Linking Participatory Poverty Assessments to Policy and Policymaking : Experience from Vietnam

The year 1999 was important for poverty-related research, and policy development in Vietnam. The General Statistics Office had collected household data in the second Vietnam Living Standards Survey in 1998, and made it available for analysis in 1999. And four participatory poverty assessments (PPAs) were implemented during 1999. The author's case study describes how government agencies, donors, and nongovernmental organizations collaborated in implementing the PPAs. The considerable amount of qualitative information about poverty produced in Vietnam over the past eight to ten years has rarely grabbed the attention of policymakers, who tend to view such information as "unscientific" and lacking in credibility. By contrast, the PPAs implemented in 1999 have been widely circulated, used, and quoted. What was different about those PPAs that led their findings to be brought into local, and national policy debates, as previous findings had not been? Working partnerships among donors, and nongovernmental organizations were important, and helped build consensus on the research findings, but more crucial was the active engagement of government partners from the very early stages. Establishing a Poverty Working Group provided a structure for implementing the PPAs, for feeding analysis through to the poverty assessment, and for keeping government fully involved. The Poverty Working Group now supports the government in drafting its poverty reduction strategy. Strong World Bank leadership, financial support from the U.K. Department for International Development, the technical expertise, and commitment of the PPA partners agencies, and the availability of recent high-quality household survey data, played an important part in ensuring the PPAs' credibility.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Turk, Carrie
Format: Policy Research Working Paper biblioteca
Language:English
en_US
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2001-01
Subjects:CAS, CASE STUDY, CG, CHILD LABOR, CIVIL SOCIETY, COLLABORATION, COMMUNITY LEVEL, DATA COLLECTION, DEMOCRACY, DEVELOPMENT WORK, DONOR COMMUNITY, ECONOMIC GROWTH, ELDERLY PEOPLE, EMPLOYMENT, ETHNIC MINORITIES, EXERCISES, GROUP DISCUSSIONS, HOUSEHOLD DATA, HOUSEHOLD LEVEL, HOUSEHOLD SURVEY, INCIDENCE OF POVERTY, INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS, INSTITUTIONAL CONTEXT, LIVING STANDARDS, LOCAL CONDITIONS, LOCAL LEVEL, LONG TERM, MIGRANTS, NATIONAL LEVEL, NATIONAL POLICY, NGO, NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS, PARTICIPATORY POVERTY, PARTICIPATORY POVERTY ASSESSMENT, PARTICIPATORY POVERTY ASSESSMENTS, PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH, PARTICIPATORY TECHNIQUES, PARTNERSHIP, PER CAPITA INCOME, POLICY DEBATES, POLICY DEVELOPMENT, POLICY DOCUMENTS, POLICY ENVIRONMENT, POLICY LEVEL, POLICY MAKERS, POLICY MESSAGES, POLICY RESEARCH, POOR, POOR COMMUNITIES, POOR HOUSEHOLDS, POVERTY ALLEVIATION, POVERTY ALLEVIATION PROGRAMS, POVERTY ANALYSIS, POVERTY ASSESSMENT, POVERTY ISSUES, POVERTY LINE, POVERTY REDUCTION, POVERTY REDUCTION POLICY, POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGY, POVERTY WORK, PPA, PROGRAMMING, PROGRAMS, PUBLIC EXPENDITURE, PUBLIC EXPENDITURE REVIEW, QUALITATIVE DATA, QUALITATIVE INFORMATION, QUALITATIVE RESEARCH, QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, QUANTITATIVE DATA, QUANTITATIVE DATA COLLECTION, RESEARCH FINDINGS, RESEARCH INSTITUTES, RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, RESEARCH TEAM, RESOURCE CONSTRAINTS, RURAL AREAS, SAFETY, SAFETY NETS, SOCIAL SERVICES, STATISTICS OFFICE, TECHNICAL CAPACITY, TRANSPARENCY,
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2001/01/1121143/linking-participatory-poverty-assessments-policy-policymaking-experience-vietnam
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/19735
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-okr-1098619735
record_format koha
