Fiscal Decentralization in Croatia

The problems in Croatia’s fiscal decentralization system have long been recognized. The fragmented territorial-administrative structure, fiscal decentralization efforts with insufficient fiscal autonomy, inconsistent public service standards, unbalanced sources of revenue, and doubts about the introduction of real estate taxes are just some of the concerns. However, there is often no consensus on the possible ways to address them. Compounding the problem is the fact that the recent and still ongoing tax reform, due to its tax relief element, has created the need to compensate subnational governments for the losses of revenues. The COVID-19 pandemic has increased the significance of these issues as the lockdown measures have had a strong negative impact on the existing revenue sources, such as personal income taxes (PITs), of many local and regional government units (LRGUs). At the same time, it may be that the current crisis has created the preconditions and opportunity needed for the government to finally implement reforms in support of fiscal decentralization and more effective financing of subnational governments, reforms that have long been postponed due to political reasons and a lack of popular support. These reforms include addressing the fragmentation of local governments, providing a clearer and more appropriate assignment of functional responsibilities, improving the fiscal equalization system by including the fiscal expenditure needs component, and introducing a working property tax. All of these ideas have long been debated, but there are many reasons to believe that the time is right for at least some of them to be implemented. This report provides a comprehensive overview of the major challenges and options for reform in several critical areas of Croatia’s fiscal decentralization system, including: (i) the vertical structure of government, (ii) expenditure responsibilities, (iii) taxation and revenue autonomy, (iv) intergovernmental transfers, (v) borrowing and debt, and (vi) asset management.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: World Bank
Format: Report biblioteca
Language:English
English
Published: Washington, DC 2021-05
Subjects:VERTICAL GOVERNMENT STRUCTURE, FISCAL POLICY, LOCAL GOVERNMENT, DELIVERY OF PUBLIC SERVICES, FISCAL REFORM, SUBNATIONAL TAXATION, REVENUE AUTONOMY,
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/582501644400447803/Fiscal-Decentralization-in-Croatia
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/38287
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-okr-1098638287
record_format koha
spelling dig-okr-10986382872022-11-08T23:44:34Z Fiscal Decentralization in Croatia World Bank VERTICAL GOVERNMENT STRUCTURE FISCAL POLICY LOCAL GOVERNMENT DELIVERY OF PUBLIC SERVICES FISCAL REFORM SUBNATIONAL TAXATION REVENUE AUTONOMY The problems in Croatia’s fiscal decentralization system have long been recognized. The fragmented territorial-administrative structure, fiscal decentralization efforts with insufficient fiscal autonomy, inconsistent public service standards, unbalanced sources of revenue, and doubts about the introduction of real estate taxes are just some of the concerns. However, there is often no consensus on the possible ways to address them. Compounding the problem is the fact that the recent and still ongoing tax reform, due to its tax relief element, has created the need to compensate subnational governments for the losses of revenues. The COVID-19 pandemic has increased the significance of these issues as the lockdown measures have had a strong negative impact on the existing revenue sources, such as personal income taxes (PITs), of many local and regional government units (LRGUs). At the same time, it may be that the current crisis has created the preconditions and opportunity needed for the government to finally implement reforms in support of fiscal decentralization and more effective financing of subnational governments, reforms that have long been postponed due to political reasons and a lack of popular support. These reforms include addressing the fragmentation of local governments, providing a clearer and more appropriate assignment of functional responsibilities, improving the fiscal equalization system by including the fiscal expenditure needs component, and introducing a working property tax. All of these ideas have long been debated, but there are many reasons to believe that the time is right for at least some of them to be implemented. This report provides a comprehensive overview of the major challenges and options for reform in several critical areas of Croatia’s fiscal decentralization system, including: (i) the vertical structure of government, (ii) expenditure responsibilities, (iii) taxation and revenue autonomy, (iv) intergovernmental transfers, (v) borrowing and debt, and (vi) asset management. 