Red and Processed Meat and Colorectal Cancer Incidence: Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies

Background: The evidence that red and processed meat influences colorectal carcinogenesis was judged convincing in the 2007 World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute of Cancer Research report. Since then, ten prospective studies have published new results. Here we update the evidence from prospective studies and explore whether there is a non-linear association of red and processed meats with colorectal cancer risk. Methods and Findings: Relevant prospective studies were identified in PubMed until March 2011. For each study, relative risks and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were extracted and pooled with a random-effects model, weighting for the inverse of the variance, in highest versus lowest intake comparison, and dose-response meta-analyses. Red and processed meats intake was associated with increased colorectal cancer risk. The summary relative risk (RR) of colorectal cancer for the highest versus the lowest intake was 1.22 (95% CI = 1.11-1.34) and the RR for every 100 g/day increase was 1.14 (95% CI = 1.04-1.24). Non-linear dose-response meta-analyses revealed that colorectal cancer risk increases approximately linearly with increasing intake of red and processed meats up to approximately 140 g/day, where the curve approaches its plateau. The associations were similar for colon and rectal cancer risk. When analyzed separately, colorectal cancer risk was related to intake of fresh red meat (RR (for 100 g/day increase) = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.05-1.31) and processed meat (RR (for 50 g/day increase) = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.10-1.28). Similar results were observed for colon cancer, but for rectal cancer, no significant associations were observed. Conclusions: High intake of red and processed meat is associated with significant increased risk of colorectal, colon and rectal cancers. The overall evidence of prospective studies supports limiting red and processed meat consumption as one of the dietary recommendations for the prevention of colorectal cancer.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chan, D.S.M., Lau, R., Aune, D., Vieira, R., Greenwood, D.C., Kampman, E., Norat, T.
Format: Article/Letter to editor biblioteca
Language:English
Subjects:colon-cancer, dietary patterns, dose-response data, nat2 polymorphisms, netherlands cohort, prospective cohort, rectal-cancer, risk-factors, united-states, womens health,
Online Access:https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/red-and-processed-meat-and-colorectal-cancer-incidence-meta-analy
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-wur-nl-wurpubs-425343
record_format koha
spelling dig-wur-nl-wurpubs-4253432024-12-04 Chan, D.S.M. Lau, R. Aune, D. Vieira, R. Greenwood, D.C. Kampman, E. Norat, T. Article/Letter to editor PLoS ONE 6 (2011) 6 ISSN: 1932-6203 Red and Processed Meat and Colorectal Cancer Incidence: Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies 2011 Background: The evidence that red and processed meat influences colorectal carcinogenesis was judged convincing in the 2007 World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute of Cancer Research report. Since then, ten prospective studies have published new results. Here we update the evidence from prospective studies and explore whether there is a non-linear association of red and processed meats with colorectal cancer risk. Methods and Findings: Relevant prospective studies were identified in PubMed until March 2011. For each study, relative risks and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were extracted and pooled with a random-effects model, weighting for the inverse of the variance, in highest versus lowest intake comparison, and dose-response meta-analyses. Red and processed meats intake was associated with increased colorectal cancer risk. The summary relative risk (RR) of colorectal cancer for the highest versus the lowest intake was 1.22 (95% CI = 1.11-1.34) and the RR for every 100 g/day increase was 1.14 (95% CI = 1.04-1.24). Non-linear dose-response meta-analyses revealed that colorectal cancer risk increases approximately linearly with increasing intake of red and processed meats up to approximately 140 g/day, where the curve approaches its plateau. The associations were similar for colon and rectal cancer risk. When analyzed separately, colorectal cancer risk was related to intake of fresh red meat (RR (for 100 g/day increase) = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.05-1.31) and processed meat (RR (for 50 g/day increase) = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.10-1.28). Similar results were observed for colon cancer, but for rectal cancer, no significant associations were observed. Conclusions: High intake of red and processed meat is associated with significant increased risk of colorectal, colon and rectal cancers. The overall evidence of prospective studies supports limiting red and processed meat consumption as one of the dietary recommendations for the prevention of colorectal cancer. en application/pdf https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/red-and-processed-meat-and-colorectal-cancer-incidence-meta-analy 10.1371/journal.pone.0020456 https://edepot.wur.nl/214252 colon-cancer dietary patterns dose-response data nat2 polymorphisms netherlands cohort prospective cohort rectal-cancer risk-factors united-states womens health Wageningen University & Research
institution WUR NL
collection DSpace
country Países bajos
countrycode NL
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-wur-nl
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname WUR Library Netherlands
language English
topic colon-cancer
dietary patterns
dose-response data
nat2 polymorphisms
netherlands cohort
prospective cohort
rectal-cancer
risk-factors
united-states
womens health
colon-cancer
dietary patterns
dose-response data
nat2 polymorphisms
netherlands cohort
prospective cohort
rectal-cancer
risk-factors
united-states
womens health
spellingShingle colon-cancer
dietary patterns
dose-response data
nat2 polymorphisms
netherlands cohort
prospective cohort
rectal-cancer
risk-factors
united-states
womens health
colon-cancer
dietary patterns
dose-response data
nat2 polymorphisms
netherlands cohort
prospective cohort
rectal-cancer
risk-factors
united-states
womens health
Chan, D.S.M.
