Randomized Impact Evaluation of Afghanistan's National Solidarity Programme : Final Report

The National Solidarity Programme (NSP) is the largest development program in Afghanistan. Since its inauguration in 2003, NSP has established 32,000 Community Development Councils (CDCs) across 361 districts in all of Afghanistan's 34 provinces and has financed nearly 65,000 development projects. NSP seeks to improve the access of rural villagers to basic services and to create a foundation of village governance based on democratic processes and female participation. The program is structured around two major village-level interventions: 1) the creation of a gender-balanced CDC through a secret-ballot, universal suffrage election; and 2) the disbursement of block grants, valued at $200 per household up to a community maximum of $60,000, to fund village-level projects selected, designed, and managed by the CDC in consultation with villagers. The NSP Impact Evaluation (NSP-IE) is a multi-year randomized control trial designed to measure the effects of implementation of the second phase of NSP on a broad range of economic, political, and social indicators. While there have been a number of qualitative studies of NSP, the NSP-IE is the first large-sample quantitative assessment capable of providing rigorous estimates of program impact. The study tests a series of hypotheses which examine the impacts at midline and end line of NSP on the access of villagers to utilities, services and infrastructure; on the economic welfare of villagers; on local governance; on political attitudes and state-building; and on social norms. NSP improves the access of villagers to basic utilities. NSP also increases access to education, health care, and counseling services for women. As NSP does not usually fund such services, these impacts arise indirectly from other changes induced by NSP. NSP increases girls' school attendance and their quality of learning, but there is no impact on boys' school attendance. NSP also increases child doctor and prenatal visits and the probability that an illness or injury is attended to by a medical professional, although does not affect other health outcomes. Finally, NSP raises the proportion of women who have a group or person with whom they can discuss their problems. NSP-funded utilities projects deliver substantial increases in access to drinking water and electricity, but infrastructure projects are less effective.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Beath, Andrew, Christia, Fotini, Enikolopov, Ruben
Format: Other Rural Study biblioteca
Language:English
en_US
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2013-07-01
Subjects:ACCESS TO HEALTH, ACCOUNTABILITY, AGGREGATE INDICATORS, AID ALLOCATION, BENEFICIAL IMPACTS, BEST PRACTICES, BLOCK GRANTS, BUDGETARY EXPENDITURE, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, CIVIL SERVICE, COLLECTIVE ACTION, COMMUNITIES, COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES, COMMUNITY CENTERS, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT, COMMUNITY LEADERS, COMMUNITY MEMBERS, COMMUNITY REPRESENTATIVES, CONSENSUS, CONSULTATION, CONSULTATION PROCESS, CONSULTATIONS, CONTROL GROUPS, CRIMES, DATA COLLECTION, DECISION-MAKERS, DEMOCRATIC ELECTIONS, DEMOCRATIC VALUES, DISTRICT, DISTRICT CENTER, DISTRICT OFFICIALS, DISTRICTS, DWELLING, ECONOMIC ACTIVITY, ELECTORAL SYSTEM, EXPENDITURES, FEASIBILITY, FEMALE, FIGURES, FLEXIBILITY, FOCUS GROUP, FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSIONS, FOCUS GROUPS, FOOD SECURITY, GENDER, GENDER EQUALITY, GOVERNANCE QUALITY, GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION, HOUSEHOLD INCOME, HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS, HOUSEHOLDS, HOUSING, IMPACT EVALUATION, INCOME LEVELS, INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS, INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLES, INTERMEDIARY, INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, INTERVENTION, INTERVENTIONS, INTERVIEWING, INTERVIEWS, LEARNING, LIVELIHOODS, LOCAL GOVERNANCE, LOCAL PUBLIC GOODS, MARGINALIZED GROUPS, MEDICAL SERVICES, MOBILITY, MOBILIZATION, MONITORING DATA, NATURAL RESOURCES, NEIGHBORHOOD, NGO, OPENNESS, PARLIAMENT, PARTICIPATION OF WOMEN, PARTICIPATION RATES, PARTICIPATORY PROCESS, POWER-HOLDERS, PREPARATION, PRIMARY SCHOOL, PROGRAM IMPACTS, PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION, PROGRAMS, PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION, PROJECT MANAGEMENT, PROJECT MONITORING, PROVINCE, PROVINCES, PROVINCIAL GOVERNOR, RECONSTRUCTION, RURAL AREAS, RURAL COMMUNITIES, SAMPLE SIZE, SCHOOL CURRICULUM, SERVICE DELIVERY, SERVICE PROVIDERS, SOCIAL COHESION, SOCIAL INDICATORS, SOCIAL SERVICES, STAKEHOLDER, STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT, STAKEHOLDERS, SUB-NATIONAL, SUB-NATIONAL GOVERNMENT, SUBNATIONAL, SUBNATIONAL GOVERNMENT, SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, TAX, TAXATION, TRANSPARENCY, TREATMENT EFFECTS, VILLAGE, VILLAGE COMMUNITIES, VILLAGE LEVEL, VILLAGES,
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2013/07/18273450/randomized-impact-evaluation-afghanistans-national-solidarity-programme
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/16637
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!