The Publicity “Defect” of Customary Law

This paper examines the extent to which dispute resolvers in customary law systems provide widely understandable justifications for their decisions. The paper first examines the liberal-democratic reasons for the importance of publicity, understood to be wide accessibility of legal justification, by reviewing the uses of publicity in Habermas and Rawls accounts of the rule of law. Taking examples from Sierra Leone, the paper then argues that customary law systems would benefit from making the reasons for local dispute resolution practices, such as "begging" from elders, witchcraft, and openness of hearings, more widely accessible. The paper concludes that although legal pluralism is usually taken to be an analytical concept, it may have a normative thrust as well, and that publicity standards would also apply to formal courts in developing countries, which are also typically "defective" along this dimension.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gauri, Varun
Language:English
Published: 2010-06-01
Subjects:ACTIONS, ACTS, ADJUDICATION, ADJUDICATIONS, ADVOCACY, ARGUMENTATION, ASSETS, AUTHORITY, BEGGING, BEST PRACTICE, CASE LAW, CITIZENSHIP, CIVIL SOCIETY, COMPENSATION, COMPLAINT, CONSTITUENTS, COURT, COURTS, CRIME, CRIMES, CRIMINALS, CUSTOMARY LAW, CUSTOMARY LAWS, DECISION MAKING, DEMOCRACY, DEMOCRATIC STATE, DIVORCE, ELECTION, EMPOWERMENT, EQUALITY, FINES, GENDER, GENDER EQUALITY, HOMES, HUMAN RIGHTS, HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS, HUMILIATIONS, HUSBAND, INEQUALITIES, INEQUALITY, INTEGRITY, INVESTIGATION, JUDGE, JUDGES, JUDICIAL PROCEDURES, JUDICIAL REVIEW, JUSTICE, JUSTICE SYSTEM, JUSTICES, LAWS, LEGAL CULTURE, LEGAL PLURALISM, LEGAL POWER, LEGAL SYSTEM, LEGAL SYSTEMS, LEGISLATION, LEGISLATORS, LEGITIMACY, LEGITIMATION, LIBERALISM, LIBERTIES, MARRIED MAN, MARRIED WOMAN, OFFENDER, OFFENSE, PARENTS, POLICE, POLICE OFFICER, POLITICAL RIGHTS, PREFERENTIAL, PRIVACY, PROPERTY RIGHTS, PROSECUTION, PUBLIC OPINION, PUBLIC SERVICES, RAPE, REPRESENTATIVES, REPRESSION, RULE OF LAW, RULINGS, SECRECY, SEX, SOCIAL RIGHTS, STATE LAW, VICTIMS, VIOLATIONS, WAR, WIFE, WILL, WOMAN,
Online Access:http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000158349_20100624162025
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/3834
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-okr-109863834
record_format koha
spelling dig-okr-1098638342024-08-08T16:04:39Z The Publicity “Defect” of Customary Law Gauri, Varun ACTIONS ACTS ADJUDICATION ADJUDICATIONS ADVOCACY ARGUMENTATION ASSETS AUTHORITY BEGGING BEST PRACTICE CASE LAW CITIZENSHIP CIVIL SOCIETY COMPENSATION COMPLAINT CONSTITUENTS COURT COURTS CRIME CRIMES CRIMINALS CUSTOMARY LAW CUSTOMARY LAWS DECISION MAKING DEMOCRACY DEMOCRATIC STATE DIVORCE ELECTION EMPOWERMENT EQUALITY FINES GENDER GENDER EQUALITY HOMES HUMAN RIGHTS HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS