How Do Borrowers Respond to a Debt Moratorium?

Debt moratoria that allow borrowers to postpone loan payments are a frequently used tool intended to soften the impact of economic crises. This paper reports results from a nationwide experiment with a large consumer lender in India, designed to study how debt forbearance offers affect loan repayment and banking relationships. In the experiment, borrowers receive forbearance offers that are presented either as an initiative of their lender or the result of government regulation. The results show that delinquent borrowers who are offered a debt moratorium by their lender are 4 percentage points (7 percent) less likely to default on their loan, while forbearance has no effect on repayment if it is granted by the regulator. Borrowers who are offered forbearance by their lender also have causally higher demand for future interactions with the lender: in a follow-up experiment conducted several months after the main intervention demand for a non-credit product offered by the lender is 10 percentage points (27 percent) higher among customers who were offered repayment flexibility by the lender than among customers who received a moratorium offer presented as an initiative of the regulator. Overall, the results suggest that, rather than generating moral hazard, debt forbearance can improve loan repayment and support the creation of longer-term banking relationships not only for liquidity but also for relational contracting reasons. This provides a rationale for offering repayment flexibility even in settings where lenders are not required to provide forbearance.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fiorin, Stefano, Hall, Joseph, Kanz, Martin
Format: Working Paper biblioteca
Language:English
English
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2023-03
Subjects:DEBT FORBEARANCE, MORAL HAZARD, RELATIONAL CONTRACTING, LOAN REPAYMENT, CONSUMER DEBT REPAYMENT, REPAYMENT FLEXIVILITY BENEFITS,
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/099612503102338755/IDU0a5f925c709613045820a0a50535cb8013812
https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/39532
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-okr-1098639532
record_format koha
spelling dig-okr-10986395322024-03-11T19:22:09Z How Do Borrowers Respond to a Debt Moratorium? Experimental Evidence from Consumer Loans in India Fiorin, Stefano Hall, Joseph Kanz, Martin DEBT FORBEARANCE MORAL HAZARD RELATIONAL CONTRACTING LOAN REPAYMENT CONSUMER DEBT REPAYMENT REPAYMENT FLEXIVILITY BENEFITS Debt moratoria that allow borrowers to postpone loan payments are a frequently used tool intended to soften the impact of economic crises. This paper reports results from a nationwide experiment with a large consumer lender in India, designed to study how debt forbearance offers affect loan repayment and banking relationships. In the experiment, borrowers receive forbearance offers that are presented either as an initiative of their lender or the result of government regulation. The results show that delinquent borrowers who are offered a debt moratorium by their lender are 4 percentage points (7 percent) less likely to default on their loan, while forbearance has no effect on repayment if it is granted by the regulator. Borrowers who are offered forbearance by their lender also have causally higher demand for future interactions with the lender: in a follow-up experiment conducted several months after the main intervention demand for a non-credit product offered by the lender is 10 percentage points (27 percent) higher among customers who were offered repayment flexibility by the lender than among customers who received a moratorium offer presented as an initiative of the regulator. Overall, the results suggest that, rather than generating moral hazard, debt forbearance can improve loan repayment and support the creation of longer-term banking relationships not only for liquidity but also for relational contracting reasons. This provides a rationale for offering repayment flexibility even in settings where lenders are not required to provide forbearance. 2023-03-14T19:55:45Z 2023-03-14T19:55:45Z 2023-03 Working Paper http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/099612503102338755/IDU0a5f925c709613045820a0a50535cb8013812 https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/39532 English en Policy Research Working Papers; 10358 CC BY-NC 3.0 IGO World Bank application/pdf text/plain World Bank, Washington, DC
institution Banco Mundial
collection DSpace
country Estados Unidos
countrycode US
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-okr
tag biblioteca
region America del Norte
libraryname Biblioteca del Banco Mundial
language English
English
topic DEBT FORBEARANCE
MORAL HAZARD
RELATIONAL CONTRACTING
LOAN REPAYMENT
CONSUMER DEBT REPAYMENT
REPAYMENT FLEXIVILITY BENEFITS
DEBT FORBEARANCE
MORAL HAZARD
RELATIONAL CONTRACTING
LOAN REPAYMENT
CONSUMER DEBT REPAYMENT
REPAYMENT FLEXIVILITY BENEFITS
spellingShingle DEBT FORBEARANCE
MORAL HAZARD
RELATIONAL CONTRACTING
LOAN REPAYMENT
CONSUMER DEBT REPAYMENT
REPAYMENT FLEXIVILITY BENEFITS
DEBT FORBEARANCE
MORAL HAZARD
RELATIONAL CONTRACTING
LOAN REPAYMENT
CONSUMER DEBT REPAYMENT
REPAYMENT FLEXIVILITY BENEFITS
Fiorin, Stefano
Hall, Joseph
Kanz, Martin
How Do Borrowers Respond to a Debt Moratorium?
description Debt moratoria that allow borrowers to postpone loan payments are a frequently used tool intended to soften the impact of economic crises. This paper reports results from a nationwide experiment with a large consumer lender in India, designed to study how debt forbearance offers affect loan repayment and banking relationships. In the experiment, borrowers receive forbearance offers that are presented either as an initiative of their lender or the result of government regulation. The results show that delinquent borrowers who are offered a debt moratorium by their lender are 4 percentage points (7 percent) less likely to default on their loan, while forbearance has no effect on repayment if it is granted by the regulator. Borrowers who are offered forbearance by their lender also have causally higher demand for future interactions with the lender: in a follow-up experiment conducted several months after the main intervention demand for a non-credit product offered by the lender is 10 percentage points (27 percent) higher among customers who were offered repayment flexibility by the lender than among customers who received a moratorium offer presented as an initiative of the regulator. Overall, the results suggest that, rather than generating moral hazard, debt forbearance can improve loan repayment and support the creation of longer-term banking relationships not only for liquidity but also for relational contracting reasons. This provides a rationale for offering repayment flexibility even in settings where lenders are not required to provide forbearance.
format Working Paper
topic_facet DEBT FORBEARANCE
MORAL HAZARD
RELATIONAL CONTRACTING
LOAN REPAYMENT
CONSUMER DEBT REPAYMENT
REPAYMENT FLEXIVILITY BENEFITS
author Fiorin, Stefano
Hall, Joseph
Kanz, Martin
author_facet Fiorin, Stefano
Hall, Joseph
Kanz, Martin
author_sort Fiorin, Stefano
title How Do Borrowers Respond to a Debt Moratorium?
title_short How Do Borrowers Respond to a Debt Moratorium?
title_full How Do Borrowers Respond to a Debt Moratorium?
title_fullStr How Do Borrowers Respond to a Debt Moratorium?
title_full_unstemmed How Do Borrowers Respond to a Debt Moratorium?
title_sort how do borrowers respond to a debt moratorium?
publisher World Bank, Washington, DC
publishDate 2023-03
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/099612503102338755/IDU0a5f925c709613045820a0a50535cb8013812
https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/39532
work_keys_str_mv AT fiorinstefano howdoborrowersrespondtoadebtmoratorium
AT halljoseph howdoborrowersrespondtoadebtmoratorium
AT kanzmartin howdoborrowersrespondtoadebtmoratorium
AT fiorinstefano experimentalevidencefromconsumerloansinindia
AT halljoseph experimentalevidencefromconsumerloansinindia
AT kanzmartin experimentalevidencefromconsumerloansinindia
_version_ 1794796958261444608