Why Some Countries Can Escape the Fiscal Pro-Cyclicality Trap and Others Cannot ?

This paper analyzes the procyclicality of fiscal policy on the tax and spending sides in a sample of 116 developing countries between 2000 and 2016. About 20 percent of the countries in the sample switched from procyclical to countercyclical policy stance. In Sub-Saharan Africa, 30 of 39 countries remained caught in the procyclicality trap and the region has the highest degree of procyclicality. The Middle East and North Africa region switched from a countercyclical policy stance to a procyclical one over time. The Europe and Central Asia and Latin America and the Caribbean regions significantly reduced the degree of procyclicality. The main economic variables that affect procyclicality are financial depth, tax base variability, and natural resource dependence. In line with the political economy literature, the perception of corruption, social fragmentation, and inequality in resource distribution are positively associated with procyclicality. The findings also show that the quality of fiscal institutions is associated with procyclicality; countries with fiscal rules have smaller procyclical bias, but the effect is not homogeneous; and higher degrees of expenditure rigidity are associated with lower procyclical bias. The study finds asymmetric policy stances along the business cycle, with procyclicality being more pronounced during recessions. Similarly, the political cycle affects procyclicality, as procyclical bias increases in electoral years. From the tax management perspective, procyclical bias is still present, but there are significant changes: most of the political economy variables lose significance; the resource-dependence variable is not significant; external credit availability reduces procyclicality; tax base variability increases procyclical bias; and expenditure rigidity is no longer significant, but fiscal space becomes determinant of procyclical bias.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kouame, Wilfred A., Herrera, Santiago, Mandon, Pierre
Format: Working Paper biblioteca
Language:English
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2019-08
Subjects:CYCLICALITY, PUBLIC SPENDING, TAX RATE, RIGIDITY, FISCAL POLICY, PROCYCLICAL POLICY, POLITICAL ECONOMY, BUSINESS CYCLE,
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/510041565102137832/Why-Some-Countries-Can-Escape-the-Fiscal-Pro-Cyclicality-Trap-and-Others-Cannot
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/32215
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-okr-1098632215
record_format koha
spelling dig-okr-10986322152024-06-23T06:35:01Z Why Some Countries Can Escape the Fiscal Pro-Cyclicality Trap and Others Cannot ? Kouame, Wilfred A. Herrera, Santiago Mandon, Pierre CYCLICALITY PUBLIC SPENDING TAX RATE RIGIDITY FISCAL POLICY PROCYCLICAL POLICY POLITICAL ECONOMY BUSINESS CYCLE This paper analyzes the procyclicality of fiscal policy on the tax and spending sides in a sample of 116 developing countries between 2000 and 2016. About 20 percent of the countries in the sample switched from procyclical to countercyclical policy stance. In Sub-Saharan Africa, 30 of 39 countries remained caught in the procyclicality trap and the region has the highest degree of procyclicality. The Middle East and North Africa region switched from a countercyclical policy stance to a procyclical one over time. The Europe and Central Asia and Latin America and the Caribbean regions significantly reduced the degree of procyclicality. The main economic variables that affect procyclicality are financial depth, tax base variability, and natural resource dependence. In line with the political economy literature, the perception of corruption, social fragmentation, and inequality in resource distribution are positively associated with procyclicality. The findings also show that the quality of fiscal institutions is associated with procyclicality; countries with fiscal rules have smaller procyclical bias, but the effect is not homogeneous; and higher degrees of expenditure rigidity are associated with lower procyclical bias. The study finds asymmetric policy stances along the business cycle, with procyclicality being more pronounced during recessions. Similarly, the political cycle affects procyclicality, as procyclical bias increases in electoral years. From the tax management perspective, procyclical bias is still present, but there are significant changes: most of the political economy variables lose significance; the resource-dependence variable is not significant; external credit availability reduces procyclicality; tax base variability increases procyclical bias; and expenditure rigidity is no longer significant, but fiscal space becomes determinant of procyclical bias. 2019-08-07T21:33:22Z 2019-08-07T21:33:22Z 2019-08 Working Paper Document de travail Documento de trabajo http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/510041565102137832/Why-Some-Countries-Can-Escape-the-Fiscal-Pro-Cyclicality-Trap-and-Others-Cannot https://hdl.handle.net/10986/32215 English Policy Research working paper,no. WPS 8963; Policy Research Working Paper;No. 8963 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo World Bank application/pdf World Bank, Washington, DC
institution Banco Mundial
collection DSpace
country Estados Unidos
countrycode US
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-okr
tag biblioteca
region America del Norte
libraryname Biblioteca del Banco Mundial
language English
topic CYCLICALITY
PUBLIC SPENDING
TAX RATE
RIGIDITY
FISCAL POLICY
PROCYCLICAL POLICY
POLITICAL ECONOMY
BUSINESS CYCLE
CYCLICALITY
PUBLIC SPENDING
TAX RATE
RIGIDITY
FISCAL POLICY
PROCYCLICAL POLICY
POLITICAL ECONOMY
BUSINESS CYCLE
spellingShingle CYCLICALITY
PUBLIC SPENDING
TAX RATE
RIGIDITY
FISCAL POLICY
PROCYCLICAL POLICY
POLITICAL ECONOMY
BUSINESS CYCLE
CYCLICALITY
PUBLIC SPENDING
TAX RATE
RIGIDITY
FISCAL POLICY
PROCYCLICAL POLICY
POLITICAL ECONOMY
BUSINESS CYCLE
Kouame, Wilfred A.
