for aquatic organisms |
description |
Following a request from EFSA, the Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR) developed an opinion on the state of the art of Toxicokinetic/Toxicodynamic (TKTD) models and their use in prospective environmental risk assessment (ERA) for pesticides and aquatic organisms. TKTD models are species‐ and compound‐specific and can be used to predict (sub)lethal effects of pesticides under untested (time‐variable) exposure conditions. Three different types of TKTD models are described, viz., (i) the ‘General Unified Threshold models of Survival’ (GUTS), (ii) those based on the Dynamic Energy Budget theory (DEBtox models), and (iii) models for primary producers. All these TKTD models follow the principle that the processes influencing internal exposure of an organism, (TK), are separated from the processes that lead to damage and effects/mortality (TD). GUTS models can be used to predict survival rate under untested exposure conditions. DEBtox models explore the effects on growth and reproduction of toxicants over time, even over the entire life cycle. TKTD model for primary producers and pesticides have been developed for algae, Lemna and Myriophyllum. For all TKTD model calibration, both toxicity data on standard test species and/or additional species can be used. For validation, substance and species‐specific data sets from independent refined‐exposure experiments are required. Based on the current state of the art (e.g. lack of documented and evaluated examples), the DEBtox modelling approach is currently limited to research applications. However, its great potential for future use in prospective ERA for pesticides is recognised. The GUTS model and the Lemna model are considered ready to be used in risk assessment. |
format |
Article/Letter to editor |
topic_facet |
Toxicokinetic/Toxicodynamic models aquatic organisms model calibration model evaluation model validation prospective risk assessment time-variable exposure |
author |
Ockleford, Colin Adriaanse, Paulien Berny, Philippe Brock, Theodorus Duquesne, Sabine Grilli, Sandro Hernandez‐Jerez, Antonio F. Bennekou, Susanne Hougaard Klein, Michael Kuhl, Thomas Laskowski, Ryszard Machera, Kyriaki Pelkonen, Olavi Pieper, Silvia Smith, Robert H. Stemmer, Michael Sundh, Ingvar Tiktak, Aaldrik Topping, Christopher J. Wolterink, Gerrit Cedergreen, Nina Charles, Sandrine Focks, Andreas Reed, Melissa Arena, Maria Ippolito, Alessio Byers, Harry Teodorovic, Ivana |
author_facet |
Ockleford, Colin Adriaanse, Paulien Berny, Philippe Brock, Theodorus Duquesne, Sabine Grilli, Sandro Hernandez‐Jerez, Antonio F. Bennekou, Susanne Hougaard Klein, Michael Kuhl, Thomas Laskowski, Ryszard Machera, Kyriaki Pelkonen, Olavi Pieper, Silvia Smith, Robert H. Stemmer, Michael Sundh, Ingvar Tiktak, Aaldrik Topping, Christopher J. Wolterink, Gerrit Cedergreen, Nina Charles, Sandrine Focks, Andreas Reed, Melissa Arena, Maria Ippolito, Alessio Byers, Harry Teodorovic, Ivana |
author_sort |
Ockleford, Colin |
title |
Scientific Opinion on the state of the art of Toxicokinetic/Toxicodynamic (TKTD) effect models for regulatory risk assessment of pesticides for aquatic organisms |
title_short |
Scientific Opinion on the state of the art of Toxicokinetic/Toxicodynamic (TKTD) effect models for regulatory risk assessment of pesticides for aquatic organisms |
title_full |
Scientific Opinion on the state of the art of Toxicokinetic/Toxicodynamic (TKTD) effect models for regulatory risk assessment of pesticides for aquatic organisms |
title_fullStr |
Scientific Opinion on the state of the art of Toxicokinetic/Toxicodynamic (TKTD) effect models for regulatory risk assessment of pesticides for aquatic organisms |
title_full_unstemmed |
Scientific Opinion on the state of the art of Toxicokinetic/Toxicodynamic (TKTD) effect models for regulatory risk assessment of pesticides for aquatic organisms |
title_sort |
scientific opinion on the state of the art of toxicokinetic/toxicodynamic (tktd) effect models for regulatory risk assessment of pesticides for aquatic organisms |
url |
https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/scientific-opinion-on-the-state-of-the-art-of-toxicokinetictoxico |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ocklefordcolin scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms AT adriaansepaulien scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms AT bernyphilippe scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms AT brocktheodorus scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms AT duquesnesabine scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms AT grillisandro scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms AT hernandezjerezantoniof scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms AT bennekoususannehougaard scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms AT kleinmichael scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms AT kuhlthomas scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms AT laskowskiryszard scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms AT macherakyriaki scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms AT pelkonenolavi scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms AT piepersilvia scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms AT smithroberth scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms AT stemmermichael scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms AT sundhingvar scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms AT tiktakaaldrik scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms AT toppingchristopherj scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms AT wolterinkgerrit scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms AT cedergreennina scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms AT charlessandrine scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms AT focksandreas scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms AT reedmelissa scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms AT arenamaria scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms AT ippolitoalessio scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms AT byersharry scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms AT teodorovicivana scientificopiniononthestateoftheartoftoxicokinetictoxicodynamictktdeffectmodelsforregulatoryriskassessmentofpesticidesforaquaticorganisms |
_version_ |
1822269354036690944 |