spelling dig-okr-10986197352021-04-23T14:03:44Z Linking Participatory Poverty Assessments to Policy and Policymaking : Experience from Vietnam Turk, Carrie CAS CASE STUDY CG CHILD LABOR CIVIL SOCIETY COLLABORATION COMMUNITY LEVEL DATA COLLECTION DEMOCRACY DEVELOPMENT WORK DONOR COMMUNITY ECONOMIC GROWTH ELDERLY PEOPLE EMPLOYMENT ETHNIC MINORITIES EXERCISES GROUP DISCUSSIONS HOUSEHOLD DATA HOUSEHOLD LEVEL HOUSEHOLD SURVEY INCIDENCE OF POVERTY INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS INSTITUTIONAL CONTEXT LIVING STANDARDS LOCAL CONDITIONS LOCAL LEVEL LONG TERM MIGRANTS NATIONAL LEVEL NATIONAL POLICY NGO NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS PARTICIPATORY POVERTY PARTICIPATORY POVERTY ASSESSMENT PARTICIPATORY POVERTY ASSESSMENTS PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH PARTICIPATORY TECHNIQUES PARTNERSHIP PER CAPITA INCOME POLICY DEBATES POLICY DEVELOPMENT POLICY DOCUMENTS POLICY ENVIRONMENT POLICY LEVEL POLICY MAKERS POLICY MESSAGES POLICY RESEARCH POOR POOR COMMUNITIES POOR HOUSEHOLDS POVERTY ALLEVIATION POVERTY ALLEVIATION PROGRAMS POVERTY ANALYSIS POVERTY ASSESSMENT POVERTY ISSUES POVERTY LINE POVERTY REDUCTION POVERTY REDUCTION POLICY POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGY POVERTY WORK PPA PROGRAMMING PROGRAMS PUBLIC EXPENDITURE PUBLIC EXPENDITURE REVIEW QUALITATIVE DATA QUALITATIVE INFORMATION QUALITATIVE RESEARCH QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS QUANTITATIVE DATA QUANTITATIVE DATA COLLECTION RESEARCH FINDINGS RESEARCH INSTITUTES RESEARCH METHODOLOGY RESEARCH TEAM RESOURCE CONSTRAINTS RURAL AREAS SAFETY SAFETY NETS SOCIAL SERVICES STATISTICS OFFICE TECHNICAL CAPACITY TRANSPARENCY The year 1999 was important for poverty-related research, and policy development in Vietnam. The General Statistics Office had collected household data in the second Vietnam Living Standards Survey in 1998, and made it available for analysis in 1999. And four participatory poverty assessments (PPAs) were implemented during 1999. The author's case study describes how government agencies, donors, and nongovernmental organizations collaborated in implementing the PPAs. The considerable amount of qualitative information about poverty produced in Vietnam over the past eight to ten years has rarely grabbed the attention of policymakers, who tend to view such information as "unscientific" and lacking in credibility. By contrast, the PPAs implemented in 1999 have been widely circulated, used, and quoted. What was different about those PPAs that led their findings to be brought into local, and national policy debates, as previous findings had not been? Working partnerships among donors, and nongovernmental organizations were important, and helped build consensus on the research findings, but more crucial was the active engagement of government partners from the very early stages. Establishing a Poverty Working Group provided a structure for implementing the PPAs, for feeding analysis through to the poverty assessment, and for keeping government fully involved. The Poverty Working Group now supports the government in drafting its poverty reduction strategy. Strong World Bank leadership, financial support from the U.K. Department for International Development, the technical expertise, and commitment of the PPA partners agencies, and the availability of recent high-quality household survey data, played an important part in ensuring the PPAs' credibility. 2014-08-26T21:43:34Z 2014-08-26T21:43:34Z 2001-01 http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2001/01/1121143/linking-participatory-poverty-assessments-policy-policymaking-experience-vietnam http://hdl.handle.net/10986/19735 English en_US Policy Research Working Paper;No. 2526 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank, Washington, DC Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working Paper Publications & Research East Asia and Pacific Vietnam
institution Banco Mundial
collection DSpace
country Estados Unidos
countrycode US
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-okr
tag biblioteca
region America del Norte
libraryname Biblioteca del Banco Mundial
