Integrating Independent Power Producers into Emerging Wholesale Power Markets

Many developing and industrial countries have sought to open their electricity industries to competition. In both contexts, policymakers and investors have to deal with the consequences of earlier, more partial sector liberalization measures. Foremost among these is the existence of long-term contracts with independent power producers (IPPs). The long-term nature of these contracts has complicated the introduction of more far-reaching sectoral reform designed to harness competitive market forces for the benefit of consumers. In developing countries, introducing competition is often coupled with breaking up and privatizing state-owned electricity monopolies. In this context, discussion of renegotiation of power purchase agreements has tended toward the polemical. At one end are those who resist any change, arguing that the "sanctity of contracts" precludes modification of contract terms. At the other end are those who favor governments taking coercive measures to modify existing contracts in the name of maximizing economic welfare and minimizing the burden of sector reform on consumers and on the state. Drawing on recent country experiences, the authors analyze alternative approaches to restructuring contracts and designing power markets to reduce rigidities and incentivize IPPs to participate more fully in wholesale power markets and to take on greater market risk. The authors conclude that forced market integration or forced contract negotiation have failed and are counterproductive. Conversely, in countries where IPPs provide a sizable proportion of generation capacity, ignoring market integration may result in insufficient market liquidity and discourage new entry, attenuating the scope for market forces to act for the benefit of consumers. Failure to adapt power purchase contracts and market rules imposes huge resource costs on the economy beyond the financial obligations consumers and taxpayers must bear. Based on recent experience, a combination of measures, including adaptation of specific market rules, contractual alternatives for enhancing market liquidity, contract buyout provisions, transitional financing mechanisms, and characteristics of the successor entity to the power purchaser, offer promising approaches for reconciling preexisting IPP contracts with new market structures and reducing the magnitude of above-market costs associated with such contracts.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Woolf, Fiona, Halpern, Jonathan
Language:English
en_US
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2001-11
Subjects:BIDDING, CHIPS, COMPETITIVENESS, CONSUMERS, DAMAGES, DEBT, DECISION MAKING, DEMAND GROWTH, ECONOMIC CONDITIONS, FINANCIAL RISK, FINANCIAL VIABILITY, FIXED COSTS, FIXED PRICES, GAME THEORY, INFLATION, INNOVATIONS, IPP, LEGISLATION, LESS DEVELOPED COUNTRIES, LIQUIDITY, MARKET, MARKET DISCIPLINE, MARKET FORCES, MARKET INTEGRATION, MARKET LIBERALIZATION, MARKET POWER, MARKET RISK, MONOPOLIES, NETWORKS, OPERATING COSTS, PENALTIES, PRESENT VALUE, PRICES, PRIVATIZATION, PUBLIC POLICY, PURCHASING, RETAIL, SALES, SUNK COSTS, SUPPLIERS, SURPLUS, VARIABLE COSTS, WELFARE ECONOMICS WHOLESALE TRADE, ENERGY PRODUCTION, ELECTRICITY TRADE, INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS, COMPETITION (ECONOMIC), CONTRACTS, FINANCING PROGRAMS, LIBERALIZATION, SECTORAL REFORMS, CONTRACT NEGOTIATION, PURCHASE TRANSACTIONS, POWER GENERATION, CONTRACTING, WELFARE ECONOMICS, WHOLESALE TRADE,
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2001/11/1631745/integrating-independent-power-producers-emerging-wholesale-power-markets
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/19499
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-okr-1098619499
record_format koha
