Empowerment and Local Level Conflict Mediation in Indonesia : A Comparative Analysis of Concepts, Measures, and Project Efficacy
The notion of empowerment has been more often deductively claimed than carefully defined or inductively assessed by development scholars and practitioners alike. The authors define and assess empowerment through an in-depth examination of the extent to which a large community development project in rural Indonesia empowers participants (especially members of marginalized groups) through building their capacity to manage local conflict. Although the project induces conflict through its deployment of a competitive bidding process, the authors argue that, when well implemented, it can also enable otherwise unequal groups to more peacefully, equitably, and effectively engage one another. Using a mixed methods approach, they compare cases from otherwise similar treatment and control villages to shed light on the chief components of villagers' capacity to manage local conflict. They discuss the interdependencies of two major analytical realms-routines of inter-group collaboration, and sources of countervailing power-and their relation to local conflict processes and outcomes.
id |
dig-okr-109868276 |
---|---|
record_format |
koha |
spelling |
dig-okr-1098682762024-08-08T17:19:11Z Empowerment and Local Level Conflict Mediation in Indonesia : A Comparative Analysis of Concepts, Measures, and Project Efficacy Gibson, Christopher Woolcock, Michael ACCOUNTABILITY ACHIEVEMENT BENEFICIARIES CITIZEN PARTICIPATION CIVIL SOCIETY COLLABORATION COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING COLLECTIVE ACTION COLLECTIVE DECISION MAKING COMMUNITIES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY DRIVEN DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION COMPETITIVE BIDDING CONCENTRATIONS OF POWER CONFLICT CONFLICT MANAGEMENT CONFLICT MEDIATION CONFLICT PREVENTION CONFLICT RESOLUTION CONFLICTS CONSULTATIONS CONTROL GROUPS DECISION MAKING DECISION MAKING INSTITUTIONS DECISION MAKING PROCESSES DECISION-MAKING DECISION-MAKING PROCESSES DECISIONMAKING DEVELOPMENT PROCESS DISADVANTAGED GROUPS ELITES EQUALITY FACILITATORS FIELDWORK FOCUS GROUP FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSIONS GROUP MEMBERS IDEAS INNOVATIONS INTEREST GROUP INTEREST GROUPS INTERVIEWS LEADERSHIP LOCAL CONFLICT LOCAL KNOWLEDGE MARGINALIZED GROUPS MOTIVATION NEGOTIATIONS PARTICIPANT OBSERVATIONS PARTICIPATORY DEVELOPMENT PEACE PERCEPTION PLAYING POLITICAL PARTIES POVERTY REDUCTION POVERTY REDUCTION EFFORTS PROBLEM SOLVING PROGRAM EVALUATION PROGRAMS PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION PUBLIC PARTICIPATION QUALITATIVE DATA REASONING RECOGNITION RECONSTRUCTION RESEARCH DESIGN SCIENTISTS SOCIAL MOVEMENTS SOCIAL SCIENCES SOCIALIZATION SOCIETY STAKEHOLDERS THINKING TRADE UNIONS VILLAGE VILLAGES VIOLENCE WAR The notion of empowerment has been more often deductively claimed than carefully defined or inductively assessed by development scholars and practitioners alike. The authors define and assess empowerment through an in-depth examination of the extent to which a large community development project in rural Indonesia empowers participants (especially members of marginalized groups) through building their capacity to manage local conflict. Although the project induces conflict through its deployment of a competitive bidding process, the authors argue that, when well implemented, it can also enable otherwise unequal groups to more peacefully, equitably, and effectively engage one another. Using a mixed methods approach, they compare cases from otherwise similar treatment and control villages to shed light on the chief components of villagers' capacity to manage local conflict. They discuss the interdependencies of two major analytical realms-routines of inter-group collaboration, and sources of countervailing power-and their relation to local conflict processes and outcomes. 