Can Local Institutions Reduce Poverty? Rural Decentralization in Burkina Faso

The authors present evidence that in Burkina Faso, certain high-performing local institutions contribute to equitable economic development. They link reduced levels of poverty, and inequality to a high degree of internal village organization. The structure of these high-performing local organizations means they can exist in a number of African countries, because they depend more on internal participation, rather than on nay one country's cultural assets. The authors find that: 1) Service-asset management groups (SAMs) - one of three local institutions identified in the study - have helped to significantly reduce inequality in participating households. SAMs are a fusion of long-standing development committees, and indigenous management councils that collectively manage community assets, such as water. SAMs have combined the productivity goals of growth, with the values of equity, and solidarity. 2) Current development approaches use growth as an initiator, assuming that surpluses will be used to benefit the poor. SAMs, and other local institutions in Burkina Faso, start with equity, and solidarity, and aim for a result of growth, and development. 3) Internal participation is essential for SAMs to function. Only locally anchored participation can power the realignments, and institutional revisions needed to scale up development action. SAMs, and other local institutions have launched their communities on equitable growth paths, and are reducing poverty with little, or no outside assistance, despite severe resource constraints. Their impact could be enormous if external development resources augmented their potential. World Bank programs, and policy interventions could build on local strength, and make their activities more sustainable by mapping local institutions to guide new initiatives in pro-poor investment, and using that mapping to formalize, and increase internal local participation - expanding nationwide by using a network of local institutions. SAMs, and other local institutions, could be the vehicle for ensuring transparency, and accountability. Working with the results of local activities, national policies could favor the development of indigenously based, but externally oriented local economies.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Donnelly-Roark, Paula, Ouedraogo, Karim, Ye, Xiao
Language:English
en_US
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2001-09
Subjects:ACCOUNTABILITY, ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK, AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION, AGRICULTURE, ASSET MANAGEMENT, CIVIL SOCIETY, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, COMMUNITY DRIVEN DEVELOPMENT, COMMUNITY LEVEL, COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT, COMMUNITY MEMBERS, COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION, CONSENSUS, CROPS, DATA SET, DATA SETS, DECENTRALIZATION, DECENTRALIZATION PROCESS, DECISION-MAKING, DEMOCRACY, DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES, DEVELOPMENT NETWORK, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, ECONOMIC GROWTH, ECONOMIC OUTCOMES, ECONOMICS, ETHNIC GROUP, ETHNIC GROUPS, EXCLUDED GROUPS, EXPENDITURE, FEDERATIONS, FIELD RESEARCH, FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE, FINANCIAL RESOURCES, FOOD SECURITY, GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE, GROWTH PATH, HEALTH CENTERS, HOUSEHOLD SURVEY, HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS, HOUSEHOLD WELFARE, HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, HUMAN DEVELOPMENT REPORT, INCOME, INCOME LEVELS, INDIGENOUS INSTITUTIONS, INEQUALITY, INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY, INSTITUTIONAL CHANGES, INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT, INSTITUTIONAL