In Pursuit of Balance : Randomization in Practice in Development Field Experiments

Randomized experiments are increasingly used in development economics, with researchers now facing the question of not just whether to randomize, but how to do so. Pure random assignment guarantees that the treatment and control groups will have identical characteristics on average, but in any particular random allocation, the two groups will differ along some dimensions. Methods used to pursue greater balance include stratification, pair-wise matching, and re-randomization. This paper presents new evidence on the randomization methods used in existing randomized experiments, and carries out simulations in order to provide guidance for researchers. Three main results emerge. First, many researchers are not controlling for the method of randomization in their analysis. The authors show this leads to tests with incorrect size, and can result in lower power than if a pure random draw was used. Second, they find that in samples of 300 or more, the different randomization methods perform similarly in terms of achieving balance on many future outcomes of interest. However, for very persistent outcome variables and in smaller sample sizes, pair-wise matching and stratification perform best. Third, the analysis suggests that on balance the re-randomization methods common in practice are less desirable than other methods, such as matching.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bruhn, Miriam, McKenzie, David
Language:English
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2008-10
Subjects:ALTERNATIVE APPROACH, BOOTSTRAP, DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH, ECONOMIC MODELS, ECONOMIC THEORY, ECONOMICS LITERATURE, ESTIMATORS, EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN, EXTERNALITIES, FIELD EXPERIMENTS, INCOME, LINEAR MODELS, LINEAR REGRESSION, LOTTERIES, METHODOLOGY, MINIMIZATION, MISSING OBSERVATIONS, NORMAL DISTRIBUTIONS, POLITICAL ECONOMY, PRECISION, PROBABILITY, PROGRAMS, RANDOMIZATION, RESEARCH PAPERS, RESEARCH REPORT, RESEARCH WORKING PAPERS, RESEARCHERS, RISK AVERSION, SAMPLE SIZE, SCENARIO, SCENARIOS, SCIENTISTS, SIGNIFICANCE LEVEL, SIMULATION, SIMULATIONS, STANDARD DEVIATIONS, STANDARD ERRORS, STATA, STATA CODE, STATISTICAL ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL METHODS, STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE, STATISTICAL TESTS, TECHNIQUES, VALIDITY,
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2008/10/9938284/pursuit-balance-randomization-practice-development-field-experiments
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/6910
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-okr-109866910
record_format koha
spelling dig-okr-1098669102024-08-08T16:34:40Z In Pursuit of Balance : Randomization in Practice in Development Field Experiments Bruhn, Miriam McKenzie, David Bruhn, Miriam ALTERNATIVE APPROACH BOOTSTRAP DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH ECONOMIC MODELS ECONOMIC THEORY ECONOMICS LITERATURE ESTIMATORS EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN EXTERNALITIES FIELD EXPERIMENTS INCOME LINEAR MODELS LINEAR REGRESSION LOTTERIES METHODOLOGY MINIMIZATION MISSING OBSERVATIONS NORMAL DISTRIBUTIONS POLITICAL ECONOMY PRECISION PROBABILITY PROGRAMS RANDOMIZATION RESEARCH PAPERS RESEARCH REPORT RESEARCH WORKING PAPERS RESEARCHERS RISK AVERSION SAMPLE SIZE SCENARIO SCENARIOS SCIENTISTS SIGNIFICANCE LEVEL SIMULATION SIMULATIONS STANDARD DEVIATIONS STANDARD ERRORS STATA STATA CODE STATISTICAL ANALYSIS STATISTICAL METHODS STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE STATISTICAL TESTS TECHNIQUES VALIDITY Randomized experiments are increasingly used in development economics, with researchers now facing the question of not just whether to randomize, but how to do so. Pure random assignment guarantees that the treatment and control groups will have identical characteristics on average, but in any particular random allocation, the two groups will differ along some dimensions. Methods used to pursue greater balance include stratification, pair-wise matching, and re-randomization. This paper presents new evidence on the randomization methods used in existing