2022-11-08T23:44:33Z 2022-11-08T23:44:33Z 2021-05 Report http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/582501644400447803/Fiscal-Decentralization-in-Croatia http://hdl.handle.net/10986/38287 English en CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo World Bank Washington, DC Economic and Sector Work (ESW) Studies :: Sector/Thematic Studies :: Other Financial Sector Study Europe and Central Asia Croatia
institution Banco Mundial
collection DSpace
country Estados Unidos
countrycode US
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-okr
tag biblioteca
region America del Norte
libraryname Biblioteca del Banco Mundial
language English
English
topic VERTICAL GOVERNMENT STRUCTURE
FISCAL POLICY
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
DELIVERY OF PUBLIC SERVICES
FISCAL REFORM
SUBNATIONAL TAXATION
REVENUE AUTONOMY
VERTICAL GOVERNMENT STRUCTURE
FISCAL POLICY
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
DELIVERY OF PUBLIC SERVICES
FISCAL REFORM
SUBNATIONAL TAXATION
REVENUE AUTONOMY
spellingShingle VERTICAL GOVERNMENT STRUCTURE
FISCAL POLICY
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
DELIVERY OF PUBLIC SERVICES
FISCAL REFORM
SUBNATIONAL TAXATION
REVENUE AUTONOMY
VERTICAL GOVERNMENT STRUCTURE
FISCAL POLICY
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
DELIVERY OF PUBLIC SERVICES
FISCAL REFORM
SUBNATIONAL TAXATION
REVENUE AUTONOMY
World Bank
Fiscal Decentralization in Croatia
description The problems in Croatia’s fiscal decentralization system have long been recognized. The fragmented territorial-administrative structure, fiscal decentralization efforts with insufficient fiscal autonomy, inconsistent public service standards, unbalanced sources of revenue, and doubts about the introduction of real estate taxes are just some of the concerns. However, there is often no consensus on the possible ways to address them. Compounding the problem is the fact that the recent and still ongoing tax reform, due to its tax relief element, has created the need to compensate subnational governments for the losses of revenues. The COVID-19 pandemic has increased the significance of these issues as the lockdown measures have had a strong negative impact on the existing revenue sources, such as personal income taxes (PITs), of many local and regional government units (LRGUs). At the same time, it may be that the current crisis has created the preconditions and opportunity needed for the government to finally implement reforms in support of fiscal decentralization and more effective financing of subnational governments, reforms that have long been postponed due to political reasons and a lack of popular support. These reforms include addressing the fragmentation of local governments, providing a clearer and more appropriate assignment of functional responsibilities, improving the fiscal equalization system by including the fiscal expenditure needs component, and introducing a working property tax. All of these ideas have long been debated, but there are many reasons to believe that the time is right for at least some of them to be implemented. This report provides a comprehensive overview of the major challenges and options for reform in several critical areas of Croatia’s fiscal decentralization system, including: (i) the vertical structure of government, (ii) expenditure responsibilities, (iii) taxation and revenue autonomy, (iv) intergovernmental transfers, (v) borrowing and debt, and (vi) asset management.
format Report
topic_facet VERTICAL GOVERNMENT STRUCTURE
FISCAL POLICY
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
DELIVERY OF PUBLIC SERVICES
FISCAL REFORM
SUBNATIONAL TAXATION
REVENUE AUTONOMY
author World Bank
author_facet World Bank
author_sort World Bank
title Fiscal Decentralization in Croatia
title_short Fiscal Decentralization in Croatia
title_full Fiscal Decentralization in Croatia
title_fullStr Fiscal Decentralization in Croatia
title_full_unstemmed Fiscal Decentralization in Croatia
title_sort fiscal decentralization in croatia
publisher Washington, DC
publishDate 2021-05
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/582501644400447803/Fiscal-Decentralization-in-Croatia
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/38287
work_keys_str_mv AT worldbank fiscaldecentralizationincroatia
_version_ 1756576219928723456