Prioritizing Infrastructure Investments

Governments worldwide face the difficult challenge of deciding which infrastructure projects to prioritize and select for implementation, given the limits of available funding and the need to attain their developmental goals. The key objective of this report is to conduct a comparative exercise between the World Bank's Infrastructure Prioritization Framework, a multicriteria analysis–based methodology to project prioritization, and a more complex cost-benefit analysis–based approach. The report focuses on Chile, which has a well-institutionalized evaluation process that uses cost-benefit analysis to assess projects on their quality and ability to generate value for money. The analysis compares the results of the Infrastructure Prioritization Framework alongside Chile's current cost-benefit analysis–based and multicriteria analysis approaches to the same subsets of projects in the road transport and water reservoir subsectors, respectively. The results show that the Infrastructure Prioritization Framework has application beyond its original proposition and can complement a traditional cost-benefit analysis by directly considering social and environmental policy goals that are otherwise difficult to quantify in a cost-benefit analysis. The analysis also finds that in Chile there is a discrepancy between the stated goals and objectives of the appraisal system and the actual implementation. In the case of transport sector projects, there is an evident deviation between cost-benefit analysis–based selection policy and actual decisions made for project implementation. In the case of water catchment selection, there is a bias toward projects with higher financial-economic performance as compared to social-environmental performance, despite policy intentions to afford consideration to environmental and social development goals.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marcelo, Darwin, House, Schuyler, Raina, Aditi
Format: Working Paper biblioteca
Language:English
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2018-10
Subjects:INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT, PRIORITIZATION, PUBLIC INVESTMENT, PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS, MULTI-CRITERIA ANALYSIS, TRANSPORT, PUBLIC UTILITIES, COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS, ROAD TRANSPORT, WATER RESERVOIR, WATER SUPPLY, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT, SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT, PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS,
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/959221538675961651/Prioritizing-Infrastructure-Investments-A-Comparative-Review-of-Applications-in-Chile
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/30511
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-okr-1098630511
record_format koha
spelling dig-okr-10986305112024-08-09T07:29:35Z Prioritizing Infrastructure Investments A Comparative Review of Applications in Chile Marcelo, Darwin House, Schuyler Raina, Aditi INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT PRIORITIZATION PUBLIC INVESTMENT PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS MULTI-CRITERIA ANALYSIS TRANSPORT PUBLIC UTILITIES COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS ROAD TRANSPORT WATER RESERVOIR WATER SUPPLY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS Governments worldwide face the difficult challenge of deciding which infrastructure projects to prioritize and select for implementation, given the limits of available funding and the need to attain their developmental goals. The key objective of this report is to conduct a comparative exercise between the World Bank's Infrastructure Prioritization Framework, a multicriteria analysis–based methodology to project prioritization, and a more complex cost-benefit analysis–based approach. The report focuses on Chile, which has a well-institutionalized evaluation process that uses cost-benefit analysis to assess projects on their quality and ability to generate value for money. The analysis compares the results of the Infrastructure Prioritization Framework alongside Chile's current cost-benefit analysis–based and multicriteria analysis approaches to the same subsets of projects in the road transport and water reservoir subsectors, respectively. The results show that the Infrastructure Prioritization Framework has application beyond its original proposition and can complement a traditional cost-benefit analysis by directly considering social and environmental policy goals that are otherwise difficult to quantify in a cost-benefit analysis. The analysis also finds that in Chile there is a discrepancy between the stated goals and objectives of the appraisal system and the actual implementation. In the case of transport sector projects, there is an evident deviation between cost-benefit analysis–based selection policy and actual decisions made for project implementation. In the case of water catchment selection, there is a bias toward projects with higher financial-economic performance as compared to social-environmental performance, despite policy intentions to afford consideration to environmental and social development goals. 2018-10-04T21:05:30Z 2018-10-04T21:05:30Z 2018-10 Working Paper Document de travail Documento de trabajo http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/959221538675961651/Prioritizing-Infrastructure-Investments-A-Comparative-Review-of-Applications-in-Chile https://hdl.handle.net/10986/30511 English Policy Research Working Paper;No. 8602 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo World Bank application/pdf text/plain World Bank, Washington, DC
