A comparative study on three analytical methods for the determination of the neurotoxin BMAA in cyanobacteria

The cyanobacterial neurotoxin ß-N-methylamino-L-alanine (BMAA) has been considered a serious health threat because of its putative role in multiple neurodegenerative diseases. First reports on BMAA concentrations in cyanobacteria were alarming: nearly all cyanobacteria were assumed to contain high BMAA concentrations, implying ubiquitous exposure. Recent studies however question this presence of high BMAA concentrations in cyanobacteria. To assess the real risk of BMAA to human health, this discrepancy must be resolved. We therefore tested whether the differences found could be caused by the analytical methods used in different studies. Eight cyanobacterial samples and two control samples were analyzed by three commonly used methods: HPLC-FLD analysis and LC-MS/MS analysis of both derivatized and underivatized samples. In line with published results, HPLC-FLD detected relatively high BMAA concentrations in some cyanobacterial samples, while both LC-MS/MS methods only detected BMAA in the positive control (cycad seed sarcotesta). Because we could eliminate the use of different samples and treatments as causal factors, we demonstrate that the observed differences were caused by the analytical methods. We conclude that HPLC-FLD overestimated BMAA concentrations in some cyanobacterial samples due to its low selectivity and propose that BMAA might be present in (some) cyanobacteria, but in the low µg/g or ng/g range instead of the high µg/g range as sometimes reported before. We therefore recommend to use only selective and sensitive analytical methods like LC-MS/MS for BMAA analysis. Although possibly present in low concentrations in cyanobacteria, BMAA can still form a health risk. Recent evidence on BMAA accumulation in aquatic food chains suggests human exposure through consumption of fish and shellfish which expectedly exceeds exposure through cyanobacteria The cyanobacterial neurotoxin ß-N-methylamino-L-alanine (BMAA) has been considered a serious health threat because of its putative role in multiple neurodegenerative diseases. First reports on BMAA concentrations in cyanobacteria were alarming: nearly all cyanobacteria were assumed to contain high BMAA concentrations, implying ubiquitous exposure. Recent studies however question this presence of high BMAA concentrations in cyanobacteria. To assess the real risk of BMAA to human health, this discrepancy must be resolved. We therefore tested whether the differences found could be caused by the analytical methods used in different studies. Eight cyanobacterial samples and two control samples were analyzed by three commonly used methods: HPLC-FLD analysis and LC-MS/MS analysis of both derivatized and underivatized samples. In line with published results, HPLC-FLD detected relatively high BMAA concentrations in some cyanobacterial samples, while both LC-MS/MS methods only detected BMAA in the positive control (cycad seed sarcotesta). Because we could eliminate the use of different samples and treatments as causal factors, we demonstrate that the observed differences were caused by the analytical methods. We conclude that HPLC-FLD overestimated BMAA concentrations in some cyanobacterial samples due to its low selectivity and propose that BMAA might be present in (some) cyanobacteria, but in the low µg/g or ng/g range instead of the high µg/g range as sometimes reported before. We therefore recommend to use only selective and sensitive analytical methods like LC-MS/MS for BMAA analysis. Although possibly present in low concentrations in cyanobacteria, BMAA can still form a health risk. Recent evidence on BMAA accumulation in aquatic food chains suggests human exposure through consumption of fish and shellfish which expectedly exceeds exposure through cyanobacteria. © 2012 Faassen et al.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Faassen, E.J., Gillissen, F., Lurling, M.
Format: Article/Letter to editor biblioteca
Language:English
Subjects:2,4-diaminobutyric acid, als, chamorro people, flying foxes, guam, liquid-chromatography, mass-spectrometry, methylamino-l-alanine, neurodegenerative disease, nonprotein amino-acids,
Online Access:https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/a-comparative-study-on-three-analytical-methods-for-the-determina
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-wur-nl-wurpubs-447488
record_format koha
institution WUR NL
collection DSpace
country Países bajos
countrycode NL
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-wur-nl
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname WUR Library Netherlands
language English
topic 2,4-diaminobutyric acid
als
chamorro people
flying foxes
guam
liquid-chromatography
mass-spectrometry
methylamino-l-alanine
neurodegenerative disease
nonprotein amino-acids
2,4-diaminobutyric acid
als
chamorro people
flying foxes
guam
liquid-chromatography
mass-spectrometry
methylamino-l-alanine
neurodegenerative disease
nonprotein amino-acids
spellingShingle 2,4-diaminobutyric acid
als
chamorro people
flying foxes
guam
liquid-chromatography
mass-spectrometry
methylamino-l-alanine
neurodegenerative disease
nonprotein amino-acids
2,4-diaminobutyric acid
als
chamorro people
flying foxes
guam
liquid-chromatography
mass-spectrometry
methylamino-l-alanine
neurodegenerative disease
nonprotein amino-acids
Faassen, E.J.