HUMILIATIONS HUSBAND INEQUALITIES INEQUALITY INTEGRITY INVESTIGATION JUDGE JUDGES JUDICIAL PROCEDURES JUDICIAL REVIEW JUSTICE JUSTICE SYSTEM JUSTICES LAWS LEGAL CULTURE LEGAL PLURALISM LEGAL POWER LEGAL SYSTEM LEGAL SYSTEMS LEGISLATION LEGISLATORS LEGITIMACY LEGITIMATION LIBERALISM LIBERTIES MARRIED MAN MARRIED WOMAN OFFENDER OFFENSE PARENTS POLICE POLICE OFFICER POLITICAL RIGHTS PREFERENTIAL PRIVACY PROPERTY RIGHTS PROSECUTION PUBLIC OPINION PUBLIC SERVICES RAPE REPRESENTATIVES REPRESSION RULE OF LAW RULINGS SECRECY SEX SOCIAL RIGHTS STATE LAW VICTIMS VIOLATIONS WAR WIFE WILL WOMAN This paper examines the extent to which dispute resolvers in customary law systems provide widely understandable justifications for their decisions. The paper first examines the liberal-democratic reasons for the importance of publicity, understood to be wide accessibility of legal justification, by reviewing the uses of publicity in Habermas and Rawls accounts of the rule of law. Taking examples from Sierra Leone, the paper then argues that customary law systems would benefit from making the reasons for local dispute resolution practices, such as "begging" from elders, witchcraft, and openness of hearings, more widely accessible. The paper concludes that although legal pluralism is usually taken to be an analytical concept, it may have a normative thrust as well, and that publicity standards would also apply to formal courts in developing countries, which are also typically "defective" along this dimension. 2012-03-19T18:40:38Z 2012-03-19T18:40:38Z 2010-06-01 http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000158349_20100624162025 https://hdl.handle.net/10986/3834 English Policy Research working paper ; no. WPS 5349 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank application/pdf text/plain
institution Banco Mundial
collection DSpace
country Estados Unidos
countrycode US
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-okr
tag biblioteca
region America del Norte
libraryname Biblioteca del Banco Mundial
language English
topic ACTIONS
ACTS
ADJUDICATION
ADJUDICATIONS
ADVOCACY
ARGUMENTATION
ASSETS
AUTHORITY
BEGGING
BEST PRACTICE
CASE LAW
CITIZENSHIP
CIVIL SOCIETY
COMPENSATION
COMPLAINT
CONSTITUENTS
COURT
COURTS
CRIME
CRIMES
CRIMINALS
CUSTOMARY LAW
CUSTOMARY LAWS
DECISION MAKING
DEMOCRACY
DEMOCRATIC STATE
DIVORCE
ELECTION
EMPOWERMENT
EQUALITY
FINES
GENDER
GENDER EQUALITY
HOMES
HUMAN RIGHTS
HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS
HUMILIATIONS
HUSBAND
INEQUALITIES
INEQUALITY
INTEGRITY
INVESTIGATION
JUDGE
JUDGES
JUDICIAL PROCEDURES
JUDICIAL REVIEW
JUSTICE
JUSTICE SYSTEM
JUSTICES
LAWS
LEGAL CULTURE
LEGAL PLURALISM
LEGAL POWER
LEGAL SYSTEM
LEGAL SYSTEMS
LEGISLATION
LEGISLATORS
LEGITIMACY
LEGITIMATION
LIBERALISM
LIBERTIES
MARRIED MAN
MARRIED WOMAN
OFFENDER
OFFENSE
PARENTS
POLICE
POLICE OFFICER
POLITICAL RIGHTS
PREFERENTIAL
PRIVACY
PROPERTY RIGHTS
PROSECUTION
PUBLIC OPINION
PUBLIC SERVICES
