Second Generation Biofuels: Economics and Policies

This study reviews economics of production of second generation biofuels from various feedstocks, including crop and wood/forestry residues, lignocellulosic energy crops, jatropha, and algae. The study indicates that while second generation biofuels could significantly contribute to the future energy supply mix, cost is a major barrier to its commercial production in the near to medium term. Depending upon type of biofuels, feedstock prices and conversion costs, the cost of cellulosic ethanol is found to be two to three times higher than the current price of gasoline on an energy equivalent basis. The median cost (across the studies reviewed) of biodiesel produced from microalgae, a prospective feedstock, is seven times higher than the current price of diesel, although much higher cost estimates have been reported. As compared with the case of first generation biofuels, in which feedstock can account for over two-thirds of the total costs, the share of feedstock in the total costs is relatively lower (30-50%) in the case of second generation biofuels. While significant cost reductions are needed for both types of second generation biofuels, the critical barriers are at different steps of the production process. For cellulosic ethanol, the biomass conversion costs needs to be reduced. On the other hand, feedstock cost is the main issue for biodiesel. At present, policy instruments, such as fiscal incentives and consumption mandates have in general not differentiated between the first and second generation biofuels except in the cases of the US and EU. The policy regime should be revised to account for the relative merits of different types of biofuels.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carriquiry, Miguel A., Du, Xiaodong, Timilsina, Govinda R.
Format: Journal Article biblioteca
Language:EN
Published: 2011
Subjects:Agricultural R&D, Agricultural Technology, Biofuels, Agricultural Extension Services Q160, Alternative Energy Sources Q420,
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10986/5498
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-okr-109865498
record_format koha
spelling dig-okr-1098654982021-04-23T14:02:22Z Second Generation Biofuels: Economics and Policies Carriquiry, Miguel A. Du, Xiaodong Timilsina, Govinda R. Agricultural R&D Agricultural Technology Biofuels Agricultural Extension Services Q160 Alternative Energy Sources Q420 This study reviews economics of production of second generation biofuels from various feedstocks, including crop and wood/forestry residues, lignocellulosic energy crops, jatropha, and algae. The study indicates that while second generation biofuels could significantly contribute to the future energy supply mix, cost is a major barrier to its commercial production in the near to medium term. Depending upon type of biofuels, feedstock prices and conversion costs, the cost of cellulosic ethanol is found to be two to three times higher than the current price of gasoline on an energy equivalent basis. The median cost (across the studies reviewed) of biodiesel produced from microalgae, a prospective feedstock, is seven times higher than the current price of diesel, although much higher cost estimates have been reported. As compared with the case of first generation biofuels, in which feedstock can account for over two-thirds of the total costs, the share of feedstock in the total costs is relatively lower (30-50%) in the case of second generation biofuels. While significant cost reductions are needed for both types of second generation biofuels, the critical barriers are at different steps of the production process. For cellulosic ethanol, the biomass conversion costs needs to be reduced. On the other hand, feedstock cost is the main issue for biodiesel. At present, policy instruments, such as fiscal incentives and consumption mandates have in general not differentiated between the first and second generation biofuels except in the cases of the US and EU. The policy regime should be revised to account for the relative merits of different types of biofuels. 2012-03-30T07:33:07Z 2012-03-30T07:33:07Z 2011 Journal Article Energy Policy 03014215 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/5498 EN http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/igo World Bank Journal Article
institution Banco Mundial
collection DSpace
country Estados Unidos
countrycode US
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-okr
tag biblioteca
region America del Norte
libraryname Biblioteca del Banco Mundial
language EN
topic Agricultural R&D
Agricultural Technology
Biofuels
Agricultural Extension Services Q160
Alternative Energy Sources Q420
Agricultural R&D
Agricultural Technology
Biofuels
Agricultural Extension Services Q160
Alternative Energy Sources Q420
spellingShingle Agricultural R&D
Agricultural Technology
Biofuels
Agricultural Extension Services Q160
Alternative Energy Sources Q420
Agricultural R&D
Agricultural Technology
Biofuels
Agricultural Extension Services Q160
Alternative Energy Sources Q420
Carriquiry, Miguel A.
Du, Xiaodong
Timilsina, Govinda R.
Second Generation Biofuels: Economics and Policies
description This study reviews economics of production of second generation biofuels from various feedstocks, including crop and wood/forestry residues, lignocellulosic energy crops, jatropha, and algae. The study indicates that while second generation biofuels could significantly contribute to the future energy supply mix, cost is a major barrier to its commercial production in the near to medium term. Depending upon type of biofuels, feedstock prices and conversion costs, the cost of cellulosic ethanol is found to be two to three times higher than the current price of gasoline on an energy equivalent basis. The median cost (across the studies reviewed) of biodiesel produced from microalgae, a prospective feedstock, is seven times higher than the current price of diesel, although much higher cost estimates have been reported. As compared with the case of first generation biofuels, in which feedstock can account for over two-thirds of the total costs, the share of feedstock in the total costs is relatively lower (30-50%) in the case of second generation biofuels. While significant cost reductions are needed for both types of second generation biofuels, the critical barriers are at different steps of the production process. For cellulosic ethanol, the biomass conversion costs needs to be reduced. On the other hand, feedstock cost is the main issue for biodiesel. At present, policy instruments, such as fiscal incentives and consumption mandates have in general not differentiated between the first and second generation biofuels except in the cases of the US and EU. The policy regime should be revised to account for the relative merits of different types of biofuels.
format Journal Article
topic_facet Agricultural R&D
Agricultural Technology
Biofuels
Agricultural Extension Services Q160
Alternative Energy Sources Q420
author Carriquiry, Miguel A.
Du, Xiaodong
Timilsina, Govinda R.
author_facet Carriquiry, Miguel A.
Du, Xiaodong
Timilsina, Govinda R.
author_sort Carriquiry, Miguel A.
title Second Generation Biofuels: Economics and Policies
title_short Second Generation Biofuels: Economics and Policies
title_full Second Generation Biofuels: Economics and Policies
title_fullStr Second Generation Biofuels: Economics and Policies
title_full_unstemmed Second Generation Biofuels: Economics and Policies
title_sort second generation biofuels: economics and policies
publishDate 2011
url http://hdl.handle.net/10986/5498
work_keys_str_mv AT carriquirymiguela secondgenerationbiofuelseconomicsandpolicies
AT duxiaodong secondgenerationbiofuelseconomicsandpolicies
AT timilsinagovindar secondgenerationbiofuelseconomicsandpolicies
_version_ 1756571626448617472