language English
en_US
topic CAS
CASE STUDY
CG
CHILD LABOR
CIVIL SOCIETY
COLLABORATION
COMMUNITY LEVEL
DATA COLLECTION
DEMOCRACY
DEVELOPMENT WORK
DONOR COMMUNITY
ECONOMIC GROWTH
ELDERLY PEOPLE
EMPLOYMENT
ETHNIC MINORITIES
EXERCISES
GROUP DISCUSSIONS
HOUSEHOLD DATA
HOUSEHOLD LEVEL
HOUSEHOLD SURVEY
INCIDENCE OF POVERTY
INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS
INSTITUTIONAL CONTEXT
LIVING STANDARDS
LOCAL CONDITIONS
LOCAL LEVEL
LONG TERM
MIGRANTS
NATIONAL LEVEL
NATIONAL POLICY
NGO
NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS
PARTICIPATORY POVERTY
PARTICIPATORY POVERTY ASSESSMENT
PARTICIPATORY POVERTY ASSESSMENTS
PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH
PARTICIPATORY TECHNIQUES
PARTNERSHIP
PER CAPITA INCOME
POLICY DEBATES
POLICY DEVELOPMENT
POLICY DOCUMENTS
POLICY ENVIRONMENT
POLICY LEVEL
POLICY MAKERS
POLICY MESSAGES
POLICY RESEARCH
POOR
POOR COMMUNITIES
POOR HOUSEHOLDS
POVERTY ALLEVIATION
POVERTY ALLEVIATION PROGRAMS
POVERTY ANALYSIS
POVERTY ASSESSMENT
POVERTY ISSUES
POVERTY LINE
POVERTY REDUCTION
POVERTY REDUCTION POLICY
POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGY
POVERTY WORK
PPA
PROGRAMMING
PROGRAMS
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE REVIEW
QUALITATIVE DATA
QUALITATIVE INFORMATION
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS
QUANTITATIVE DATA
QUANTITATIVE DATA COLLECTION
RESEARCH FINDINGS
RESEARCH INSTITUTES
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
RESEARCH TEAM
RESOURCE CONSTRAINTS
RURAL AREAS
SAFETY
SAFETY NETS
SOCIAL SERVICES
STATISTICS OFFICE
TECHNICAL CAPACITY
TRANSPARENCY
CAS
CASE STUDY
CG
CHILD LABOR
CIVIL SOCIETY
COLLABORATION
COMMUNITY LEVEL
DATA COLLECTION
DEMOCRACY
DEVELOPMENT WORK
DONOR COMMUNITY
ECONOMIC GROWTH
ELDERLY PEOPLE
EMPLOYMENT
ETHNIC MINORITIES
EXERCISES
GROUP DISCUSSIONS
HOUSEHOLD DATA
HOUSEHOLD LEVEL
HOUSEHOLD SURVEY
INCIDENCE OF POVERTY
INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS
INSTITUTIONAL CONTEXT
LIVING STANDARDS
LOCAL CONDITIONS
LOCAL LEVEL
LONG TERM
MIGRANTS
NATIONAL LEVEL
NATIONAL POLICY
NGO
NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS
PARTICIPATORY POVERTY
PARTICIPATORY POVERTY ASSESSMENT
PARTICIPATORY POVERTY ASSESSMENTS
PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH
PARTICIPATORY TECHNIQUES
PARTNERSHIP
PER CAPITA INCOME
POLICY DEBATES
POLICY DEVELOPMENT
POLICY DOCUMENTS
POLICY ENVIRONMENT
POLICY LEVEL
POLICY MAKERS
POLICY MESSAGES
POLICY RESEARCH
POOR
POOR COMMUNITIES
POOR HOUSEHOLDS
POVERTY ALLEVIATION
POVERTY ALLEVIATION PROGRAMS
POVERTY ANALYSIS
POVERTY ASSESSMENT
POVERTY ISSUES
POVERTY LINE
POVERTY REDUCTION
POVERTY REDUCTION POLICY
POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGY
POVERTY WORK
PPA
PROGRAMMING
PROGRAMS
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE REVIEW
QUALITATIVE DATA
QUALITATIVE INFORMATION
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS
QUANTITATIVE DATA
QUANTITATIVE DATA COLLECTION
RESEARCH FINDINGS
RESEARCH INSTITUTES
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
RESEARCH TEAM
RESOURCE CONSTRAINTS
RURAL AREAS
SAFETY
SAFETY NETS
SOCIAL SERVICES
STATISTICS OFFICE
TECHNICAL CAPACITY
TRANSPARENCY
spellingShingle CAS
CASE STUDY
CG
CHILD LABOR
CIVIL SOCIETY
COLLABORATION
COMMUNITY LEVEL
DATA COLLECTION
DEMOCRACY
DEVELOPMENT WORK
DONOR COMMUNITY
ECONOMIC GROWTH
ELDERLY PEOPLE
EMPLOYMENT
ETHNIC MINORITIES
EXERCISES
GROUP DISCUSSIONS
HOUSEHOLD DATA
HOUSEHOLD LEVEL
HOUSEHOLD SURVEY
INCIDENCE OF POVERTY
INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS
INSTITUTIONAL CONTEXT
LIVING STANDARDS
LOCAL CONDITIONS
LOCAL LEVEL
LONG TERM
MIGRANTS
NATIONAL LEVEL
NATIONAL POLICY
NGO
NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS
PARTICIPATORY POVERTY
PARTICIPATORY POVERTY ASSESSMENT
PARTICIPATORY POVERTY ASSESSMENTS
PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH
PARTICIPATORY TECHNIQUES
PARTNERSHIP
PER CAPITA INCOME
POLICY DEBATES
POLICY DEVELOPMENT
POLICY DOCUMENTS
POLICY ENVIRONMENT
POLICY LEVEL
POLICY MAKERS
POLICY MESSAGES
POLICY RESEARCH
POOR
POOR COMMUNITIES
POOR HOUSEHOLDS
POVERTY ALLEVIATION
POVERTY ALLEVIATION PROGRAMS