ENVIRONMENT, INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, KNOWLEDGE SYSTEMS, LANDS, LEGITIMACY, LIVING CONDITIONS, LOCAL COMMUNITIES, LOCAL COUNCILS, LOCAL ELECTIONS, LOCAL GOVERNANCE, LOCAL GOVERNMENT, LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, LOCAL INSTITUTIONS, LOCAL LANGUAGES, LOCAL LEVEL, LOCAL LEVEL INSTITUTIONS, LOCAL ORGANIZATIONS, LOCAL PEOPLE, NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS, NATIONAL LEVEL, NATIONAL LEVELS, NATIONAL POLICIES, NATIONAL RESEARCH, NATURAL RESOURCES, PARTICIPATORY ACTION, PARTICIPATORY ANALYSIS, PARTICIPATORY APPROACH, PARTICIPATORY MONITORING, PARTICIPATORY PROCESSES, POLICY RESEARCH, POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT, POLITICAL PARTIES, POOR HOUSEHOLDS, POVERTY ERADICATION, POVERTY LEVELS, POVERTY REDUCTION, POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGY, PROPAGANDA, QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, REDUCING POVERTY, RELIGIOUS ASSOCIATIONS, RESEARCH TEAM, RESOURCE CONSTRAINTS, RESOURCE MOBILIZATION, RURAL DEVELOPMENT, RURAL FINANCE, RURAL PEOPLE, RURAL POPULATION, SERVICE PROVISION, SOCIAL ACTION, SOCIAL CAPITAL, SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT, SOCIAL GROUP, SOCIAL NORMS, SOCIAL STABILITY, STATE AGENCY, STATE INTERVENTION, SUSTAINABILITY, TEAM LEADERS, TRANSPARENCY, URBAN AREAS,
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2001/09/1614753/can-local-institutions-reduce-poverty-rural-decentralization-burkina-faso
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/19551
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-okr-1098619551
record_format koha
institution Banco Mundial
collection DSpace
country Estados Unidos
countrycode US
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-okr
tag biblioteca
region America del Norte
libraryname Biblioteca del Banco Mundial
language English
en_US
topic ACCOUNTABILITY
ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION
AGRICULTURE
ASSET MANAGEMENT
CIVIL SOCIETY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
COMMUNITY DRIVEN DEVELOPMENT
COMMUNITY LEVEL
COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT
COMMUNITY MEMBERS
COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
CONSENSUS
CROPS
DATA SET
DATA SETS
DECENTRALIZATION
DECENTRALIZATION PROCESS
DECISION-MAKING
DEMOCRACY
DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES
DEVELOPMENT NETWORK
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
ECONOMIC GROWTH
ECONOMIC OUTCOMES
ECONOMICS
ETHNIC GROUP
ETHNIC GROUPS
EXCLUDED GROUPS
EXPENDITURE
FEDERATIONS
FIELD RESEARCH
FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
FINANCIAL RESOURCES
FOOD SECURITY
GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE
GROWTH PATH
HEALTH CENTERS
HOUSEHOLD SURVEY
HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS
HOUSEHOLD WELFARE
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT REPORT
INCOME
INCOME LEVELS
INDIGENOUS INSTITUTIONS
INEQUALITY
INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY
INSTITUTIONAL CHANGES
INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT
INSTITUTIONAL ENVIRONMENT
INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
KNOWLEDGE SYSTEMS
LANDS
LEGITIMACY
LIVING CONDITIONS
LOCAL COMMUNITIES
LOCAL COUNCILS
LOCAL ELECTIONS
LOCAL GOVERNANCE
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
LOCAL INSTITUTIONS
LOCAL LANGUAGES
LOCAL LEVEL
LOCAL LEVEL INSTITUTIONS
LOCAL ORGANIZATIONS
LOCAL PEOPLE
NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS
NATIONAL LEVEL
NATIONAL LEVELS
NATIONAL POLICIES
NATIONAL RESEARCH
NATURAL RESOURCES
PARTICIPATORY ACTION
PARTICIPATORY ANALYSIS
PARTICIPATORY APPROACH
PARTICIPATORY MONITORING
PARTICIPATORY PROCESSES
POLICY RESEARCH
POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT
POLITICAL PARTIES
POOR HOUSEHOLDS
POVERTY ERADICATION
POVERTY LEVELS
POVERTY REDUCTION
POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGY
PROPAGANDA
QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS
REDUCING POVERTY
RELIGIOUS ASSOCIATIONS
RESEARCH TEAM
RESOURCE CONSTRAINTS
RESOURCE MOBILIZATION
RURAL DEVELOPMENT
RURAL FINANCE
RURAL PEOPLE
RURAL POPULATION
SERVICE PROVISION
SOCIAL ACTION
SOCIAL CAPITAL
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT
SOCIAL GROUP
SOCIAL NORMS
SOCIAL STABILITY
STATE AGENCY
STATE INTERVENTION
SUSTAINABILITY
TEAM LEADERS
TRANSPARENCY
URBAN AREAS
ACCOUNTABILITY
ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION
AGRICULTURE
ASSET MANAGEMENT
CIVIL SOCIETY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
COMMUNITY DRIVEN DEVELOPMENT
COMMUNITY LEVEL
COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT
COMMUNITY MEMBERS
COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
CONSENSUS
CROPS
DATA SET
DATA SETS
DECENTRALIZATION
DECENTRALIZATION PROCESS
DECISION-MAKING
DEMOCRACY
DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES
DEVELOPMENT NETWORK
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
ECONOMIC GROWTH
ECONOMIC OUTCOMES
ECONOMICS
ETHNIC GROUP
ETHNIC GROUPS
EXCLUDED GROUPS
EXPENDITURE
FEDERATIONS
FIELD RESEARCH
FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
FINANCIAL RESOURCES
FOOD SECURITY
GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE
GROWTH PATH
HEALTH CENTERS
HOUSEHOLD SURVEY
HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS
HOUSEHOLD WELFARE
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT REPORT
INCOME
INCOME LEVELS
INDIGENOUS INSTITUTIONS
INEQUALITY
INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY
INSTITUTIONAL CHANGES
INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT
INSTITUTIONAL ENVIRONMENT
INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
KNOWLEDGE SYSTEMS
LANDS
LEGITIMACY
LIVING CONDITIONS
LOCAL COMMUNITIES
LOCAL COUNCILS
LOCAL ELECTIONS
LOCAL GOVERNANCE
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
LOCAL INSTITUTIONS
LOCAL LANGUAGES
LOCAL LEVEL
LOCAL LEVEL INSTITUTIONS
LOCAL ORGANIZATIONS
LOCAL PEOPLE
NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS
NATIONAL LEVEL
NATIONAL LEVELS
NATIONAL POLICIES
NATIONAL RESEARCH
NATURAL RESOURCES
PARTICIPATORY ACTION
PARTICIPATORY ANALYSIS
PARTICIPATORY APPROACH
PARTICIPATORY MONITORING
PARTICIPATORY PROCESSES
POLICY RESEARCH
POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT
POLITICAL PARTIES
POOR HOUSEHOLDS
POVERTY ERADICATION
POVERTY LEVELS
POVERTY REDUCTION
POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGY
PROPAGANDA
QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS
REDUCING POVERTY
RELIGIOUS ASSOCIATIONS
RESEARCH TEAM
RESOURCE CONSTRAINTS
RESOURCE MOBILIZATION
RURAL DEVELOPMENT
RURAL FINANCE
RURAL PEOPLE
RURAL POPULATION
SERVICE PROVISION
SOCIAL ACTION
SOCIAL CAPITAL
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT
SOCIAL GROUP
SOCIAL NORMS
SOCIAL STABILITY
STATE AGENCY
STATE INTERVENTION
SUSTAINABILITY
TEAM LEADERS
TRANSPARENCY
URBAN AREAS
spellingShingle ACCOUNTABILITY
ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION
AGRICULTURE
ASSET MANAGEMENT
CIVIL SOCIETY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
COMMUNITY DRIVEN DEVELOPMENT
COMMUNITY LEVEL
COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT
COMMUNITY MEMBERS
COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
CONSENSUS
CROPS
DATA SET
DATA SETS
DECENTRALIZATION
DECENTRALIZATION PROCESS
DECISION-MAKING
DEMOCRACY
DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES
DEVELOPMENT NETWORK
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
ECONOMIC GROWTH
ECONOMIC OUTCOMES
ECONOMICS
ETHNIC GROUP
ETHNIC GROUPS
EXCLUDED GROUPS
EXPENDITURE
FEDERATIONS
FIELD RESEARCH
FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
FINANCIAL RESOURCES
FOOD SECURITY
GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE
GROWTH PATH
HEALTH CENTERS
