Call Me Maybe

This study analyzes the effects of differences in survey frequency and medium on microenterprise survey data. A sample of enterprises were randomly assigned to monthly in-person, weekly in-person, or weekly phone surveys for a 12-week panel. The results show few differences across the groups in measured means, distributions, and deviations of measured data from an objective data-quality standard provided by Benford’s Law. However, phone interviews generated higher within-enterprise variation through time in several variables and may be more sensitive to social desirability bias. Higher-frequency interviews did not lead to persistent changes in reporting or increase permanent attrition from the panel but did increase the share of missed interviews. These findings show that collecting high-frequency survey data by phone does not substantially affect data quality. However, researchers who are particularly interested in within-enterprise dynamics should exercise caution when choosing survey medium.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Garlick, Robert, Orkin, Kate, Quinn, Simon
Format: Journal Article biblioteca
Published: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the World Bank 2020-06
Subjects:MICROENTERPRISE, SURVEY METHODS, DATA COLLECTION,
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10986/36717
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-okr-1098636717
record_format koha
spelling dig-okr-10986367172023-08-28T16:39:09Z Call Me Maybe Experimental Evidence on Frequency and Medium Effects in Microenterprise Surveys Garlick, Robert Orkin, Kate Quinn, Simon MICROENTERPRISE SURVEY METHODS DATA COLLECTION This study analyzes the effects of differences in survey frequency and medium on microenterprise survey data. A sample of enterprises were randomly assigned to monthly in-person, weekly in-person, or weekly phone surveys for a 12-week panel. The results show few differences across the groups in measured means, distributions, and deviations of measured data from an objective data-quality standard provided by Benford’s Law. However, phone interviews generated higher within-enterprise variation through time in several variables and may be more sensitive to social desirability bias. Higher-frequency interviews did not lead to persistent changes in reporting or increase permanent attrition from the panel but did increase the share of missed interviews. These findings show that collecting high-frequency survey data by phone does not substantially affect data quality. However, researchers who are particularly interested in within-enterprise dynamics should exercise caution when choosing survey medium. 2021-12-10T15:18:19Z 2021-12-10T15:18:19Z 2020-06 Journal Article Article de journal Artículo de revista World Bank Economic Review 1564-698X http://hdl.handle.net/10986/36717 World Bank Economic Review CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 IGO World Bank http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/igo application/pdf Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the World Bank
institution Banco Mundial
collection DSpace
country Estados Unidos
countrycode US
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-okr
tag biblioteca
region America del Norte
libraryname Biblioteca del Banco Mundial
topic MICROENTERPRISE
SURVEY METHODS
DATA COLLECTION
MICROENTERPRISE
SURVEY METHODS
DATA COLLECTION
spellingShingle MICROENTERPRISE
SURVEY METHODS
DATA COLLECTION
MICROENTERPRISE
SURVEY METHODS
DATA COLLECTION
Garlick, Robert
Orkin, Kate
Quinn, Simon
Call Me Maybe
description This study analyzes the effects of differences in survey frequency and medium on microenterprise survey data. A sample of enterprises were randomly assigned to monthly in-person, weekly in-person, or weekly phone surveys for a 12-week panel. The results show few differences across the groups in measured means, distributions, and deviations of measured data from an objective data-quality standard provided by Benford’s Law. However, phone interviews generated higher within-enterprise variation through time in several variables and may be more sensitive to social desirability bias. Higher-frequency interviews did not lead to persistent changes in reporting or increase permanent attrition from the panel but did increase the share of missed interviews. These findings show that collecting high-frequency survey data by phone does not substantially affect data quality. However, researchers who are particularly interested in within-enterprise dynamics should exercise caution when choosing survey medium.
format Journal Article
topic_facet MICROENTERPRISE
SURVEY METHODS
DATA COLLECTION
author Garlick, Robert
Orkin, Kate
Quinn, Simon
author_facet Garlick, Robert
Orkin, Kate
Quinn, Simon
author_sort Garlick, Robert
title Call Me Maybe
title_short Call Me Maybe
title_full Call Me Maybe
title_fullStr Call Me Maybe
title_full_unstemmed Call Me Maybe
title_sort call me maybe
publisher Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the World Bank
publishDate 2020-06
url http://hdl.handle.net/10986/36717
work_keys_str_mv AT garlickrobert callmemaybe
AT orkinkate callmemaybe
AT quinnsimon callmemaybe
AT garlickrobert experimentalevidenceonfrequencyandmediumeffectsinmicroenterprisesurveys
AT orkinkate experimentalevidenceonfrequencyandmediumeffectsinmicroenterprisesurveys
AT quinnsimon experimentalevidenceonfrequencyandmediumeffectsinmicroenterprisesurveys
_version_ 1775948912020946944