Trade, Growth, and Poverty
The evidence from individual cases and from cross-country analysis supports the view that globalization leads to faster growth and poverty reduction in poor countries. To determine the effect of globalization on growth, poverty, and inequality, the authors first identify a group of developing countries that are participating more in globalization. China, India, and several other large countries are part of this group, so well over half the population of the developing world lives in these globalizing economies. Over the past 20 years, the post-1980 globalizers have seen large increases in trade and significant declines in tariffs. Their growth rates accelerated between the 1970s and the 1980s and again between the 1980s and the 1990s, even as growth in the rich countries and the rest of the developing world slowed. The post-1980 globalizers are catching up to the rich countries, but the rest of the developing world (the non-globalizers) is falling further behind. Next, the authors ask how general these patterns are, using regressions that exploit within-country variations in trade and growth. After controlling for changes in other policies and addressing endogeneity with internal instruments, they find that trade has a strong positive effect on growth. Finally, the authors examine the effects of trade on the poor. They find little systematic evidence of a relationship between changes in trade volumes (or any other measure of globalization they consider) and changes in the income share of the poorest-or between changes in trade volumes and changes in household income inequality. They conclude, therefore, that the increase in growth rates that accompanies expanded trade translates on average into proportionate increases in incomes of the poor. Absolute poverty in the globalizing developing economies has fallen sharply in the past 20 years. The evidence from individual cases and from cross-country analysis supports the view that globalization leads to faster growth and poverty reduction in poor countries.
Summary: | The evidence from individual cases and
from cross-country analysis supports the view that
globalization leads to faster growth and poverty reduction
in poor countries. To determine the effect of globalization
on growth, poverty, and inequality, the authors first
identify a group of developing countries that are
participating more in globalization. China, India, and
several other large countries are part of this group, so
well over half the population of the developing world lives
in these globalizing economies. Over the past 20 years, the
post-1980 globalizers have seen large increases in trade and
significant declines in tariffs. Their growth rates
accelerated between the 1970s and the 1980s and again
between the 1980s and the 1990s, even as growth in the rich
countries and the rest of the developing world slowed. The
post-1980 globalizers are catching up to the rich countries,
but the rest of the developing world (the non-globalizers)
is falling further behind. Next, the authors ask how general
these patterns are, using regressions that exploit
within-country variations in trade and growth. After
controlling for changes in other policies and addressing
endogeneity with internal instruments, they find that trade
has a strong positive effect on growth. Finally, the authors
examine the effects of trade on the poor. They find little
systematic evidence of a relationship between changes in
trade volumes (or any other measure of globalization they
consider) and changes in the income share of the poorest-or
between changes in trade volumes and changes in household
income inequality. They conclude, therefore, that the
increase in growth rates that accompanies expanded trade
translates on average into proportionate increases in
incomes of the poor. Absolute poverty in the globalizing
developing economies has fallen sharply in the past 20
years. The evidence from individual cases and from
cross-country analysis supports the view that globalization
leads to faster growth and poverty reduction in poor countries. |
---|