Joint Bidding, Governance and Public Procurement Costs : A Case of Road Projects

To utilize public resources efficiently, it is important to take advantage of competition in public procurement auctions to the maximum extent. Joint bidding is a common practice that potentially facilitates competition. By pooling financial and experiential resources, more firms are expected to enter the market, but it will also directly reduce competition if more than one bidder who is solely qualified makes a coalition. In theory joint bidding may or may not be beneficial to auctioneers, depending on the model. The paper empirically examines the impacts of joint bidding on firms' entry as well as bidding behaviour, using data on public road projects in developing countries. It shows that coalitional bids, in particular by local firms, would be competitive, but foreign joint ventures would undermine competition. It is also found that good governance can encourage firms' entry into the tendering and facilitate joint bidding practices.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Estache, Antonio, Iimi, Atsushi
Format: Journal Article biblioteca
Language:EN
Published: 2009
Subjects:Auctions D440, National Government Expenditures and Related Policies: Procurement H570, Formal and Informal Sectors, Shadow Economy, Institutional Arrangements O170, Economic Development: Regional, Urban, and Rural Analyses, Transportation O180, Transportation Systems: Government and Private Investment Analysis, Road Maintenance, Transportation Planning R420, Public Facility Location Analysis, Public Investment and Capital Stock R530,
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10986/5699
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-okr-109865699
record_format koha
spelling dig-okr-1098656992021-04-23T14:02:23Z Joint Bidding, Governance and Public Procurement Costs : A Case of Road Projects Estache, Antonio Iimi, Atsushi Auctions D440 National Government Expenditures and Related Policies: Procurement H570 Formal and Informal Sectors Shadow Economy Institutional Arrangements O170 Economic Development: Regional, Urban, and Rural Analyses Transportation O180 Transportation Systems: Government and Private Investment Analysis Road Maintenance, Transportation Planning R420 Public Facility Location Analysis Public Investment and Capital Stock R530 To utilize public resources efficiently, it is important to take advantage of competition in public procurement auctions to the maximum extent. Joint bidding is a common practice that potentially facilitates competition. By pooling financial and experiential resources, more firms are expected to enter the market, but it will also directly reduce competition if more than one bidder who is solely qualified makes a coalition. In theory joint bidding may or may not be beneficial to auctioneers, depending on the model. The paper empirically examines the impacts of joint bidding on firms' entry as well as bidding behaviour, using data on public road projects in developing countries. It shows that coalitional bids, in particular by local firms, would be competitive, but foreign joint ventures would undermine competition. It is also found that good governance can encourage firms' entry into the tendering and facilitate joint bidding practices. 2012-03-30T07:34:06Z 2012-03-30T07:34:06Z 2009 Journal Article Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 13704788 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/5699 EN http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/igo World Bank Journal Article
institution Banco Mundial
collection DSpace
country Estados Unidos
countrycode US
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-okr
tag biblioteca
region America del Norte
libraryname Biblioteca del Banco Mundial
language EN
topic Auctions D440
National Government Expenditures and Related Policies: Procurement H570
Formal and Informal Sectors
Shadow Economy
Institutional Arrangements O170
Economic Development: Regional, Urban, and Rural Analyses
Transportation O180
Transportation Systems: Government and Private Investment Analysis
Road Maintenance, Transportation Planning R420
Public Facility Location Analysis
Public Investment and Capital Stock R530
Auctions D440
National Government Expenditures and Related Policies: Procurement H570
Formal and Informal Sectors
Shadow Economy
Institutional Arrangements O170
Economic Development: Regional, Urban, and Rural Analyses
Transportation O180
Transportation Systems: Government and Private Investment Analysis
Road Maintenance, Transportation Planning R420
Public Facility Location Analysis
Public Investment and Capital Stock R530
spellingShingle Auctions D440
National Government Expenditures and Related Policies: Procurement H570
Formal and Informal Sectors
Shadow Economy
Institutional Arrangements O170
Economic Development: Regional, Urban, and Rural Analyses
Transportation O180
Transportation Systems: Government and Private Investment Analysis
Road Maintenance, Transportation Planning R420
Public Facility Location Analysis
Public Investment and Capital Stock R530
Auctions D440
National Government Expenditures and Related Policies: Procurement H570
Formal and Informal Sectors
Shadow Economy
Institutional Arrangements O170
Economic Development: Regional, Urban, and Rural Analyses
Transportation O180
Transportation Systems: Government and Private Investment Analysis
Road Maintenance, Transportation Planning R420
Public Facility Location Analysis
Public Investment and Capital Stock R530
Estache, Antonio
Iimi, Atsushi
Joint Bidding, Governance and Public Procurement Costs : A Case of Road Projects
description To utilize public resources efficiently, it is important to take advantage of competition in public procurement auctions to the maximum extent. Joint bidding is a common practice that potentially facilitates competition. By pooling financial and experiential resources, more firms are expected to enter the market, but it will also directly reduce competition if more than one bidder who is solely qualified makes a coalition. In theory joint bidding may or may not be beneficial to auctioneers, depending on the model. The paper empirically examines the impacts of joint bidding on firms' entry as well as bidding behaviour, using data on public road projects in developing countries. It shows that coalitional bids, in particular by local firms, would be competitive, but foreign joint ventures would undermine competition. It is also found that good governance can encourage firms' entry into the tendering and facilitate joint bidding practices.
format Journal Article
topic_facet Auctions D440
National Government Expenditures and Related Policies: Procurement H570
Formal and Informal Sectors
Shadow Economy
Institutional Arrangements O170
Economic Development: Regional, Urban, and Rural Analyses
Transportation O180
Transportation Systems: Government and Private Investment Analysis
Road Maintenance, Transportation Planning R420
Public Facility Location Analysis
Public Investment and Capital Stock R530
author Estache, Antonio
Iimi, Atsushi
author_facet Estache, Antonio
Iimi, Atsushi
author_sort Estache, Antonio
title Joint Bidding, Governance and Public Procurement Costs : A Case of Road Projects
title_short Joint Bidding, Governance and Public Procurement Costs : A Case of Road Projects
title_full Joint Bidding, Governance and Public Procurement Costs : A Case of Road Projects
title_fullStr Joint Bidding, Governance and Public Procurement Costs : A Case of Road Projects
title_full_unstemmed Joint Bidding, Governance and Public Procurement Costs : A Case of Road Projects
title_sort joint bidding, governance and public procurement costs : a case of road projects
publishDate 2009
url http://hdl.handle.net/10986/5699
work_keys_str_mv AT estacheantonio jointbiddinggovernanceandpublicprocurementcostsacaseofroadprojects
AT iimiatsushi jointbiddinggovernanceandpublicprocurementcostsacaseofroadprojects
_version_ 1756571650415919104