2012-06-18T16:03:01Z 2012-06-18T16:03:01Z 2005-09 http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2005/09/6275688/empowerment-local-level-conflict-mediation-indonesia-comparative-analysis-concepts-measures-project-efficacy https://hdl.handle.net/10986/8276 English Policy Research Working Paper; No. 3713 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank application/pdf text/plain |
institution |
Banco Mundial |
collection |
DSpace |
country |
Estados Unidos |
countrycode |
US |
component |
Bibliográfico |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
dig-okr |
tag |
biblioteca |
region |
America del Norte |
libraryname |
Biblioteca del Banco Mundial |
language |
English |
topic |
ACCOUNTABILITY ACHIEVEMENT BENEFICIARIES CITIZEN PARTICIPATION CIVIL SOCIETY COLLABORATION COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING COLLECTIVE ACTION COLLECTIVE DECISION MAKING COMMUNITIES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY DRIVEN DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION COMPETITIVE BIDDING CONCENTRATIONS OF POWER CONFLICT CONFLICT MANAGEMENT CONFLICT MEDIATION CONFLICT PREVENTION CONFLICT RESOLUTION CONFLICTS CONSULTATIONS CONTROL GROUPS DECISION MAKING DECISION MAKING INSTITUTIONS DECISION MAKING PROCESSES DECISION-MAKING DECISION-MAKING PROCESSES DECISIONMAKING DEVELOPMENT PROCESS DISADVANTAGED GROUPS ELITES EQUALITY FACILITATORS FIELDWORK FOCUS GROUP FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSIONS GROUP MEMBERS IDEAS INNOVATIONS INTEREST GROUP INTEREST GROUPS INTERVIEWS LEADERSHIP LOCAL CONFLICT LOCAL KNOWLEDGE MARGINALIZED GROUPS MOTIVATION NEGOTIATIONS PARTICIPANT OBSERVATIONS PARTICIPATORY DEVELOPMENT PEACE PERCEPTION PLAYING POLITICAL PARTIES POVERTY REDUCTION POVERTY REDUCTION EFFORTS PROBLEM SOLVING PROGRAM EVALUATION PROGRAMS PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION PUBLIC PARTICIPATION QUALITATIVE DATA REASONING RECOGNITION RECONSTRUCTION RESEARCH DESIGN SCIENTISTS SOCIAL MOVEMENTS SOCIAL SCIENCES SOCIALIZATION SOCIETY STAKEHOLDERS THINKING TRADE UNIONS VILLAGE VILLAGES VIOLENCE WAR ACCOUNTABILITY ACHIEVEMENT BENEFICIARIES CITIZEN PARTICIPATION CIVIL SOCIETY COLLABORATION COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING COLLECTIVE ACTION COLLECTIVE DECISION MAKING COMMUNITIES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY DRIVEN DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION COMPETITIVE BIDDING CONCENTRATIONS OF POWER CONFLICT CONFLICT MANAGEMENT CONFLICT MEDIATION CONFLICT PREVENTION CONFLICT RESOLUTION CONFLICTS CONSULTATIONS CONTROL GROUPS DECISION MAKING DECISION MAKING INSTITUTIONS DECISION MAKING PROCESSES DECISION-MAKING DECISION-MAKING PROCESSES DECISIONMAKING DEVELOPMENT PROCESS DISADVANTAGED GROUPS ELITES EQUALITY FACILITATORS FIELDWORK FOCUS GROUP FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSIONS GROUP MEMBERS IDEAS INNOVATIONS INTEREST GROUP INTEREST GROUPS INTERVIEWS LEADERSHIP LOCAL CONFLICT LOCAL KNOWLEDGE MARGINALIZED GROUPS MOTIVATION NEGOTIATIONS PARTICIPANT OBSERVATIONS PARTICIPATORY DEVELOPMENT PEACE PERCEPTION PLAYING POLITICAL PARTIES POVERTY REDUCTION POVERTY REDUCTION EFFORTS PROBLEM SOLVING PROGRAM EVALUATION PROGRAMS PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION PUBLIC PARTICIPATION QUALITATIVE DATA REASONING RECOGNITION RECONSTRUCTION RESEARCH DESIGN SCIENTISTS SOCIAL MOVEMENTS SOCIAL SCIENCES SOCIALIZATION SOCIETY STAKEHOLDERS THINKING TRADE UNIONS VILLAGE VILLAGES VIOLENCE WAR |