spelling dig-okr-10986194992024-08-08T17:58:52Z Integrating Independent Power Producers into Emerging Wholesale Power Markets Woolf, Fiona Halpern, Jonathan BIDDING CHIPS COMPETITIVENESS CONSUMERS DAMAGES DEBT DECISION MAKING DEMAND GROWTH ECONOMIC CONDITIONS FINANCIAL RISK FINANCIAL VIABILITY FIXED COSTS FIXED PRICES GAME THEORY INFLATION INNOVATIONS IPP LEGISLATION LESS DEVELOPED COUNTRIES LIQUIDITY MARKET MARKET DISCIPLINE MARKET FORCES MARKET INTEGRATION MARKET LIBERALIZATION MARKET POWER MARKET RISK MONOPOLIES NETWORKS OPERATING COSTS PENALTIES PRESENT VALUE PRICES PRIVATIZATION PUBLIC POLICY PURCHASING RETAIL SALES SUNK COSTS SUPPLIERS SURPLUS VARIABLE COSTS WELFARE ECONOMICS WHOLESALE TRADE ENERGY PRODUCTION ELECTRICITY TRADE INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS COMPETITION (ECONOMIC) LIQUIDITY CONTRACTS FINANCING PROGRAMS LIBERALIZATION SECTORAL REFORMS CONTRACT NEGOTIATION PRIVATIZATION MONOPOLIES PURCHASE TRANSACTIONS POWER GENERATION MARKET INTEGRATION CONTRACTING WELFARE ECONOMICS WHOLESALE TRADE Many developing and industrial countries have sought to open their electricity industries to competition. In both contexts, policymakers and investors have to deal with the consequences of earlier, more partial sector liberalization measures. Foremost among these is the existence of long-term contracts with independent power producers (IPPs). The long-term nature of these contracts has complicated the introduction of more far-reaching sectoral reform designed to harness competitive market forces for the benefit of consumers. In developing countries, introducing competition is often coupled with breaking up and privatizing state-owned electricity monopolies. In this context, discussion of renegotiation of power purchase agreements has tended toward the polemical. At one end are those who resist any change, arguing that the "sanctity of contracts" precludes modification of contract terms. At the other end are those who favor governments taking coercive measures to modify existing contracts in the name of maximizing economic welfare and minimizing the burden of sector reform on consumers and on the state. Drawing on recent country experiences, the authors analyze alternative approaches to restructuring contracts and designing power markets to reduce rigidities and incentivize IPPs to participate more fully in wholesale power markets and to take on greater market risk. The authors conclude that forced market integration or forced contract negotiation have failed and are counterproductive. Conversely, in countries where IPPs provide a sizable proportion of generation capacity, ignoring market integration may result in insufficient market liquidity and discourage new entry, attenuating the scope for market forces to act for the benefit of consumers. Failure to adapt power purchase contracts and market rules imposes huge resource costs on the economy beyond the financial obligations consumers and taxpayers must bear. Based on recent experience, a combination of measures, including adaptation of specific market rules, contractual alternatives for enhancing market liquidity, contract buyout provisions, transitional financing mechanisms, and characteristics of the successor entity to the power purchaser, offer promising approaches for reconciling preexisting IPP contracts with new market structures and reducing the magnitude of above-market costs associated with such contracts. 2014-08-20T18:07:36Z 2014-08-20T18:07:36Z 2001-11 http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2001/11/1631745/integrating-independent-power-producers-emerging-wholesale-power-markets https://hdl.handle.net/10986/19499 English en_US Policy Research Working Paper;No. 2703 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ application/pdf text/plain World Bank, Washington, DC
institution Banco Mundial
collection DSpace
country Estados Unidos
countrycode US
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-okr
tag biblioteca
region America del Norte
libraryname Biblioteca del Banco Mundial
language English
en_US
topic BIDDING
CHIPS
COMPETITIVENESS
CONSUMERS
DAMAGES
DEBT
DECISION MAKING
DEMAND GROWTH
