Synthesis report harmonising APRM-NPoAs and other national plans into a common medium term expenditure framework: experiences from Ghana, Rwanda, Uganda, and Benin
The African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM), Under its auspices each undertook what was almost certainly the most rigorous assessment of the performance of national institutions in the areas of: democracy and political governance, economic governance and management, corporate governance, and socio-economic development. The findings from these assessments then became the basis of the production of a National Program of Action (NPoA) intended to address the challenges discovered during the self-assessment. These two documents, together with independent research conducted by the Continental Secretariat of the APRM fed into a Country Review Report prepared by the Secretariat. These documents were then presented to the APRM Forum, the grouping of African Heads of State whose counties had acceded to the APRM, for discussion by heads of state of countries participating in the APRM. The Peer Review of Africa countries accordingly became the highlight and focal point of the process of the APRM.
Format: | Reports biblioteca |
---|---|
Language: | eng |
Published: |
2010-03
|
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
dig-uneca-et-10855-23403 |
---|---|
record_format |
koha |
spelling |
dig-uneca-et-10855-234032018-12-28T14:26:22Z Synthesis report harmonising APRM-NPoAs and other national plans into a common medium term expenditure framework: experiences from Ghana, Rwanda, Uganda, and Benin The African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM), Under its auspices each undertook what was almost certainly the most rigorous assessment of the performance of national institutions in the areas of: democracy and political governance, economic governance and management, corporate governance, and socio-economic development. The findings from these assessments then became the basis of the production of a National Program of Action (NPoA) intended to address the challenges discovered during the self-assessment. These two documents, together with independent research conducted by the Continental Secretariat of the APRM fed into a Country Review Report prepared by the Secretariat. These documents were then presented to the APRM Forum, the grouping of African Heads of State whose counties had acceded to the APRM, for discussion by heads of state of countries participating in the APRM. The Peer Review of Africa countries accordingly became the highlight and focal point of the process of the APRM. 2017-02-15T08:49:57Z 2017-02-15T08:49:57Z 2010-03 Reports eng 13 p. application/pdf |
institution |
ONU |
collection |
DSpace |
country |
Etiopía |
countrycode |
ET |
component |
Bibliográfico |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
dig-uneca-et |
tag |
biblioteca |
region |
África del Este |
libraryname |
Biblioteca de la Comisión Económica para África de la ONU |
language |
eng |
description |
The African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM), Under its auspices each undertook what was almost certainly the most rigorous assessment of the performance of national institutions in the areas of: democracy and political governance, economic governance and management, corporate governance, and socio-economic development. The findings from these assessments then became the basis of the production of a National Program of Action (NPoA) intended to address the challenges discovered during the self-assessment. These two documents, together with independent research conducted by the Continental Secretariat of the APRM fed into a Country Review Report prepared by the Secretariat. These documents were then presented to the APRM Forum, the grouping of African Heads of State whose counties had acceded to the APRM, for discussion by heads of state of countries participating in the APRM. The Peer Review of Africa countries accordingly became the highlight and focal point of the process of the APRM. |
format |
Reports |
title |
Synthesis report harmonising APRM-NPoAs and other national plans into a common medium term expenditure framework: experiences from Ghana, Rwanda, Uganda, and Benin |
spellingShingle |
Synthesis report harmonising APRM-NPoAs and other national plans into a common medium term expenditure framework: experiences from Ghana, Rwanda, Uganda, and Benin |
title_short |
Synthesis report harmonising APRM-NPoAs and other national plans into a common medium term expenditure framework: experiences from Ghana, Rwanda, Uganda, and Benin |
title_full |
Synthesis report harmonising APRM-NPoAs and other national plans into a common medium term expenditure framework: experiences from Ghana, Rwanda, Uganda, and Benin |
title_fullStr |
Synthesis report harmonising APRM-NPoAs and other national plans into a common medium term expenditure framework: experiences from Ghana, Rwanda, Uganda, and Benin |
title_full_unstemmed |
Synthesis report harmonising APRM-NPoAs and other national plans into a common medium term expenditure framework: experiences from Ghana, Rwanda, Uganda, and Benin |
title_sort |
synthesis report harmonising aprm-npoas and other national plans into a common medium term expenditure framework: experiences from ghana, rwanda, uganda, and benin |
publishDate |
2010-03 |
_version_ |
1762935304371568640 |