Price Adjustments and Poverty Measurement

Measuring poverty entails making interpersonal welfare comparisons, that should account for differences in prices faced by households, both over time and across space. This paper investigates the impact of seemingly minor differences in the practical implementation of price adjustments, by developing an analytical framework that is consistent with standard consumer theory and mindful of the data limitations faced by practitioners. The main result is at odds with common sense: even when multiple price indexes are available, say a food and a nonfood Consumer Price Index, it turns out that using a single price index, the total Consumer Price Index, to adjust the consumption aggregate is recommended. The practice of adjusting the components of the consumption aggregate separately, using matching deflators—food expenditure with the food index and nonfood expenditure with the nonfood index—can lead to a systematic bias in the welfare measure, and consequently in poverty and inequality measures. The direction of the bias can be easily predicted based on the price level and household consumption patterns. On the interplay between spatial and temporal deflation, the findings show that temporal deflation should be carried out before implementing adjustments to spatial cost-of-living differences. The paper illustrates these findings using the Islamic Republic of Iran’s 2019 Household Income and Expenditure survey: the bias in the headcount poverty rate due to incorrect deflation is substantive (5–10 percent for estimates at the national level, 15–20 percent in urban and rural areas, and more than 30 percent for district-level headcount rates). Higher-order Foster-Greer-Thorbecke poverty measures are even more affected.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amendola, Nicola, Mancini, Guilia, Redaelli, Silvia, Vecchi, Giovanni
Format: Working Paper biblioteca
Language:English
English
Published: World Bank 2023-05-01
Subjects:POVERTY, INEQUALITY, PRICE ADJUSTMENT, PRICE INDEXES, COST-OF-LIVING DIFFERENCES, INFLATION, POVERTY MEASUREMENT, HOUSEHOLD INCOME AND EXPENDITURE SURVEY,
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/099311104272341601/IDU06af3b51809e4e049840b03f03e26a6c1f357
https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/39759
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-okr-1098639759
record_format koha
spelling dig-okr-10986397592024-03-11T19:22:21Z Price Adjustments and Poverty Measurement Amendola, Nicola Mancini, Guilia Redaelli, Silvia Vecchi, Giovanni POVERTY INEQUALITY PRICE ADJUSTMENT PRICE INDEXES COST-OF-LIVING DIFFERENCES INFLATION POVERTY MEASUREMENT HOUSEHOLD INCOME AND EXPENDITURE SURVEY Measuring poverty entails making interpersonal welfare comparisons, that should account for differences in prices faced by households, both over time and across space. This paper investigates the impact of seemingly minor differences in the practical implementation of price adjustments, by developing an analytical framework that is consistent with standard consumer theory and mindful of the data limitations faced by practitioners. The main result is at odds with common sense: even when multiple price indexes are available, say a food and a nonfood Consumer Price Index, it turns out that using a single price index, the total Consumer Price Index, to adjust the consumption aggregate is recommended. The practice of adjusting the components of the consumption aggregate separately, using matching deflators—food expenditure with the food index and nonfood expenditure with the nonfood index—can lead to a systematic bias in the welfare measure, and consequently in poverty and inequality measures. The direction of the bias can be easily predicted based on the price level and household consumption patterns. On the interplay between spatial and temporal deflation, the findings show that temporal deflation should be carried out before implementing adjustments to spatial cost-of-living differences. The paper illustrates these findings using the Islamic Republic of Iran’s 2019 Household Income and Expenditure survey: the bias in the headcount poverty rate due to incorrect deflation is substantive (5–10 percent for estimates at the national level, 15–20 percent in urban and rural areas, and more than 30 percent for district-level headcount rates). Higher-order Foster-Greer-Thorbecke poverty measures are even more affected. 2023-05-01T17:54:36Z 2023-05-01T17:54:36Z 2023-05-01 Working Paper http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/099311104272341601/IDU06af3b51809e4e049840b03f03e26a6c1f357 https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/39759 English en Policy Research Working Papers; 10426 CC BY 3.0 IGO https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank application/pdf text/plain World Bank