HOUSEHOLD SURVEY
HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS
HOUSEHOLD WELFARE
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT REPORT
INCOME
INCOME LEVELS
INDIGENOUS INSTITUTIONS
INEQUALITY
INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY
INSTITUTIONAL CHANGES
INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT
INSTITUTIONAL ENVIRONMENT
INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
KNOWLEDGE SYSTEMS
LANDS
LEGITIMACY
LIVING CONDITIONS
LOCAL COMMUNITIES
LOCAL COUNCILS
LOCAL ELECTIONS
LOCAL GOVERNANCE
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
LOCAL INSTITUTIONS
LOCAL LANGUAGES
LOCAL LEVEL
LOCAL LEVEL INSTITUTIONS
LOCAL ORGANIZATIONS
LOCAL PEOPLE
NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS
NATIONAL LEVEL
NATIONAL LEVELS
NATIONAL POLICIES
NATIONAL RESEARCH
NATURAL RESOURCES
PARTICIPATORY ACTION
PARTICIPATORY ANALYSIS
PARTICIPATORY APPROACH
PARTICIPATORY MONITORING
PARTICIPATORY PROCESSES
POLICY RESEARCH
POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT
POLITICAL PARTIES
POOR HOUSEHOLDS
POVERTY ERADICATION
POVERTY LEVELS
POVERTY REDUCTION
POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGY
PROPAGANDA
QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS
REDUCING POVERTY
RELIGIOUS ASSOCIATIONS
RESEARCH TEAM
RESOURCE CONSTRAINTS
RESOURCE MOBILIZATION
RURAL DEVELOPMENT
RURAL FINANCE
RURAL PEOPLE
RURAL POPULATION
SERVICE PROVISION
SOCIAL ACTION
SOCIAL CAPITAL
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT
SOCIAL GROUP
SOCIAL NORMS
SOCIAL STABILITY
STATE AGENCY
STATE INTERVENTION
SUSTAINABILITY
TEAM LEADERS
TRANSPARENCY
URBAN AREAS
ACCOUNTABILITY
ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION
AGRICULTURE
ASSET MANAGEMENT
CIVIL SOCIETY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
COMMUNITY DRIVEN DEVELOPMENT
COMMUNITY LEVEL
COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT
COMMUNITY MEMBERS
COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
CONSENSUS
CROPS
DATA SET
DATA SETS
DECENTRALIZATION
DECENTRALIZATION PROCESS
DECISION-MAKING
DEMOCRACY
DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES
DEVELOPMENT NETWORK
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
ECONOMIC GROWTH
ECONOMIC OUTCOMES
ECONOMICS
ETHNIC GROUP
ETHNIC GROUPS
EXCLUDED GROUPS
EXPENDITURE
FEDERATIONS
FIELD RESEARCH
FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
FINANCIAL RESOURCES
FOOD SECURITY
GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE
GROWTH PATH
HEALTH CENTERS
HOUSEHOLD SURVEY
HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS
HOUSEHOLD WELFARE
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT REPORT
INCOME
INCOME LEVELS
INDIGENOUS INSTITUTIONS
INEQUALITY
INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY
INSTITUTIONAL CHANGES
INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT
INSTITUTIONAL ENVIRONMENT
INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
KNOWLEDGE SYSTEMS
LANDS
LEGITIMACY
LIVING CONDITIONS
LOCAL COMMUNITIES
LOCAL COUNCILS
LOCAL ELECTIONS
LOCAL GOVERNANCE
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
LOCAL INSTITUTIONS
LOCAL LANGUAGES
LOCAL LEVEL
LOCAL LEVEL INSTITUTIONS
LOCAL ORGANIZATIONS
LOCAL PEOPLE
NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS
NATIONAL LEVEL
NATIONAL LEVELS
NATIONAL POLICIES
NATIONAL RESEARCH
NATURAL RESOURCES
PARTICIPATORY ACTION
PARTICIPATORY ANALYSIS
PARTICIPATORY APPROACH
PARTICIPATORY MONITORING
PARTICIPATORY PROCESSES
POLICY RESEARCH
POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT
POLITICAL PARTIES
POOR HOUSEHOLDS
POVERTY ERADICATION
POVERTY LEVELS
POVERTY REDUCTION
POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGY
PROPAGANDA
QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS
REDUCING POVERTY
RELIGIOUS ASSOCIATIONS
RESEARCH TEAM
RESOURCE CONSTRAINTS
RESOURCE MOBILIZATION
RURAL DEVELOPMENT
RURAL FINANCE
RURAL PEOPLE