spellingShingle |
ACCOUNTABILITY ACHIEVEMENT BENEFICIARIES CITIZEN PARTICIPATION CIVIL SOCIETY COLLABORATION COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING COLLECTIVE ACTION COLLECTIVE DECISION MAKING COMMUNITIES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY DRIVEN DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION COMPETITIVE BIDDING CONCENTRATIONS OF POWER CONFLICT CONFLICT MANAGEMENT CONFLICT MEDIATION CONFLICT PREVENTION CONFLICT RESOLUTION CONFLICTS CONSULTATIONS CONTROL GROUPS DECISION MAKING DECISION MAKING INSTITUTIONS DECISION MAKING PROCESSES DECISION-MAKING DECISION-MAKING PROCESSES DECISIONMAKING DEVELOPMENT PROCESS DISADVANTAGED GROUPS ELITES EQUALITY FACILITATORS FIELDWORK FOCUS GROUP FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSIONS GROUP MEMBERS IDEAS INNOVATIONS INTEREST GROUP INTEREST GROUPS INTERVIEWS LEADERSHIP LOCAL CONFLICT LOCAL KNOWLEDGE MARGINALIZED GROUPS MOTIVATION NEGOTIATIONS PARTICIPANT OBSERVATIONS PARTICIPATORY DEVELOPMENT PEACE PERCEPTION PLAYING POLITICAL PARTIES POVERTY REDUCTION POVERTY REDUCTION EFFORTS PROBLEM SOLVING PROGRAM EVALUATION PROGRAMS PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION PUBLIC PARTICIPATION QUALITATIVE DATA REASONING RECOGNITION RECONSTRUCTION RESEARCH DESIGN SCIENTISTS SOCIAL MOVEMENTS SOCIAL SCIENCES SOCIALIZATION SOCIETY STAKEHOLDERS THINKING TRADE UNIONS VILLAGE VILLAGES VIOLENCE WAR ACCOUNTABILITY ACHIEVEMENT BENEFICIARIES CITIZEN PARTICIPATION CIVIL SOCIETY COLLABORATION COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING COLLECTIVE ACTION COLLECTIVE DECISION MAKING COMMUNITIES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY DRIVEN DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION COMPETITIVE BIDDING CONCENTRATIONS OF POWER CONFLICT CONFLICT MANAGEMENT CONFLICT MEDIATION CONFLICT PREVENTION CONFLICT RESOLUTION CONFLICTS CONSULTATIONS CONTROL GROUPS DECISION MAKING DECISION MAKING INSTITUTIONS DECISION MAKING PROCESSES DECISION-MAKING DECISION-MAKING PROCESSES DECISIONMAKING DEVELOPMENT PROCESS DISADVANTAGED GROUPS ELITES EQUALITY FACILITATORS FIELDWORK FOCUS GROUP FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSIONS GROUP MEMBERS IDEAS INNOVATIONS INTEREST GROUP INTEREST GROUPS INTERVIEWS LEADERSHIP LOCAL CONFLICT LOCAL KNOWLEDGE MARGINALIZED GROUPS MOTIVATION NEGOTIATIONS PARTICIPANT OBSERVATIONS PARTICIPATORY DEVELOPMENT PEACE PERCEPTION PLAYING POLITICAL PARTIES POVERTY REDUCTION POVERTY REDUCTION EFFORTS PROBLEM SOLVING PROGRAM EVALUATION PROGRAMS PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION PUBLIC PARTICIPATION QUALITATIVE DATA REASONING RECOGNITION RECONSTRUCTION RESEARCH DESIGN SCIENTISTS SOCIAL MOVEMENTS SOCIAL SCIENCES SOCIALIZATION SOCIETY STAKEHOLDERS THINKING TRADE UNIONS VILLAGE VILLAGES VIOLENCE WAR Gibson, Christopher Woolcock, Michael Empowerment and Local Level Conflict Mediation in Indonesia : A Comparative Analysis of Concepts, Measures, and Project Efficacy |
description |
