Industrial Policy Effects and the Case for Competition
It is conventional wisdom that industrial policies can be at odds with competitive markets. This note examines the historical basis for industrial policy and empirical effects. Although the direct effects of industrial policy are mixed, the indirect effects often involve market distortions. By contrast, the literature is broadly united on the benefits of competition for productivity and innovation. This review finds that the most successful industrial policies reinforce competition, suggesting that competition policy and certain types of industrial policy can be crafted as complements.
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Pop, Georgiana, Connon, Davida |
---|---|
Format: | Report biblioteca |
Language: | English |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2020-09-24
|
Subjects: | INDUSTRIAL POLICY, COMPETITION POLICY, STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISES, SMALL AND MEDIUM SIZE ENTERPRISE, PRODUCTIVITY, INNOVATION, SUBSIDY, TRADE POLICY, PUBLIC PROCUREMENT, |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/548701601014977452/Equitable-Growth-Finance-and-Institutions-Insight-Industrial-Policy-Effects-and-the-Case-for-Competition https://hdl.handle.net/10986/34536 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Containing Chinese State-Owned Enterprises? The Role of Deep Trade Agreements
by: Lefebvre, Kevin, et al.
Published: (2021-04) -
Improving Efficiency in Public Procurement in Georgia
by: Turkewitz, Joel, et al.
Published: (2018-06) -
Does State Ownership Have Limits in Romania?
by: Dauda, Seidu, et al.
Published: (2023-12-21) -
Econometric Analysis of Framework Agreements in Brazil and Colombia
by: World Bank
Published: (2021-06) -
The Textile-Clothing Value Chain in India and Bangladesh
by: Kabir, Mahfuz, et al.
Published: (2019-02)