Gillissen, F.
Lurling, M.
A comparative study on three analytical methods for the determination of the neurotoxin BMAA in cyanobacteria
description The cyanobacterial neurotoxin ß-N-methylamino-L-alanine (BMAA) has been considered a serious health threat because of its putative role in multiple neurodegenerative diseases. First reports on BMAA concentrations in cyanobacteria were alarming: nearly all cyanobacteria were assumed to contain high BMAA concentrations, implying ubiquitous exposure. Recent studies however question this presence of high BMAA concentrations in cyanobacteria. To assess the real risk of BMAA to human health, this discrepancy must be resolved. We therefore tested whether the differences found could be caused by the analytical methods used in different studies. Eight cyanobacterial samples and two control samples were analyzed by three commonly used methods: HPLC-FLD analysis and LC-MS/MS analysis of both derivatized and underivatized samples. In line with published results, HPLC-FLD detected relatively high BMAA concentrations in some cyanobacterial samples, while both LC-MS/MS methods only detected BMAA in the positive control (cycad seed sarcotesta). Because we could eliminate the use of different samples and treatments as causal factors, we demonstrate that the observed differences were caused by the analytical methods. We conclude that HPLC-FLD overestimated BMAA concentrations in some cyanobacterial samples due to its low selectivity and propose that BMAA might be present in (some) cyanobacteria, but in the low µg/g or ng/g range instead of the high µg/g range as sometimes reported before. We therefore recommend to use only selective and sensitive analytical methods like LC-MS/MS for BMAA analysis. Although possibly present in low concentrations in cyanobacteria, BMAA can still form a health risk. Recent evidence on BMAA accumulation in aquatic food chains suggests human exposure through consumption of fish and shellfish which expectedly exceeds exposure through cyanobacteria The cyanobacterial neurotoxin ß-N-methylamino-L-alanine (BMAA) has been considered a serious health threat because of its putative role in multiple neurodegenerative diseases. First reports on BMAA concentrations in cyanobacteria were alarming: nearly all cyanobacteria were assumed to contain high BMAA concentrations, implying ubiquitous exposure. Recent studies however question this presence of high BMAA concentrations in cyanobacteria. To assess the real risk of BMAA to human health, this discrepancy must be resolved. We therefore tested whether the differences found could be caused by the analytical methods used in different studies. Eight cyanobacterial samples and two control samples were analyzed by three commonly used methods: HPLC-FLD analysis and LC-MS/MS analysis of both derivatized and underivatized samples. In line with published results, HPLC-FLD detected relatively high BMAA concentrations in some cyanobacterial samples, while both LC-MS/MS methods only detected BMAA in the positive control (cycad seed sarcotesta). Because we could eliminate the use of different samples and treatments as causal factors, we demonstrate that the observed differences were caused by the analytical methods. We conclude that HPLC-FLD overestimated BMAA concentrations in some cyanobacterial samples due to its low selectivity and propose that BMAA might be present in (some) cyanobacteria, but in the low µg/g or ng/g range instead of the high µg/g range as sometimes reported before. We therefore recommend to use only selective and sensitive analytical methods like LC-MS/MS for BMAA analysis. Although possibly present in low concentrations in cyanobacteria, BMAA can still form a health risk. Recent evidence on BMAA accumulation in aquatic food chains suggests human exposure through consumption of fish and shellfish which expectedly exceeds exposure through cyanobacteria. © 2012 Faassen et al.
format Article/Letter to editor
topic_facet 2,4-diaminobutyric acid
als
chamorro people
flying foxes
guam
liquid-chromatography
mass-spectrometry
methylamino-l-alanine
neurodegenerative disease
nonprotein amino-acids
author Faassen, E.J.
Gillissen, F.
Lurling, M.
author_facet Faassen, E.J.
Gillissen, F.
Lurling, M.
author_sort Faassen, E.J.
