Attitudes of Dutch Pig Farmers Towards Tail Biting and Tail Docking

The Dutch policy objective of a fully sustainable livestock sector without mutilations by 2023 is not compatible with the routine practice of tail docking to minimize the risk of tail biting. To examine farmer attitudes towards docking, a telephone survey was conducted among 487 conventional and 33 organic Dutch pig farmers. “Biting” (of tails, ears, or limbs) was identified by the farmers as a main welfare problem in pig farming. About half of the farmers reported to have no tail biting problems in their own herd. When farmers did report problems, they most often reported figures between 1 and 5 % of the animals. High incidences of tail biting were anticipated when trying to keep undocked pigs. Enrichment materials used in the conventional sector included mainly chains (52–63 % of the farms) and hanging rubber or plastic balls (22–30 %). Straw, sawdust, or wood shavings was hardly provided in conventional pig farming (2–3 %), in contrast to organic farming (88–100 % of farms). Conventional pig farmers feel a curly tail is not very important for sustainable pig farming. They consider enrichment to be less effective and tail docking to be less stressful for them and their piglets than their organic colleagues do. Pig farmers identified climate as a main risk factor for tail biting as opposed to enrichment. The objective of reducing routine tail docking requires solutions for dealing with tail biting problems at the farm level. In this process, transfer of scientific knowledge about enrichment materials and other measures to prevent and cure tail biting is critical, as is a change in farmer attitudes and awareness of the moral issues involved

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bracke, M.B.M., de Lauwere, C.C., Wind, S.M.M., Zonderland, J.J.
Format: Article/Letter to editor biblioteca
Language:English
Subjects:animal-welfare, risk, semantic model,
Online Access:https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/attitudes-of-dutch-pig-farmers-towards-tail-biting-and-tail-docki
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-wur-nl-wurpubs-427287
record_format koha
spelling dig-wur-nl-wurpubs-4272872024-08-16 Bracke, M.B.M. de Lauwere, C.C. Wind, S.M.M. Zonderland, J.J. Article/Letter to editor Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (2013) 4 ISSN: 1187-7863 Attitudes of Dutch Pig Farmers Towards Tail Biting and Tail Docking 2013 The Dutch policy objective of a fully sustainable livestock sector without mutilations by 2023 is not compatible with the routine practice of tail docking to minimize the risk of tail biting. To examine farmer attitudes towards docking, a telephone survey was conducted among 487 conventional and 33 organic Dutch pig farmers. “Biting” (of tails, ears, or limbs) was identified by the farmers as a main welfare problem in pig farming. About half of the farmers reported to have no tail biting problems in their own herd. When farmers did report problems, they most often reported figures between 1 and 5 % of the animals. High incidences of tail biting were anticipated when trying to keep undocked pigs. Enrichment materials used in the conventional sector included mainly chains (52–63 % of the farms) and hanging rubber or plastic balls (22–30 %). Straw, sawdust, or wood shavings was hardly provided in conventional pig farming (2–3 %), in contrast to organic farming (88–100 % of farms). Conventional pig farmers feel a curly tail is not very important for sustainable pig farming. They consider enrichment to be less effective and tail docking to be less stressful for them and their piglets than their organic colleagues do. Pig farmers identified climate as a main risk factor for tail biting as opposed to enrichment. The objective of reducing routine tail docking requires solutions for dealing with tail biting problems at the farm level. In this process, transfer of scientific knowledge about enrichment materials and other measures to prevent and cure tail biting is critical, as is a change in farmer attitudes and awareness of the moral issues involved en application/pdf https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/attitudes-of-dutch-pig-farmers-towards-tail-biting-and-tail-docki 10.1007/s10806-012-9410-2 https://edepot.wur.nl/222440 animal-welfare risk semantic model Wageningen University & Research
institution WUR NL
collection DSpace
country Países bajos
countrycode NL
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-wur-nl
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname WUR Library Netherlands
language English
topic animal-welfare
risk
semantic model
animal-welfare
risk
semantic model
spellingShingle animal-welfare
risk
semantic model
animal-welfare
risk
semantic model
Bracke, M.B.M.
de Lauwere, C.C.
Wind, S.M.M.
Zonderland, J.J.
Attitudes of Dutch Pig Farmers Towards Tail Biting and Tail Docking
description The Dutch policy objective of a fully sustainable livestock sector without mutilations by 2023 is not compatible with the routine practice of tail docking to minimize the risk of tail biting. To examine farmer attitudes towards docking, a telephone survey was conducted among 487 conventional and 33 organic Dutch pig farmers. “Biting” (of tails, ears, or limbs) was identified by the farmers as a main welfare problem in pig farming. About half of the farmers reported to have no tail biting problems in their own herd. When farmers did report problems, they most often reported figures between 1 and 5 % of the animals. High incidences of tail biting were anticipated when trying to keep undocked pigs. Enrichment materials used in the conventional sector included mainly chains (52–63 % of the farms) and hanging rubber or plastic balls (22–30 %). Straw, sawdust, or wood shavings was hardly provided in conventional pig farming (2–3 %), in contrast to organic farming (88–100 % of farms). Conventional pig farmers feel a curly tail is not very important for sustainable pig farming. They consider enrichment to be less effective and tail docking to be less stressful for them and their piglets than their organic colleagues do. Pig farmers identified climate as a main risk factor for tail biting as opposed to enrichment. The objective of reducing routine tail docking requires solutions for dealing with tail biting problems at the farm level. In this process, transfer of scientific knowledge about enrichment materials and other measures to prevent and cure tail biting is critical, as is a change in farmer attitudes and awareness of the moral issues involved
format Article/Letter to editor
topic_facet animal-welfare
risk
semantic model
author Bracke, M.B.M.
de Lauwere, C.C.
Wind, S.M.M.
Zonderland, J.J.
author_facet Bracke, M.B.M.
de Lauwere, C.C.
Wind, S.M.M.
Zonderland, J.J.
author_sort Bracke, M.B.M.
title Attitudes of Dutch Pig Farmers Towards Tail Biting and Tail Docking
title_short Attitudes of Dutch Pig Farmers Towards Tail Biting and Tail Docking
title_full Attitudes of Dutch Pig Farmers Towards Tail Biting and Tail Docking
title_fullStr Attitudes of Dutch Pig Farmers Towards Tail Biting and Tail Docking
title_full_unstemmed Attitudes of Dutch Pig Farmers Towards Tail Biting and Tail Docking
title_sort attitudes of dutch pig farmers towards tail biting and tail docking
url https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/attitudes-of-dutch-pig-farmers-towards-tail-biting-and-tail-docki
work_keys_str_mv AT brackembm attitudesofdutchpigfarmerstowardstailbitingandtaildocking
AT delauwerecc attitudesofdutchpigfarmerstowardstailbitingandtaildocking
AT windsmm attitudesofdutchpigfarmerstowardstailbitingandtaildocking
AT zonderlandjj attitudesofdutchpigfarmerstowardstailbitingandtaildocking
_version_ 1816159944957755392