The notion of empowerment has been more often deductively claimed than carefully defined or inductively assessed by development scholars and practitioners alike. The authors define and assess empowerment through an in-depth examination of the extent to which a large community development project in rural Indonesia empowers participants (especially members of marginalized groups) through building their capacity to manage local conflict. Although the project induces conflict through its deployment of a competitive bidding process, the authors argue that, when well implemented, it can also enable otherwise unequal groups to more peacefully, equitably, and effectively engage one another. Using a mixed methods approach, they compare cases from otherwise similar treatment and control villages to shed light on the chief components of villagers' capacity to manage local conflict. They discuss the interdependencies of two major analytical realms-routines of inter-group collaboration, and sources of countervailing power-and their relation to local conflict processes and outcomes. |
topic_facet |
ACCOUNTABILITY ACHIEVEMENT BENEFICIARIES CITIZEN PARTICIPATION CIVIL SOCIETY COLLABORATION COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING COLLECTIVE ACTION COLLECTIVE DECISION MAKING COMMUNITIES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY DRIVEN DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION COMPETITIVE BIDDING CONCENTRATIONS OF POWER CONFLICT CONFLICT MANAGEMENT CONFLICT MEDIATION CONFLICT PREVENTION CONFLICT RESOLUTION CONFLICTS CONSULTATIONS CONTROL GROUPS DECISION MAKING DECISION MAKING INSTITUTIONS DECISION MAKING PROCESSES DECISION-MAKING DECISION-MAKING PROCESSES DECISIONMAKING DEVELOPMENT PROCESS DISADVANTAGED GROUPS ELITES EQUALITY FACILITATORS FIELDWORK FOCUS GROUP FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSIONS GROUP MEMBERS IDEAS INNOVATIONS INTEREST GROUP INTEREST GROUPS INTERVIEWS LEADERSHIP LOCAL CONFLICT LOCAL KNOWLEDGE MARGINALIZED GROUPS MOTIVATION NEGOTIATIONS PARTICIPANT OBSERVATIONS PARTICIPATORY DEVELOPMENT PEACE PERCEPTION PLAYING POLITICAL PARTIES POVERTY REDUCTION POVERTY REDUCTION EFFORTS PROBLEM SOLVING PROGRAM EVALUATION PROGRAMS PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION PUBLIC PARTICIPATION QUALITATIVE DATA REASONING RECOGNITION RECONSTRUCTION RESEARCH DESIGN SCIENTISTS SOCIAL MOVEMENTS SOCIAL SCIENCES SOCIALIZATION SOCIETY STAKEHOLDERS THINKING TRADE UNIONS VILLAGE VILLAGES VIOLENCE WAR |
author |
Gibson, Christopher Woolcock, Michael |
author_facet |
Gibson, Christopher Woolcock, Michael |
author_sort |
Gibson, Christopher |
title |
Empowerment and Local Level Conflict Mediation in Indonesia : A Comparative Analysis of Concepts, Measures, and Project Efficacy |
title_short |
Empowerment and Local Level Conflict Mediation in Indonesia : A Comparative Analysis of Concepts, Measures, and Project Efficacy |
title_full |
Empowerment and Local Level Conflict Mediation in Indonesia : A Comparative Analysis of Concepts, Measures, and Project Efficacy |
title_fullStr |
Empowerment and Local Level Conflict Mediation in Indonesia : A Comparative Analysis of Concepts, Measures, and Project Efficacy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Empowerment and Local Level Conflict Mediation in Indonesia : A Comparative Analysis of Concepts, Measures, and Project Efficacy |
title_sort |
empowerment and local level conflict mediation in indonesia : a comparative analysis of concepts, measures, and project efficacy |
publishDate |
2005-09 |
url |
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2005/09/6275688/empowerment-local-level-conflict-mediation-indonesia-comparative-analysis-concepts-measures-project-efficacy https://hdl.handle.net/10986/8276 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT gibsonchristopher empowermentandlocallevelconflictmediationinindonesiaacomparativeanalysisofconceptsmeasuresandprojectefficacy AT woolcockmichael empowermentandlocallevelconflictmediationinindonesiaacomparativeanalysisofconceptsmeasuresandprojectefficacy |
_version_ |
1809105711380037632 |