Lau, R.
Aune, D.
Vieira, R.
Greenwood, D.C.
Kampman, E.
Norat, T.
Red and Processed Meat and Colorectal Cancer Incidence: Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies
description Background: The evidence that red and processed meat influences colorectal carcinogenesis was judged convincing in the 2007 World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute of Cancer Research report. Since then, ten prospective studies have published new results. Here we update the evidence from prospective studies and explore whether there is a non-linear association of red and processed meats with colorectal cancer risk. Methods and Findings: Relevant prospective studies were identified in PubMed until March 2011. For each study, relative risks and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were extracted and pooled with a random-effects model, weighting for the inverse of the variance, in highest versus lowest intake comparison, and dose-response meta-analyses. Red and processed meats intake was associated with increased colorectal cancer risk. The summary relative risk (RR) of colorectal cancer for the highest versus the lowest intake was 1.22 (95% CI = 1.11-1.34) and the RR for every 100 g/day increase was 1.14 (95% CI = 1.04-1.24). Non-linear dose-response meta-analyses revealed that colorectal cancer risk increases approximately linearly with increasing intake of red and processed meats up to approximately 140 g/day, where the curve approaches its plateau. The associations were similar for colon and rectal cancer risk. When analyzed separately, colorectal cancer risk was related to intake of fresh red meat (RR (for 100 g/day increase) = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.05-1.31) and processed meat (RR (for 50 g/day increase) = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.10-1.28). Similar results were observed for colon cancer, but for rectal cancer, no significant associations were observed. Conclusions: High intake of red and processed meat is associated with significant increased risk of colorectal, colon and rectal cancers. The overall evidence of prospective studies supports limiting red and processed meat consumption as one of the dietary recommendations for the prevention of colorectal cancer.
format Article/Letter to editor
topic_facet colon-cancer
dietary patterns
dose-response data
nat2 polymorphisms
netherlands cohort
prospective cohort
rectal-cancer
risk-factors
united-states
womens health
author Chan, D.S.M.
Lau, R.
Aune, D.
Vieira, R.
Greenwood, D.C.
Kampman, E.
Norat, T.
author_facet Chan, D.S.M.
Lau, R.
Aune, D.
Vieira, R.
Greenwood, D.C.
Kampman, E.
Norat, T.
author_sort Chan, D.S.M.
title Red and Processed Meat and Colorectal Cancer Incidence: Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies
title_short Red and Processed Meat and Colorectal Cancer Incidence: Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies
title_full Red and Processed Meat and Colorectal Cancer Incidence: Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies
title_fullStr Red and Processed Meat and Colorectal Cancer Incidence: Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies
title_full_unstemmed Red and Processed Meat and Colorectal Cancer Incidence: Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies
title_sort red and processed meat and colorectal cancer incidence: meta-analysis of prospective studies
url https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/red-and-processed-meat-and-colorectal-cancer-incidence-meta-analy
work_keys_str_mv AT chandsm redandprocessedmeatandcolorectalcancerincidencemetaanalysisofprospectivestudies
AT laur redandprocessedmeatandcolorectalcancerincidencemetaanalysisofprospectivestudies
AT auned redandprocessedmeatandcolorectalcancerincidencemetaanalysisofprospectivestudies
AT vieirar redandprocessedmeatandcolorectalcancerincidencemetaanalysisofprospectivestudies
AT greenwooddc redandprocessedmeatandcolorectalcancerincidencemetaanalysisofprospectivestudies
AT kampmane redandprocessedmeatandcolorectalcancerincidencemetaanalysisofprospectivestudies
AT noratt redandprocessedmeatandcolorectalcancerincidencemetaanalysisofprospectivestudies
_version_ 1819149644589957120