The utility of sensor technology to support reproductive management on dairy farms

Since the 1980s, efforts have been made to develop sensors that measure a parameter from an individual cow. The development started with individual cow recognition and was followed by sensors that measure the electrical conductivity of milk and pedometers that measure activity. Some sensors like activity meters, electrical conductivity, weight floors and somatic cell count sensors are commercially available. Adoption has in general been low and mainly driven by the AMS, with a clear exception for estrus detection. In practice, the economic benefits of using sensor systems has not been proven. So, to make sensors live up to their full potential there is a need for research to shift from technical development towards practical applications and integration with operational farm management. Estrus detection sensors can have a good detection performance and are currently applied by farmers in practice, therefore this thesis focusses on sensors that support reproductive management. The main objective of this thesis is to study the utility of sensor technology to support reproductive management on dairy farms. This main objective was split in five sub objectives that each study a part of the main objective and were discussed in the separate chapters of this thesis. We demonstrated that utility of sensors for reproductive management can be found in economic benefits (estrus and calving detection), reduction of labor (calving and estrus detection) and more detailed management information (prognosis of insemination success). So, automated estrus detection aids reproductive management. From this thesis the following conclusions can be drawn: The developed theoretical framework describes four levels of sensor development, which should all be included in proper development of sensor systems. The literature review showed that no studies developed sensor systems with regard to management and decision support. It was possible to improve the prediction of the start of calving compared to a model that only uses the expected calving date. However, predicting the start of calving within an hour was not possible with a high sensitivity and specificity. There was financial merit in the use of calving detection, because the sensor system enables more timely intervention by the farmer. The uncertainty about the positive effects was large, which caused a wide range in the simulated financial benefits. Investment in a sensor for estrus detection was on average profitable with a return on investment of 11%. Profitability was influenced most by the heuristic culling rules and the expected increase of the estrus detection rate between detection by visual observation and the sensor. Routinely collected farm data can be used to estimate a prognosis on insemination success and be used to determine whether an individual cow has a higher or lower than average likelihood of insemination success. Integration of this prognostic model with an estrus detection sensor has potential. Currently farmers only adopt sensors for estrus detection or because they were standard with an AMS. A reason for this is that sensor systems do not produce clear information for farmers. Sensor technology should be focused on management support of applications. Labor benefits of sensors are important for adoption of sensors by farmers, farmers value flexibility, increased family time and less physical workload as benefits. However, economic evaluations of technical solutions are unable to quantify these benefits. Sensor research should consider the preference of farmers regarding labor. For the appraisal of sensor technology new methods to value labor benefits of sensor are needed. Furthermore, in sensor development societal acceptance should be an important consideration. Animal rights activists may frame the use of sensors as a form of industrialized farming. Only using technical arguments and considerations to explain the benefits of sensors will hamper the societal acceptance of modern dairy farming. Application of sensors on dairy farms should be communicated smartly to society in terms that relate the values of citizens.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rutten, C.J.
Other Authors: Hogeveen, H.
Format: Doctoral thesis biblioteca
Language:English
Published: Wageningen University
Subjects:activity, agricultural economics, animal health, calving, dairy cattle, dairy farming, dairy farms, management, reproduction, reproductive behaviour, sensors, technology, activiteit, agrarische economie, bedrijfsvoering, diergezondheid, kalven, melkvee, melkveebedrijven, melkveehouderij, technologie, voortplanting, voortplantingsgedrag,
Online Access:https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/the-utility-of-sensor-technology-to-support-reproductive-manageme
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-wur-nl-wurpubs-523228
record_format koha
institution WUR NL
collection DSpace
country Países bajos
countrycode NL
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-wur-nl
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname WUR Library Netherlands
language English
topic activity
agricultural economics
animal health
calving
dairy cattle
dairy farming
dairy farms
management
reproduction
reproductive behaviour
sensors
technology
activiteit
agrarische economie
bedrijfsvoering
diergezondheid
kalven
melkvee
melkveebedrijven
melkveehouderij
sensors
technologie
voortplanting
voortplantingsgedrag
activity
agricultural economics
animal health
calving
dairy cattle
dairy farming
dairy farms
management
reproduction
reproductive behaviour
sensors
technology
activiteit
agrarische economie
bedrijfsvoering
diergezondheid
kalven
melkvee
melkveebedrijven
melkveehouderij
sensors
technologie
voortplanting
voortplantingsgedrag
spellingShingle activity
agricultural economics
animal health
calving
dairy cattle
dairy farming
dairy farms
management
reproduction
reproductive behaviour
sensors
technology
activiteit
agrarische economie
bedrijfsvoering
diergezondheid
kalven
melkvee
melkveebedrijven
melkveehouderij
sensors
technologie
voortplanting
voortplantingsgedrag
activity
agricultural economics
animal health
calving
dairy cattle
dairy farming
dairy farms
management
reproduction
reproductive behaviour
sensors
technology
activiteit
agrarische economie
bedrijfsvoering
diergezondheid
kalven
melkvee
melkveebedrijven
melkveehouderij
sensors
technologie
voortplanting
voortplantingsgedrag
Rutten, C.J.
