Approaches to REDD+ Nesting
Mitigation of greenhouse gases in the land sector is complex and has a unique set of challenges. The most significant challenges arise from the geographically diffuse nature of the emissions sources (compared to, for example, point-based energy sources of emissions), the vast array of potential management responses, the ongoing effects of past actions, the interaction of human and natural processes, and the strong influences of policy and markets. These factors result in a large number and diversity of actors involved, temporal variability in emissions sources and volumes, and higher uncertainty associated with the processes generating the emission reductions. Because of this, achieving large-scale mitigation in the land sector requires collective action involving multiple stakeholders undertaking different activities. This paper synthesizes several lessons learned in efforts to develop systems that integrate incentive mechanisms at multiple scales. It illustrates many lessons through examples and the appendix presents individual case studies from a variety of geographies, Acre (state in Brazil), Australia, Brazil (Amazon), the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Guatemala, and Zambia. The hope is that the experiences of emerging ‘nested’ systems can provide inspiration to countries developing REDD systems, particularly those which seek to catalyze across a landscape local actions that contribute to national mitigation. The objective of this paper is to share a few lessons from nested systems. While there are many positive benefits to nesting, experience suggests that countries struggle with development of nested systems. Very few have been operationalized (with exception to a few developed countries, such as Australia and New Zealand), although several REDD nested systems are now emerging. Section two explores four high-level ‘typologies’ that countries may consider when developing a nested system. Section three summarizes three key technical challenges that countries face: alignment of measurement systems, reference levels, and double counting. Both sections illustrate options using real-world examples from countries pioneering nested approaches and explain why certain choices were made. The paper concludes with thoughts on overall lessons learned, recognizing that the journey is still young.
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Working Paper biblioteca |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2018-04-13
|
| Subjects: | DEFORESTATION, DEGRADATION, GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS, BIODIVERSITY, CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION, CLIMATE CHANGE, REDUCED EMISSIONS, CARBON FINANCE, CARBON POLICY, CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE, INDIGENOUS COMMUNITIES, NATIVE FOREST, ECONOMIC ZONING, SUBNATIONAL GOVERNMENT, LOCAL GOVERNMENT, STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT, |
| Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/670171523647847532/Main-report https://hdl.handle.net/10986/29720 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| id |
dig-okr-1098629720 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
koha |
| spelling |
dig-okr-10986297202024-08-21T03:45:15Z Approaches to REDD+ Nesting Lessons Learned from Country Experiences Lee, Donna Llopis, Pablo Waterworth, Rob Roberts, Geoff Pearson, Tim DEFORESTATION DEGRADATION GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS BIODIVERSITY CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION CLIMATE CHANGE REDUCED EMISSIONS CARBON FINANCE CARBON POLICY CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE INDIGENOUS COMMUNITIES NATIVE FOREST ECONOMIC ZONING SUBNATIONAL GOVERNMENT LOCAL GOVERNMENT STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT Mitigation of greenhouse gases in the land sector is complex and has a unique set of challenges. The most significant challenges arise from the geographically diffuse nature of the emissions sources (compared to, for example, point-based energy sources of emissions), the vast array of potential management responses, the ongoing effects of past actions, the interaction of human and natural processes, and the strong influences of policy and markets. These factors result in a large number and diversity of actors involved, temporal variability in emissions sources and volumes, and higher uncertainty associated with the processes generating the emission reductions. Because of this, achieving large-scale mitigation in the land sector requires collective action involving multiple stakeholders undertaking different activities. This paper synthesizes several lessons learned in efforts to develop systems that integrate incentive mechanisms at multiple scales. It illustrates many lessons through examples and the appendix presents individual case studies from a variety of geographies, Acre (state in Brazil), Australia, Brazil (Amazon), the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Guatemala, and Zambia. The hope is that the experiences of emerging ‘nested’ systems can provide inspiration to countries developing REDD systems, particularly those which seek to catalyze across a landscape local actions that contribute to national mitigation. The objective of this paper is to share a few lessons from nested systems. While there are many positive benefits to nesting, experience suggests that countries struggle with development of nested systems. Very few have been operationalized (with exception to a few developed countries, such as Australia and New Zealand), although several REDD nested systems are now emerging. Section two explores four high-level ‘typologies’ that countries may consider when developing a nested system. Section three summarizes three key technical challenges that countries face: alignment of measurement systems, reference levels, and double counting. Both sections illustrate options using real-world examples from countries pioneering nested approaches and explain why certain choices were made. The paper concludes with thoughts on overall lessons learned, recognizing that the journey is still young. 2018-04-24T14:50:13Z 2018-04-24T14:50:13Z 2018-04-13 Working Paper Document de travail Documento de trabajo http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/670171523647847532/Main-report https://hdl.handle.net/10986/29720 English CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo World Bank application/pdf application/pdf World Bank, Washington, DC |