randomized experiments, and carries out simulations in order to provide guidance for researchers. Three main results emerge. First, many researchers are not controlling for the method of randomization in their analysis. The authors show this leads to tests with incorrect size, and can result in lower power than if a pure random draw was used. Second, they find that in samples of 300 or more, the different randomization methods perform similarly in terms of achieving balance on many future outcomes of interest. However, for very persistent outcome variables and in smaller sample sizes, pair-wise matching and stratification perform best. Third, the analysis suggests that on balance the re-randomization methods common in practice are less desirable than other methods, such as matching. 2012-06-01T19:07:20Z 2012-06-01T19:07:20Z 2008-10 http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2008/10/9938284/pursuit-balance-randomization-practice-development-field-experiments https://hdl.handle.net/10986/6910 English Policy Research Working Paper; No. 4752 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank application/pdf text/plain World Bank, Washington, DC
institution Banco Mundial
collection DSpace
country Estados Unidos
countrycode US
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-okr
tag biblioteca
region America del Norte
libraryname Biblioteca del Banco Mundial
language English
topic ALTERNATIVE APPROACH
BOOTSTRAP
DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS
DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH
ECONOMIC MODELS
ECONOMIC THEORY
ECONOMICS LITERATURE
ESTIMATORS
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
EXTERNALITIES
FIELD EXPERIMENTS
INCOME
LINEAR MODELS
LINEAR REGRESSION
LOTTERIES
METHODOLOGY
MINIMIZATION
MISSING OBSERVATIONS
NORMAL DISTRIBUTIONS
POLITICAL ECONOMY
PRECISION
PROBABILITY
PROGRAMS
RANDOMIZATION
RESEARCH PAPERS
RESEARCH REPORT
RESEARCH WORKING PAPERS
RESEARCHERS
RISK AVERSION
SAMPLE SIZE
SCENARIO
SCENARIOS
SCIENTISTS
SIGNIFICANCE LEVEL
SIMULATION
SIMULATIONS
STANDARD DEVIATIONS
STANDARD ERRORS
STATA
STATA CODE
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
STATISTICAL METHODS
STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE
STATISTICAL TESTS
TECHNIQUES
VALIDITY
ALTERNATIVE APPROACH
BOOTSTRAP
DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS
DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH
ECONOMIC MODELS
ECONOMIC THEORY
ECONOMICS LITERATURE
ESTIMATORS
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
EXTERNALITIES
FIELD EXPERIMENTS
INCOME
LINEAR MODELS
LINEAR REGRESSION
LOTTERIES
METHODOLOGY
MINIMIZATION
MISSING OBSERVATIONS
NORMAL DISTRIBUTIONS
POLITICAL ECONOMY
PRECISION
PROBABILITY
PROGRAMS
RANDOMIZATION
RESEARCH PAPERS
RESEARCH REPORT
RESEARCH WORKING PAPERS
RESEARCHERS
RISK AVERSION
SAMPLE SIZE
SCENARIO
SCENARIOS
SCIENTISTS
SIGNIFICANCE LEVEL
SIMULATION
SIMULATIONS
STANDARD DEVIATIONS
STANDARD ERRORS
STATA
STATA CODE
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
STATISTICAL METHODS
STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE
STATISTICAL TESTS
TECHNIQUES
VALIDITY
spellingShingle ALTERNATIVE APPROACH
BOOTSTRAP
DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS
DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH
ECONOMIC MODELS
ECONOMIC THEORY
ECONOMICS LITERATURE
ESTIMATORS
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
EXTERNALITIES
FIELD EXPERIMENTS
INCOME
LINEAR MODELS
LINEAR REGRESSION
LOTTERIES
METHODOLOGY
MINIMIZATION
MISSING OBSERVATIONS
NORMAL DISTRIBUTIONS
POLITICAL ECONOMY
PRECISION
PROBABILITY
PROGRAMS
RANDOMIZATION
RESEARCH PAPERS
RESEARCH REPORT
RESEARCH WORKING PAPERS
RESEARCHERS
RISK AVERSION
SAMPLE SIZE
SCENARIO
SCENARIOS
SCIENTISTS
SIGNIFICANCE LEVEL
SIMULATION
SIMULATIONS
STANDARD DEVIATIONS
STANDARD ERRORS
STATA
STATA CODE
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
STATISTICAL METHODS
STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE
STATISTICAL TESTS
TECHNIQUES
VALIDITY
ALTERNATIVE APPROACH
BOOTSTRAP
DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS
DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH
ECONOMIC MODELS
ECONOMIC THEORY
ECONOMICS LITERATURE
ESTIMATORS
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
