Conditional Cash Transfers and the Equity-Efficiency Debate

During the past decade, the use of conditional cash transfers to increase investment in human capital has generated considerable excitement in both research and policy forums. Such schemes are being increasingly adopted in a number of contexts and countries to improve outcomes in health, education, and child labor as they aim to balance the goals of current and future poverty reduction. In this paper, the authors define any scheme requiring a specified course of action in order to receive a benefit as a conditional cash transfer. This definition includes cash transfers based on human capital investments, but is sufficiently broad to encompass other schemes such as work-fare programs or consumption transfers. The authors examine the rationales behind, the problems with, and the tradeoffs inherent to conditional cash transfer programs. They discuss two main concerns: low participation and fungibility. Low participation refers to the problem of program uptake. If individuals do not participate in the program, whether it was designed to increase human capital investment or to target resources, the program will not be successful. The problem of fungibility, however, depends on the rationale for the particular conditional cash transfer program. When used to increase efficiency, even when program uptake is high, program effects may be less than envisioned due to behavioral responses of households that lead to changes in the consumption of close substitutes. While researchers have typically addressed these issues separately, the authors emphasize the need for policymakers to incorporate a number of different factors in a comprehensive framework to design optimal conditional cash transfer schemes.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Do, Quy-Toan, Das, Jishnu, Özler, Berk
Language:English
en_US
Published: World Bank, Washington, D.C. 2004-04
Subjects:CASH TRANSFERS, EQUITY, HUMAN CAPITAL, HEALTH, EDUCATION, CHILD LABOR, POVERTY MITIGATION, WORK GROUPS, CONSUMPTION ECONOMICS, FUNGIBILITY, PARTICIPATION, HOUSEHOLD BEHAVIORS CONDITIONAL CASH TRANSFERS,
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2004/04/3573068/conditional-cash-transfers-equity-efficiency-debate
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/14299
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-okr-1098614299
record_format koha
spelling dig-okr-10986142992024-08-08T17:35:52Z Conditional Cash Transfers and the Equity-Efficiency Debate Do, Quy-Toan Das, Jishnu Özler, Berk CASH TRANSFERS EQUITY HUMAN CAPITAL HEALTH EDUCATION CHILD LABOR POVERTY MITIGATION WORK GROUPS CONSUMPTION ECONOMICS FUNGIBILITY PARTICIPATION HOUSEHOLD BEHAVIORS CONDITIONAL CASH TRANSFERS During the past decade, the use of conditional cash transfers to increase investment in human capital has generated considerable excitement in both research and policy forums. Such schemes are being increasingly adopted in a number of contexts and countries to improve outcomes in health, education, and child labor as they aim to balance the goals of current and future poverty reduction. In this paper, the authors define any scheme requiring a specified course of action in order to receive a benefit as a conditional cash transfer. This definition includes cash transfers based on human capital investments, but is sufficiently broad to encompass other schemes such as work-fare programs or consumption transfers. The authors examine the rationales behind, the problems with, and the tradeoffs inherent to conditional cash transfer programs. They discuss two main concerns: low participation and fungibility. Low participation refers to the problem of program uptake. If individuals do not participate in the program, whether it was designed to increase human capital investment or to target resources, the program will not be successful. The problem of fungibility, however, depends on the rationale for the particular conditional cash transfer program. When used to increase efficiency, even when program uptake is high, program effects may be less than envisioned due to behavioral responses of households that lead to changes in the consumption of close substitutes. While researchers have typically addressed these issues separately, the authors emphasize the need for policymakers to incorporate a number of different factors in a comprehensive framework to design optimal conditional cash transfer schemes. 2013-07-01T15:23:49Z 2013-07-01T15:23:49Z 2004-04 http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2004/04/3573068/conditional-cash-transfers-equity-efficiency-debate https://hdl.handle.net/10986/14299 English en_US Policy Research Working Paper;No.3280 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank application/pdf text/plain World Bank, Washington, D.C.