RAPE
REPRESENTATIVES
REPRESSION
RULE OF LAW
RULINGS
SECRECY
SEX
SOCIAL RIGHTS
STATE LAW
VICTIMS
VIOLATIONS
WAR
WIFE
WILL
WOMAN
ACTIONS
ACTS
ADJUDICATION
ADJUDICATIONS
ADVOCACY
ARGUMENTATION
ASSETS
AUTHORITY
BEGGING
BEST PRACTICE
CASE LAW
CITIZENSHIP
CIVIL SOCIETY
COMPENSATION
COMPLAINT
CONSTITUENTS
COURT
COURTS
CRIME
CRIMES
CRIMINALS
CUSTOMARY LAW
CUSTOMARY LAWS
DECISION MAKING
DEMOCRACY
DEMOCRATIC STATE
DIVORCE
ELECTION
EMPOWERMENT
EQUALITY
FINES
GENDER
GENDER EQUALITY
HOMES
HUMAN RIGHTS
HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS
HUMILIATIONS
HUSBAND
INEQUALITIES
INEQUALITY
INTEGRITY
INVESTIGATION
JUDGE
JUDGES
JUDICIAL PROCEDURES
JUDICIAL REVIEW
JUSTICE
JUSTICE SYSTEM
JUSTICES
LAWS
LEGAL CULTURE
LEGAL PLURALISM
LEGAL POWER
LEGAL SYSTEM
LEGAL SYSTEMS
LEGISLATION
LEGISLATORS
LEGITIMACY
LEGITIMATION
LIBERALISM
LIBERTIES
MARRIED MAN
MARRIED WOMAN
OFFENDER
OFFENSE
PARENTS
POLICE
POLICE OFFICER
POLITICAL RIGHTS
PREFERENTIAL
PRIVACY
PROPERTY RIGHTS
PROSECUTION
PUBLIC OPINION
PUBLIC SERVICES
RAPE
REPRESENTATIVES
REPRESSION
RULE OF LAW
RULINGS
SECRECY
SEX
SOCIAL RIGHTS
STATE LAW
VICTIMS
VIOLATIONS
WAR
WIFE
WILL
WOMAN
spellingShingle ACTIONS
ACTS
ADJUDICATION
ADJUDICATIONS
ADVOCACY
ARGUMENTATION
ASSETS
AUTHORITY
BEGGING
BEST PRACTICE
CASE LAW
CITIZENSHIP
CIVIL SOCIETY
COMPENSATION
COMPLAINT
CONSTITUENTS
COURT
COURTS
CRIME
CRIMES
CRIMINALS
CUSTOMARY LAW
CUSTOMARY LAWS
DECISION MAKING
DEMOCRACY
DEMOCRATIC STATE
DIVORCE
ELECTION
EMPOWERMENT
EQUALITY
FINES
GENDER
GENDER EQUALITY
HOMES
HUMAN RIGHTS
HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS
HUMILIATIONS
HUSBAND
INEQUALITIES
INEQUALITY
INTEGRITY
INVESTIGATION
JUDGE
JUDGES
JUDICIAL PROCEDURES
JUDICIAL REVIEW
JUSTICE
JUSTICE SYSTEM
JUSTICES
LAWS
LEGAL CULTURE
LEGAL PLURALISM
LEGAL POWER
LEGAL SYSTEM
LEGAL SYSTEMS
LEGISLATION
LEGISLATORS
LEGITIMACY
LEGITIMATION
LIBERALISM
LIBERTIES
MARRIED MAN
MARRIED WOMAN
OFFENDER
OFFENSE
PARENTS
POLICE
POLICE OFFICER
POLITICAL RIGHTS
PREFERENTIAL
PRIVACY
PROPERTY RIGHTS
PROSECUTION
PUBLIC OPINION
PUBLIC SERVICES
RAPE
REPRESENTATIVES
REPRESSION
RULE OF LAW
RULINGS
SECRECY
SEX
SOCIAL RIGHTS
STATE LAW
VICTIMS
VIOLATIONS
WAR
WIFE
WILL
WOMAN
ACTIONS
ACTS
ADJUDICATION
ADJUDICATIONS
ADVOCACY
ARGUMENTATION
ASSETS
AUTHORITY
BEGGING
BEST PRACTICE
CASE LAW
CITIZENSHIP
CIVIL SOCIETY
COMPENSATION
COMPLAINT
CONSTITUENTS
COURT
COURTS
CRIME
CRIMES
CRIMINALS
CUSTOMARY LAW
CUSTOMARY LAWS
DECISION MAKING
DEMOCRACY
DEMOCRATIC STATE
DIVORCE
ELECTION
EMPOWERMENT
EQUALITY
FINES
GENDER
GENDER EQUALITY
HOMES
HUMAN RIGHTS
HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS
HUMILIATIONS
HUSBAND
INEQUALITIES
INEQUALITY
INTEGRITY
INVESTIGATION
JUDGE
JUDGES
JUDICIAL PROCEDURES
JUDICIAL REVIEW
JUSTICE
JUSTICE SYSTEM
JUSTICES
LAWS
LEGAL CULTURE
LEGAL PLURALISM
LEGAL POWER
LEGAL SYSTEM
LEGAL SYSTEMS
LEGISLATION
LEGISLATORS
LEGITIMACY
LEGITIMATION
LIBERALISM
LIBERTIES
MARRIED MAN
MARRIED WOMAN
OFFENDER
OFFENSE
PARENTS