institution Banco Mundial
collection DSpace
country Estados Unidos
countrycode US
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-okr
tag biblioteca
region America del Norte
libraryname Biblioteca del Banco Mundial
language English
topic INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT
PRIORITIZATION
PUBLIC INVESTMENT
PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS
MULTI-CRITERIA ANALYSIS
TRANSPORT
PUBLIC UTILITIES
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
ROAD TRANSPORT
WATER RESERVOIR
WATER SUPPLY
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT
PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS
INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT
PRIORITIZATION
PUBLIC INVESTMENT
PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS
MULTI-CRITERIA ANALYSIS
TRANSPORT
PUBLIC UTILITIES
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
ROAD TRANSPORT
WATER RESERVOIR
WATER SUPPLY
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT
PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS
spellingShingle INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT
PRIORITIZATION
PUBLIC INVESTMENT
PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS
MULTI-CRITERIA ANALYSIS
TRANSPORT
PUBLIC UTILITIES
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
ROAD TRANSPORT
WATER RESERVOIR
WATER SUPPLY
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT
PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS
INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT
PRIORITIZATION
PUBLIC INVESTMENT
PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS
MULTI-CRITERIA ANALYSIS
TRANSPORT
PUBLIC UTILITIES
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
ROAD TRANSPORT
WATER RESERVOIR
WATER SUPPLY
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT
PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS
Marcelo, Darwin
House, Schuyler
Raina, Aditi
Prioritizing Infrastructure Investments
description Governments worldwide face the difficult challenge of deciding which infrastructure projects to prioritize and select for implementation, given the limits of available funding and the need to attain their developmental goals. The key objective of this report is to conduct a comparative exercise between the World Bank's Infrastructure Prioritization Framework, a multicriteria analysis–based methodology to project prioritization, and a more complex cost-benefit analysis–based approach. The report focuses on Chile, which has a well-institutionalized evaluation process that uses cost-benefit analysis to assess projects on their quality and ability to generate value for money. The analysis compares the results of the Infrastructure Prioritization Framework alongside Chile's current cost-benefit analysis–based and multicriteria analysis approaches to the same subsets of projects in the road transport and water reservoir subsectors, respectively. The results show that the Infrastructure Prioritization Framework has application beyond its original proposition and can complement a traditional cost-benefit analysis by directly considering social and environmental policy goals that are otherwise difficult to quantify in a cost-benefit analysis. The analysis also finds that in Chile there is a discrepancy between the stated goals and objectives of the appraisal system and the actual implementation. In the case of transport sector projects, there is an evident deviation between cost-benefit analysis–based selection policy and actual decisions made for project implementation. In the case of water catchment selection, there is a bias toward projects with higher financial-economic performance as compared to social-environmental performance, despite policy intentions to afford consideration to environmental and social development goals.
format Working Paper
topic_facet INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT
PRIORITIZATION
PUBLIC INVESTMENT
PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS
MULTI-CRITERIA ANALYSIS
TRANSPORT
PUBLIC UTILITIES
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
ROAD TRANSPORT
WATER RESERVOIR
WATER SUPPLY
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT
PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS
author Marcelo, Darwin
House, Schuyler
Raina, Aditi
author_facet Marcelo, Darwin
House, Schuyler
Raina, Aditi
author_sort Marcelo, Darwin
title Prioritizing Infrastructure Investments
title_short Prioritizing Infrastructure Investments
title_full Prioritizing Infrastructure Investments
title_fullStr Prioritizing Infrastructure Investments
title_full_unstemmed Prioritizing Infrastructure Investments
title_sort prioritizing infrastructure investments
publisher World Bank, Washington, DC
publishDate 2018-10
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/959221538675961651/Prioritizing-Infrastructure-Investments-A-Comparative-Review-of-Applications-in-Chile
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/30511
work_keys_str_mv AT marcelodarwin prioritizinginfrastructureinvestments
AT houseschuyler prioritizinginfrastructureinvestments
AT rainaaditi prioritizinginfrastructureinvestments
AT marcelodarwin acomparativereviewofapplicationsinchile
AT houseschuyler acomparativereviewofapplicationsinchile
AT rainaaditi acomparativereviewofapplicationsinchile
_version_ 1807160091288272896