Herrera, Santiago
Mandon, Pierre
Why Some Countries Can Escape the Fiscal Pro-Cyclicality Trap and Others Cannot ?
description This paper analyzes the procyclicality of fiscal policy on the tax and spending sides in a sample of 116 developing countries between 2000 and 2016. About 20 percent of the countries in the sample switched from procyclical to countercyclical policy stance. In Sub-Saharan Africa, 30 of 39 countries remained caught in the procyclicality trap and the region has the highest degree of procyclicality. The Middle East and North Africa region switched from a countercyclical policy stance to a procyclical one over time. The Europe and Central Asia and Latin America and the Caribbean regions significantly reduced the degree of procyclicality. The main economic variables that affect procyclicality are financial depth, tax base variability, and natural resource dependence. In line with the political economy literature, the perception of corruption, social fragmentation, and inequality in resource distribution are positively associated with procyclicality. The findings also show that the quality of fiscal institutions is associated with procyclicality; countries with fiscal rules have smaller procyclical bias, but the effect is not homogeneous; and higher degrees of expenditure rigidity are associated with lower procyclical bias. The study finds asymmetric policy stances along the business cycle, with procyclicality being more pronounced during recessions. Similarly, the political cycle affects procyclicality, as procyclical bias increases in electoral years. From the tax management perspective, procyclical bias is still present, but there are significant changes: most of the political economy variables lose significance; the resource-dependence variable is not significant; external credit availability reduces procyclicality; tax base variability increases procyclical bias; and expenditure rigidity is no longer significant, but fiscal space becomes determinant of procyclical bias.
format Working Paper
topic_facet CYCLICALITY
PUBLIC SPENDING
TAX RATE
RIGIDITY
FISCAL POLICY
PROCYCLICAL POLICY
POLITICAL ECONOMY
BUSINESS CYCLE
author Kouame, Wilfred A.
Herrera, Santiago
Mandon, Pierre
author_facet Kouame, Wilfred A.
Herrera, Santiago
Mandon, Pierre
author_sort Kouame, Wilfred A.
title Why Some Countries Can Escape the Fiscal Pro-Cyclicality Trap and Others Cannot ?
title_short Why Some Countries Can Escape the Fiscal Pro-Cyclicality Trap and Others Cannot ?
title_full Why Some Countries Can Escape the Fiscal Pro-Cyclicality Trap and Others Cannot ?
title_fullStr Why Some Countries Can Escape the Fiscal Pro-Cyclicality Trap and Others Cannot ?
title_full_unstemmed Why Some Countries Can Escape the Fiscal Pro-Cyclicality Trap and Others Cannot ?
title_sort why some countries can escape the fiscal pro-cyclicality trap and others cannot ?
publisher World Bank, Washington, DC
publishDate 2019-08
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/510041565102137832/Why-Some-Countries-Can-Escape-the-Fiscal-Pro-Cyclicality-Trap-and-Others-Cannot
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/32215
work_keys_str_mv AT kouamewilfreda whysomecountriescanescapethefiscalprocyclicalitytrapandotherscannot
AT herrerasantiago whysomecountriescanescapethefiscalprocyclicalitytrapandotherscannot
AT mandonpierre whysomecountriescanescapethefiscalprocyclicalitytrapandotherscannot
_version_ 1802820737619197952