POVERTY ANALYSIS
POVERTY ASSESSMENT
POVERTY ISSUES
POVERTY LINE
POVERTY REDUCTION
POVERTY REDUCTION POLICY
POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGY
POVERTY WORK
PPA
PROGRAMMING
PROGRAMS
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE REVIEW
QUALITATIVE DATA
QUALITATIVE INFORMATION
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS
QUANTITATIVE DATA
QUANTITATIVE DATA COLLECTION
RESEARCH FINDINGS
RESEARCH INSTITUTES
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
RESEARCH TEAM
RESOURCE CONSTRAINTS
RURAL AREAS
SAFETY
SAFETY NETS
SOCIAL SERVICES
STATISTICS OFFICE
TECHNICAL CAPACITY
TRANSPARENCY
CAS
CASE STUDY
CG
CHILD LABOR
CIVIL SOCIETY
COLLABORATION
COMMUNITY LEVEL
DATA COLLECTION
DEMOCRACY
DEVELOPMENT WORK
DONOR COMMUNITY
ECONOMIC GROWTH
ELDERLY PEOPLE
EMPLOYMENT
ETHNIC MINORITIES
EXERCISES
GROUP DISCUSSIONS
HOUSEHOLD DATA
HOUSEHOLD LEVEL
HOUSEHOLD SURVEY
INCIDENCE OF POVERTY
INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS
INSTITUTIONAL CONTEXT
LIVING STANDARDS
LOCAL CONDITIONS
LOCAL LEVEL
LONG TERM
MIGRANTS
NATIONAL LEVEL
NATIONAL POLICY
NGO
NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS
PARTICIPATORY POVERTY
PARTICIPATORY POVERTY ASSESSMENT
PARTICIPATORY POVERTY ASSESSMENTS
PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH
PARTICIPATORY TECHNIQUES
PARTNERSHIP
PER CAPITA INCOME
POLICY DEBATES
POLICY DEVELOPMENT
POLICY DOCUMENTS
POLICY ENVIRONMENT
POLICY LEVEL
POLICY MAKERS
POLICY MESSAGES
POLICY RESEARCH
POOR
POOR COMMUNITIES
POOR HOUSEHOLDS
POVERTY ALLEVIATION
POVERTY ALLEVIATION PROGRAMS
POVERTY ANALYSIS
POVERTY ASSESSMENT
POVERTY ISSUES
POVERTY LINE
POVERTY REDUCTION
POVERTY REDUCTION POLICY
POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGY
POVERTY WORK
PPA
PROGRAMMING
PROGRAMS
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE REVIEW
QUALITATIVE DATA
QUALITATIVE INFORMATION
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS
QUANTITATIVE DATA
QUANTITATIVE DATA COLLECTION
RESEARCH FINDINGS
RESEARCH INSTITUTES
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
RESEARCH TEAM
RESOURCE CONSTRAINTS
RURAL AREAS
SAFETY
SAFETY NETS
SOCIAL SERVICES
STATISTICS OFFICE
TECHNICAL CAPACITY
TRANSPARENCY
Turk, Carrie
Linking Participatory Poverty Assessments to Policy and Policymaking : Experience from Vietnam
description The year 1999 was important for poverty-related research, and policy development in Vietnam. The General Statistics Office had collected household data in the second Vietnam Living Standards Survey in 1998, and made it available for analysis in 1999. And four participatory poverty assessments (PPAs) were implemented during 1999. The author's case study describes how government agencies, donors, and nongovernmental organizations collaborated in implementing the PPAs. The considerable amount of qualitative information about poverty produced in Vietnam over the past eight to ten years has rarely grabbed the attention of policymakers, who tend to view such information as "unscientific" and lacking in credibility. By contrast, the PPAs implemented in 1999 have been widely circulated, used, and quoted. What was different about those PPAs that led their findings to be brought into local, and national policy debates, as previous findings had not been? Working partnerships among donors, and nongovernmental organizations were important, and helped build consensus on the research findings, but more crucial was the active engagement of government partners from the very early stages. Establishing a Poverty Working Group provided a structure for implementing the PPAs, for feeding analysis through to the poverty assessment, and for keeping government fully involved. The Poverty Working Group now supports the government in drafting its poverty reduction strategy. Strong World Bank leadership, financial support from the U.K. Department for International Development, the technical expertise, and commitment of the PPA partners agencies, and the availability of recent high-quality household survey data, played an important part in ensuring the PPAs' credibility.
format Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working Paper
topic_facet CAS
CASE STUDY
CG
CHILD LABOR
CIVIL SOCIETY
COLLABORATION
COMMUNITY LEVEL
DATA COLLECTION
DEMOCRACY
DEVELOPMENT WORK
DONOR COMMUNITY
ECONOMIC GROWTH
ELDERLY PEOPLE
EMPLOYMENT
ETHNIC MINORITIES
EXERCISES
GROUP DISCUSSIONS
HOUSEHOLD DATA
HOUSEHOLD LEVEL
HOUSEHOLD SURVEY
INCIDENCE OF POVERTY
INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS
INSTITUTIONAL CONTEXT
LIVING STANDARDS
LOCAL CONDITIONS
LOCAL LEVEL
LONG TERM
MIGRANTS
NATIONAL LEVEL
NATIONAL POLICY
NGO
NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS
PARTICIPATORY POVERTY
PARTICIPATORY POVERTY ASSESSMENT
PARTICIPATORY POVERTY ASSESSMENTS
PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH
PARTICIPATORY TECHNIQUES
PARTNERSHIP
PER CAPITA INCOME
POLICY DEBATES
POLICY DEVELOPMENT
POLICY DOCUMENTS
POLICY ENVIRONMENT
POLICY LEVEL
POLICY MAKERS
POLICY MESSAGES
POLICY RESEARCH
POOR
POOR COMMUNITIES
POOR HOUSEHOLDS
POVERTY ALLEVIATION
POVERTY ALLEVIATION PROGRAMS
POVERTY ANALYSIS
POVERTY ASSESSMENT
POVERTY ISSUES
POVERTY LINE
POVERTY REDUCTION
POVERTY REDUCTION POLICY
POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGY
POVERTY WORK
PPA
PROGRAMMING
PROGRAMS
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE REVIEW
QUALITATIVE DATA
QUALITATIVE INFORMATION
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS
QUANTITATIVE DATA
QUANTITATIVE DATA COLLECTION
RESEARCH FINDINGS
RESEARCH INSTITUTES
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
RESEARCH TEAM
RESOURCE CONSTRAINTS
RURAL AREAS
SAFETY
SAFETY NETS
SOCIAL SERVICES
STATISTICS OFFICE
TECHNICAL CAPACITY
TRANSPARENCY
author Turk, Carrie
author_facet Turk, Carrie
author_sort Turk, Carrie
title Linking Participatory Poverty Assessments to Policy and Policymaking : Experience from Vietnam
title_short Linking Participatory Poverty Assessments to Policy and Policymaking : Experience from Vietnam
title_full Linking Participatory Poverty Assessments to Policy and Policymaking : Experience from Vietnam
title_fullStr Linking Participatory Poverty Assessments to Policy and Policymaking : Experience from Vietnam
title_full_unstemmed Linking Participatory Poverty Assessments to Policy and Policymaking : Experience from Vietnam
title_sort linking participatory poverty assessments to policy and policymaking : experience from vietnam
publisher World Bank, Washington, DC
publishDate 2001-01
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2001/01/1121143/linking-participatory-poverty-assessments-policy-policymaking-experience-vietnam
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/19735
work_keys_str_mv AT turkcarrie linkingparticipatorypovertyassessmentstopolicyandpolicymakingexperiencefromvietnam
_version_ 1756573524378517504