RURAL POPULATION
SERVICE PROVISION
SOCIAL ACTION
SOCIAL CAPITAL
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT
SOCIAL GROUP
SOCIAL NORMS
SOCIAL STABILITY
STATE AGENCY
STATE INTERVENTION
SUSTAINABILITY
TEAM LEADERS
TRANSPARENCY
URBAN AREAS
Donnelly-Roark, Paula
Ouedraogo, Karim
Ye, Xiao
Can Local Institutions Reduce Poverty? Rural Decentralization in Burkina Faso
description The authors present evidence that in Burkina Faso, certain high-performing local institutions contribute to equitable economic development. They link reduced levels of poverty, and inequality to a high degree of internal village organization. The structure of these high-performing local organizations means they can exist in a number of African countries, because they depend more on internal participation, rather than on nay one country's cultural assets. The authors find that: 1) Service-asset management groups (SAMs) - one of three local institutions identified in the study - have helped to significantly reduce inequality in participating households. SAMs are a fusion of long-standing development committees, and indigenous management councils that collectively manage community assets, such as water. SAMs have combined the productivity goals of growth, with the values of equity, and solidarity. 2) Current development approaches use growth as an initiator, assuming that surpluses will be used to benefit the poor. SAMs, and other local institutions in Burkina Faso, start with equity, and solidarity, and aim for a result of growth, and development. 3) Internal participation is essential for SAMs to function. Only locally anchored participation can power the realignments, and institutional revisions needed to scale up development action. SAMs, and other local institutions have launched their communities on equitable growth paths, and are reducing poverty with little, or no outside assistance, despite severe resource constraints. Their impact could be enormous if external development resources augmented their potential. World Bank programs, and policy interventions could build on local strength, and make their activities more sustainable by mapping local institutions to guide new initiatives in pro-poor investment, and using that mapping to formalize, and increase internal local participation - expanding nationwide by using a network of local institutions. SAMs, and other local institutions, could be the vehicle for ensuring transparency, and accountability. Working with the results of local activities, national policies could favor the development of indigenously based, but externally oriented local economies.
topic_facet ACCOUNTABILITY
ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION
AGRICULTURE
ASSET MANAGEMENT
CIVIL SOCIETY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
COMMUNITY DRIVEN DEVELOPMENT
COMMUNITY LEVEL
COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT
COMMUNITY MEMBERS
COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
CONSENSUS
CROPS
DATA SET
DATA SETS
DECENTRALIZATION
DECENTRALIZATION PROCESS
DECISION-MAKING
DEMOCRACY
DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES
DEVELOPMENT NETWORK
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
ECONOMIC GROWTH
ECONOMIC OUTCOMES
ECONOMICS
ETHNIC GROUP
ETHNIC GROUPS
EXCLUDED GROUPS
EXPENDITURE
FEDERATIONS
FIELD RESEARCH
FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
FINANCIAL RESOURCES
FOOD SECURITY
GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE
GROWTH PATH
HEALTH CENTERS
HOUSEHOLD SURVEY
HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS
HOUSEHOLD WELFARE
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT REPORT
INCOME
INCOME LEVELS
INDIGENOUS INSTITUTIONS
INEQUALITY
INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY
INSTITUTIONAL CHANGES
INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT
INSTITUTIONAL ENVIRONMENT
INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
KNOWLEDGE SYSTEMS
LANDS
LEGITIMACY
LIVING CONDITIONS
LOCAL COMMUNITIES
LOCAL COUNCILS
LOCAL ELECTIONS
LOCAL GOVERNANCE
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
LOCAL INSTITUTIONS
LOCAL LANGUAGES
LOCAL LEVEL
LOCAL LEVEL INSTITUTIONS
LOCAL ORGANIZATIONS
LOCAL PEOPLE
NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS
NATIONAL LEVEL
NATIONAL LEVELS
NATIONAL POLICIES
NATIONAL RESEARCH
NATURAL RESOURCES
PARTICIPATORY ACTION
PARTICIPATORY ANALYSIS
PARTICIPATORY APPROACH
PARTICIPATORY MONITORING
PARTICIPATORY PROCESSES
POLICY RESEARCH
POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT
POLITICAL PARTIES
POOR HOUSEHOLDS
POVERTY ERADICATION
POVERTY LEVELS
POVERTY REDUCTION
POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGY
PROPAGANDA
QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS
REDUCING POVERTY
RELIGIOUS ASSOCIATIONS
RESEARCH TEAM
RESOURCE CONSTRAINTS
RESOURCE MOBILIZATION
RURAL DEVELOPMENT
RURAL FINANCE
RURAL PEOPLE
RURAL POPULATION
SERVICE PROVISION
SOCIAL ACTION
SOCIAL CAPITAL
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT
SOCIAL GROUP
SOCIAL NORMS
SOCIAL STABILITY
STATE AGENCY
STATE INTERVENTION
SUSTAINABILITY
TEAM LEADERS
TRANSPARENCY
URBAN AREAS
author Donnelly-Roark, Paula
Ouedraogo, Karim
Ye, Xiao
author_facet Donnelly-Roark, Paula
Ouedraogo, Karim
Ye, Xiao
author_sort Donnelly-Roark, Paula
title Can Local Institutions Reduce Poverty? Rural Decentralization in Burkina Faso
title_short Can Local Institutions Reduce Poverty? Rural Decentralization in Burkina Faso
title_full Can Local Institutions Reduce Poverty? Rural Decentralization in Burkina Faso
title_fullStr Can Local Institutions Reduce Poverty? Rural Decentralization in Burkina Faso
title_full_unstemmed Can Local Institutions Reduce Poverty? Rural Decentralization in Burkina Faso
title_sort can local institutions reduce poverty? rural decentralization in burkina faso
publisher World Bank, Washington, DC
publishDate 2001-09
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2001/09/1614753/can-local-institutions-reduce-poverty-rural-decentralization-burkina-faso
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/19551
work_keys_str_mv AT donnellyroarkpaula canlocalinstitutionsreducepovertyruraldecentralizationinburkinafaso
AT ouedraogokarim canlocalinstitutionsreducepovertyruraldecentralizationinburkinafaso
AT yexiao canlocalinstitutionsreducepovertyruraldecentralizationinburkinafaso
_version_ 1807155254712598528
spelling dig-okr-10986195512024-08-08T18:00:11Z Can Local Institutions Reduce Poverty? Rural Decentralization in Burkina Faso Donnelly-Roark, Paula Ouedraogo, Karim Ye, Xiao ACCOUNTABILITY ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION AGRICULTURE ASSET MANAGEMENT CIVIL SOCIETY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY DRIVEN DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY LEVEL COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT COMMUNITY MEMBERS COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION CONSENSUS CROPS DATA SET DATA SETS DECENTRALIZATION DECENTRALIZATION PROCESS DECISION-MAKING DEMOCRACY DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES DEVELOPMENT NETWORK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ECONOMIC GROWTH ECONOMIC OUTCOMES ECONOMICS ETHNIC GROUP ETHNIC GROUPS EXCLUDED GROUPS EXPENDITURE FEDERATIONS FIELD RESEARCH FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FINANCIAL RESOURCES FOOD SECURITY GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE GROWTH PATH HEALTH CENTERS HOUSEHOLD SURVEY HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS HOUSEHOLD WELFARE HUMAN DEVELOPMENT HUMAN DEVELOPMENT REPORT INCOME INCOME LEVELS INDIGENOUS INSTITUTIONS INEQUALITY INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY INSTITUTIONAL CHANGES INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTIONAL ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT KNOWLEDGE SYSTEMS LANDS LEGITIMACY LIVING CONDITIONS LOCAL COMMUNITIES LOCAL COUNCILS LOCAL ELECTIONS LOCAL GOVERNANCE LOCAL GOVERNMENT LOCAL GOVERNMENTS LOCAL INSTITUTIONS LOCAL LANGUAGES LOCAL LEVEL LOCAL LEVEL INSTITUTIONS LOCAL ORGANIZATIONS LOCAL PEOPLE NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS NATIONAL LEVEL NATIONAL LEVELS NATIONAL POLICIES NATIONAL RESEARCH NATURAL RESOURCES PARTICIPATORY ACTION PARTICIPATORY ANALYSIS PARTICIPATORY APPROACH PARTICIPATORY MONITORING PARTICIPATORY PROCESSES POLICY RESEARCH POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT POLITICAL PARTIES POOR HOUSEHOLDS POVERTY ERADICATION POVERTY LEVELS POVERTY REDUCTION POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGY PROPAGANDA QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS REDUCING POVERTY RELIGIOUS ASSOCIATIONS RESEARCH TEAM RESOURCE CONSTRAINTS RESOURCE MOBILIZATION RURAL DEVELOPMENT RURAL FINANCE RURAL PEOPLE RURAL POPULATION SERVICE PROVISION SOCIAL ACTION SOCIAL CAPITAL SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT SOCIAL GROUP SOCIAL NORMS SOCIAL STABILITY STATE AGENCY STATE INTERVENTION SUSTAINABILITY TEAM LEADERS TRANSPARENCY URBAN AREAS The authors present evidence that in Burkina Faso, certain high-performing local institutions contribute to equitable economic development. They link reduced levels of poverty, and inequality to a high degree of internal village organization. The structure of these high-performing local organizations means they can exist in a number of African countries, because they depend more on internal participation, rather than on nay one country's cultural assets. The authors find that: 1) Service-asset management groups (SAMs) - one of three local institutions identified in the study - have helped to significantly reduce inequality in participating households. SAMs are a fusion of long-standing development committees, and indigenous management councils that collectively manage community assets, such as water. SAMs have combined the productivity goals of growth, with the values of equity, and solidarity. 2) Current development approaches use growth as an initiator, assuming that surpluses will be used to benefit the poor. SAMs, and other local institutions in Burkina Faso, start with equity, and solidarity, and aim for a result of growth, and development. 3) Internal participation is essential for SAMs to function. Only locally anchored participation can power the realignments, and institutional revisions needed to scale up development action. SAMs, and other local institutions have launched their communities on equitable growth paths, and are reducing poverty with little, or no outside assistance, despite severe resource constraints. Their impact could be enormous if external development resources augmented their potential. World Bank programs, and policy interventions could build on local strength, and make their activities more sustainable by mapping local institutions to guide new initiatives in pro-poor investment, and using that mapping to formalize, and increase internal local participation - expanding nationwide by using a network of local institutions. SAMs, and other local institutions, could be the vehicle for ensuring transparency, and accountability. Working with the results of local activities, national policies could favor the development of indigenously based, but externally oriented local economies. 2014-08-21T15:28:29Z 2014-08-21T15:28:29Z 2001-09 http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2001/09/1614753/can-local-institutions-reduce-poverty-rural-decentralization-burkina-faso https://hdl.handle.net/10986/19551 English en_US Policy Research Working Paper;No. 2677 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ application/pdf text/plain World Bank, Washington, DC