"Create" or "Buy"

The role of innovation in improving productivity might vary according to a country's relative position in technology advancement. Frontier countries might benefit more from policies that promote firms' internal innovation (create), while follower countries would gain more from policies favoring the adoption of existing technologies through innovation outsourcing (buy). However, in many countries, the government policies to promote innovation narrowly focus on "creating," regardless of considerations of the level of a country's technological advancement. This paper investigates the effect of different sources of innovation on output via productivity with representative manufacturing firms in Tunisia from 1997 to 2007. It finds that "buying" has a positive effect on productivity whereas "creating" does not, which might imply that Tunisian firms do not invest sufficiently in "creating," or that "creating" is more difficult for Tunisian firms because they might be too far from the technology frontier. Meanwhile, there is no synergy from using both sources of innovation simultaneously –- a finding that counters literature suggesting that "creating" could enhance firms' absorptive capacity. The paper considers the possibility that "creating" and "buying" substitute for each other in Tunisia, where resources are limited, assuming the effect of innovation is not linear or requires a certain amount of investment (threshold) to positively affect productivity. The estimation result using the Tobit model supports this assumption. The findings suggest that innovation policy in Tunisia should emphasize adoption and adaptation, rather that creation and innovation. To encourage firms' "buying," the government can promote exports and workers' skills, whereas incentives that encourage firms to hire more technicians or to acquire foreign investment might not be efficient ways to encourage "buying." Moreover, the fact that there is a minimum requirement (threshold) for innovation investment suggests that policies that aim to reduce this threshold or support firms around this threshold could catalyze the innovation investment.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Choi, Jieun
Format: Working Paper biblioteca
Language:English
en_US
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2017-06
Subjects:PRODUCTIVITY, INNOVATION, R&D, ROYALTIES, KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER, TOBIT MODEL, TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION, FOREIGN INVESTMENT,
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/270861498570809131/Create-or-buy-internal-vs-external-sources-of-innovation-and-firm-productivity
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/27624
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-okr-1098627624
record_format koha
spelling dig-okr-10986276242024-08-09T08:49:50Z "Create" or "Buy" Internal vs. External Sources of Innovation and Firm Productivity Choi, Jieun PRODUCTIVITY INNOVATION R&D ROYALTIES KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER TOBIT MODEL TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION FOREIGN INVESTMENT The role of innovation in improving productivity might vary according to a country's relative position in technology advancement. Frontier countries might benefit more from policies that promote firms' internal innovation (create), while follower countries would gain more from policies favoring the adoption of existing technologies through innovation outsourcing (buy). However, in many countries, the government policies to promote innovation narrowly focus on "creating," regardless of considerations of the level of a country's technological advancement. This paper investigates the effect of different sources of innovation on output via productivity with representative manufacturing firms in Tunisia from 1997 to 2007. It finds that "buying" has a positive effect on productivity whereas "creating" does not, which might imply that Tunisian firms do not invest sufficiently in "creating," or that "creating" is more difficult for Tunisian firms because they might be too far from the technology frontier. Meanwhile, there is no synergy from using both sources of innovation simultaneously –- a finding that counters literature suggesting that "creating" could enhance firms' absorptive capacity. The paper considers the possibility that "creating" and "buying" substitute for each other in Tunisia, where resources are limited, assuming the effect of innovation is not linear or requires a certain amount of investment (threshold) to positively affect productivity. The estimation result using the Tobit model supports this assumption. The findings suggest that innovation policy in Tunisia should emphasize adoption and adaptation, rather that creation and innovation. To encourage firms' "buying," the government can promote exports and workers' skills, whereas incentives that encourage firms to hire more technicians or to acquire foreign investment might not be efficient ways to encourage "buying." Moreover, the fact that there is a minimum requirement (threshold) for innovation investment suggests that policies that aim to reduce this threshold or support firms around this threshold could catalyze the innovation investment. 2017-07-18T22:22:25Z 2017-07-18T22:22:25Z 2017-06 Working Paper Document de travail Documento de trabajo http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/270861498570809131/Create-or-buy-internal-vs-external-sources-of-innovation-and-firm-productivity https://hdl.handle.net/10986/27624 English en_US Policy Research Working Paper;No. 8121 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo World Bank application/pdf World Bank, Washington, DC
institution Banco Mundial
collection DSpace
country Estados Unidos
countrycode US
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-okr
tag biblioteca
region America del Norte
libraryname Biblioteca del Banco Mundial
language English
en_US
topic PRODUCTIVITY
INNOVATION
R&D
ROYALTIES
KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER
TOBIT MODEL
TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION
FOREIGN INVESTMENT
PRODUCTIVITY
INNOVATION
R&D
ROYALTIES
KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER
TOBIT MODEL
TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION
FOREIGN INVESTMENT
spellingShingle PRODUCTIVITY
INNOVATION
R&D
ROYALTIES
KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER
TOBIT MODEL
TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION
FOREIGN INVESTMENT
PRODUCTIVITY
INNOVATION
R&D
ROYALTIES
KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER
TOBIT MODEL
TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION
FOREIGN INVESTMENT
Choi, Jieun
"Create" or "Buy"
description The role of innovation in improving productivity might vary according to a country's relative position in technology advancement. Frontier countries might benefit more from policies that promote firms' internal innovation (create), while follower countries would gain more from policies favoring the adoption of existing technologies through innovation outsourcing (buy). However, in many countries, the government policies to promote innovation narrowly focus on "creating," regardless of considerations of the level of a country's technological advancement. This paper investigates the effect of different sources of innovation on output via productivity with representative manufacturing firms in Tunisia from 1997 to 2007. It finds that "buying" has a positive effect on productivity whereas "creating" does not, which might imply that Tunisian firms do not invest sufficiently in "creating," or that "creating" is more difficult for Tunisian firms because they might be too far from the technology frontier. Meanwhile, there is no synergy from using both sources of innovation simultaneously –- a finding that counters literature suggesting that "creating" could enhance firms' absorptive capacity. The paper considers the possibility that "creating" and "buying" substitute for each other in Tunisia, where resources are limited, assuming the effect of innovation is not linear or requires a certain amount of investment (threshold) to positively affect productivity. The estimation result using the Tobit model supports this assumption. The findings suggest that innovation policy in Tunisia should emphasize adoption and adaptation, rather that creation and innovation. To encourage firms' "buying," the government can promote exports and workers' skills, whereas incentives that encourage firms to hire more technicians or to acquire foreign investment might not be efficient ways to encourage "buying." Moreover, the fact that there is a minimum requirement (threshold) for innovation investment suggests that policies that aim to reduce this threshold or support firms around this threshold could catalyze the innovation investment.
format Working Paper
topic_facet PRODUCTIVITY
INNOVATION
R&D
ROYALTIES
KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER
TOBIT MODEL
TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION
FOREIGN INVESTMENT
author Choi, Jieun
author_facet Choi, Jieun
author_sort Choi, Jieun
title "Create" or "Buy"
title_short "Create" or "Buy"
title_full "Create" or "Buy"
title_fullStr "Create" or "Buy"
title_full_unstemmed "Create" or "Buy"
title_sort "create" or "buy"
publisher World Bank, Washington, DC
publishDate 2017-06
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/270861498570809131/Create-or-buy-internal-vs-external-sources-of-innovation-and-firm-productivity
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/27624
work_keys_str_mv AT choijieun createorbuy
AT choijieun internalvsexternalsourcesofinnovationandfirmproductivity
_version_ 1807160449964179456