What Fundamentally Drives Growth? Revisiting the Institutions and Economic Performance Debate
The recent empirical growth literature has proposed three underlying fundamental determinants of economic growth, namely, physical geography, economic integration and institutional quality. This paper unpacks the final determinant into both political-economic institutions as well as the primarily political institution of democratic development. Using both cross-sectional and panel datasets, we show that, properly instrumented, there is no evidence that democracies grow faster or slower than non-democracies. This result is in contrast to much of the more recent literature, which tends to find a weakly positive relationship. Political- economic institutions, however, remain positive and significant determinants of economic growth, which corroborates much of the empirical evidence in the existing literature.
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Journal Article biblioteca |
Language: | EN |
Published: |
2008
|
Subjects: | Formal and Informal Sectors, Shadow Economy, Institutional Arrangements O170, Institutions and Growth O430, |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10986/5605 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
dig-okr-109865605 |
---|---|
record_format |
koha |
spelling |
dig-okr-1098656052021-04-23T14:02:23Z What Fundamentally Drives Growth? Revisiting the Institutions and Economic Performance Debate Decker, Jessica Henson Lim, Jamus Jerome Formal and Informal Sectors Shadow Economy Institutional Arrangements O170 Institutions and Growth O430 The recent empirical growth literature has proposed three underlying fundamental determinants of economic growth, namely, physical geography, economic integration and institutional quality. This paper unpacks the final determinant into both political-economic institutions as well as the primarily political institution of democratic development. Using both cross-sectional and panel datasets, we show that, properly instrumented, there is no evidence that democracies grow faster or slower than non-democracies. This result is in contrast to much of the more recent literature, which tends to find a weakly positive relationship. Political- economic institutions, however, remain positive and significant determinants of economic growth, which corroborates much of the empirical evidence in the existing literature. 2012-03-30T07:33:38Z 2012-03-30T07:33:38Z 2008 Journal Article Journal of International Development 09541748 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/5605 EN http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/igo World Bank Journal Article |
institution |
Banco Mundial |
collection |
DSpace |
country |
Estados Unidos |
countrycode |
US |
component |
Bibliográfico |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
dig-okr |
tag |
biblioteca |
region |
America del Norte |
libraryname |
Biblioteca del Banco Mundial |
language |
EN |
topic |
Formal and Informal Sectors Shadow Economy Institutional Arrangements O170 Institutions and Growth O430 Formal and Informal Sectors Shadow Economy Institutional Arrangements O170 Institutions and Growth O430 |
spellingShingle |
Formal and Informal Sectors Shadow Economy Institutional Arrangements O170 Institutions and Growth O430 Formal and Informal Sectors Shadow Economy Institutional Arrangements O170 Institutions and Growth O430 Decker, Jessica Henson Lim, Jamus Jerome What Fundamentally Drives Growth? Revisiting the Institutions and Economic Performance Debate |
description |
The recent empirical growth literature has proposed three underlying fundamental determinants of economic growth, namely, physical geography, economic integration and institutional quality. This paper unpacks the final determinant into both political-economic institutions as well as the primarily political institution of democratic development. Using both cross-sectional and panel datasets, we show that, properly instrumented, there is no evidence that democracies grow faster or slower than non-democracies. This result is in contrast to much of the more recent literature, which tends to find a weakly positive relationship. Political- economic institutions, however, remain positive and significant determinants of economic growth, which corroborates much of the empirical evidence in the existing literature. |
format |
Journal Article |
topic_facet |
Formal and Informal Sectors Shadow Economy Institutional Arrangements O170 Institutions and Growth O430 |
author |
Decker, Jessica Henson Lim, Jamus Jerome |
author_facet |
Decker, Jessica Henson Lim, Jamus Jerome |
author_sort |
Decker, Jessica Henson |
title |
What Fundamentally Drives Growth? Revisiting the Institutions and Economic Performance Debate |
title_short |
What Fundamentally Drives Growth? Revisiting the Institutions and Economic Performance Debate |
title_full |
What Fundamentally Drives Growth? Revisiting the Institutions and Economic Performance Debate |
title_fullStr |
What Fundamentally Drives Growth? Revisiting the Institutions and Economic Performance Debate |
title_full_unstemmed |
What Fundamentally Drives Growth? Revisiting the Institutions and Economic Performance Debate |
title_sort |
what fundamentally drives growth? revisiting the institutions and economic performance debate |
publishDate |
2008 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/5605 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT deckerjessicahenson whatfundamentallydrivesgrowthrevisitingtheinstitutionsandeconomicperformancedebate AT limjamusjerome whatfundamentallydrivesgrowthrevisitingtheinstitutionsandeconomicperformancedebate |
_version_ |
1756571638877388800 |