| institution |
Banco Mundial |
| collection |
DSpace |
| country |
Estados Unidos |
| countrycode |
US |
| component |
Bibliográfico |
| access |
En linea |
| databasecode |
dig-okr |
| tag |
biblioteca |
| region |
America del Norte |
| libraryname |
Biblioteca del Banco Mundial |
| language |
English |
| topic |
DEFORESTATION DEGRADATION GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS BIODIVERSITY CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION CLIMATE CHANGE REDUCED EMISSIONS CARBON FINANCE CARBON POLICY CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE INDIGENOUS COMMUNITIES NATIVE FOREST ECONOMIC ZONING SUBNATIONAL GOVERNMENT LOCAL GOVERNMENT STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT DEFORESTATION DEGRADATION GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS BIODIVERSITY CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION CLIMATE CHANGE REDUCED EMISSIONS CARBON FINANCE CARBON POLICY CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE INDIGENOUS COMMUNITIES NATIVE FOREST ECONOMIC ZONING SUBNATIONAL GOVERNMENT LOCAL GOVERNMENT STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT |
| spellingShingle |
DEFORESTATION DEGRADATION GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS BIODIVERSITY CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION CLIMATE CHANGE REDUCED EMISSIONS CARBON FINANCE CARBON POLICY CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE INDIGENOUS COMMUNITIES NATIVE FOREST ECONOMIC ZONING SUBNATIONAL GOVERNMENT LOCAL GOVERNMENT STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT DEFORESTATION DEGRADATION GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS BIODIVERSITY CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION CLIMATE CHANGE REDUCED EMISSIONS CARBON FINANCE CARBON POLICY CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE INDIGENOUS COMMUNITIES NATIVE FOREST ECONOMIC ZONING SUBNATIONAL GOVERNMENT LOCAL GOVERNMENT STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT Lee, Donna Llopis, Pablo Waterworth, Rob Roberts, Geoff Pearson, Tim Approaches to REDD+ Nesting |
| description |
Mitigation of greenhouse gases in the
land sector is complex and has a unique set of challenges.
The most significant challenges arise from the
geographically diffuse nature of the emissions sources
(compared to, for example, point-based energy sources of
emissions), the vast array of potential management
responses, the ongoing effects of past actions, the
interaction of human and natural processes, and the strong
influences of policy and markets. These factors result in a
large number and diversity of actors involved, temporal
variability in emissions sources and volumes, and higher
uncertainty associated with the processes generating the
emission reductions. Because of this, achieving large-scale
mitigation in the land sector requires collective action
involving multiple stakeholders undertaking different
activities. This paper synthesizes several lessons learned
in efforts to develop systems that integrate incentive
mechanisms at multiple scales. It illustrates many lessons
through examples and the appendix presents individual case
studies from a variety of geographies, Acre (state in
Brazil), Australia, Brazil (Amazon), the Democratic Republic
of Congo (DRC), Guatemala, and Zambia. The hope is that the
experiences of emerging ‘nested’ systems can provide
inspiration to countries developing REDD systems,
particularly those which seek to catalyze across a landscape
local actions that contribute to national mitigation. The
objective of this paper is to share a few lessons from
nested systems. While there are many positive benefits to
nesting, experience suggests that countries struggle with
development of nested systems. Very few have been
operationalized (with exception to a few developed
countries, such as Australia and New Zealand), although
several REDD nested systems are now emerging. Section two
explores four high-level ‘typologies’ that countries may
consider when developing a nested system. Section three
summarizes three key technical challenges that countries
face: alignment of measurement systems, reference levels,
and double counting. Both sections illustrate options using
real-world examples from countries pioneering nested
approaches and explain why certain choices were made. The
paper concludes with thoughts on overall lessons learned,
recognizing that the journey is still young. |
| format |
Working Paper |
| topic_facet |
DEFORESTATION DEGRADATION GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS BIODIVERSITY CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION CLIMATE CHANGE REDUCED EMISSIONS CARBON FINANCE CARBON POLICY CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE INDIGENOUS COMMUNITIES NATIVE FOREST ECONOMIC ZONING SUBNATIONAL GOVERNMENT LOCAL GOVERNMENT STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT |
| author |
Lee, Donna Llopis, Pablo Waterworth, Rob Roberts, Geoff Pearson, Tim |
| author_facet |
Lee, Donna Llopis, Pablo Waterworth, Rob Roberts, Geoff Pearson, Tim |
| author_sort |
Lee, Donna |
| title |
Approaches to REDD+ Nesting |
| title_short |
Approaches to REDD+ Nesting |
| title_full |
Approaches to REDD+ Nesting |
| title_fullStr |
Approaches to REDD+ Nesting |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Approaches to REDD+ Nesting |
| title_sort |
approaches to redd+ nesting |
| publisher |
World Bank, Washington, DC |
| publishDate |
2018-04-13 |
| url |
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/670171523647847532/Main-report https://hdl.handle.net/10986/29720 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT leedonna approachestoreddnesting AT llopispablo approachestoreddnesting AT waterworthrob approachestoreddnesting AT robertsgeoff approachestoreddnesting AT pearsontim approachestoreddnesting AT leedonna lessonslearnedfromcountryexperiences AT llopispablo lessonslearnedfromcountryexperiences AT waterworthrob lessonslearnedfromcountryexperiences AT robertsgeoff lessonslearnedfromcountryexperiences AT pearsontim lessonslearnedfromcountryexperiences |
| _version_ |
1809105735780401152 |