title A comparative study on three analytical methods for the determination of the neurotoxin BMAA in cyanobacteria
title_short A comparative study on three analytical methods for the determination of the neurotoxin BMAA in cyanobacteria
title_full A comparative study on three analytical methods for the determination of the neurotoxin BMAA in cyanobacteria
title_fullStr A comparative study on three analytical methods for the determination of the neurotoxin BMAA in cyanobacteria
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study on three analytical methods for the determination of the neurotoxin BMAA in cyanobacteria
title_sort comparative study on three analytical methods for the determination of the neurotoxin bmaa in cyanobacteria
url https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/a-comparative-study-on-three-analytical-methods-for-the-determina
work_keys_str_mv AT faassenej acomparativestudyonthreeanalyticalmethodsforthedeterminationoftheneurotoxinbmaaincyanobacteria
AT gillissenf acomparativestudyonthreeanalyticalmethodsforthedeterminationoftheneurotoxinbmaaincyanobacteria
AT lurlingm acomparativestudyonthreeanalyticalmethodsforthedeterminationoftheneurotoxinbmaaincyanobacteria
AT faassenej comparativestudyonthreeanalyticalmethodsforthedeterminationoftheneurotoxinbmaaincyanobacteria
AT gillissenf comparativestudyonthreeanalyticalmethodsforthedeterminationoftheneurotoxinbmaaincyanobacteria
AT lurlingm comparativestudyonthreeanalyticalmethodsforthedeterminationoftheneurotoxinbmaaincyanobacteria
_version_ 1813202698027139072
spelling dig-wur-nl-wurpubs-4474882024-06-25 Faassen, E.J. Gillissen, F. Lurling, M. Article/Letter to editor PLoS ONE 7 (2012) 5 ISSN: 1932-6203 A comparative study on three analytical methods for the determination of the neurotoxin BMAA in cyanobacteria 2012 The cyanobacterial neurotoxin ß-N-methylamino-L-alanine (BMAA) has been considered a serious health threat because of its putative role in multiple neurodegenerative diseases. First reports on BMAA concentrations in cyanobacteria were alarming: nearly all cyanobacteria were assumed to contain high BMAA concentrations, implying ubiquitous exposure. Recent studies however question this presence of high BMAA concentrations in cyanobacteria. To assess the real risk of BMAA to human health, this discrepancy must be resolved. We therefore tested whether the differences found could be caused by the analytical methods used in different studies. Eight cyanobacterial samples and two control samples were analyzed by three commonly used methods: HPLC-FLD analysis and LC-MS/MS analysis of both derivatized and underivatized samples. In line with published results, HPLC-FLD detected relatively high BMAA concentrations in some cyanobacterial samples, while both LC-MS/MS methods only detected BMAA in the positive control (cycad seed sarcotesta). Because we could eliminate the use of different samples and treatments as causal factors, we demonstrate that the observed differences were caused by the analytical methods. We conclude that HPLC-FLD overestimated BMAA concentrations in some cyanobacterial samples due to its low selectivity and propose that BMAA might be present in (some) cyanobacteria, but in the low µg/g or ng/g range instead of the high µg/g range as sometimes reported before. We therefore recommend to use only selective and sensitive analytical methods like LC-MS/MS for BMAA analysis. Although possibly present in low concentrations in cyanobacteria, BMAA can still form a health risk. Recent evidence on BMAA accumulation in aquatic food chains suggests human exposure through consumption of fish and shellfish which expectedly exceeds exposure through cyanobacteria The cyanobacterial neurotoxin ß-N-methylamino-L-alanine (BMAA) has been considered a serious health threat because of its putative role in multiple neurodegenerative diseases. First reports on BMAA concentrations in cyanobacteria were alarming: nearly all cyanobacteria were assumed to contain high BMAA concentrations, implying ubiquitous exposure. Recent studies however question this presence of high BMAA concentrations in cyanobacteria. To assess the real risk of BMAA to human health, this discrepancy must be resolved. We therefore tested whether the differences found could be caused by the analytical methods used in different studies. Eight cyanobacterial samples and two control samples were analyzed by three commonly used methods: HPLC-FLD analysis and LC-MS/MS analysis of both derivatized and underivatized samples. In line with published results, HPLC-FLD detected relatively high BMAA concentrations in some cyanobacterial samples, while both LC-MS/MS methods only detected BMAA in the positive control (cycad seed sarcotesta). Because we could eliminate the use of different samples and treatments as causal factors, we demonstrate that the observed differences were caused by the analytical methods. We conclude that HPLC-FLD overestimated BMAA concentrations in some cyanobacterial samples due to its low selectivity and propose that BMAA might be present in (some) cyanobacteria, but in the low µg/g or ng/g range instead of the high µg/g range as sometimes reported before. We therefore recommend to use only selective and sensitive analytical methods like LC-MS/MS for BMAA analysis. Although possibly present in low concentrations in cyanobacteria, BMAA can still form a health risk. Recent evidence on BMAA accumulation in aquatic food chains suggests human exposure through consumption of fish and shellfish which expectedly exceeds exposure through cyanobacteria. © 2012 Faassen et al. en application/pdf https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/a-comparative-study-on-three-analytical-methods-for-the-determina 10.1371/journal.pone.0036667 https://edepot.wur.nl/287707 2,4-diaminobutyric acid als chamorro people flying foxes guam liquid-chromatography mass-spectrometry methylamino-l-alanine neurodegenerative disease nonprotein amino-acids Wageningen University & Research