ECONOMIC CONDITIONS
FINANCIAL RISK
FINANCIAL VIABILITY
FIXED COSTS
FIXED PRICES
GAME THEORY
INFLATION
INNOVATIONS
IPP
LEGISLATION
LESS DEVELOPED COUNTRIES
LIQUIDITY
MARKET
MARKET DISCIPLINE
MARKET FORCES
MARKET INTEGRATION
MARKET LIBERALIZATION
MARKET POWER
MARKET RISK
MONOPOLIES
NETWORKS
OPERATING COSTS
PENALTIES
PRESENT VALUE
PRICES
PRIVATIZATION
PUBLIC POLICY
PURCHASING
RETAIL
SALES
SUNK COSTS
SUPPLIERS
SURPLUS
VARIABLE COSTS
WELFARE ECONOMICS WHOLESALE TRADE
ENERGY PRODUCTION
ELECTRICITY TRADE
INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS
COMPETITION (ECONOMIC)
LIQUIDITY
CONTRACTS
FINANCING PROGRAMS
LIBERALIZATION
SECTORAL REFORMS
CONTRACT NEGOTIATION
PRIVATIZATION
MONOPOLIES
PURCHASE TRANSACTIONS
POWER GENERATION
MARKET INTEGRATION
CONTRACTING
WELFARE ECONOMICS
WHOLESALE TRADE
BIDDING
CHIPS
COMPETITIVENESS
CONSUMERS
DAMAGES
DEBT
DECISION MAKING
DEMAND GROWTH
ECONOMIC CONDITIONS
FINANCIAL RISK
FINANCIAL VIABILITY
FIXED COSTS
FIXED PRICES
GAME THEORY
INFLATION
INNOVATIONS
IPP
LEGISLATION
LESS DEVELOPED COUNTRIES
LIQUIDITY
MARKET
MARKET DISCIPLINE
MARKET FORCES
MARKET INTEGRATION
MARKET LIBERALIZATION
MARKET POWER
MARKET RISK
MONOPOLIES
NETWORKS
OPERATING COSTS
PENALTIES
PRESENT VALUE
PRICES
PRIVATIZATION
PUBLIC POLICY
PURCHASING
RETAIL
SALES
SUNK COSTS
SUPPLIERS
SURPLUS
VARIABLE COSTS
WELFARE ECONOMICS WHOLESALE TRADE
ENERGY PRODUCTION
ELECTRICITY TRADE
INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS
COMPETITION (ECONOMIC)
LIQUIDITY
CONTRACTS
FINANCING PROGRAMS
LIBERALIZATION
SECTORAL REFORMS
CONTRACT NEGOTIATION
PRIVATIZATION
MONOPOLIES
PURCHASE TRANSACTIONS
POWER GENERATION
MARKET INTEGRATION
CONTRACTING
WELFARE ECONOMICS
WHOLESALE TRADE
spellingShingle BIDDING
CHIPS
COMPETITIVENESS
CONSUMERS
DAMAGES
DEBT
DECISION MAKING
DEMAND GROWTH
ECONOMIC CONDITIONS
FINANCIAL RISK
FINANCIAL VIABILITY
FIXED COSTS
FIXED PRICES
GAME THEORY
INFLATION
INNOVATIONS
IPP
LEGISLATION
LESS DEVELOPED COUNTRIES
LIQUIDITY
MARKET
MARKET DISCIPLINE
MARKET FORCES
MARKET INTEGRATION
MARKET LIBERALIZATION
MARKET POWER
MARKET RISK
MONOPOLIES
NETWORKS
OPERATING COSTS
PENALTIES
PRESENT VALUE
PRICES
PRIVATIZATION
PUBLIC POLICY
PURCHASING
RETAIL
SALES
SUNK COSTS
SUPPLIERS
SURPLUS
VARIABLE COSTS
WELFARE ECONOMICS WHOLESALE TRADE
ENERGY PRODUCTION
ELECTRICITY TRADE
INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS
COMPETITION (ECONOMIC)
LIQUIDITY
CONTRACTS
FINANCING PROGRAMS
LIBERALIZATION
SECTORAL REFORMS
CONTRACT NEGOTIATION
PRIVATIZATION
MONOPOLIES
PURCHASE TRANSACTIONS
POWER GENERATION
MARKET INTEGRATION
CONTRACTING
WELFARE ECONOMICS
WHOLESALE TRADE
BIDDING
CHIPS
COMPETITIVENESS
CONSUMERS
DAMAGES
DEBT
DECISION MAKING
DEMAND GROWTH
ECONOMIC CONDITIONS
FINANCIAL RISK
FINANCIAL VIABILITY
FIXED COSTS
FIXED PRICES
GAME THEORY
INFLATION
INNOVATIONS
IPP
LEGISLATION
LESS DEVELOPED COUNTRIES
LIQUIDITY
MARKET
MARKET DISCIPLINE
MARKET FORCES
MARKET INTEGRATION
MARKET LIBERALIZATION
MARKET POWER
MARKET RISK
MONOPOLIES
NETWORKS
OPERATING COSTS
PENALTIES
PRESENT VALUE
PRICES
PRIVATIZATION
PUBLIC POLICY
PURCHASING
RETAIL
SALES
SUNK COSTS
SUPPLIERS
SURPLUS
VARIABLE COSTS
WELFARE ECONOMICS WHOLESALE TRADE
ENERGY PRODUCTION
ELECTRICITY TRADE
INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS
COMPETITION (ECONOMIC)
LIQUIDITY
CONTRACTS
FINANCING PROGRAMS
LIBERALIZATION
SECTORAL REFORMS
CONTRACT NEGOTIATION
PRIVATIZATION
MONOPOLIES
PURCHASE TRANSACTIONS
POWER GENERATION
MARKET INTEGRATION
CONTRACTING
WELFARE ECONOMICS
WHOLESALE TRADE
Woolf, Fiona
Halpern, Jonathan
Integrating Independent Power Producers into Emerging Wholesale Power Markets