POLICE
POLICE OFFICER
POLITICAL RIGHTS
PREFERENTIAL
PRIVACY
PROPERTY RIGHTS
PROSECUTION
PUBLIC OPINION
PUBLIC SERVICES
RAPE
REPRESENTATIVES
REPRESSION
RULE OF LAW
RULINGS
SECRECY
SEX
SOCIAL RIGHTS
STATE LAW
VICTIMS
VIOLATIONS
WAR
WIFE
WILL
WOMAN
Gauri, Varun
The Publicity “Defect” of Customary Law
description This paper examines the extent to which dispute resolvers in customary law systems provide widely understandable justifications for their decisions. The paper first examines the liberal-democratic reasons for the importance of publicity, understood to be wide accessibility of legal justification, by reviewing the uses of publicity in Habermas and Rawls accounts of the rule of law. Taking examples from Sierra Leone, the paper then argues that customary law systems would benefit from making the reasons for local dispute resolution practices, such as "begging" from elders, witchcraft, and openness of hearings, more widely accessible. The paper concludes that although legal pluralism is usually taken to be an analytical concept, it may have a normative thrust as well, and that publicity standards would also apply to formal courts in developing countries, which are also typically "defective" along this dimension.
topic_facet ACTIONS
ACTS
ADJUDICATION
ADJUDICATIONS
ADVOCACY
ARGUMENTATION
ASSETS
AUTHORITY
BEGGING
BEST PRACTICE
CASE LAW
CITIZENSHIP
CIVIL SOCIETY
COMPENSATION
COMPLAINT
CONSTITUENTS
COURT
COURTS
CRIME
CRIMES
CRIMINALS
CUSTOMARY LAW
CUSTOMARY LAWS
DECISION MAKING
DEMOCRACY
DEMOCRATIC STATE
DIVORCE
ELECTION
EMPOWERMENT
EQUALITY
FINES
GENDER
GENDER EQUALITY
HOMES
HUMAN RIGHTS
HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS
HUMILIATIONS
HUSBAND
INEQUALITIES
INEQUALITY
INTEGRITY
INVESTIGATION
JUDGE
JUDGES
JUDICIAL PROCEDURES
JUDICIAL REVIEW
JUSTICE
JUSTICE SYSTEM
JUSTICES
LAWS
LEGAL CULTURE
LEGAL PLURALISM
LEGAL POWER
LEGAL SYSTEM
LEGAL SYSTEMS
LEGISLATION
LEGISLATORS
LEGITIMACY
LEGITIMATION
LIBERALISM
LIBERTIES
MARRIED MAN
MARRIED WOMAN
OFFENDER
OFFENSE
PARENTS
POLICE
POLICE OFFICER
POLITICAL RIGHTS
PREFERENTIAL
PRIVACY
PROPERTY RIGHTS
PROSECUTION
PUBLIC OPINION
PUBLIC SERVICES
RAPE
REPRESENTATIVES
REPRESSION
RULE OF LAW
RULINGS
SECRECY
SEX
SOCIAL RIGHTS
STATE LAW
VICTIMS
VIOLATIONS
WAR
WIFE
WILL
WOMAN
author Gauri, Varun
author_facet Gauri, Varun
author_sort Gauri, Varun
title The Publicity “Defect” of Customary Law
title_short The Publicity “Defect” of Customary Law
title_full The Publicity “Defect” of Customary Law
title_fullStr The Publicity “Defect” of Customary Law
title_full_unstemmed The Publicity “Defect” of Customary Law
title_sort publicity “defect” of customary law
publishDate 2010-06-01
url http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000158349_20100624162025
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/3834
work_keys_str_mv AT gaurivarun thepublicitydefectofcustomarylaw
AT gaurivarun publicitydefectofcustomarylaw
_version_ 1807154466330247168