Stolen Asset Recovery : A Good Practices Guide for Non-conviction Based Asset Forfeiture

The guide is organized into three major parts: Part A first provides an overview of the problem of stolen assets and the problem of recovering the assets once they are transferred abroad. Second, it describes how the international community has taken steps to respond to the problem through United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC) and the Stolen Asset Recovery (StAR) Initiative. UNCAC introduced a new framework to facilitate the tracing, freezing, seizing, forfeiture, and return of assets stolen through corrupt practices and hidden in foreign jurisdictions. The StAR Initiative developed an action plan to support the domestication and implementation of asset recovery provisions under UNCAC, to facilitate countries' efforts to recover stolen assets that have been hidden in foreign jurisdictions, and ultimately, to help deter such flows and eliminate safe havens for hiding corruption proceeds. Third and finally, Part A introduces non-conviction based (NCB) asset forfeiture as one of the critical tools to combat corruption, describing the situations when it is useful, how it differs from criminal forfeiture, its usefulness in civil and common law jurisdictions, and the support it has gained internationally. Part B contains the 36 key concepts. The concepts have been grouped together by topic area, including prime imperatives, definitions of assets and offenses subject to NCB asset forfeiture, measures for investigation and preservation of assets, procedural and evidentiary concepts, determining parties and ensuring proper notice, judgment proceedings, organizational considerations and asset management, and international cooperation and asset recovery. The concepts are illustrated through examples from cases and excerpts from different jurisdictions' NCB asset forfeiture legislation. Part C contains a number of special contributions written by individual practitioners. The contributions focus on the general practice of NCB asset forfeiture and international cooperation in specific jurisdictions, namely Colombia, Guernsey, Ireland, Kuwait, Switzerland, Thailand, and the United Kingdom. In addition, some contributions illustrate a selection of NCB asset forfeiture practices, such as asset management, delegating certain roles to the executive branch, and pursuing forfeiture based on illicit enrichment.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Greenberg, Theodore S., Samuel, Linda M., Grant, Wingate, Gray, Larissa
Language:English
Published: World Bank 2009
Subjects:ABUSE, ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES, ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING, ASSET MANAGEMENT, ASSET RECOVERY, ASSETS, AUCTION, AUCTION PROCESS, BEST PRACTICE, BEST PRACTICES, BRIBERY OF FOREIGN PUBLIC OFFICIALS, BRIBES, CASE LAW, CASH PAYMENTS, CIVIL LAW, CLAIM, CLAIMANT, COCAINE, COMBATING BRIBERY, COMMON LAW, COMMON LAW JURISDICTION, COMMON LAW JURISDICTIONS, COMMON LAW SYSTEMS, COMPENSATION, CONFIDENCE, CONFISCATION ORDER, CONSTITUTIONAL COURT, CONVICTION, CONVICTIONS, CORRUPT, CORRUPT OFFICIAL, CORRUPT OFFICIALS, CORRUPT PRACTICES, CORRUPTION, CORRUPTION INVESTIGATION, COURT, COURT APPROVAL, COURT OF APPEAL, COURT OF JUSTICE, COURTS, CREDITORS, CRIME, CRIMES, CRIMINAL, CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES, CRIMINAL ACTIVITY, CRIMINAL CASE, CRIMINAL CODE, CRIMINAL COURT, CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION, CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS, CRIMINAL JURISDICTION, CRIMINAL LAW, CRIMINAL LAWS, CRIMINALS, CUSTOMARY LAW, DEFAULT JUDGMENT, DEPENDENT, DEPOSITS, DISCLOSURE, DISCRETION, DISPOSAL OF ASSETS, DISPOSITION, DOMESTIC LAW, DOMESTIC LAWS, DRUG, DRUG ABUSE, DRUG TRAFFICKING, DRUGS, DUE PROCESS, EMBEZZLEMENT, ENFORCEABILITY, ESTATE, EU, EXISTING LAWS, FAIR TRIAL, FIGHT AGAINST CORRUPTION, FINAL JUDGMENT, FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, FINANCIAL INTELLIGENCE, FINANCIAL INTELLIGENCE UNIT, FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, FINANCIAL MARKET, FINANCIAL MARKETS, FINANCIAL RESOURCES, FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, FORFEITURE, FORFEITURES, FRAUD, FROZEN ASSETS, GRAND CORRUPTION, HOME, HUMAN RIGHTS, ILLICIT DRUG, IMPLEMENTATION OF LAWS, IMPRISONMENT, INITIATIVE, INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY, INTEGRITY, INTERESTED PARTIES, INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS, INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS, INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL SYSTEM, INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT, INTERNATIONAL TREATIES, INVESTIGATING MAGISTRATES, INVESTIGATION, INVESTIGATIONS, INVESTIGATORS, INVESTMENT CLIMATE, JUDGE, JUDGEMENT, JUDGES, JUDGMENT, JUDGMENTS, JUDICIAL ACTION, JUDICIAL CAPACITY, JUDICIAL COOPERATION, JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS, JUDICIAL SCRUTINY, JUDICIAL SYSTEM, JUDICIARY, JURISDICTION, LAW ENFORCEMENT, LEGAL ACTIONS, LEGAL CHALLENGE, LEGAL CHALLENGES, LEGAL FRAMEWORK, LEGAL MECHANISM, LEGAL STATUS, LEGAL SYSTEM, LEGISLATION, MINISTERS, MORTGAGE, MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE, NARCOTIC, NARCOTIC DRUGS, NARCOTICS, NARCOTICS AGENCY, NARCOTICS CONTROL, NEGOTIATION, OFFENDER, OFFENSE, OFFENSES, OFFICIAL CORRUPTION, ORGANISED CRIME, ORGANIZED CRIME, PEP, PERSONAL ASSETS, POLICE, POLITICIAN, PRESERVATION OF ASSETS, PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE, PRIVACY, PRIVATE INVESTMENT, PRIVATE LAW, PROPERTY LAW, PROPERTY RIGHTS, PROSECUTION, PROSECUTIONS, PROSECUTOR, PROSECUTORS, PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES, PUBLIC FUNDS, PUBLIC OFFICIALS, REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTIONS, RECOVERED FUNDS, RECOVERY OF ASSETS, REMEDIES, REPATRIATION, RESTRAINT ORDER, RESTRAINT ORDERS, RIGHT OF PROPERTY, RULES OF PROCEDURE, SAFE HAVEN, SAFE HAVENS, SANCTION, SECURED CREDITORS, SERVICE DELIVERY, SOCIAL SERVICE, STATEMENT, STOLEN FUNDS, TERRORISM, THEFT, THEFTS, TITLES, TRIAL, VALUE OF ASSETS, VICTIMS, WILL,
Online Access:http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000333038_20090413022407
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/2615
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!