The utility of sensor technology to support reproductive management on dairy farms
description Since the 1980s, efforts have been made to develop sensors that measure a parameter from an individual cow. The development started with individual cow recognition and was followed by sensors that measure the electrical conductivity of milk and pedometers that measure activity. Some sensors like activity meters, electrical conductivity, weight floors and somatic cell count sensors are commercially available. Adoption has in general been low and mainly driven by the AMS, with a clear exception for estrus detection. In practice, the economic benefits of using sensor systems has not been proven. So, to make sensors live up to their full potential there is a need for research to shift from technical development towards practical applications and integration with operational farm management. Estrus detection sensors can have a good detection performance and are currently applied by farmers in practice, therefore this thesis focusses on sensors that support reproductive management. The main objective of this thesis is to study the utility of sensor technology to support reproductive management on dairy farms. This main objective was split in five sub objectives that each study a part of the main objective and were discussed in the separate chapters of this thesis. We demonstrated that utility of sensors for reproductive management can be found in economic benefits (estrus and calving detection), reduction of labor (calving and estrus detection) and more detailed management information (prognosis of insemination success). So, automated estrus detection aids reproductive management. From this thesis the following conclusions can be drawn: The developed theoretical framework describes four levels of sensor development, which should all be included in proper development of sensor systems. The literature review showed that no studies developed sensor systems with regard to management and decision support. It was possible to improve the prediction of the start of calving compared to a model that only uses the expected calving date. However, predicting the start of calving within an hour was not possible with a high sensitivity and specificity. There was financial merit in the use of calving detection, because the sensor system enables more timely intervention by the farmer. The uncertainty about the positive effects was large, which caused a wide range in the simulated financial benefits. Investment in a sensor for estrus detection was on average profitable with a return on investment of 11%. Profitability was influenced most by the heuristic culling rules and the expected increase of the estrus detection rate between detection by visual observation and the sensor. Routinely collected farm data can be used to estimate a prognosis on insemination success and be used to determine whether an individual cow has a higher or lower than average likelihood of insemination success. Integration of this prognostic model with an estrus detection sensor has potential. Currently farmers only adopt sensors for estrus detection or because they were standard with an AMS. A reason for this is that sensor systems do not produce clear information for farmers. Sensor technology should be focused on management support of applications. Labor benefits of sensors are important for adoption of sensors by farmers, farmers value flexibility, increased family time and less physical workload as benefits. However, economic evaluations of technical solutions are unable to quantify these benefits. Sensor research should consider the preference of farmers regarding labor. For the appraisal of sensor technology new methods to value labor benefits of sensor are needed. Furthermore, in sensor development societal acceptance should be an important consideration. Animal rights activists may frame the use of sensors as a form of industrialized farming. Only using technical arguments and considerations to explain the benefits of sensors will hamper the societal acceptance of modern dairy farming. Application of sensors on dairy farms should be communicated smartly to society in terms that relate the values of citizens.
author2 Hogeveen, H.
author_facet Hogeveen, H.