EXTERNALITIES
FIELD EXPERIMENTS
INCOME
LINEAR MODELS
LINEAR REGRESSION
LOTTERIES
METHODOLOGY
MINIMIZATION
MISSING OBSERVATIONS
NORMAL DISTRIBUTIONS
POLITICAL ECONOMY
PRECISION
PROBABILITY
PROGRAMS
RANDOMIZATION
RESEARCH PAPERS
RESEARCH REPORT
RESEARCH WORKING PAPERS
RESEARCHERS
RISK AVERSION
SAMPLE SIZE
SCENARIO
SCENARIOS
SCIENTISTS
SIGNIFICANCE LEVEL
SIMULATION
SIMULATIONS
STANDARD DEVIATIONS
STANDARD ERRORS
STATA
STATA CODE
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
STATISTICAL METHODS
STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE
STATISTICAL TESTS
TECHNIQUES
VALIDITY
Bruhn, Miriam
McKenzie, David
Bruhn, Miriam
In Pursuit of Balance : Randomization in Practice in Development Field Experiments
description Randomized experiments are increasingly used in development economics, with researchers now facing the question of not just whether to randomize, but how to do so. Pure random assignment guarantees that the treatment and control groups will have identical characteristics on average, but in any particular random allocation, the two groups will differ along some dimensions. Methods used to pursue greater balance include stratification, pair-wise matching, and re-randomization. This paper presents new evidence on the randomization methods used in existing randomized experiments, and carries out simulations in order to provide guidance for researchers. Three main results emerge. First, many researchers are not controlling for the method of randomization in their analysis. The authors show this leads to tests with incorrect size, and can result in lower power than if a pure random draw was used. Second, they find that in samples of 300 or more, the different randomization methods perform similarly in terms of achieving balance on many future outcomes of interest. However, for very persistent outcome variables and in smaller sample sizes, pair-wise matching and stratification perform best. Third, the analysis suggests that on balance the re-randomization methods common in practice are less desirable than other methods, such as matching.
topic_facet ALTERNATIVE APPROACH
BOOTSTRAP
DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS
DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH
ECONOMIC MODELS
ECONOMIC THEORY
ECONOMICS LITERATURE
ESTIMATORS
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
EXTERNALITIES
FIELD EXPERIMENTS
INCOME
LINEAR MODELS
LINEAR REGRESSION
LOTTERIES
METHODOLOGY
MINIMIZATION
MISSING OBSERVATIONS
NORMAL DISTRIBUTIONS
POLITICAL ECONOMY
PRECISION
PROBABILITY
PROGRAMS
RANDOMIZATION
RESEARCH PAPERS
RESEARCH REPORT
RESEARCH WORKING PAPERS
RESEARCHERS
RISK AVERSION
SAMPLE SIZE
SCENARIO
SCENARIOS
SCIENTISTS
SIGNIFICANCE LEVEL
SIMULATION
SIMULATIONS
STANDARD DEVIATIONS
STANDARD ERRORS
STATA
STATA CODE
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
STATISTICAL METHODS
STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE
STATISTICAL TESTS
TECHNIQUES
VALIDITY
author Bruhn, Miriam
McKenzie, David
Bruhn, Miriam
author_facet Bruhn, Miriam
McKenzie, David
Bruhn, Miriam
author_sort Bruhn, Miriam
title In Pursuit of Balance : Randomization in Practice in Development Field Experiments
title_short In Pursuit of Balance : Randomization in Practice in Development Field Experiments
title_full In Pursuit of Balance : Randomization in Practice in Development Field Experiments
title_fullStr In Pursuit of Balance : Randomization in Practice in Development Field Experiments
title_full_unstemmed In Pursuit of Balance : Randomization in Practice in Development Field Experiments
title_sort in pursuit of balance : randomization in practice in development field experiments
publisher World Bank, Washington, DC
publishDate 2008-10
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2008/10/9938284/pursuit-balance-randomization-practice-development-field-experiments
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/6910
work_keys_str_mv AT bruhnmiriam inpursuitofbalancerandomizationinpracticeindevelopmentfieldexperiments
AT mckenziedavid inpursuitofbalancerandomizationinpracticeindevelopmentfieldexperiments
AT bruhnmiriam inpursuitofbalancerandomizationinpracticeindevelopmentfieldexperiments
_version_ 1807157151417761792