institution Banco Mundial
collection DSpace
country Estados Unidos
countrycode US
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-okr
tag biblioteca
region America del Norte
libraryname Biblioteca del Banco Mundial
language English
English
topic POVERTY
INEQUALITY
PRICE ADJUSTMENT
PRICE INDEXES
COST-OF-LIVING DIFFERENCES
INFLATION
POVERTY MEASUREMENT
HOUSEHOLD INCOME AND EXPENDITURE SURVEY
POVERTY
INEQUALITY
PRICE ADJUSTMENT
PRICE INDEXES
COST-OF-LIVING DIFFERENCES
INFLATION
POVERTY MEASUREMENT
HOUSEHOLD INCOME AND EXPENDITURE SURVEY
spellingShingle POVERTY
INEQUALITY
PRICE ADJUSTMENT
PRICE INDEXES
COST-OF-LIVING DIFFERENCES
INFLATION
POVERTY MEASUREMENT
HOUSEHOLD INCOME AND EXPENDITURE SURVEY
POVERTY
INEQUALITY
PRICE ADJUSTMENT
PRICE INDEXES
COST-OF-LIVING DIFFERENCES
INFLATION
POVERTY MEASUREMENT
HOUSEHOLD INCOME AND EXPENDITURE SURVEY
Amendola, Nicola
Mancini, Guilia
Redaelli, Silvia
Vecchi, Giovanni
Price Adjustments and Poverty Measurement
description Measuring poverty entails making interpersonal welfare comparisons, that should account for differences in prices faced by households, both over time and across space. This paper investigates the impact of seemingly minor differences in the practical implementation of price adjustments, by developing an analytical framework that is consistent with standard consumer theory and mindful of the data limitations faced by practitioners. The main result is at odds with common sense: even when multiple price indexes are available, say a food and a nonfood Consumer Price Index, it turns out that using a single price index, the total Consumer Price Index, to adjust the consumption aggregate is recommended. The practice of adjusting the components of the consumption aggregate separately, using matching deflators—food expenditure with the food index and nonfood expenditure with the nonfood index—can lead to a systematic bias in the welfare measure, and consequently in poverty and inequality measures. The direction of the bias can be easily predicted based on the price level and household consumption patterns. On the interplay between spatial and temporal deflation, the findings show that temporal deflation should be carried out before implementing adjustments to spatial cost-of-living differences. The paper illustrates these findings using the Islamic Republic of Iran’s 2019 Household Income and Expenditure survey: the bias in the headcount poverty rate due to incorrect deflation is substantive (5–10 percent for estimates at the national level, 15–20 percent in urban and rural areas, and more than 30 percent for district-level headcount rates). Higher-order Foster-Greer-Thorbecke poverty measures are even more affected.
format Working Paper
topic_facet POVERTY
INEQUALITY
PRICE ADJUSTMENT
PRICE INDEXES
COST-OF-LIVING DIFFERENCES
INFLATION
POVERTY MEASUREMENT
HOUSEHOLD INCOME AND EXPENDITURE SURVEY
author Amendola, Nicola
Mancini, Guilia
Redaelli, Silvia
Vecchi, Giovanni
author_facet Amendola, Nicola
Mancini, Guilia
Redaelli, Silvia
Vecchi, Giovanni
author_sort Amendola, Nicola
title Price Adjustments and Poverty Measurement
title_short Price Adjustments and Poverty Measurement
title_full Price Adjustments and Poverty Measurement
title_fullStr Price Adjustments and Poverty Measurement
title_full_unstemmed Price Adjustments and Poverty Measurement
title_sort price adjustments and poverty measurement
publisher World Bank
publishDate 2023-05-01
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/099311104272341601/IDU06af3b51809e4e049840b03f03e26a6c1f357
https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/39759
work_keys_str_mv AT amendolanicola priceadjustmentsandpovertymeasurement
AT manciniguilia priceadjustmentsandpovertymeasurement
AT redaellisilvia priceadjustmentsandpovertymeasurement
AT vecchigiovanni priceadjustmentsandpovertymeasurement
_version_ 1794797015141449728