description Many developing and industrial countries have sought to open their electricity industries to competition. In both contexts, policymakers and investors have to deal with the consequences of earlier, more partial sector liberalization measures. Foremost among these is the existence of long-term contracts with independent power producers (IPPs). The long-term nature of these contracts has complicated the introduction of more far-reaching sectoral reform designed to harness competitive market forces for the benefit of consumers. In developing countries, introducing competition is often coupled with breaking up and privatizing state-owned electricity monopolies. In this context, discussion of renegotiation of power purchase agreements has tended toward the polemical. At one end are those who resist any change, arguing that the "sanctity of contracts" precludes modification of contract terms. At the other end are those who favor governments taking coercive measures to modify existing contracts in the name of maximizing economic welfare and minimizing the burden of sector reform on consumers and on the state. Drawing on recent country experiences, the authors analyze alternative approaches to restructuring contracts and designing power markets to reduce rigidities and incentivize IPPs to participate more fully in wholesale power markets and to take on greater market risk. The authors conclude that forced market integration or forced contract negotiation have failed and are counterproductive. Conversely, in countries where IPPs provide a sizable proportion of generation capacity, ignoring market integration may result in insufficient market liquidity and discourage new entry, attenuating the scope for market forces to act for the benefit of consumers. Failure to adapt power purchase contracts and market rules imposes huge resource costs on the economy beyond the financial obligations consumers and taxpayers must bear. Based on recent experience, a combination of measures, including adaptation of specific market rules, contractual alternatives for enhancing market liquidity, contract buyout provisions, transitional financing mechanisms, and characteristics of the successor entity to the power purchaser, offer promising approaches for reconciling preexisting IPP contracts with new market structures and reducing the magnitude of above-market costs associated with such contracts.
topic_facet BIDDING
CHIPS
COMPETITIVENESS
CONSUMERS
DAMAGES
DEBT
DECISION MAKING
DEMAND GROWTH
ECONOMIC CONDITIONS
FINANCIAL RISK
FINANCIAL VIABILITY
FIXED COSTS
FIXED PRICES
GAME THEORY
INFLATION
INNOVATIONS
IPP
LEGISLATION
LESS DEVELOPED COUNTRIES
LIQUIDITY
MARKET
MARKET DISCIPLINE
MARKET FORCES
MARKET INTEGRATION
MARKET LIBERALIZATION
MARKET POWER
MARKET RISK
MONOPOLIES
NETWORKS
OPERATING COSTS
PENALTIES
PRESENT VALUE
PRICES
PRIVATIZATION
PUBLIC POLICY
PURCHASING
RETAIL
SALES
SUNK COSTS
SUPPLIERS
SURPLUS
VARIABLE COSTS
WELFARE ECONOMICS WHOLESALE TRADE
ENERGY PRODUCTION
ELECTRICITY TRADE
INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS
COMPETITION (ECONOMIC)
LIQUIDITY
CONTRACTS
FINANCING PROGRAMS
LIBERALIZATION
SECTORAL REFORMS
CONTRACT NEGOTIATION
PRIVATIZATION
MONOPOLIES
PURCHASE TRANSACTIONS
POWER GENERATION
MARKET INTEGRATION
CONTRACTING
WELFARE ECONOMICS
WHOLESALE TRADE
author Woolf, Fiona
Halpern, Jonathan
author_facet Woolf, Fiona
Halpern, Jonathan
author_sort Woolf, Fiona
title Integrating Independent Power Producers into Emerging Wholesale Power Markets
title_short Integrating Independent Power Producers into Emerging Wholesale Power Markets
title_full Integrating Independent Power Producers into Emerging Wholesale Power Markets
title_fullStr Integrating Independent Power Producers into Emerging Wholesale Power Markets
title_full_unstemmed Integrating Independent Power Producers into Emerging Wholesale Power Markets
title_sort integrating independent power producers into emerging wholesale power markets
publisher World Bank, Washington, DC
publishDate 2001-11
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2001/11/1631745/integrating-independent-power-producers-emerging-wholesale-power-markets
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/19499
work_keys_str_mv AT woolffiona integratingindependentpowerproducersintoemergingwholesalepowermarkets
AT halpernjonathan integratingindependentpowerproducersintoemergingwholesalepowermarkets
_version_ 1807159774607835136