Evaluating the Comprehensive Development Framework

Country ownership is the linchpin of the Comprehensive Development Framework (CDF), according to a recent World Bank report on the CDF. This evaluation of the role of ownership and participation in the CDF will examine these issues by addressing five specific questions: (1) has the CDF been successful in reflecting the new development consensus, in particular, the emphasis on ownership and participation?; (2) to what extent have aid agencies and organizations adopted ownership and participation as central to their operations?; (3) has the existence of the Comprehensive Development Framework led to the emphasis on ownership and participation among aid agencies?; (4) to what extent have governments receiving aid ‘owned’ the aid and sought the participation of their bureaucracies, parliaments and civil societies in planning and implementing the aid-funded activities?; (5) has better ownership led to better-designed and implemented policies and fewer policy rollbacks?; The following sections will first introduce the concept of ownership and participation and their incorporation in the CDF; then examine the role of ownership and participation in the activities of aid donors; third, examine ownership and participation in the work of aid recipients and finally, the extent to which the CDF has been put into use and has helped internalize/operationalize the concept of ownership and participation.

Bibliographic Details

Main Authors:	Handoussa, Heba, Lancaster, Carol
Format:	Evaluation biblioteca
Language:	English en_US
Published:	World Bank, Washington, DC 2003-09-01
Subjects:	FOCUS GROUPS, LIVING STANDARDS, DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE, PARTICIPANTS, PARTICIPATIONS, CONSULTATION, CIVIL SERVANTS, INTENDED BENEFICIARIES, LAWS, COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT, CIVIL SOCIETIES, GOVERNMENT, DEMOCRATIC COUNTRIES, GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, STRATEGIES, PREPARATION, POLITICAL ECONOMY, NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, MINISTER, INCENTIVES, CAPACITY BUILDING, AID AGENCIES, VARIABLES, PROJECTS, PRIORITIES, DEVELOPMENT POLICIES, PARLIAMENT, INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTIONS, OWNERSHIP, DEVELOPMENT GOALS, CORRUPTION, BENEFICIARIES, DEVELOPMENT PROCESS, MOBILIZATION, CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONS, COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION, CREDIBILITY, POVERTY REDUCTION, COLLABORATION, POLITICAL PLURALISM, DEVELOPMENT, AID, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE, AID CONDITIONALITY, COSTS, PARTICIPATORY PROCESSES, ACTIVE INVOLVEMENT, DEVELOPMENT PLANNING, RELEVANCE, DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES, CIVIL SOCIETY, POLITICAL POWER, DEMOCRACY, INITIATIVE, VIOLENCE, STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION, NEEDS, ORGANIZATIONS, LOCAL GOVERNMENT, CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATION, INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, ACCESS, CIVIL SOCIETY GROUPS, NEGOTIATIONS, REPRESENTATIVES, MEDIUM, PARLIAMENTS, GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY, MARGINALIZED GROUPS, ECONOMIC RESEARCH, INTERNATIONAL AID, POLITICAL SYSTEM, BANKS, AID PROGRAMS, AID DEPENDENCY, POLITICAL ECONOMY OF REFORM, INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS, INITIATIVES, PARLIAMENTARIANS, ELECTIONS, CONSULTATION PROCESSES, CONSENSUS BUILDING, ACCOUNTABILITY, POLICIES, PARTICIPATION, SURVEY, DEVELOPMENT BANKS, BANK, ACCOUNTABILITIES, STAKEHOLDERS, FLEXIBILITY, CONSULTATIONS, DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY, MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENTS, DEVELOPMENT ISSUES, DECISIONMAKING, CIVIL SOCIETY PARTICIPATION, INTEREST GROUPS, PARTICIPATORY PROCESS, DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS, DEVELOPMENT AID, TRADE UNIONS, CONSTITUENCIES, POLICY, DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES, POLITICAL PARTIES, MEDIA, GOVERNANCE, CONSENSUS, THEORY, COMPLAINTS, ORGANIZATION, FREE SPEECH, BILATERAL AID, COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK, DECENTRALIZATION, COMPLAINT, STAKEHOLDER, PARTICIPATORY’ PROCESSES, LEADERSHIP, GOVERNORS, DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION, STRATEGY, DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS, GOVERNMENTS, OUTCOMES, AID FLOWS, OBJECTIVES, DEBT RELIEF,
Online Access:	http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2016/03/26017329/evaluating-comprehensive-development-framework-cdf-ownership-participation https://hdl.handle.net/10986/24112
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!