Rutten, C.J.
format Doctoral thesis
topic_facet activity
agricultural economics
animal health
calving
dairy cattle
dairy farming
dairy farms
management
reproduction
reproductive behaviour
sensors
technology
activiteit
agrarische economie
bedrijfsvoering
diergezondheid
kalven
melkvee
melkveebedrijven
melkveehouderij
sensors
technologie
voortplanting
voortplantingsgedrag
author Rutten, C.J.
author_sort Rutten, C.J.
title The utility of sensor technology to support reproductive management on dairy farms
title_short The utility of sensor technology to support reproductive management on dairy farms
title_full The utility of sensor technology to support reproductive management on dairy farms
title_fullStr The utility of sensor technology to support reproductive management on dairy farms
title_full_unstemmed The utility of sensor technology to support reproductive management on dairy farms
title_sort utility of sensor technology to support reproductive management on dairy farms
publisher Wageningen University
url https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/the-utility-of-sensor-technology-to-support-reproductive-manageme
work_keys_str_mv AT ruttencj theutilityofsensortechnologytosupportreproductivemanagementondairyfarms
AT ruttencj utilityofsensortechnologytosupportreproductivemanagementondairyfarms
_version_ 1813198992479092736
spelling dig-wur-nl-wurpubs-5232282024-02-15 Rutten, C.J. Hogeveen, H. Nielen, M. Steeneveld, W. Doctoral thesis The utility of sensor technology to support reproductive management on dairy farms 2017 Since the 1980s, efforts have been made to develop sensors that measure a parameter from an individual cow. The development started with individual cow recognition and was followed by sensors that measure the electrical conductivity of milk and pedometers that measure activity. Some sensors like activity meters, electrical conductivity, weight floors and somatic cell count sensors are commercially available. Adoption has in general been low and mainly driven by the AMS, with a clear exception for estrus detection. In practice, the economic benefits of using sensor systems has not been proven. So, to make sensors live up to their full potential there is a need for research to shift from technical development towards practical applications and integration with operational farm management. Estrus detection sensors can have a good detection performance and are currently applied by farmers in practice, therefore this thesis focusses on sensors that support reproductive management. The main objective of this thesis is to study the utility of sensor technology to support reproductive management on dairy farms. This main objective was split in five sub objectives that each study a part of the main objective and were discussed in the separate chapters of this thesis. We demonstrated that utility of sensors for reproductive management can be found in economic benefits (estrus and calving detection), reduction of labor (calving and estrus detection) and more detailed management information (prognosis of insemination success). So, automated estrus detection aids reproductive management. From this thesis the following conclusions can be drawn: The developed theoretical framework describes four levels of sensor development, which should all be included in proper development of sensor systems. The literature review showed that no studies developed sensor systems with regard to management and decision support. It was possible to improve the prediction of the start of calving compared to a model that only uses the expected calving date. However, predicting the start of calving within an hour was not possible with a high sensitivity and specificity. There was financial merit in the use of calving detection, because the sensor system enables more timely intervention by the farmer. The uncertainty about the positive effects was large, which caused a wide range in the simulated financial benefits. Investment in a sensor for estrus detection was on average profitable with a return on investment of 11%. Profitability was influenced most by the heuristic culling rules and the expected increase of the estrus detection rate between detection by visual observation and the sensor. Routinely collected farm data can be used to estimate a prognosis on insemination success and be used to determine whether an individual cow has a higher or lower than average likelihood of insemination success. Integration of this prognostic model with an estrus detection sensor has potential. Currently farmers only adopt sensors for estrus detection or because they were standard with an AMS. A reason for this is that sensor systems do not produce clear information for farmers. Sensor technology should be focused on management support of applications. Labor benefits of sensors are important for adoption of sensors by farmers, farmers value flexibility, increased family time and less physical workload as benefits. However, economic evaluations of technical solutions are unable to quantify these benefits. Sensor research should consider the preference of farmers regarding labor. For the appraisal of sensor technology new methods to value labor benefits of sensor are needed. Furthermore, in sensor development societal acceptance should be an important consideration. Animal rights activists may frame the use of sensors as a form of industrialized farming. Only using technical arguments and considerations to explain the benefits of sensors will hamper the societal acceptance of modern dairy farming. Application of sensors on dairy farms should be communicated smartly to society in terms that relate the values of citizens. en Wageningen University application/pdf https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/the-utility-of-sensor-technology-to-support-reproductive-manageme 10.18174/413664 https://edepot.wur.nl/413664 activity agricultural economics animal health calving dairy cattle dairy farming dairy farms management reproduction reproductive behaviour sensors technology activiteit agrarische economie bedrijfsvoering diergezondheid kalven melkvee melkveebedrijven melkveehouderij sensors technologie voortplanting voortplantingsgedrag Wageningen University & Research