institution Banco Mundial
collection DSpace
country Estados Unidos
countrycode US
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-okr
tag biblioteca
region America del Norte
libraryname Biblioteca del Banco Mundial
language English
en_US
topic CASH TRANSFERS
EQUITY
HUMAN CAPITAL
HEALTH
EDUCATION
CHILD LABOR
POVERTY MITIGATION
WORK GROUPS
CONSUMPTION ECONOMICS
FUNGIBILITY
PARTICIPATION
HOUSEHOLD BEHAVIORS CONDITIONAL CASH TRANSFERS
CASH TRANSFERS
EQUITY
HUMAN CAPITAL
HEALTH
EDUCATION
CHILD LABOR
POVERTY MITIGATION
WORK GROUPS
CONSUMPTION ECONOMICS
FUNGIBILITY
PARTICIPATION
HOUSEHOLD BEHAVIORS CONDITIONAL CASH TRANSFERS
spellingShingle CASH TRANSFERS
EQUITY
HUMAN CAPITAL
HEALTH
EDUCATION
CHILD LABOR
POVERTY MITIGATION
WORK GROUPS
CONSUMPTION ECONOMICS
FUNGIBILITY
PARTICIPATION
HOUSEHOLD BEHAVIORS CONDITIONAL CASH TRANSFERS
CASH TRANSFERS
EQUITY
HUMAN CAPITAL
HEALTH
EDUCATION
CHILD LABOR
POVERTY MITIGATION
WORK GROUPS
CONSUMPTION ECONOMICS
FUNGIBILITY
PARTICIPATION
HOUSEHOLD BEHAVIORS CONDITIONAL CASH TRANSFERS
Do, Quy-Toan
Das, Jishnu
Özler, Berk
Conditional Cash Transfers and the Equity-Efficiency Debate
description During the past decade, the use of conditional cash transfers to increase investment in human capital has generated considerable excitement in both research and policy forums. Such schemes are being increasingly adopted in a number of contexts and countries to improve outcomes in health, education, and child labor as they aim to balance the goals of current and future poverty reduction. In this paper, the authors define any scheme requiring a specified course of action in order to receive a benefit as a conditional cash transfer. This definition includes cash transfers based on human capital investments, but is sufficiently broad to encompass other schemes such as work-fare programs or consumption transfers. The authors examine the rationales behind, the problems with, and the tradeoffs inherent to conditional cash transfer programs. They discuss two main concerns: low participation and fungibility. Low participation refers to the problem of program uptake. If individuals do not participate in the program, whether it was designed to increase human capital investment or to target resources, the program will not be successful. The problem of fungibility, however, depends on the rationale for the particular conditional cash transfer program. When used to increase efficiency, even when program uptake is high, program effects may be less than envisioned due to behavioral responses of households that lead to changes in the consumption of close substitutes. While researchers have typically addressed these issues separately, the authors emphasize the need for policymakers to incorporate a number of different factors in a comprehensive framework to design optimal conditional cash transfer schemes.
topic_facet CASH TRANSFERS
EQUITY
HUMAN CAPITAL
HEALTH
EDUCATION
CHILD LABOR
POVERTY MITIGATION
WORK GROUPS
CONSUMPTION ECONOMICS
FUNGIBILITY
PARTICIPATION
HOUSEHOLD BEHAVIORS CONDITIONAL CASH TRANSFERS
author Do, Quy-Toan
Das, Jishnu
Özler, Berk
author_facet Do, Quy-Toan
Das, Jishnu
Özler, Berk
author_sort Do, Quy-Toan
title Conditional Cash Transfers and the Equity-Efficiency Debate
title_short Conditional Cash Transfers and the Equity-Efficiency Debate
title_full Conditional Cash Transfers and the Equity-Efficiency Debate
title_fullStr Conditional Cash Transfers and the Equity-Efficiency Debate
title_full_unstemmed Conditional Cash Transfers and the Equity-Efficiency Debate
title_sort conditional cash transfers and the equity-efficiency debate
publisher World Bank, Washington, D.C.
publishDate 2004-04
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2004/04/3573068/conditional-cash-transfers-equity-efficiency-debate
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/14299
work_keys_str_mv AT doquytoan conditionalcashtransfersandtheequityefficiencydebate
AT dasjishnu conditionalcashtransfersandtheequityefficiencydebate
AT ozlerberk conditionalcashtransfersandtheequityefficiencydebate
_version_ 1807159532210618368